Timothy (@DomenGolder) header
Timothy (@DomenGolder) profile picture
Chicago, IL
Joined May 2015
Photo by Timothy (@DomenGolder)Photo by Timothy (@DomenGolder)Photo by Timothy (@DomenGolder)Photo by Timothy (@DomenGolder)Photo by Timothy (@DomenGolder)Photo by Timothy (@DomenGolder)Photo by Timothy (@DomenGolder)Photo by Timothy (@DomenGolder)
Not offsides ☘️
Ever wonder what Rudy’s sack looked like in real life? Here you go:
2
3
1
48
Well said @jessica_smetana couldn’t agree more.
.@jessica_smetana still has some serious concerns over the coaching staff @mikegolicjr
3
662
Timothy retweeted
Hunter Yurachek on Tuesday: I asked the members to close their eyes, and envision Toney on that field, what he would have done, how he would have played, while I played the Miami Hurricane fight song, and then asked them to determine if they’d have won the game or not.
Replying to @greg2126
Can’t wait to see how the committee uses this against us to leave us out at 11-1
12
34
1
547
17,943
Timothy retweeted
“The reason we lost is the war.” That’s true, but not the whole story. You guys all but put your hand on the Bible and swore you wouldn’t do it, and everyone knows the promise was broken solely to serve the interests of a foreign country. An appalling, brazen betrayal.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
185
1,294
23
14,390
163,866
To be fair, Notre Dame played without Jeremiyah Love vs Miami last year (coaches decision).
NEWS: Miami star Malachi Toney is dealing with an injured ankle and his status for Saturday’s game against Notre Dame is uncertain, sources tell me and @max_olson. Toney is expected to press and attempt to play, given the magnitude of the game.
66
44
11
1,110
55,267
Good start JD, but these were basically the core issues of campaign promises of 2024. 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Republicans lost yesterday because’24 campaign promises were not delivered, Trump called us panicans and me a traitor and you stayed silent and supported Trump while he failed, you all primaried Thomas Massie with millions from Israel, ignored rape victims of Epstein and company, and MAHA was ignored. Just to name a few issues. You should have listened to me and Tucker and others who told you early. Blaming the Iran war won’t work and it’s not going to be an easy pivot.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
804
1,703
72
16,588
764,729
Replying to @JDVance
What an absolutely galling analysis from @JDVance. Where does one even start? The Vice President tells us: “The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel” In reality, J.D., all you need is #3. It covers the others entirely, and a few you missed. And yet you have it 3rd! Why? Because you apparently needed a pollster to explain that betraying the coalition that elected you was going to piss them off. The issues you’re missing include: the breathtaking corruption of your administration, covering up for the Epstein class, failure to deliver on MAHA and failure to properly investigate notorious political crimes. Putting America first is all you had to do. If your administration had done that, you’d have been in great shape. Having failed to do it, no amount of clever rhetoric and rallies could possibly have saved you. And whatever they’re telling you, J.D., the people who showed up and put you in office in ‘24 did not suddenly vote for race-bating Marxists in ‘26. You are the Vice President. This is not inherently your fault, but it becomes your fault if you keep playing along.
374
836
66
9,543
476,526
Good luck with that we’ve got the Pope on our side.
MALACHI TONEY PRAYER CIRCLE
2
343
Slept on it. If Bama wins this weekend, they are in and EARNED it. If Bama loses this weekend, their ranking gives them insurance. If Bama is destroyed this weekend, they are still on the fringe. With Vandy, Chattanooga, and Auburn remaining.
What Bama team has this committee been watching? WTH
87
28
7
877
86,367
Hunter Yurachek is the Arkansas athletic director. Notre Dame embarrassed Arkansas 56-13 last year, their worst loss since 2020. It led to them firing their coach. Since becoming CFP chair, the committee’s perception of ND has been RADICALLY different. There’s obvious bias.
CFP chair Hunter Yurachek: "They are a very good football team. But when you look at Notre Dame's schedule and the wins they have vs. the teams that are ahead of them, they don't have that signature win right now. They lost in their only Top-25 matchup at BYU. Their next-best-win is on a neutral site against Wisconsin. They've got a great opportunity in front of them this weekend at home vs. Miami to get that signature win that I think they need to move up in the rankings."
21
81
4
664
19,046
There are 13 teams ranked higher in the CFP rankings than the AP Poll...9 are from the SEC. There are also 9 teams ranked lower in the CFP rankings than the AP Poll... ZERO are from the SEC. This isn't a coincidence.
33
325
12
2,220
38,680
Timothy retweeted
Every single SEC team with a winning record is ranked. The Big 10 has 7 teams with a winning record unranked. The ACC has 6 teams with a winning record unranked. The Big 12 has 4 teams with a winning record unranked.
83
254
14
2,616
197,644
Alabama has won one of their last three and is currently sitting at number 5. ESPN has done irreversible damage to the sport I once loved
93
424
21
6,837
103,705
Tonight’s outcome isn’t about placing faith in Democrats or socialist principles; it’s about holding Republicans accountable for betraying their promises. All Republicans had to do was: 1. put Americans First 2. not start another war 3. prosecute sex traffickers
6,691
29,109
1,984
202,278
3,649,708
The committee banged Notre Dame for a lack of signature wins (or win, singular) No. 4 Indiana's wins: North Texas Howard Western Kentucky Northwestern (29-23) Rutgers Nebraska (20-17) Michigan (13-6 in OT) Minnesota (23-16 in OT)
275
607
67
3,970
369,182
This disrespect couldn’t come at a better time. Reminds this team that the whole country hates them.
Notre Dame at No. 11 in the first College Football Playoff rankings. Good Lord. Basically lose and you're out versus Miami.
121
I'm surprised the committee didn't just go ahead and rank Alabama at No. 1.
93
206
21
3,206
92,213
The coaches should all be fired
This is the most chaotic, bizarre free throw shooting form I think I have ever seen
1
109
Timothy retweeted
Because Navy plays Notre Dame with the intent to do physical harm, there's no other reasonable explanation. AAC teams Navy has played the most in the last decade, 10 games each: Temple - 0 Injuries Tulane - 0 Injuries East Carolina - 2 Injuries Memphis - 1 Injury And then: ND - 9
Replying to @verypiratey
Notre Dame is the only team Navy plays that whines incessantly about legal low blocks. It's an obsession with your fan base. It's like Rudy. You want Navy's undersized guys to stand tall and get crushed.
10
11
5
126
10,644
Cancel the Navy series. No upside, only downside.
Hearing rumblings that Francis Brewu could also be out for the season now… Losing him and Bowen for the year in the same game feels like a nail in the coffin #NotreDame #Irish @LoveTheeNDIrish
1
58
10,533
Timothy retweeted
Say what you will about Tucker, but he is well sourced, Netanyahu is backed into a corner and President Trump is impulsive and does what he wants. If this 90% exaggerated we should be concerned. Stopping unnecessary wars in the Middle East is the one thing DJT was elected to do.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
966
471
87
9,156
1,000,000