Archana Sharma | Psychotherapist

Did you happen to hear the words of your own grandmother, Indira Gandhi, Mr @RahulGandhi, when BBC asked her why she had put Morarji Desai in jail? Your grandmother justified imprisoning political opponents during the Emergency in the name of protecting democracy. And today, you accuse Mr @narendramodi of destroying democracy. But where is the comparison? Mr Modi has not imposed an Emergency like the one declared by your grandmother in 1975. You cannot equate political allegations with constitutional violations simply by repeating them. India continues to function under its Constitution, with elections, Parliament and the judiciary. The government faces political opposition, public criticism and electoral accountability. Disagreeing with the government is your democratic right, but disagreement alone does not establish that the Constitution has been violated. Mr @RahulGandhi, before accusing others of destroying democracy, perhaps you should reflect on the democratic rights suspended under your own grandmother's government. Democracy cannot mean one thing when your party is in power and another when someone else is. India deserves facts, consistency and honest political debate—not accusations without evidence. ~ Archana Sharma Consultant Psychologist and Psychotherapist (RCI)

Secret candid recording by my cute Gen Z friend, Sheetal! Some moments become more special when you don’t even know you’re being recorded. These little spontaneous moments of laughter, playfulness and being completely yourself are also a beautiful part of a healthy life. 🤩 Keep your Gen Z friends around — they have a magical way of keeping you young! 💖✨ #HeeraKiTamanna #CandidMoments #HealthyLiving #SimpleJoys #JoyInLife #StayYoung

kahin bair na ho,koi gair na ho,sab mile ke yun chalte chalein..jahan gam bi na ho aansu bi na bad pyaar hi pyaar pale #IsingtoMyselfWhenSad

I don't trust @CBIHeadquarters How credible is the CBI in India when so many high-profile cases end in closure reports after years of investigation? Cases are investigated, headlines are made, years pass—and eventually, the case is closed. When an agency is regarded as India’s premier investigative body, repeatedly filing closure reports in high-profile cases, naturally raises serious questions about its independence, effectiveness, and accountability. Look at the record: Aarushi–Hemraj murder case — CBI took over in 2008; closure report filed in 2010. Mulayam Singh Yadav disproportionate-assets case — CBI inquiry began in 2007; closure in 2013. Talabira-II coal-block case — CBI case registered in 2013; closure proceedings continued through the years; finally closed by the Supreme Court in 2026. Jindal Steel–Ramchandi coal-block case — CBI inquiry involving former PM Manmohan Singh; closed in 2016. Najeeb Ahmed disappearance — missing since 2016; CBI closure report ultimately accepted in 2025. Jayanthi Natarajan case — CBI FIR in 2017; closure report after years of investigation. Praful Patel/Air India aircraft-leasing case — CBI case registered in 2017; closure report in 2024. NDTV founders case — CBI case registered in 2017; closure report in 2024, accepted by the court in 2025. Sushant Singh Rajput death case — CBI took over in 2020; closure reports filed in 2025. And these are only some of the high-profile cases. CBI filed 174 closure reports in 2024 alone, citing lack of evidence. Years of investigation. National headlines. Closure reports. Then why are taxpayers paying salaries for an agency that so often seems unable to bring high-profile investigations to a meaningful conclusion? At this point, I genuinely feel the fictional crime show Crime Patrol does a better job of solving cases than the CBI in India. cc @Yasmin2186 @republic #CBI #India #SushantSinghRajput #SSR #SSRCase #JusticeForSushant #DishaCase #Disha_SSR_Case #DishaSalian