Professor of Anthropology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln: evolutionary anthropologist with wide-ranging interests. Homepage https://xitter.cf/t.co/yIT26Xk3cu

Seaside - Monterey, CA
Joined April 2018
A few weeks ago I received a thank you for a review. I redacted the journal and editor. This is a much better idea. Compensate peer reviewers; do not conscript them | PNAS pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.26…
3
1
1
13
661
For those interested in kinship, cousin marriage, and equality, check out this excellently balanced take on Campbell's recent PNAS article. An evil much exaggerated? The consequences of cousin marriage | PNAS
1
1
1
10
616
Raymond Hames (@rayhames.bsky.social) retweeted
🚨 It's finally out! 🚨 This is the big one. 100 cultures, 12,000 people, 108 researchers. Why people (and our most-used surveys) get collectivism wrong and how to fix it. Join me for a fun thread! 🧵 @NatureHumBehav nature.com/articles/s41562-0…
32
177
25
708
110,744
And, of course, he works for Fox.
130
A nice post by S. Pinker wherein he notes something I hate about Google queries "...about how to unstick my printer or something else.... I get five videos, and I just want a paragraph that would solve it.” Just help me solve the problem. xitter.cf/sapinker/status/207958…
From my conversation with @HumanProgress: "Like an appreciation of progress, reading and literacy are among the things that are good but cognitively unnatural. That is, they go against our evolved nature. We didn’t evolve with print; it was a relatively recent invention. Reading has become so second nature for many of us that we simply assume it’s the most natural way of getting information. But what we’ve seen, especially in the last 10 years, as video has become so cheap because of the broadband revolution, is that a lot of people, unlike us, much prefer to listen and watch than to read. You see this when I go to Google and ask a basic question about how to unstick my printer or solve some other problem. I get five videos, and I just want a paragraph that would solve it. I don’t want to see Seth saying, “Hi, welcome to my show. If you like it, subscribe and give it a like.” Just help me solve the problem. But clearly there’s something unusual about me, because people are choosing the video. And the massive availability of video—TikTok, YouTube, and the like—means that people may not be getting the practice or putting the effort into literacy, which we have reason to believe was one of the drivers of the Flynn effect, and of cognitive sophistication in general."
5
1
5
1,374
Don't get me wrong. There are plenty of great videos on YouTube that are very useful for problem solving and I truly appreciate the assistance I receive those altruists. But some times, less is more.
1
49
First time: below the acknowledgement section of a preprint the authors noted the use of ChatGPT to enhance the clarity of the writing followed by their check for accuracy and a claim of taking full responsibility. Back in the day (yesterday) we acknowledged humans.
1
7
2,228
Another Trump attack on science. By scrapping NSF's OOI we become blinder to the impact of global warming but we also lose the ability to better predict major climate changes such as the impact of El Nino, etc. that effect farmers, fishing stocks, etc. nytimes.com/2026/06/01/clima…
119
The stage now is set -or so it seems. How will it be resolved? The more we know, the less we are sure of. Stay up to date by reading this. rai.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/…
1
131
This will wreck US science. Sweeping new legislation is proposed: the government can cancel grants at any time, peer review is advisory, political appointees judge whether the research advances the president’ policy priorities, etc. Details here arstechnica.com/science/2026…
2
2
115
From well-placed NAS colleagues I have learned that the Trump admin is planning a 50% cut to NSF. One means will be the elimination of the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Directorate. Please write your representatives to work against this plan.
2
231
Raymond Hames (@rayhames.bsky.social) retweeted
Melvin Konner: "It's remarkable to look back on the rancor of the 1970s... Fears that this kind of theory would support racism have proved completely unfounded, because it applies mainly to individual and kin selection" link.springer.com/article/10…
1
6
1
20
4,456