Pinned Tweet
Here's the hard truth about Canada's broken generational system: Cutting costs on lattes and avocado toast won't fix this but our policy solutions can! (2024 CREA and StatsCan data adjusted for inflation) #cdnpoli #Canada gensqueeze.ca
Generation Squeeze retweeted
"We are not yet building a Canada for younger generations. But we still can. And we must. So let's start!" #bcpoli #BritishColumbia #BCelection #BCVotes
"We are not yet building a Canada for younger generations. But we still can. And we must. So let's start!" #bcpoli #BritishColumbia #BCelection #BCVotes
Generation Squeeze retweeted
Bravo to @ylc_jlc Chair @nick_aboagye for this thoughtful, brave call for reform of Old Aged Security, which has become a morally unjustifiable upward transfer of wealth from struggling young people to high income seniors.
I hope that the @CPC_HQ will have the courage and integrity to demand similar common sense reforms!
"Prime Minister Carney has argued that leaders must focus on the challenges they can actually solve. OAS reform is one of those opportunities," writes @nick_aboagye #cdnpoli #cdnecon ipolitics.ca/2026/09/21/if-w…
Generation Squeeze retweeted
Replying to @nernzi19 @JohnRustad4BC
You are not actually naiv enough to believe that John Rustad cares about rental affordability?
He only cares while is in the opposition. John Rustad sat in cabinet while he housing unaffordability soared in BC!
#BCLiberals 2001-2017
via @GenSqueeze:
Generation Squeeze retweeted
Here's the hard truth about Canada's broken generational system: Cutting costs on lattes and avocado toast won't fix this but our policy solutions can! (2024 CREA and StatsCan data adjusted for inflation) #cdnpoli #Canada gensqueeze.ca
Generation Squeeze retweeted
Here's an actual CPC MP defending the insanity of increasing OAS (because of much inflation -even though OAS is already fully adjusted) and a senior specific tax cut
I hope the Liberals win this riding. There, I said it
Replying to @Prominent_Bryan
What are we doing here? Since I help a lot in this by-election, I’ll answer … It’s actually pretty simple.
1️⃣ Listening to the people we represent.
In a region with one of the oldest populations in Quebec, talking to voters, understanding their reality and proposing solutions that respond to it seems to me like a pretty good way to earn their trust.
2️⃣ Rewarding work, experience and contribution.
Offering people who want to re-enter the workforce the opportunity to earn up to $35,000 tax-free is about as Conservative as it gets: make work pay.
We want experienced workers—with their knowledge, skills and wisdom—to have every reason to come back, help our businesses, mentor the next generation and contribute to our economy.
And when they do, they should be rewarded by keeping more of the money they earn.
3️⃣ Recognizing the reality of inflation—and proposing a solution.
Inflation has affected everyone, but its impact is especially difficult for people living on fixed incomes. That isn’t partisan. It’s economic reality.
Recognizing a problem is important. Finding an intelligent solution is better.
Instead of simply asking government to spend more money, we proposed a solution that rewards work, helps employers find experienced workers and leaves more money in people’s pockets.
4️⃣ And here’s the part some critics seem to have missed: this isn’t new.
This proposal was already part of our platform in the last election.
So why the sudden outrage?
Before criticizing these announcements, it might be worth understanding the reality of the communities they are designed to serve—and checking the facts.
We listened. We proposed solutions. And we’ll keep working to make sure experience is valued, work is rewarded and Canadians keep more of what they earn.
Generation Squeeze retweeted
Increasing OAS in any capacity is not future focused policy – it's completely the opposite.
OAS as stands is projected to balloon to $277B in yearly payments by 2060 – a 3.1x increase from where it standsb today.
We cannot expect our upcoming generations to subsidize an exploding class of retirees. It's economic suicide.
What the hell is even this?
The CPC wants to:
1) raise OAS
2) provide a tax cut but only for seniors
What are we even doing here?
ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle…
Our plan to fix Old Age Security will save Canada $$ billions. @buildcanada is on board and agrees that the future health of our economy depends on restoring generational fairness. Let's use our federal budget wisely! gensqueeze.ca/fix_oas
Replying to @buildcanada
Build Canada has written on this alongside @jeffcanadamson, and works by @GenSqueeze have studied intently the consequences of OAS on it's current trajectory.
They've also proposed politically viable path for potential reforms.
Let's be careful here, Canada.
buildcanada.com/memos/rebala…
Generation Squeeze retweeted
Replying to @HoCStaffer
Said it here, but there is tremendous work being done on this by @GenSqueeze - check them out!
xitter.cf/accordingtoca/status/2…
Replying to @Anthony__Koch
Anthony, you and @MikePMoffatt are poking around one of the central flaws of our democratic system.
This is (I think) the essence of what @tobi was saying the other day with the democracy related to taxes paid voting system.
It's part of what I call "grandma theory". Society has no problem saying other grandmas should be doing x (say, downsizing, or taking less pension when they have a tremendous amount of capital).
But the vast majority of society will also say "well, with my grandma - we should make an exception. She needs that money or she needs to stay in the family home".
Paul Kershaw from @GenSqueeze talks around the solution a lot: There needs to be a critical mass of bipartisan political cover so that politicians "feel safe enough" to do what's needed to fix this.
If you want change, support our fix for reforming OAS. It would adjust the benefit in order to eliminate poverty for seniors but also provide more financial support for ALL young Canadians (not just young families). gensqueeze.ca/fix_OAS
Replying to @MikePMoffatt
And let's look at that OAS clawback. OAS doesn't get clawed back until *individual* income exceeds $93,000.
Meanwhile, child benefit cheques start to get clawed back when *family* incomes reach $39,000.
Generation Squeeze retweeted
I ask anyone to justify this.
You can be salty at me for calling out seniors entitlements all you want, but do your best to explain to me why programs designed to support young families are so much more restrictive than those designed for seniors.
It’s generational selfishness.
Replying to @MikePMoffatt
And let's look at that OAS clawback. OAS doesn't get clawed back until *individual* income exceeds $93,000.
Meanwhile, child benefit cheques start to get clawed back when *family* incomes reach $39,000.
Generation Squeeze retweeted
“The Conservatives can’t stay competitive with middle-aged and younger Canadians concerned about the cost of living and their ability to find and keep a job while simultaneously competing to win over the majority of boomers looking for stability,” Coletto explained. “You can’t be for both sides.”
UNLOCKED | ‘The battle brewing in Canada is generational, and they are country miles apart,’ says pollster Nik Nanos as parties split youth vote. By @LeftHandStu #cdnpoli
hilltimes.com/2026/07/29/the…
Generation Squeeze retweeted
My piece today at @globeandmail
We have two retirement ages: the one Canada set and the one Canadians use
📌 Set at 70 in 1927, lowered to 65 in 1965. Hasn't moved since.
📈 Life expectancy: 72 in 1965, 82 today. A 10-year gap.
💰 OAS now costs ~$80B/year, 15% of the federal budget.
⏳ The "unofficial" retirement age looks closer to 67-68.
📊 Labour participation among 65-69 year-olds tripled since 2000: 10% to 30%.
💸Delaying pays: CPP +8.4%/yr after 65, OAS +7.2%/yr to age 70.
The official number says 65. The real one says otherwise.
Full piece: theglobeandmail.com/investin…
-------------------------
Provided by WOWA.ca
Simply Know Your Options 🔍
A growing number of Canadians want to fix Old Age Security. Tom thinks OAS claw back thresholds are too high and the funds should be better used. #cdnpoli youtube.com/watch?v=fOUTDMld…
Generation Squeeze retweeted
Rising home values have helped some, but hurt others. Do we want them to go up or down?
This is the ultimate crux of the housing debate, of which the nation is split and Canada's National Housing Strategy is completely silent on
Generation Squeeze retweeted
There are many important reasons we should build more, faster, esp. nonmarket, purpose-built, family-sized, and missing middle.
But we can't expect new supply alone to restore affordability in the market.
xitter.cf/floydmarinescu/status/…
We can believe 2 things at once:
+ we should build way more housing
+ we won't build anywhere near enough to make a serious dent in prices
This dynamic persists as long as our financial system is centred around land as an investment, fuelling the private capture of land rents. When uncapped credit creation is concentrated in residential mortgages, prices can rise much faster than we can build to bring them down.
"While real prices have more than doubled, housing stock per capita has increased by 39 per cent, and real mortgage debt has more than tripled."
With the financialization machine firing on all cylinders, it's hard to believe just building more supply can make housing affordable again. We might not even have the materials and/or labour to build enough to have a serious impact on prices in places like Vancouver and Toronto.
I say this as someone who believes more supply can impact prices and rents -- just not nearly enough.
"the housing crisis has been created by banking practices that have directed excessive amounts of credit into the property market, and especially residential mortgages. As a result, buyers can bid prices up to ever-higher levels, resulting in a market where people must pay more for the same type of housing. Hence financialization can be defined as an inflationary tendency in the housing market that is induced jointly by banks’ desire to expand mortgage lending and buyers’ confidence that the value of their properties will rise."
"The housing crisis is not a crisis of supply; it is a crisis of distribution. Housing inflation has boosted owners’ wealth substantially—a particular windfall for those who own multiple properties and carry little mortgage debt. Meanwhile, rising prices have put homeownership out of reach for many Canadians and put new buyers deeply in debt, while driving up homelessness."
"policymakers cannot reasonably blame immigration for the long-term trend. Over the past half-century, the number of housing units has risen substantially relative to population, and their average size has increased as well."
There's something much deeper at the centre of our economy that we must fix first -- a political and financial machine bent towards extracting (or preserving) wealth from property (60-90% land value), at the cost of workers, builders, and value-adding businesses.
This is a critical evolution in the national housing debate.
Generation Squeeze retweeted
Another great piece by UBC's Dr. Paul Kershaw
One of the few very visible Canadians shedding light on the hard truth about housing.
"We cannot reward housing speculation with tax breaks without expecting home values to outpace local earnings."
theglobeandmail.com/investin…





























