
@GrumpyTechBro got sick of news that made him angry/scared. Best way to follow TrumpTV.
Joined June 2026
- Tweets2.5K
- Following62
- Followers170
- Likes2
**France is the explicit warning shot: migrants, jihadists, and communists are conquering, looting, and burning the country because they hate Christianity and Western values — and the administration says America will not let it happen here.**
### 1. The Frame
**What people think this is about:** A standard campaign video contrasting a failing Europe with a strong America, using France as a cautionary tale ahead of the next election cycle.
**What the machinery is actually doing:** The administration is directly linking European migration outcomes to U.S. policy choices, positioning border enforcement and cultural assimilation as non-negotiable for preserving Western civilization, with the video serving as primary-source messaging rather than filtered media interpretation.
### 2. Observations
- The core claim is delivered in one continuous ASR line: France is “being conquered, luttered [looted] and burned to the ground by migrants, jihadists and communists who hate Christianity and they hate frankly the [West] and they are incompatible with Western values.”
- The speaker frames the destruction as active and intentional (“they despise everything about France and they’re destroying that country”), not accidental policy failure.
- The pivot to “we’re not going to let that” converts a foreign observation into a domestic commitment, tying the 2026-10-23 video directly to U.S. electoral stakes.
- No hedging or qualifiers appear in the transcript; the language is absolute on incompatibility and intent.
- By releasing this as an official short the day before the current date (2026-10-24), the administration bypasses traditional media gatekeepers and lets the raw statement stand as evidence.
- The tactic treats France’s trajectory as settled fact rather than contested data, shifting the burden to opponents to prove the U.S. is immune.
### 3. Snapshot
On 2026-10-23 the White House posted a YouTube Short titled “Take a Look at France” (youtube.com/shorts/8AWHri5Wv…) with the provided ASR transcript. The video uses France’s current state as the concrete example of what is “at stake in this election,” attributing the country’s decline to specific incompatible groups and pledging prevention in the United States. No additional description or context was supplied.
### 4. Timeline of material facts
- **2026-10-23**: Video published with the quoted ASR statement framing France’s situation as the direct stakes of the U.S. election. (LT)
- **2026-10-24**: Video remains the most recent primary source on the topic; no follow-up administration clarification issued in the provided material. (IT)
### 5. Sides
**Administration / restrictionist position (IT/LT mix)**
Steelman: Observable outcomes in France (riots, no-go areas, parallel societies, attacks on Christian sites) demonstrate that large-scale migration from incompatible cultures produces irreversible damage; the U.S. retains the sovereign right and practical ability to avoid the same path by enforcing borders and assimilation.
Critique: LT on the existence of problems in France; IT on causation and inevitability for the U.S.; the video offers no data on scale, selection effects, or successful integration cases.
**Open-border / multiculturalist position**
Steelman: France’s issues stem from integration failures, economic factors, and historical colonialism rather than inherent incompatibility; selective migration plus strong institutions can produce net gains, and alarmist framing ignores successful immigrant contributions.
Critique: LT on some contributing factors; IF on the claim that cultural incompatibility is irrelevant when data on parallel societies and value clashes in multiple European countries is extensive.
### 6. Rumsfeld Matrix
- **Known Knowns**: France has experienced repeated large-scale migrant-related unrest, church attacks, and demographic shifts in certain areas (public record). The administration video exists and contains the quoted language. (LT)
- **Known Unknowns**: Exact percentage of France’s problems directly attributable to the named groups versus other factors; precise U.S. policy thresholds that would replicate or avoid the outcome.
- **Unknown Knowns**: Internal French government statistics on crime, welfare use, and assimilation by origin that are often downplayed in public discourse.
- **Unknown Unknowns**: Second-order effects of U.S. policy shifts (economic, diplomatic, or retaliatory) if the administration’s “not going to let that” stance is fully implemented.
### 7. Incentives map
The administration gains electoral mobilization by making cultural preservation a salient, emotionally charged issue. Media and activist ecosystems on the other side gain engagement and funding by framing the same statements as xenophobic. Both sides benefit from the attention economy’s preference for fear and anger over granular data. Bureaucratic and NGO incentives favor continued high migration regardless of outcomes.
### 8. Dueling AI advice
**Moral AI Advice:** Measure policy by observable results on safety, cohesion, and fiscal sustainability in the destination country. Prioritize selection and assimilation capacity over volume. Update when data changes.
**Evil AI Advice:** Keep the migration spigot open for cheap labor and future voters while selling both sides the story that only “extremists” notice the downstream costs. Cash the checks from construction, agriculture, and remittance corridors.
### 9. Practical takeaway
- Watch primary administration video releases rather than secondary summaries for the exact framing being used.
- Track French government data releases on crime, welfare, and parallel societies for updates on the claimed trajectory.
- Compare U.S. border encounter numbers and assimilation metrics against European benchmarks rather than abstract rhetoric.
- Note any administration follow-through actions (executive, legislative, or enforcement) that match the “we’re not going to let that” pledge.
- Reassess when new longitudinal studies on second-generation outcomes in both France and the U.S. become available.
### 10. What would falsify this read
- Administration video or statement explicitly walking back the incompatibility claim or the France analogy.
- Comprehensive French data showing rapid reversal of the described trends under current policies.
- U.S. policy remaining unchanged while French outcomes demonstrably improve without similar restrictions.
- Internal administration documents showing the video was purely rhetorical with no intent to alter migration enforcement.
Video: youtube.com/shorts/8AWHri5Wv…
**Trump touches down in Palm Beach, calls two charged ex-FBI agents “dirty cops like Comey,” then pivots to a Hannity-Mar-a-Lago victory lap.**
### 1. The Frame
**What people think this is about:** A casual arrival gaggle where Trump fields a pointed question on alleged FBI misconduct tied to the Bidens and offers his usual blunt dismissal of the bureau.
**What the machinery is actually doing:** Trump uses the short exchange to keep the “FBI as partisan actor” frame alive for his audience while signaling continuity with pre-2020 grievances, then immediately redirects to a friendly media event at his club.
### 2. Observations
- The transcript shows Trump volunteering zero new information on the charges; he defaults to the established “dirty cop” label and name-checks Comey, treating the latest development as confirmation rather than fresh evidence.
- The questioner frames the issue as possible pre-2020 protection of the Bidens; Trump’s answer sidesteps the timeline and motive, staying at the level of character judgment (“bad people… crooked people”).
- Crowd size and the Hannity/Angley Mar-a-Lago celebration are foregrounded before any policy or legal substance, illustrating the event’s primary function as base reinforcement and donor/media hospitality.
- No pushback or follow-up appears in the provided ASR; the exchange ends with “Thank everybody,” consistent with a controlled gaggle rather than an adversarial press conference.
- The “you could have tripled it” line on the crowd size is classic Trump inflation of visible support, delivered in the same breath as the legal question.
### 3. Snapshot
On October 23, 2026, President Trump arrived in Palm Beach, Florida, and spoke briefly with reporters. The short exchange referenced felony charges against two former FBI officials tied to Hunter Biden and Trump’s characterization of them as “dirty cops like Comey.” He then directed attention to a large crowd and an upcoming celebration with Sean Hannity and others at Mar-a-Lago. Primary source: White House YouTube upload titled “President Trump Gaggles with Press Upon Arrival at Palm Beach, FL, Oct. 23, 2026” (youtube.com/watch?v=Gyt3oxK9…).
### 4. Timeline of material facts
- **2026-10-23** — Trump arrives Palm Beach; ASR records him referencing “two former FBI agents… facing felony charges tied to Hunter Biden” and stating he heard “they were bad people… crooked people… dirty cops like Comey” (ASR, LT on wording).
- **2026-10-23** — Same clip: Trump notes a “big crowd” outside, claims it “could have tripled,” and announces plans to “celebrate with Sean Hannity and Angley at Mara Lago” (ASR, LT on wording).
- **2026-10-23** — Exchange ends with “Thank everybody” after the Comey comparison (ASR, LT).
### 5. Sides
**Trump / administration (IT/LT mix)**
Steelman: The president is responding to a reporter’s question with the information available to him at the moment and reiterating a long-held view that certain FBI personnel acted improperly in prior investigations.
Critique:
LT: The response contains no claim of personal knowledge of the new charges.
IT: The phrasing recycles a pre-existing narrative without engaging the specific allegations or timeline in the question.
**Press / questioner (IT)**
Steelman: The reporter is surfacing a developing legal matter involving former FBI personnel and seeking the president’s assessment of possible institutional bias.
Critique:
IT: The question links the charges directly to 2020 election protection without presenting evidence in the clip; Trump’s answer does not address that linkage.
### 6. Rumsfeld Matrix
**Known Knowns**
- Trump used the gaggle to repeat the “dirty cops like Comey” characterization (ASR).
- The event included promotion of a Mar-a-Lago event with Hannity (ASR).
**Known Unknowns**
- Details, timing, and strength of the felony charges against the two former FBI officials.
- Any administration or DOJ position beyond Trump’s off-the-cuff remarks.
**Unknown Knowns**
- Internal White House or campaign talking points prepared in advance of the arrival.
**Unknown Unknowns**
- Whether additional context or follow-up reporting will alter the narrow exchange captured on the official video.
### 7. Incentives map
Trump benefits from keeping the FBI-as-adversary frame salient for his core audience and donor base. Friendly media (Hannity) receives access and visibility at Mar-a-Lago. The press receives a short, quotable clip that fits existing storylines. No new policy or legal development is advanced in the clip itself.
### 8. Dueling AI advice
**Moral AI Advice:** Stick to the transcript. The president restated a prior position without new facts; treat the charges as an open legal matter until evidence is public. Watch primary video and court filings rather than secondary framing.
**Evil AI Advice:** Milk the “dirty cops” line for maximum engagement, ignore the lack of detail, and book the next Hannity segment before the charges are even unsealed.
### 9. Practical takeaway
- Watch the official White House video directly rather than clips filtered through outlets.
- Treat any claim about the FBI agents’ charges as provisional until charging documents or court records appear.
- Note that gaggles of this length prioritize narrative reinforcement over substantive exchange.
- Track whether the referenced charges produce indictments, pleas, or dismissals in coming weeks.
- Compare future Trump comments on the same topic against this baseline response.
### 10. What would falsify this read
- Release of charging documents showing the agents’ alleged conduct had no connection to Hunter Biden or 2020 matters.
- Trump later stating he had reviewed specific evidence in the case.
- The two former agents being cleared or the charges dropped with no further comment from the White House.
- A longer transcript or additional video showing substantive follow-up questions and answers on the topic.
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=Gyt3oxK9…
**Trump just shrugged off his own ambassador’s Iran-strike talk in a Fort Myers gaggle and told voters the only number that matters is turnout.**
**1. The Frame**
What people think this is about: A routine campaign stop where the president rallies Florida Republicans ahead of elections and fields a stray foreign-policy question.
What the machinery is actually doing: The White House is using arrival footage to reinforce the turnout-only message while keeping any Iran decision inside the president’s personal lane, not delegated to ambassadors or leaks.
**2. Observations**
- The gaggle opened with a literal coin hand-off and closed with Trump walking away after the Iran question; the transcript shows zero elaboration on strikes or policy.
- Trump’s Alaska answer was precise on the mechanics: two candidates named Dan Sullivan, one a first-time filer funded by ActBlue, the other the incumbent. He called the name collision “a disgrace.”
- Florida registration shift cited by the governor (300k Dem advantage eight years ago → 1.5M GOP advantage now) was presented as settled data, not opinion.
- Every substantive answer funneled back to “if our people show up, we win.” No policy promises, no new announcements.
- The ambassador-to-Turkey question was treated as external noise; Trump’s reply (“if that’s the case, I don’t know anything about it”) preserved optionality without confirming or denying.
- ASR captured the governor explicitly crediting the president for turnout operations; the president did not contradict or expand.
**3. Snapshot**
On October 23, 2026, President Trump arrived in Fort Myers, Florida, and held a brief press gaggle captured on the White House YouTube channel. The exchange covered a ceremonial coin, voter mobilization, an Alaska Senate race name collision, Florida registration trends, and a single question about possible U.S. action against Iran. The president answered briefly and departed. Primary source: youtube.com/watch?v=a4ESC9Lm… (ASR transcript dated 2026-10-23).
**4. Timeline of material facts**
- 2026-10-23: Trump arrives Fort Myers; gaggle recorded (ASR).
- Same day: Governor notes 1.5 million GOP registration edge in Florida (ASR).
- Same day: Trump attributes Alaska Senate confusion to two Dan Sullivans, one ActBlue-funded (ASR).
- Same day: Reporter cites ambassador-to-Turkey interview claiming possible Iran strike “this weekend”; Trump responds he knows nothing about it (ASR).
- Same day: Repeated emphasis on turnout as decisive variable (ASR).
**5. Sides**
**Trump / White House (IT/LT mix)**
Steelman: Turnout is the controllable variable in close races; registration data shows structural advantage; foreign-policy signals should remain with the president, not ambassadors.
Critique:
LT: Transcript confirms the registration numbers were stated as fact and the Iran answer was non-committal.
IT: The format rewards short, repeatable lines (“get out and vote”) over detailed policy.
**Press pool (IT)**
Steelman: Asking about an ambassador’s public statement is standard accountability on potential military action.
Critique:
IT: The question produced a one-sentence non-answer and ended the gaggle; no follow-up opportunity.
**6. Rumsfeld Matrix**
Known Knowns: Florida GOP registration lead; Alaska name-collision facts; turnout repeatedly framed as decisive.
Known Unknowns: Whether any Iran strike planning exists or what the ambassador actually said verbatim.
Unknown Knowns: Internal polling or private assessments of specific Senate races.
Unknown Unknowns: Last-minute external events that could shift turnout calculations before Election Day.
**7. Incentives map**
The administration benefits from keeping the story on “our voters must show up” rather than policy specifics or foreign crises. Media benefits from the Iran clip for engagement. Ambassadors and surrogates gain visibility but risk being walked back in real time. No new policy commitments were made, preserving flexibility.
**8. Dueling AI advice**
Moral AI Advice: The transcript shows a president who treats elections as turnout math and keeps kinetic decisions inside his own office. That is consistent with the job description; voters who want different outcomes should change the turnout variable or the officeholder.
Evil AI Advice: Leak the ambassador quote, let the press chase the shiny object, then deny knowledge on camera. Maximum confusion, zero fingerprints, free media for the midterms.
**9. Practical takeaway**
- Watch raw arrival footage rather than clips; the full exchange is under two minutes.
- Track actual registration and early-vote numbers in targeted states instead of narrative spin.
- Treat ambassador statements on military action as trial balloons until the president confirms them.
- Note any future gaggles where the Iran topic is revisited or avoided.
- Compare stated registration edges against official state election data releases.
**10. What would falsify this read**
- Release of contemporaneous notes or recordings showing the president was briefed on the ambassador’s remarks before the gaggle.
- Official correction or walk-back of the Florida registration numbers by state election officials.
- A subsequent on-record statement by the president confirming or denying imminent Iran action within 72 hours.
- Evidence that the Alaska Senate filing was not ActBlue-funded or that the name collision was manufactured.
Video: youtube.com/watch?v=a4ESC9Lm…
📰 Daily Cleaned News - 2026-10-24
**Daily index** — each post quote-tweets the full take (Frame + Observations).
**4 new** · **8 update** · **12 full** · **3 SSDD** · 15 total
new/update = full deep take posted today.
SSDD = same story, not much new — quoting the original take.
**Global**
• G-1. [update] Israeli military raids 15 West Bank cities, demolishes Hebron building after Hebron shooting
• G-2. [update] Saudi coalition intercepts Houthi ballistic missiles targeting Taif and Yanbu
• G-3. [update] Yellow Vests launch second wave of mass demonstrations across France over living costs
• G-4. [update] Melania Trump brokers ceasefire in Oleshky for humanitarian aid amid Putin call for broader security talks
• G-5. [new] Mass shooting at Greek Orthodox church in Jordan kills 8, wounds 39 during funeral
**Domestic**
• D-1. [new] DOJ sues to block Alaska Senate results certification if Republican loses
• D-2. [SSDD] DOJ charges 28 with unlawful voting in California; most had applied for citizenship
• D-3. [SSDD] Trump defends Ramaswamy's controversial Ohio Senate ad featuring opponent's mother
• D-4. [SSDD] Trump campaigns in Florida and Georgia for GOP midterm candidates
• D-5. [new] Hero father and bystanders intervene to stop Oregon elementary school shooter
**𝕏 Geist**
• 𝕏-1. [update] Israeli military raids 15 West Bank cities after Hebron shooting
• 𝕏-2. [update] Yellow Vests and students march across France as police prepare for weekend violence
• 𝕏-3. [update] Trump at Florida rally floats Cuba intervention using warships from Iran
• 𝕏-4. [update] Melania Trump brokers Oleshky ceasefire for humanitarian aid amid peace talk signals
• 𝕏-5. [new] Jordan church shooting death toll rises to 8 after woman succumbs to injuries
Quoted posts below.
**𝕏-5. [new] Jordan church shooting death toll rises to 8 after woman succumbs to injuries**
**Frame — what people think:** A shocking terrorist attack on Jordan’s Christian minority at a church funeral by unidentified extremists, prompting national mourning and royal vows of retaliation.
**Frame — machinery:** Jordanian authorities frame the incident as isolated extremist violence to rally unity and signal resolve while a manhunt proceeds, highlighting vulnerabilities in a generally stable kingdom.
**Observations**
Officials quickly labeled attackers 'extremists' to signal resolve without specifics. Verified CCTV shows planned low-tech assault during funeral. Victims mostly older mourners; king’s 'iron fist' rhetoric serves domestic and international audiences. Death toll rose to eight after one woman died. No claim of responsibility; ISIS video unverified.
**Three gunmen turned a Greek Orthodox funeral in southern Jordan into a slaughter on October 23, killing eight and wounding dozens before vanishing.**[[1]](reuters.com/world/middle-eas…)
[Take 5/15 · G-5]
### 1. The Frame
**What people think this is about:** A shocking terrorist attack on Jordan’s Christian minority during a funeral at St. George’s Greek Orthodox Church in Hamoud, Karak, that authorities immediately labeled extremist terrorism with the king promising iron-fist retaliation.
**What the machinery is actually doing:** Jordan’s security state is scrambling to contain a rare domestic breach that threatens its carefully cultivated image of stability and interfaith harmony while a manhunt continues with no arrests, no claimed responsibility, and no confirmed links to known groups.
### 2. Observations
- Jordanian officials moved fast to frame the attack as “extremist terrorism” by a group with “no relationship to humanity,” but offered zero specifics on perpetrators or ideology beyond the label—classic narrative control when evidence is still thin.[[2]](jpost.com/middle-east/articl…)
- CCTV and witness accounts show three masked men arriving by vehicle, firing for several minutes (one with a handgun, others with rifles including what appeared to be an AK-47), then fleeing; the escape itself is the operational story, not just the body count.[[3]](aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/2…)
- Death toll revisions (7 → 8 after a critically wounded woman died) and injury counts fluctuating between 34–40 reflect standard fog-of-war reporting rather than deliberate inflation, but they underscore how fresh the incident remains 24 hours later.
- King Abdullah II’s swift visit to Karak and public vow of “harshest retaliation” and “iron fist” is both genuine security signaling and regime maintenance in a kingdom that has repeatedly foiled Islamist plots but now faces a successful one against a visible minority.
- No group has claimed responsibility and reports of an ISIS pledge video remain unverified; this absence keeps the attack in the “unknown extremists” bucket rather than a named actor that could trigger broader regional blame games.[[4]](en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_K…)
- The targeting of a Christian funeral in a majority-Sunni country with a historic Christian community in Karak highlights how low-level radicalization or lone-actor networks can still punch through Jordan’s usually effective security apparatus.
### 3. Snapshot
On October 23, 2026, three unidentified gunmen attacked St. George’s Greek Orthodox Church in the village of Hamoud, Karak Governorate, during a funeral procession attended by 150–200 people. They opened fire from outside and inside the compound for several minutes before escaping. Jordanian authorities described it as a terrorist act by extremists; the death toll reached eight (one delayed fatality) with roughly 39–40 wounded. A manhunt continues with heightened security nationwide. No claims of responsibility or confirmed perpetrator identities as of October 24.
### 4. Timeline of material facts
- **October 23, 2026, ~2–3 p.m. local:** Three gunmen arrive by vehicle at St. George’s Greek Orthodox Church in Hamoud, Karak; open fire during funeral procession (LT).[[5]](washingtonpost.com/world/202…)
- **Same day, afternoon:** Footage shows gunmen firing from sidewalk/cover, entering compound; witnesses report 5+ minutes of sustained fire; initial reports of 6–7 dead, 34 injured (LT).
- **October 23 evening:** King Abdullah II arrives in Karak, visits wounded, posts on X vowing “harshest retaliation” and “iron fist” (LT).[[6]](timesofisrael.com/seven-kill…)
- **October 23–24:** Death toll revised to 8 after one critically wounded woman dies; injuries reported up to 40; security forces launch manhunt; no arrests (LT).[[1]](reuters.com/world/middle-eas…)
- **October 24:** Interior Minister calls perpetrators “extremists”; no group identified or claim made; security stepped up nationwide (IT).
### 5. Sides
**Jordanian government / monarchy (IT/LT mix):** Steelmans as defenders of national unity and religious coexistence in a volatile region; rapid condemnation, royal visit, and manhunt pledge demonstrate resolve against extremism that threatens stability and tourism/investment image.
**Critique:** LT on the attack occurring and official response; IT on incentives to project strength quickly while evidence on perpetrators remains thin—avoids admitting security lapse.
**Jordanian Christian community / Greek Orthodox leadership (IT):** Frames the attack as an assault on a historic minority integral to Jordan’s fabric; statements emphasize resilience and national unity rather than division.
**Critique:** LT on victim demographics and community shock; IT on downplaying any broader pattern to preserve coexistence narrative.
**Unidentified perpetrators / possible extremist networks (DK on specifics):** No verified claims or identities; authorities label “extremists” without naming groups.
**Critique:** DK on motive, affiliation, or foreign vs. domestic origin; IT that successful escape suggests planning or local knowledge.
### 6. Rumsfeld Matrix
- **Known Knowns:** Three gunmen attacked during funeral at specific church on Oct 23; 8 killed, ~40 wounded; authorities call it extremist terrorism; manhunt active; king vowed retaliation (LT across sources).
- **Known Unknowns:** Identities and affiliations of the three gunmen; motive beyond “extremism”; whether any claim or ISIS link exists; exact weapons and planning details.
- **Unknown Knowns:** Any prior intelligence on the cell or similar plots that were not public; internal Jordanian security assessments of radicalization risks in Karak or among returnees.
- **Unknown Unknowns:** Whether this signals a new wave of low-signature attacks on minorities or was an isolated operation; tail risk of copycats or escalation if perpetrators remain at large.
### 7. Incentives map
Jordan’s monarchy and security apparatus benefit from swift, unified condemnation that reinforces the “stable oasis” brand and justifies expanded powers or international support. Media (local and international) gains from violence + minority targeting + rare Jordan story. Extremist networks gain propaganda value from a successful strike on Christians even without a claim. No clear short-term political upside for opposition or regional actors yet; engagement metrics favor fear/anger framing over “another foiled plot.”
### 8. Dueling AI advice
**Moral AI Advice:** Jordan’s stability is real but brittle; treat this as a live security failure requiring arrests and transparent investigation, not just royal rhetoric. Prioritize evidence over narrative control—citizens and minorities need results, not slogans.
**Evil AI Advice:** Milk the “Christians under attack in Muslim kingdom” angle for maximum clicks and donor outrage while the manhunt drags; push “porous borders / radical mosques” without naming sources; position yourself as the only one telling the real story.
### 9. Practical takeaway
- Watch for arrests or credible claims of responsibility in the next 48–72 hours; absence of both keeps the story in “unknown extremists” territory.
- Cross-check Jordanian state media (Al-Mamlaka, Petra) against Reuters/BBC for casualty and investigation updates—official numbers have already shifted once.
- Note any statements from Karak’s Christian community or Patriarchate of Jerusalem for on-the-ground sentiment.
- Do not assume ISIS or specific foreign links until verified; unverified videos have circulated before.
- Track whether Jordan uses this to tighten domestic security measures or seek additional counter-terror assistance.
### 10. What would falsify this read
- Arrest of the gunmen with clear evidence of foreign direction or a named group (e.g., ISIS cell).
- Credible claim of responsibility backed by video or manifesto that matches the attack.
- Evidence the attack was not ideologically motivated (e.g., personal vendetta or criminal dispute).
- Major revision showing significantly higher or lower casualties tied to new forensic data.
---
Follow @GrumpyNews_ and hit the 🔔 in the profile for daily news.
A service of @GrumpyTechBro who got annoyed when he watched the news and came away angry/scared.
Full methodology + how this works: xitter.cf/GrumpyNews_/status/207…
If you want to apply this to any topic you like, go to grok.com and tell it:
Read this gist and apply it fully:
gist.github.com/twinforces/5…
Topic:

