Pinned Tweet
Retail is dead? No. It’s only dead in downtown SF where CAR FREE is. Serramonte & Stones are packed. As locals, it’s sad that we can’t shop locally bc of crazy SF policies that’r anti-car anti-families anti-biz & pro criminals, closed/slowed street gangs, bike/transit/walkSF nuts
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Prop G campaign funding update 👇
• YES on G: $149,291.82 in contributions and $69,022.82 in reported spending.
• No on G: $1,610,469.50 in contributions and $1,103,191.71 in reported spending.
The No on G donor list includes:
👉Jeremy Stoppelman at $750,000.
👉Laura Yakovenko at $250,000.
👉Emmett Shear at $75,000.
Follow the money.
campaign.sfethics.org/electi…
Bumbling Bay retweeted
If you were to look at a map of San Francisco, it’s easy to see that cutting off the only western traffic corridor that allows commuters to avoid Golden Gate Park would increase congestion.
Instead of spreading out traffic evenly the permanent closure of the Great Highway has created concentrated bottlenecks in other parks that have roads such as Golden Gate Park, the Presidio, and many across the city. A weekday compromise could help elevate congestion and increase overall walkability in one of the most park friendly cities in the US.
Replying to @behindthenet
Scott Wiener also passed SB 922 which allowed the road to park conversion work on the GH to move forward without a full Environmental Impact Report.
When you add that to the fact that the closure increased traffic in Golden Gate Park it makes you wonder how much the environment plays a role in the closure.
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Replying to @behindthenet
Scott Wiener also passed SB 922 which allowed the road to park conversion work on the GH to move forward without a full Environmental Impact Report.
When you add that to the fact that the closure increased traffic in Golden Gate Park it makes you wonder how much the environment plays a role in the closure.
Bumbling Bay retweeted
We can deal with this on weekends, but can we share access on weekdays? Keep San Francisco moving on weekdays, let people get to work and kids go to school.
Vote YES on G. Share and compromise.
And this 👇 multi-year project. sfpuc.gov/irving-street-and-…
Bumbling Bay retweeted
San Francisco: Connie Chan has many flaws, but she recognizes things that normal everyday working-class people want.
Normal people, most of all, don't want to be harmed. She recognizes how the things YIMBYs want, such as tearing down infrastructure WHILE adding population density, will harm most people, so she simply refuses to go along with them.
Not harming most people is a good way to get most people on your side.
Therefore, I predict she'll win handily in parts of San Francisco where YIMBYs are most intent on causing harm.
Connie Chan basically opposes all the same things that the tiny group of Republicans in San Francisco do.
She doesn't want new housing built. She doesn't want urban freeways removed to reconnect neighborhoods. She doesn't want anything done that might even temporarily inconvenience a suburban car commuter or an incumbent homeowner.
It's not a surprise she'd be leading with Republicans.
Bumbling Bay retweeted
When we say SFMTA has zero incentive to fix or reduce their budget if both Prop H and RTM pass in November…We mean it.
SFMTA is banking on both measures to pass so they can please labor unions. Instead of reducing attrition/absenteeism, overtime spending, and more.
Vote NO on Prop H and Prop RTM.
Bumbling Bay retweeted
From Facebook. 👇
SAN FRANCISCO, CA (10/21)- Local residents are coming together in the Sunset, in an effort to demand changes for the future of San Francisco and its Westside. According to GrowSF, "Prop G would close Sunset Dunes Park and reopen the Upper Great Highway to cars for most of the week. It restores a version of the weekend compromise that ran from 2022 to 2024: the road will be closed to private vehicles from Friday at 6:00 p.m. through Monday at 4:00 a.m., and on holidays.
Reopening the road to cars would require a coastal development permit from the California Coastal Commission, and possibly other approvals.
Currently, Rec and Park says Sunset Dunes received 1.7M "visits" in its first year. That does not mean 1.7M people visited the new park. The infrared sensors count every pass, so one person can be counted several times. They also cannot tell whether a pass is new park activity or coastal activity that would have happened anyway. The figure measures traffic through the park, not the number of unique or new visitors.
Let’s bring Safety back to SF especially the west side for our neighbors specially elders and small children.
Let’s allow out parents to get their kids to school on time and ultimately to work on time.
Yes to compromise yes to sharing
Yes to safe neighborhood streets
Neighborhood residents have noted, "A compromise that worked. For years, San Francisco had a practical compromise on the Great Highway: vehicle access on weekdays and a car-free space for recreation on weekends and holidays. It gave residents access to the coast while keeping an important transportation route available during the workweek. A compromise that worked.
City Hall changed course. In 2024, five members of the Board of Supervisors placed Proposition K on the ballot to permanently end vehicle access on the Great Highway. The measure passed citywide, despite strong opposition from many of the Westside neighborhoods most directly affected.
The Westside fought back. More than 10,000 District 4 residents signed a petition to recall Supervisor Joel Engardio, a leading Prop K proponent. Nearly two-thirds of voters removed him from office, but the recall couldn’t change Prop K. So residents organized again.
16,000 San Franciscans put Prop G on the ballot. In an all-volunteer effort, residents collected more than 16,000 signatures to give voters another say. On November 3, San Francisco can restore the weekday/weekend compromise that worked. Prop G restores it...."
Citing the history of the area, proponents who spoke with reporters noted, "This makeshift, asphalt-and-sand park—the only playground along a two-mile stretch—was hastily thrown together to divert 20,000 private vehicles onto neighboring side streets. Voted on by the entire city without a shred of input or notice given to West Side residents, this bitter, windswept lot has completely wiped out a century of San Francisco history. Here lies a piece of our heritage that a handful of people should never have been allowed to erase just to throw up a temporary traffic diversion.
Once upon a time, a scenic coastal road ran along SF's western edge right next to Ocean Beach. It went from wild sand dunes to an iconic roadway—and now, into a controversial park space that mostly sits empty in the freezing fog and wind.
100+ Years of Bringing the City Together
Back in the 1860s, western SF was just a giant stretch of shifting dunes called the "Outside Lands." People actually used the firm sand near the waves as their main route. By 1868, it was officially named after an 1864 city record that promised development would never ruin access to "God's great highway."
1/2 🧵Great Highway shared with everyone under the Compromise 👇
m.facebook.com/story.php?sto…
Time for these two to kiss and buh-bye. San Francisco is better off without these polarizing politicians who hate everyday people. Bye @Scott_Wiener!
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Love how @rachelswan doesn’t even mention the Great Highway. I live in an area where Crossover has always been my secret route around tourists on weekends, but now it’s backed up almost daily. It took us 45 minutes on a Saturday to get to the Polish deli on Geary. sfchronicle.com/sf/article/t…
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Huge traffic jam. Glad no pregnant woman got stuck in the Crossover Drive traffic and had to deliver in Golden Gate Park. What’s the solution? I bet it’s not about @openthegreathwy during emergency, but probably don’t get pregnant or give birth on the Westside? #YesOnG!
Hardly Strictly temporarily closes all gates for first time ever due to crowds sfgate.com/sf-culture/articl…
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Another No On G nut just wanted us die in traffic jam, instead of @openthegreathwy during emergencies. This is the 3rd one after Barak Gila who wanted to burn us alive to get our land. The housing nuts and the shutting down the road nuts both want us dead. They same group?
Replying to @WestsideAsians @openthegreathwy
This just proves the Yes on G campaign will aim for weekend closure of Sunset Dunes in 2028.
The “compromise” people NEVER wanted compromise.
Collusion in closing the Great Highway for sure, among @Scott_Wiener @SFMTA_Muni @sfcta @RecParkSF @JoelEngardio Friends of Sand Dunes Park, @LondonBreed @philginsburgsf @jeffreytumlin Abundance AF, Myrna Melgar… They need to be fired.
Looking at you
@SPUR_Urbanist @DanielLurie
@myrnamelgarsf @Scott_Wiener @SFMTA_Muni @SFBART
And mostly: the creepy AF Abundance Network
Defrauding voters of their RIGHT to approve or disapprove bonds for public transportation through lies, manipulation and disinformation.
Prop H and RTM need to go down in flames. This kind of guerilla governance is NOT RIGHT.
It is COLLUSION against voters and taxpayers.
@HarmeetKDhillon
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Looking at you
@SPUR_Urbanist @DanielLurie
@myrnamelgarsf @Scott_Wiener @SFMTA_Muni @SFBART
And mostly: the creepy AF Abundance Network
Defrauding voters of their RIGHT to approve or disapprove bonds for public transportation through lies, manipulation and disinformation.
Prop H and RTM need to go down in flames. This kind of guerilla governance is NOT RIGHT.
It is COLLUSION against voters and taxpayers.
@HarmeetKDhillon
Bumbling Bay retweeted
The problem is YiMBYs openly plot on how to tax grandma out of her home and even openly and freely fantasize about her house burning down and defunding the fire department. So if given the ultimatum between the 2 groups, I’m with grandma.
3 thoughts about the Politico property tax revolt piece.
1. This reminds us of why California voters approved Prop 13 in the first place. Property owners faced rapid increases in their taxes due to higher rates and sharp rises in assessed values.
2. Getting rid of property taxes or exempting seniors only works if there are offsetting spending cuts so that local government budgets don't get thrown out of balance.
3. I can understand why seniors think they should get an exemption (living on fixed incomes, no longer having kids in public schools, desire to own a home free and clear), but I don't think age-based exemptions are good public policy. The goal should be to keep taxes in check for everyone by controlling spending.
politico.com/news/magazine/2…


































