Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst) header
Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst) profile picture

Forex/Finance|| A student of life|| Gen Z|| Manchester United fan|| Eyen Akwa Ibom|| Oyoho eyen Uruan|| Catholic.

Uyo, Nigeria
Joined August 2019
Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)Photo by Unwana (@Fx_Catalyst)
Dear Aspiring Trader, Trading the financial markets is a true test of patience, resilience, and the will to keep pushing forward, even through back-breaking losing streaks. Every successful trader has faced and overcome this tough but necessary phase of the journey.
3
5
21
2,346
Unwana retweeted
If you are looking to travel the world for work, conferences, competitions, summits, volunteering, workshops, education, and more across Pakistan, Nigeria, SA, UAE, Nepal, India, Ghana, the UK, the US, and beyond. I spent hours during the weekend finding companies abroad that are actively hiring and funding and compiled them into one sheet. Application links, eligibility criteria have been added, so all you have to do is review the sheet and apply. drive.google.com/file/d/1zSJ…
300
1,227
34
4,762
369,238
Unwana retweeted
If you understood this simple strategy, you would have caught this sell off on Gold. Trust me, this is the only trading strategy you’d ever need In this video, I break down the current Gold market sell-off using a simple strategy I discovered, explaining the price action behind the bearish move Watch on YouTube ⬇️ youtu.be/WN0H4csC-oM
1
2
8
285
This one pain me 😤🤌 $XAUt
17
Unwana retweeted
No rush 🙏🏼
67
150
9
1,396
14,550
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
28,292
73,373
25,442
389,542
89,520,553
May the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.
30
That feeling when you can’t be friends. Can’t be together. Can’t move on. Can’t let go. Just existing in the space between love and goodbye. Too much love to be strangers. Too much pain to be anything else.
58
2,008
245
10,839
206,613
Who killed Gaddafi? Who killed Thomas Sankara? Who killed Patrice Lumumba? Who killed Samora Machel? Who killed Amilcar Cabral? Who toppled Kwame Nkrumah? Who keeps West Africa enslaved to a useless cirrency? Who protects Paul Biya? Who forces Alassane Ouattara on the people of Ivory coast? Who committed crimes agaisnt humanity in Kenya, Senegal, Chad, Central African Republic, Angola, Namibia, Algeria, Somalia, Mocambique, and South africa? The answer you are looking for is; not Russia.
Russia’s expanding influence in Africa carries a darker side: armed pressure, exploitation, and forced recruitment.
76
1,963
28
5,375
77,927
Unwana retweeted
And when I finally win again I’m going to post this video 🥹😭🙏
599
16,745
740
94,195
4,292,185
Becoming everything i once envisioned, one day at a time. No rush, just consistency, growth, and execution.
4
11
302
Unwana retweeted
You have a principal, who brought you stardom and increased political and social capital. Your principal has the support of millions of Nigerians whose hope are resting on his shoulders. Your principal announced that no matter the circumstances, situations and challenges; he must be on the ballot. A coalition came up, formed by Atiku and his friends. Your principal joined the coalition alongside his entire political structure. He reached out to other heavyweights who agreed to deputise him. They approached Atiku and his group for a consensus candidate. Atiku and his group ignored them and insisted on primaries because they know Atiku doesn't lose primaries. Your principal knows he's not good in party primaries because of the heavy bribing and rigging which is against his principles. You went behind and inserted yourself into Atiku's camp, negotiated a huge deal and positioned yourself for a mega cash out. Because of your selfish interests, you now started pressuring your principal and his supporters not to leave the one-sided Atiku's coalition. Your plan is simple. Let them remain there till the deadline shuts up on them and they'll end begging for the VP ticket. And you'll be positioned already. But unknown to you, your principal is your master. Your moves, he's aware of. He plays along whilst making strategic plan B behind everyone. Plan B matures, your principal switches alongside his base. And that was how he became your worst enemy. Master is master. Apprentice is apprentice.
254
1,148
55
4,412
127,964
Unwana retweeted
Your womb is BIOLOGY. God gave it to you for free. A rich man’s bank account is not BIOLOGY. No man is born with a million dollars in his balls. He had to BUILD that. You want to trade something you got for free for something he bled for? Are you smart at all? A man who wants kids first asks: can I feed them? Can I house them? Can I protect them? That's why you don't see homeless dudes demanding babies. Real men don't breed if they can't provide. You on the other hand - you WANT the baby. You open your legs, you get pregnant, you keep it. That's 100% your choice. Now let's talk about the rich man you want. He didn't wake up rich. He got humiliated. He got rejected. He worked while you were partying. He lost friends, lost sleep, risked his last dollar. For YEARS. And you just show up after the hard part is over and say "what's yours is ours because I have a womb?" That's entitlement. If birth is the price for money, then every broke woman would be a wife. But she isn't.
Men want children, but women are the ones who sacrifice their bodies and careers to make it happen. But when a woman wants a rich man who can provide for her, she's called a gold digger. Make it make sense.
90
1,381
72
5,520
240,418
Need to get a tat of my mom before the year ends. Please, recommend a good tattoo artist in Uyo or Port Harcourt.
1
1
3
145
Satoshi is not a person. Satoshi is the government. This is my hypothesis.
Truth be told no one is 100% anonymous on earth, satoshi is definitely known to the top boys in government and anonymous to people like us.
21
wAS iT thE cIa ThaT Told hAitiAns nOt tO bUilD inFraStruCtuRe tO gRoW thEiR ecOnoMy? alL tHeSe deLuSionAl pAn aFriCanisTs aLwaYs bLamiNg wHiTe mEN iNsTeaD oF tAkiNg rEsPonSibiLity...
There was a Haitian president who built social housing he was exiled at gunpoint by the US marines. Another afterwards built highways and hydroelectric projects, he was assassinated.
28
633
7
1,960
58,192
Unwana retweeted
I have been shouting about Calvin Bassey for about two years now. I do not understand why he's underrated. He barely puts a foot wrong, and good LCBs are hard to find. J.Redknapp acknowledging him, we just need to give Bassey PR. He's top.
I cannot really understand clubs. Bassey is 26 years of age, he’s in a prime age. He’s a proven defender at the highest level. He’s played in the EPL for years, he played in Europe with Ajax and took Rangers to Europa League final. He is physical, he’s good on the ball, he can really play. He’s so tough that Haaland said in an interview with Alan Shearer and Gary Lineker that Bassey is so strong. There are only few LCB better than him or have his qualities. His contract expires in the summer and I do not see a club below Fulham level coming for him. I said Deco should step in the other day, many Barcelona fans said he’s average and not Barcelona level, meanwhile we have Gerard Martin who is Barcelona level. SMH. This is a no brainer. He’s a free agent next season. He’s on £60k per week, we can upgrade him to £100k, why say no to such bargain?
22
142
3
818
21,277
Unwana retweeted
Fun fact:Catholic Church has more hospitals than FG and all 36 states combined
If I become the president of Nigeria I will first of all ban religion.
166
1,995
94
13,392
526,299
Kemi, congratulations on leading a major British party as a Black Woman. It takes real talent to rise to where you are and deceit is what it takes to rise as a Black leader in a western Conservative Party. It is a pity the climb did not leave room for a history book and since you chose to argue in the language of history, let us do the history. Let’s dissect your verbal diarrhea point by point. Everyone participated." Slavery existed on every continent. So did war, and nobody calls a village feud the World War. The transatlantic trade ran for 366 years (1501 to 1866) and put about 12.5 million Africans on ships, of whom about 1.8 million died before they saw the Americas, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database. It ran through joint-stock companies, chartered monopolies, Lloyd's underwriters and acts of Parliament. It was hereditary, because the law made the child of an enslaved mother property from birth. It was racial, because a whole continent was defined as chattel. No other system in history combined those features at that scale. Dissolving all of it into "people from every continent" is far worse than intellectual dishonesty. Britain was a market leader, not a participant. British ships carried about 3.2 million Africans, second only to Portugal and Brazil. The Treaty of Utrecht (1713) gave Britain the asiento, a thirty-year monopoly to supply 4,800 enslaved Africans a year to Spanish America. The Royal African Company, chartered in 1672 and headed by the Duke of York, later James II, branded its captives "DY". During Edward Colston's years in its leadership it shipped about 84,000 people, and roughly 19,000 died on the way. You say British taxpayers should not answer for what happened before they were born. They did. In 1833 Britain borrowed £20 million to compensate slaveholders, and taxpayers serviced that loan until 2015, including the descendants of the enslaved. So the principle you invoke was not applied when the cheque went to slaveholders. It only appears when the cheque changes direction. "Navel-gazing" is a curious charge from someone whose party spends more energy on the past (Empire nostalgia, culture war crusades) than most of those you accuse. Defend Britain if you must. But do not use your Nigerian name as the permission slip for arguments Nigerians know better than anyone.
Slavery was an evil in which people from every continent and region participated. We should be honest about the whole history, not select the parts that are politically convenient today, especially given Britain's leading role in ending the transatlantic slave trade. If Caribbean countries are asking Britain for a formal apology for Britain’s role in the transatlantic slave trade, will they also be asking the same of the descendants of African kingdoms, rulers and merchants who captured, sold and profited from the trade? On demands for reparations, whether through cash or debt relief, we have been down this track before. Twenty-five years ago, Jubilee 2000, Drop the Debt and Make Poverty History argued that cancelling the debts of poorer countries would give them a fresh start. More than $100 billion of debt was eventually written off, but many of those countries have since built up even bigger debts. Labour are already spending too much on Britain's welfare state, now is not the time for Andy Burnham to be providing global welfare. There is no reason British taxpayers today should be held financially responsible for things that happened generations before any of us were born. And I have even less patience for political elites in commonwealth countries who don’t know how to make their own citizens prosperous now looking for another opportunity to blame Britain. As Prime Minister, Andy Burnham should be Britain’s greatest defender. Instead, he is writing articles saying we need to confront our history (as if we haven't done enough of that) and considering another formal historical apology. Tony Blair already expressed Britain’s deep sorrow and regret for our role in the slave trade nearly twenty years ago. There is no need to do so again. This is all another navel-gazing distraction. The Commonwealth should be looking forward, not endlessly backwards. That means economic partnerships to make us all richer and deeper military and security cooperation against common threats. If every Commonwealth summit becomes an exercise in presenting Britain with demands for cash then we need to start asking if it is worth the effort.
747
2,734
154
8,560
629,020
NO BAD DAYS IN NOVEMBER📈 AFFIRM IT.
658
897
231
5,690
70,924
This is a female from a state where they're still stereotyped for this crap by whole country.
This quoted post is unavailable.
67
90
12
657
107,231