Building the architecture for safe, democratic SuperIntelligence, designed to solve the core problems today’s AI labs ignore. https://teapawt.org/t.co/vGDS3uDcQj
San Jose, CA
Joined April 2025
- Tweets951
- Following841
- Followers336
- Likes507
Pinned Tweet
Today's AI follows instructions. Tomorrow's SuperIntelligence may decide those instructions no longer apply.
We can't count on rules alone to keep SuperIntelligence safe. I believe lasting alignment must come from values embedded in AI itself. youtube.com/shorts/-5i89dFpd…
3
71
AI agents are becoming more capable, but are we doing enough to keep them within our control?
Australia’s proposed AI oversight measures, covered by @Reuters’ @renjujose, highlight why we need to design for safety from the outset, especially as we approach SuperIntelligence. reuters.com/world/australia-…
2
32
As AI accelerates its own development, maintaining human understanding becomes even more important. @ronbodkin highlights why speed alone isn't enough.
We need to ensure humans can still evaluate what AI systems are doing and why. That's essential if we're going to advance toward SuperIntelligence safely.
METR estimates Anthropic's acceleration from automating AI R&D at 2x. They note "It is possible that automation is close, and leads to very rapid acceleration once human bottlenecks are removed."
However, it is a choice as to whether an organization takes humans out of the loop. Maintaining human understanding and accountability is critical both to pace the frontier and to ensure human experts understand and stand behind safety claims.
To keep humans in the loop, it's important to test whether people still understand what agents are doing.
(1/2)
1
42
Just because AI sounds confident doesn't mean it's right. Even the most advanced systems can miss something obvious.
I talked with @cmcnulty2000 on the @synozur Polaris Podcast about why human expertise is still essential. youtube.com/shorts/d-1PRuipI…
1
36
An AI system doesn't have to be superintelligent to cause serious harm. Give it autonomy over financial transactions, and the stakes change quickly.
The @USOCC's new guidance, covered by @Reuters' @peteschroeder, reflects this concern. AI safety needs to account for what systems can do, not just how smart they are. reuters.com/business/finance…
27
Geoffrey Hinton is right to raise concerns about where AI is headed. But the answer isn't simply to slow down.
We need to design superintelligence to understand and respect human values before it becomes more capable than we are. theguardian.com/uk-news/2026…
2
74
Congress is weighing new safeguards for frontier AI, but the bigger question is whether we can keep pace with its growing capabilities.
We need both effective oversight and technical solutions that keep SuperIntelligence safe and aligned with human values. southbaychronicle.com/2026/1…
38
Slowing AI development won't automatically make SuperIntelligence safer. We need to rethink how these systems are built.
The key is designing systems that become safer as they grow more intelligent. superintelligence.com/releas…
49
What if one of the most important ingredients for AGI is something humanity already possesses?
Our ability to combine ideas, experiences, and insights could help us engineer AI that reflects the best of human intelligence. youtube.com/shorts/D4FNShAEb…
1
68
The Moon landing wasn't just Neil Armstrong's achievement. It was the result of thousands of people solving incredibly difficult problems together.
Reaching AGI and SuperIntelligence safely will take that same spirit of teamwork and engineering. youtube.com/shorts/mg6kxI8A5…
44
As AI becomes more autonomous, how do we ensure it continues to act in humanity’s best interests?
I discussed with @shaunph on the #BetterWithHumans Podcast why safety and alignment must be engineered into AGI and SuperIntelligence from the start. betterwithhumans.com/episode…
1
61
Engineering safer SuperIntelligence needs to be a priority as AI capabilities continue to advance.
The concerns raised by Anthropic's @jackclarkSF and IMF chief @KGeorgieva are well-founded, as @AP's @ekurtenbach highlights. We have an opportunity to address these risks through better design from the start. apnews.com/article/ai-econom…
47
