Deacon (@Deaconsblu) profile picture

I’ve lived a few lifetimes . Some memories I’d love to remember and some I’d love to forget. And some that will never fit into either.

USA
Joined October 2025
Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)Photo by Deacon (@Deaconsblu)
NYT reports today that the Obama DOJ first started investigating Ilhan Omar (alias) marriage to her brother ten years ago. “Federal agents in Minnesota opened an investigation, according to several people familiar with the matter. They found evidence suggesting that Mr. Elmi and Ms. Omar were siblings, according to the six former and current officials familiar with the case. But, because prosecutors did not pursue the matter, the agents had limited investigative tools, the officials said.” After rumors of the sham marriage—it was well known in Minneapolis’ Somali community back then—threatened to derail her run for state representative, the Obama appointed U.S. Attorney for Minnesota stepped in to save her with this extraordinary letter to her attorney. She was elected to Congress in 2018. Andrew Luger was later rewarded with the same appointment from Joe Biden. He then worked closely with—guess who?—Lisa Monaco.
109
1,552
94
3,541
57,729
Deacon retweeted
500 Milhões de Europeus, esperam que 300 Milhões de Americanos os protejam contra 120 Milhões de Russos que nem conseguem derrotar 40 Milhões de Ucranianos enquanto, não percebem, que estão a ser invadidos por 2000 milhões de Muçulmanos que se dizem perseguidos por 9 milhões de Israelitas!
1,059
13,892
779
60,564
1,814,191
🚨REAL TIME GA Election Fraud 🚨 October 28th Next 614 Cases - multiple counties Deadline to register was 10/5. We have a 10/1, 10/12, and 10/26 voter roll. Early voting started on 10/13. Called an election office today and confirmed that ALL registrations had to be in GARViS by 10/5. A well repeated pattern is packing the voter roll AFTER the deadline but making it look like it was there when it wasn't. We believe this to be the state not at the county level. Below is a sample of 614 registrations that are new to the 10/26 voter roll (not on 10/1 or 10/12) AND they have vote credit! Notice the Registration dates. Notice the counties. Not looking good GA 2026 general.....
70
640
48
1,013
20,455
Hard for me to see someone who was a colleague at MIT relishing in my destruction. Particularly since they barely knew me and never bothered--as perhaps scientists should--to check if there was another version of events.
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES EXPLOSIVE PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEALING COORDINATION BETWEEN KRISTIN KNOUSE AND MIT PROFESSOR SANGEETA BHATIA IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL. 🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes how Knouse and Bhatia privately celebrated Sabatini’s removal, discussed the potential destruction of his professional career, and anticipated the revocation of his @MIT tenure. An 80-message exchange between Kristin Knouse and MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia, dated August 20–21, 2021, reveals their private reactions immediately following Whitehead Institute and HHMI's severance of ties with Professor @DMSabatini. The communications contain statements that deserve serious public examination. 🔴 1. “YOU DID IT” — “AND HE’S OUT.” On August 20, 2021, Bhatia congratulated Knouse: 🔴 “YOU DID IT. You crossed the finish line. It's out in the open. And you're not out in the open. And you're on the faculty. And he's out.” Knouse responded: 🔴 “You connecting me to Nancy [Hopkins]was the turning point. I will never forget that walk in Lexington.” 🔴 2. “THIS WAS THE OUTCOME I DREAMED OF.” The following morning, as news coverage spread, Knouse discussed the possibility of Sabatini losing his MIT tenure: 🔴 “Hard to imagine MIT will be left with any choice other than to revoke tenure.” Bhatia responded: 🔴 “You're right about tenure” She subsequently wrote: 🔴 “This was the outcome I dreamed of but NEVER certain I would get it.” Knouse also described her assessment of Whitehead's handling of the matter: 🔴 “And as skeptical as I was of Whitehead's end game, in the end I think the overall process was perfectly executed.” Bhatia expressed her approval of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann: 🔴 “I'm proud of Ruth [Lehmann]” These exchanges occurred months before MIT's April 2022 tenure-revocation recommendation. 🔴 3. THE PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES — BEYOND WHITEHEAD. The participants also discussed Sabatini's corporate affiliations and prospects for future employment. Knouse wrote: 🔴 “I know of one company already speaking with lawyers to remove him on grounds of morality clause.” She subsequently stated: 🔴 “Hard to imagine how he can be gainfully employed anywhere after the past 24 hours ...” These were not merely discussions about an institutional investigation. They extended to the potential consequences for Sabatini's career, tenure, corporate affiliations, and future livelihood. 🔴 4. THE DIVERSITY SURVEY AND PROTECTION FROM PUBLIC IDENTIFICATION. In another particularly consequential exchange, Bhatia wrote: 🔴 “Also the dei survey and subsequent investigation really protects you, which I love. There is not even a scent of whistleblower in all the press.” This statement takes on particular significance alongside the previously disclosed communications in which Knouse and Nora Kory discussed using Whitehead's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration (📑 see the original court evidence in the first comment below). 🔴 5. “WE DRANK CHAMPAGNE” — CELEBRATING AS THE NEWS SPREAD. Perhaps the most striking exchange appears on KK011419. On August 21, 2021, Knouse declared: 🔴 “I KNOW! Young people took down a relatively young king. Progress, progress, progress.” Knouse also wrote: 🔴 “Two other women who came forward and I drank champagne while watching the Tweets and articles roll in last night. It felt like campaign headquarters after an election victory. Really special.” Bhatia responded: 🔴 “That's awesome.” These exchanges reinforce the serious concerns about coordination and conflicts of interest raised by our previous disclosures. Their significance must be assessed alongside the full documentary record and the subsequent jury verdict. The scientific community deserves full accountability for any misconduct established by the evidence, including the roles of individuals who participated in or improperly influenced the institutional processes that subjected Professor Sabatini to a devastating ordeal and profoundly damaged his career. 📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW. 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️ @SciGuardians 🔱
227
655
32
6,409
299,887
Soutien à @TRobinsonNewEra et à tous les courageux militants persécutés par la justice partout dans le monde, simplement parce qu’ils refusent de se taire.
142
2,856
105
12,465
395,274
One of the greatest analogies you’ll ever hear 💀 @adamcarolla BRAVO 👏👏👏
176
781
40
5,761
326,903
CARTA À NAÇÃO BRASILEIRA 🇧🇷 28.10.26
35,684
47,527
11,298
247,756
13,400,499
I HANDED CBS THE RECEIPTS... AND THEY STILL CAME BACK WITH ANOTHER TRUMP HIT PIECE?! 👀🔥 Oh, this one's PERSONAL... I sat down with Lesley Stahl for 60 Minutes, explained the problems with federal restitution law, and even handed her team the DOCUMENTS! But that part never aired. Now CBS is back with another story about Trump pardons supposedly costing crime victims millions, and I've got some BIG questions about what they're leaving out! Ever heard of the PELOSI WRAPAROUND SMEAR? Well, you're about to! I'm naming names and breaking down this media mess in my latest WYNK on "Early Bird With Ed Martin," on @RealAmVoice! WATCH! 👇
205
3,601
86
8,284
63,745
I want to give this man money! He speaks for a majority of Americans and I want to do my part and help make is life a little less hard!
‘MY LIFE IS HARD AS IT IS, I DON’T NEED THIS CRAP!’ — Grocery store worker SNAPS at clout-chasing kids Teens tried to apologize to the man with four kids and a mortgage, but it didn’t look sincere to him
145
352
9
3,577
86,515
Deacon retweeted
‼️ The PHONY "Daniel Sullivan" of Alaska who is running as a spoiler, has ONE campaign expense… A law firm in DC called Caplin & Drysdale. Known for representing high-profile Democrats. The Senior Counsel for that law firm is Trevor Potter. Trevor Potter formed The Committee to Modernize Voter Registration (CMVR) in 2009 with none other than MARC ELIAS. Their goals were more lenient voter laws and a modernized automated system using government databases to automatically register eligible voters (with an opt-out). 🤯 Potter is also a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institute. Phony "Dan Sullivan" sent Trevor Potter’s firm 10K.
86
1,573
64
3,007
45,555
Deacon retweeted
Mary Peltola has paid Marc Elias over 100K for legal services. Here her advisors make fun of potential voters for being swindled over two of the same names being on the ballot in a focus group. Was that advisor Elias Law Group?
In the Summer of 2025, Mary Peltola’s campaign was instructing staffers to "find as many Dan Sullivans as they could." They didn’t stop there. The Democrat campaign was also attempting to form a fake "MAGA party" to pull votes from Sen. Sullivan. They consulted this plot with Jacquelyn Lopez from the Elias Law Group. In the Summer of 2025, Mary Peltola was paying Marc Elias thousands for legal fees. 🤯
84
1,553
110
2,898
73,985
Deacon retweeted
What did the candidate know And when did she know it. That’s the question about Alaska and the democratic recruitment of a fake candidate with the same name as Dan Sullivan. This is an affront to the cry of being on the side of democracy.
47
151
4
809
9,161
Deacon retweeted
The second Elon Musk started looking at NGOs and USAID, they burned down Tesla dealerships and called him a Nazi. That reaction confirmed he found something real. If Democrats regain power, they will send everything they have against him.
317
3,131
49
29,005
425,887
Replying to @CaseyPutsch
This man speaks, as my mother would say, with a strong Irish accent. And he speaks the truth. Don’t argue about his language, debate him on the excellent points he makes.
15
30
1
740
17,593
Deacon retweeted
🤨
Hundreds of ballots left exposed at Skid Row homeless center ahead of LA election trib.al/jDflz8e
873
3,474
95
20,863
1,782,528
Good Morning ! "Dear Judge Nichols, I was impressed by the email from Dominion’s lawyer directly to you and impressed by the alacrity with which you acted upon it. Untutored in the august ways of the law as I am, I was not previously aware that a party can just email requests directly to a federal judge and get such prompt action, but I am doing so now. Obviously it is too much to expect that you will provide me with the same impressive customer service as you provide Dominion, but hope springs eternal. I have three issues for your consideration ... Your Honor, I’m a reasonable man. I want to accommodate Dominion. I’ll offer them a graceful exit. Through their lies they bluffed Fox News out of $787.5 million. Just instruct them to give me that, and I’ll walk away."
56
936
21
2,616
99,213
Deacon retweeted
Replying to @Geiger_Capital
Wow
338
777
24
15,801
204,450
We have the tools to end mosquito-borne illness. Why don't we use them? My latest for @WSJFreeEx
49
179
37
2,169
79,576
🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens is celebrating being PERSONALLY DISMISSED from the Macron defamation lawsuit. But there are a few things she conveniently left out... First, yes, Owens secured a legal victory. The Delaware court dismissed her in her individual capacity because it lacked personal jurisdiction over her - NOT because she was cleared of wrongdoing or because the judge found her allegations to be true. However, BOTH of her companies remain defendants in the lawsuit: - Candace Owens LLC - the company she solely owns and manages, which publishes and distributes her content. - Georgetom, Inc. - the company operating CandaceOwens.com, including her merchandise and paid subscriptions. The judge REJECTED their attempt to have the lawsuit dismissed on inconvenient-forum grounds. Secondly, it's bizarre that even when Owens scores a genuine legal victory, she still feels the need to LIE. She claims: "I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male." Yet on PAGE 8 of the judge's 56-page decision, it explicitly states: "Throughout the Series, Ms. Owens contended that Mrs. Macron is a biological man, that the Macrons are blood relatives, and that they abused levers of state power to keep the nature of their relationship a secret." The judge also identifies her allegations about Brigitte Macron's identity as a central part of the dispute. Owens however, wants her audience to believe this lawsuit was only about her claims involving MKUltra and an alleged identity theft. But the court's own description of the case proves this false. The Macrons also secured TWO significant procedural victories: -The court REFUSED to dismiss the lawsuit against Owens' two companies on inconvenient-forum grounds. -The court REJECTED the attempt to strike the Macrons' amended complaint. A potentially decisive statute-of-limitations question remains unresolved. So yes, Candace Owens won an important personal legal victory. But she was NOT vindicated on the merits, BOTH of her companies remain defendants, and the lawsuit is FAR from over.
191
482
74
3,009
569,279