Pinned Tweet
My crime: not promoting contact with my abuser.
My abusers crime:
#Childassault, s3xual assault, r4pe, #domesticabuse, #emotionalabuse, #coercivecontrol, #financialabuse, #medicalneglect, #perjury, #gaslighting, #litigationabuse and #animalabuse to name a few.
The current situation: children removed from me and placed with the abuser.
#familycourt #cafcass #corrupt #corruption #bias #notfitforpurpose #shamingvictims #blamingvictims #enablingabuse
Ex has a habit of making up stories from years gone by.
The new one now is my hubby chased my son on a bike.
When was this supposed to have occurred? Over two years ago. When was it? Not sure. What happened? Don’t know. Why is that the reason I can’t have contact?
Amanda Against Abuse retweeted
Reporting takes courage.
Having to repeat your story over and over can be deeply distressing. Victims deserve trauma-informed responses, to be listened to with respect, and for concerns to be properly investigated.
#StalkingAwareness #VAWG #VictimSupport #Safeguarding #UK
I’m in this weird world where I have no contact with my children, but am still aware of the active harm they live with every minute of every day.
Most would say “report it” but when you’ve done that and been labelled bitter or high conflict. You quickly stop.
So rather than protect and safeguard your child, you worry about how bad it has to get for someone else to do something.
It shatters your heart and soul. It’s an extremely difficult way to live you life. Watching those you brought into the world being harmed.
Amanda Against Abuse retweeted
Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can
Image: instagram.com/margheritavox
Amanda Against Abuse retweeted
Practice Direction 12J has been in force since 2008 - for 18 years. It stipulates exactly how courts should respond to child arrangements cases where domestic abuse is an issue. But so many family court judges and magistrates don’t follow it properly or ignore it. Why? What’s so hard about following a clear blueprint for proceedings?
A mother in my current research project said the judge hearing her appeal was good because he knew Practice Direction 12J well. While that is positive, what a low bar our judiciary have set. All judges should know PD12J well and follow it.
Its terms aren’t guidance. They’re mandatory. Judiciary have to up their game.
Amanda Against Abuse retweeted
On Tuesday Minister Sarah Sackman confirmed in the UK Parliament that: “Let us be absolutely clear: the Government's position is that parental alienation has no evidential basis and is a totally discredited concept".
This is very much welcome. But 100s and possibly 1000s of children have been removed from protective mothers to live with abusive fathers based on parental alienation. This has to stop and the children must be reunited with their mothers.
Find out more from our podcast series
@Right2Equality @SDDivorceCoach @NataliePage @Bruneluni @SarahTaylo89428 @ResoluteSupport
righttoequality.org/podcasts…
Amanda Against Abuse retweeted
After years of advocating for myself in the justice system, I've realised how many of the same challenges exist in women's healthcare. Being heard shouldn't depend on how hard you can fight.
Amanda Against Abuse retweeted
🚨 Family courts are failing women and children. The evidence is undeniable.
New @RighttoEquality report finds 72.5% of judgments in domestic abuse cases contain judicial victim-blaming. 530 instances — mostly from judges. Mothers discredited, their trauma trivialised, rape myths repeated, abusers excused while their behaviour is minimised.
This isn’t “neutrality”. It’s institutional misogyny that puts kids at risk and re-traumatises survivors.
The report lands in Parliament TODAY.
Enough secrecy. Enough bias. Enough judges marking their own homework.
Read the full Guardian exposé:
theguardian.com/law/2026/jun…
The book for those who've lived it: The System Is The Weapon amzn.eu/d/02oGEAlh
I don't expect my ex to know everything.
I certainly don't.
But I do expect him to know the basics - especially when he's been repeatedly presented as the "better" parent.
Does he know that constant moves destabilise children?
That hours spent commuting aren't in their best interests?
That animals repeatedly breeding, suffering, and dying through neglect can be traumatic for children?
That regularly struggling to feed them isn't what "putting children first" looks like?
That telling children one minute their mother is safe, then unsafe, then safe again is harmful in itself?
Apparently none of that matters.
Because in family court, stability is negotiable. Safety is subjective. Reality is inconvenient.
The parent who says, "Please protect these children" is treated as the problem.
The parent who says, "Yes, Judge. Whatever you say, Judge," is treated as cooperative.
I've spent two years trying to understand that contradiction.
Two years later, the children have moved 11 times.
Home has been a house, a hotel, someone else's sofa, and most often a caravan with fewer bedrooms than people.
Food is sometimes available. Sometimes not.
There are sometimes baby bunnies. Sometimes kittens. Then there aren't.
Yet somehow this is considered stability.
Family courts often tell us children's welfare is paramount.
If that's true, what exactly is the threshold?
How much instability does a child have to live through before it matters?
How much chaos is acceptable, provided the parent experiencing it doesn't challenge the court?
No contact brings a certain peace because I no longer have to witness every detail in real time.
But peace and safety aren't the same thing.
The harm doesn't stop just because I can no longer see it happening in real time.
And every time I hear about another move, another struggle, another crisis, I'm left wondering:
Was I really punished for being wrong?
Or for refusing to pretend everything was fine?
Amanda Against Abuse retweeted
Real love isn’t conditional or calculated. What feels like kindness can be bait in an abusive cycle.
#EmotionalAbuse #GaslightingAwareness
Amanda Against Abuse retweeted
A rape case was dropped 13 days before trial.
Years later, an independent review found it should have gone ahead.
But by then, it was too late.
Here's why that matters.
A woman reported a rape.
Three and a half years later, she was preparing for trial.
Then the CPS dropped the case.
The reason? A sexsomnia defence.
The case would never be heard by a jury.
Most people thought that was the end.
It wasn't.
She requested a Victim's Right to Review.
An independent Chief Crown Prosecutor reviewed the decision.
The conclusion was extraordinary.
The case should never have been dropped.
In fact, the review found it was more likely than not that a jury would have convicted.
But there was a devastating problem.
The CPS had already offered no evidence in court.
Double jeopardy meant the case could never be reopened.
The decision was found to be wrong.
The outcome could not be changed.
So she sued the CPS.
The CPS apologised.
They paid damages.
They changed policy.
And today, there is a pilot scheme that gives victims an option for a review before rape cases are dropped.
That woman was me.
My case can't be put back before a jury.
But others shouldn't have to hear that a case should have gone to trial only after it's too late to do anything about it.
That's why I'm campaigning for victims to have a review before cases are dropped.
And for the current pilot to become permanent.
Not after.
When it's too late.
#RightToBeReviewed #VictimsRights #JusticeMatters




















