Vancouver policy lawyer, past Deputy Minister, CEO, UBC law prof., Bank of Canada director. Quora rated him most viewed writer in climatology.
VANCOUVER BC
Joined September 2013
- Tweets25.4K
- Following708
- Followers882
- Likes2.9K
Jim Matkin retweeted
China emits as much CO2 in 16 days as Canada emits in an entire year. Australia's annual total takes China just 12 days to emit, while Britain's takes barely 9 days.
Combined, Canada, Australia and the UK emit about 1.23 billion tonnes a year. China emits that much in roughly 37 days.
So, even if all three countries eliminated every tonne of fossil CO2, closing every factory, power station and banning every gas vehicle, China would replace the entire annual reduction in little more than five weeks.
Yet, Western governments are deliberately making energy scarcer and more expensive, by dismantling dependable sources, restricting oil and gas exploration and loading industry with carbon taxes and net zero mandates.
Steel, chemicals, fertilizers, refining and manufacturing are driven overseas, often to countries burning more coal. So the emissions do not disappear. Only the jobs, tax revenues and energy security do.
The West impoverishes itself. China profits.
The Climate Narrative is Collapsing wattsupwiththat.com/2026/10/… via @wattsupwiththat The Gulf War brought to light the utter impossibility of ‘Net Zero’. This is the deeper context of the current conflict within the IPCC. What was being pursued is completely impossible, quite apart from the widespread doubts about its necessity. No one can ignore it any longer: actually, stopping the production of all fossil fuels means nothing other than a ‘Zero Economy’.
Jim Matkin retweeted
Part 2 of 2:
Without consultation with their own citizens, Western governments aligned with the UN and its coterie of globalist institutions, signed onto framework agreements like the 2015 Paris Accord.
What began as voluntary, moralising international commitments were rapidly written into binding domestic legislation. The end goal has been the erosion of national sovereignty, democracy and economic freedom.
The resulting legacy routinely excludes taxpayers from decision-making while elite-driven administrations power ahead. These governments commit billions in subsidies to unproven pet projects - such as Australia’s disastrous $9 trillion scheme to become a green hydrogen superpower.
Prior to this shift, Western industrial policy prioritised dense, dispatchable energy security - the foundation of modern life. Today, governments lock in multi-decade decarbonisation commitments that outlast their electoral tenures by decades.
Vast tracts of agricultural and wilderness land have been greenlit and bulldozed for transmission corridors, access roads and sprawling industrial turbine arrays. All of this serves an intangible belief system that vilifies carbon dioxide - the fundamental building block of biological growth and energy creation.
The result is the most expensive household power bills in history, the destruction of dispatchable coal and gas capacity and chronic damage to national economic and defensive resilience.
Rule by decree was the governance model of communism under Lenin, not of democratic representation. Net Zero stands as the most diabolical act of self-inflicted harm ever visited upon democratic nations by their own leadership.
California’s Energy Crisis Could Bring The West Coast To Its Knees climatechangedispatch.com/ca… via @ccdeditor Cap and trade regs cripple refineries.."It is time for our governor, democratic legislature, and air board to step back and look at the big picture. California, Nevada, and Arizona are in serious trouble. Cap and invest policies are crippling the state. It’s past time for Governor Newsom and state legislators to make courageous and correct decisions to get us out of the debacle that we are in. If they cannot, then the only choice will be for the President to invoke the Defense Production Act on behalf of the military and citizens of California."
Jim Matkin retweeted
The loss of cultural Western icons to raging mobs has opened the floodgates - and the old world order is on the ropes.
Make no mistake, this is an orchestrated agenda, ranging from climate alarmism to unchecked mass migration. The coordinated assault on cities across France and the United Kingdom is eating away at a cultural heritage preserved across generations going back a thousand years. That is its purpose.
A web of interconnected forces has reversed the historic relationship between the free citizen and the state. Suddenly, democracy has been forgotten, and Western leaders are revealing just how deeply the rot has spread.
These mobs are highly organised. We see hard-bitten socialists, driven by hatred for a society that left them in the lurch living on welfare and resentment, now eager to tear down the structures built around them. Today, they operate alongside hundreds of thousands of migrants from Africa and the Middle East, with targets increasingly defined by new ideological fault lines.
Carrying Palestinian flags, they target and loot Jewish-owned stores. The traditional bonds of society are being torn apart.
At the apex of this tsunami sits the immutable United Nations, spreading its fear campaigns and overstepping authority under the banner of a climate crisis. Under the guise of humanitarianism, the UN apparatus has 'enabled' migration flows - providing accommodation, communications and transport.
Unelected and unaligned with Western national interests, this global bureaucracy of nearly 190,000 officials has become the staging ground for a One World Government. This vast network of people and agencies is quietly at work eroding the tottering sovereignty and supremacy of the West.
Domestically, governments are using heavy-handed, creeping authoritarianism to quell dissent. They imagine that this is how democracy works, but it isn't. Armed with arbitrary authority, they police language, values and daily behavior.
This is starkly evident in the fractured responses to these uprisings across the United Kingdom, France and Sweden, where national authorities increasingly thunder at their own citizens for daring to voice anger over an exploding cultural time bomb.
They throw their own people before the courts, then lock them up to silence everyone else.
Let's face it. The West has been self-destructing for decades. It's just that time has finally caught up. As state power expands, the fabric of civilisation shrinks. Within a single generation, traditional family structures - once the basis for moral instruction, emotional security, and self-reliance - have been displaced by a doctrine of supreme executive control.
No one believed it would end this way. But it does look like the end.
Jim Matkin retweeted
Weather reporting has transitioned from a routine public service into a continuous broadcast of existential dread.
Day after day, audiences are subjected to a barrage of dramatic terminology like 'heat domes', 'bomb cyclones' and 'climate emergencies'. They are shown on weather maps glowing with increasingly alarming shades of crimson. Yet who sets the tone for this relentless narrative, and why does the media machine strictly adhere to worst-case scenarios yet ignore counter-balancing data?
I have looked beyond local news outlets to the insternational framework that created global climate news. I found the crisis narrative isn't an accident; it's driven from top-down by global institutions using slick public relations tactics.
The mainstream media pretends climate alarmism is a spontaneous response to current events, but its structural roots are deeply institutional. The World Meteorological Organization is a specialised agency of the United Nations, not a passive coordinator of weather data. Critically, the WMO and UN Environment Programme founded the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 1988.
By establishing the IPCC, they created a central body responsible for synthesising climate science into a global climate crisis. This connection is vital. The WMO bridges the gap between meteorological data and international political agendas.
While a direct, covert directive ordering local meteorologists to falsify daily forecasts can't be explicitly proven, the WMO’s role in the IPCC ensures a 'crisis framework' is the baseline for meteorological reports. Local weather outlets and national agencies operate inside an ecosystem heavily influenced by the WMO’s overarching, high-alarm targets.
The crisis agenda is broadcast and printed by daily media, which relies on this heavily doctored public relations framework. Mainstream news outlets systematically prioritise worst-case, speculative climate models over real wold observations. This aligns with the political agenda of international bodies, and feeds the media's 'attention economy', where fear translates directly into clicks, views and revenue.
What is entirely absent from modern journalism is any meaningful self-analysis or critique of this invisible climate PR structure. Media outlets broadcast dire predictions, but rarely hold themselves to account when predictions fail to materialise.
By continuously dramatising short-term weather as proof of climate collapse, the news media operates as the PR arm of global climate agendas. This avoids any investigation into the framework that actually funds and promotes the climate crisis narrative.
Perhaps the most telling evidence of a biased narrative is what the media chooses not to report. While worst-case scenarios get wall-to-wall coverage, significant scientific data that complicates the narrative is routinely ignored.
A prime example is the phenomenon of 'global greening', identified by NASA satellites over multiple decades. It has revealed a significant increase in green vegetation across the planet, largely driven by increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, which acts as a fertiliser for plant life.
According to satellite observations, this greening effect has added millions of square kilometres of vegetation - equivalent to a new continent of green. Yet, this massive, verifiable ecological shift is virtually never analysed or reported by major weather news outlets.
To report global greening would introduce unwanted nuance, defuse public anxiety, and contradict the narrative of impending, unmitigated catastrophe.
The constant state of unease permeating modern weather reporting is the product of this highly coordinated systemic framework, run by the WMO and UN. The media apparatus thrives on sensationalism and ignores balancing scientific observations, like NASA's global greening data.
The result is a public relations machine designed to drive a permanent state of crisis.
But a recent scientific paper has blown all this Noah-inspired nonsense out of the water. Studying both documentary and geological flooding records, a group of European scientists found that over multi-century and millennial periods across parts of western and southwestern Europe, floods have been of a much higher magnitude than those of the present day. In the UK, flooding in the Severn area during the last 70 years “was not considered exceptional” in the context of the 4,000-year reco
Jim Matkin retweeted
This is exactly why; 1910 was a low in the temperature record. This was due to the 60-year Yoshimura climate cycle, which has lows and highs approx every 60 years;
1880 - HIGH
1910 - LOW
1942 - HIGH
1975 - LOW
2003 - HIGH
Its the Yoshimura which drives the AMO and other known climate cycles;
Jim Matkin retweeted
So how could we have been facing an existential global warming threat? Earth is not even remotely facing runaway warming now or in the near future, and reaching the dramatic prediction of a 5.5°C rise by 2100 is virtually impossible.
It is a full 9°C colder across the world than the 24°C global average over the past 485 million years (Judd et al, Science 2024).
The climate crisis narrative was built upon a predicted warming scenario, now widely acknowledged by scientists as implausible. First introduced in 2011 to guide policy, this extreme scenario - known as RCP8.5 (and later SSP5-8.5) - served as the primary engine for terrifying 'business-as-usual' headlines for over a decade.
Those apocalyptic projections simply did not occur.
With the retirement of the extreme 5°C baseline ahead of the 7th Assessment Report (AR7), the ceiling for high-emissions projections has dropped significantly. The IPCC's unrealistic high-end baselines have been downgraded toward a maximum around 3.3°C. and this s also implausible.
World temperature, averaged via statistics and guesswork, has changed by just 1.1°C to 1.4°C over the 250 years since the start of the Industrial Revolution.
CO₂ concentrations do not automatically trigger runaway temperatures. The world is too complex. Any analysis of past climate reveals the world does not have one temperature or one climate. It is a composite of regional climate patterns. A lift in CO₂ delivered immediate recovery, with green leaf expansion across barren wastelands. Some cereal crop yields have jumped by 280%. We have seen this in worldwide greening identified via NASA satellites.
CO₂ is a trace atmospheric gas - around 420 parts per million - among the lowest concentrations in geological history, while the atmosphere is over 99% nitrogen, oxygen, and argon, with water vapor exceeding CO₂ many times over.
This deceptive original scenario - promoted heavily through the United Nations - became the primary justification for Net Zero. It forced the premature decline of reliable energy systems across Western nations, leading to widespread economic strain and a massive transfer of industrial capacity to Beijing.
Jim Matkin retweeted
Since the time of the Cambrian Explosion half a billion years ago, atmospheric CO₂ and global temperatures have fluctuated wildly.
This vast span of time covers the emergence of land plants, insects, reptiles, the dinosaur eras and Age of Mammals (the Cenozoic). During major evolutionary leaps, atmospheric CO₂ was not just measured in hundreds of parts per million, but in the thousands.
For example, CO₂ levels were 10 to 15 times higher than today during peaks in the early Paleozoic era 538.8 to 251.9 million years ago. Far from causing a mass, sterilising collapse, these high-carbon epochs created the richest expansions of biosphere diversity in Earth’s history. The long-term geological record reaffirms that atmospheric CO₂ and global surface temperature do not move together in lockstep.
In another notable example, extensive ice sheets covered major continental areas during the Late Ordovician glaciation 440 million years ago - yet CO₂ levels were over 4,000 ppm. By contrast, today's CO₂ hovers around 425 ppm, rising and falling with the natural rhythms of the seasons.
The ancient perspective is reconstructed from marine sediment cores, fossil isotope data and the geological evidence engraved in the bedrock. It makes the modern panic around atmospheric CO₂ look decidedly flawed.
These records form a permanent blueprint of the ancient world through the rise of multicellular life, the geological record, and the broader story of biology. This surviving infographic written in stone deeply challenges the current crisis narrative.
The world's climate is actually governed by a complex array of natural drivers - ocean circulation, cloud albedo, solar irradiance and orbital cycles - of which CO₂ is merely one piece in a jigsaw puzzle.
In the broad arc of Earth history, our current geological epoch (the Quaternary) sits near historical low levels for atmospheric carbon. During recent glacial peaks, CO₂ fell to approximately 180 ppm - flirting dangerously with the 150 ppm threshold where land plants cease photosynthetic activity.
The modest rise in CO₂ levels going into the modern industrial era has effectively pulled the biosphere further away from that biological basement, stimulating global vegetation growth and leaf area expansion verified by NASA satellite observations.
Science is at its best when it welcomes questions rather than demanding conformity. When we look at Earth’s full story, CO₂ is not a pollutant, but an essential building block of our living biological world.
To reduce this grand planetary vision to a single monochrome of ecological collapse makes a mockery of the hard truth in the rocks beneath our feet.
IMAGE: What 540 million years of geological history says: Willis Eschenbach.
Jim Matkin retweeted
Annual COP summits convened by the United Nations for the past 30 years serve as a financial scheme to extract trillions of dollars from gullible Western nations.
The manufactured crisis sustains a perpetual state of fear and alarm about a feigned collapse of climate stability - a condition that has no basis in planetary history. This manufactured crisis has served as a tool to achieve distinct political and economic advantages.
This seeks to shift decision-making power from elected national governments to unaccountable, pan-globalist institutions. The traditional democratic choices and fundamental freedoms valued in Western society are being systematically dismantled. Economic stability is being eroded as nations lose industrial wealth to nations like China and India.
China now dominates the rare earth market and builds around 90% of the world's turbines and solar panels, plus components. It has expanded its coal power plants to become the greatest producer of clean coal power in history.
Erasing national boundaries and centralising control makes the human world more fragmented, easier to manage, and less capable of resisting or reversing a top-down global restructure.
The Net Zero transition opens up new avenues for corporate profit, allowing a global elite to influence international policy to suit their bottom lines under the guise of environmental stewardship.
The narrative of a climate crisis represents a profound bid for political power and financial control. The Earth is a resilient, self-regulating biological environment, that has thrived under vastly warmer and more carbon-rich conditions than those we experience today.
The true threat to contemporary society is not a changing climate, but dismantling national sovereignty, loss of economic stability and erosion of democratic freedoms in pursuit of a micromanaged, borderless world.
Jim Matkin retweeted
Ding-Dong the Green New Deal is dead - following the elimination of the Obama EPA 2009 Endangerment Finding - saving consumers billions of dollars of unnecessary greenhouse gas regulations. epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-rel…
Jim Matkin retweeted
Let me tell you what Islam did to Greece and the rest of the world:
In the 1.300 years of Muslim-Arab slave trade, approximately a million Greeks were sold as slaves just because they were Christians.
On March 30, 1822, the Chios Massacre took place. The Muslim Turks slaughtered (Greeks) 42,000 women, men & children. Additionally, 52,000 were sold as slaves in the markets of Smyrna & Constantinople. Young girls were raped publicly in the streets, and newlyweds in front of their husbands, who were then slaughtered. Others were raped in front of their parents, after which the men's genitals were cut off. Women over 40 were set on fire and left to burn alive. Pregnant women had their bellies ripped open and their fetuses pulled out, while small children were thrown forcefully against rocks. The frenzy of the Muslims was unprecedented.
On September 1, 1821, Samothrace was devastated by the Ottomans through a general massacre led by the Turkish Kara Ali. Approximately 10,000 men & boys were slaughtered. Women & children were sold in the markets of Constantinople & Smyrna (Holocaust of Samothrace).
On June 4, 1821, the Turks carried out a massacre against the Greeks of Kydonies in Asia Minor (modern-day Ayvalık). They did pogroms at shops and homes, looting them, while seizing women and children to sell as slaves. Simultaneously, they conducted a general massacre of the population, and the town was set ablaze and completely destroyed.
In Crete muslims carried chains with them to tie up Greek Christian women so they could take them away.
For 300 years the muslim Turks were stealing kids from their mothers. This was the most brutal thing humanity ever witnessed. They were waiting for women to birth, raise their kids, and then at the age of 8 were collecting the them. The devşirme known as "collection of children" or "blood tax" or in Greek as "paidomazoma".
After the Ottoman conquest of Crete (1669), local officials and governors began to oppress the Christian population in every way: killing, abducting and abusing women, demanding money, and preventing the performance of the subjects' religious duties.
We Greeks, called the Muslim Turks, "The grand masters of torture." In 1821, in Patras, they captured a father and son and, after impaling them, lit a fire and forced the other captives to roast them like lambs. Ali Pasha at that point was more inventive: When he impaled Christians, he forced their relatives to turn the spit, threatening that otherwise he would impale them too.
The Muslim Pasha of Thessaloniki, Abdul Abud, who had set as his goal the extermination of the Greeks, burned 120 villages and wiped out their inhabitants to the last one.
5.000 Greeks were massacred in Naousa, the rest were sold in slave markets, and the entire city was reduced to ashes.
The most common torture inflicted by the Muslims during the Ottoman period was whipping. The usual victims were the Christians. It was the introductory torment in every other torture, so common in the persecutions of Christians that the phrase became proverbial: "I will whip you until you change your faith."
During the Ottoman period, Muslims enjoyed performing all kinds of mutilations. Ears, noses, lips, tongues, breasts, and genitals were primarily cut off. Not just those, though. Let's recall here the newly-revealed Saint Raphael of Mytilene, who was hanged from a tree and had his lower jaw cut off, while the twelve-year-old martyr Irene was roasted in a barrel on the Tuesday of Easter in the year 1463, ten years after the fall of Constantinople.
In 1822, Muslims captured the wives of Zafeirakis and Gatsos. The wife of Zafeirakis was built into the wall up to the neck in the church of Hagia Sophia in Thessaloniki. Maria Karatasou, daughter of a priest refused to change faith, and for this Ebub Lubut enclosed her in a sack with deadly snakes, where she martyred.
The Greek Christian Woman, during the years when Greece was enslaved to the Muslim Turks, in order to avoid -as much as she could- the abhorrent dishonor from the barbaric Muslims, would destroy the youthful beauty of her face, or create a family from the age of fourteen, believing that she would not give birth to slaves.
Muslim Turks committed the Greek Genocide 1913–1923) to create their pan-Islamic pseudo nation called Turkey. They killed 750.000
Muslim Turks committed the Armenian Genocide 1914–1923). They killed 1.500.000
Muslim Turks committed the Assyrian Genocide 1914–1920). They killed 300.000
Muslim Turks committed the Hamidian massacres (1894–1896) and Adana massacre (1909): 350.000 total
Muslims commited GENOCIDES and Islamized the Anatolia.
On September 1955 in Constantinople 4,348 Greek businesses, 110 hotels, 27 pharmacies, 23 schools, and 73 churches were damaged or destroyed. The exodus of Greeks from Turkey, reduced the community of over 150.000 (who have already left from the Fall), to fewer than 2.000 today.
Muslim Arabs did the Trans-Saharan slave trade (650–1900). The longest slave trade in human history (1.300 years). Estimates of 6–10 million sub-Saharan Africans. It was them who were selling black slaves.
Muslim Arabs did the East African / Red Sea / Indian Ocean trade to the Middle East and Arabia. Slave markets with millions of slaves. 1.3–2.5 million over centuries
Muslim Arabs did the Barbary corsair slave trade (16th–early 19th centuries): Estimated 1–1.25 million Europeans slaves
Millions of massacres in Italy and Spain by the Islamic Caliphates.
60-70 millions of people died in India and the Islamic pseudo-nation of Pakistan was created.
Muslims enslaved Afhganistan you stupid uneducated Turk.
Muslims enslaved Iraq you uneducated Turk.
Muslims enslaved and slaughtered the Christians in every single country you mentioned in Middle East.
No one of the events you mentioned committed because of a religion but every single historical event I mentioned you was committed because of Islam and the Quran.
Islamic imperialism and expansionisms is the biggest and most murderous in human history. Africa and Middle east are enslaved from Islam. They were never muslim countries and the people suffer under the sharia law.
In 2015, 21 Egyptian Copts beheaded in Libya (video released by ISIS).
Islam literally genocided the Copts in Egypt and destroyed this historical nation.
al-Qaeda did the 11 September 2001 (US)
11 March 2004 (Madrid train bombings): 191 killed.
12 October 2002 (Bali bombings): 202 killed.
13 November 2015 (Paris attacks, including Bataclan): 130 killed (Islamic State)
Islam is cancer.
Ottoman Empire and the Caliphates did harmed unimaginably the world and went the sciences and human progression 1.000 years back into darkness. Constantinople went from the most advanced city (The richest and most advanced city for 1.000 years) to the most underdeveloped city under the muslim rule (after the fall in 1453). Every single country in Africa and Middle East is now a destroyed country because of you. Lebanon was the Paris of Middle East. Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq all the cities were proud and beautiful. Islam brought only death and destruction.
You provide nothing to our world therefore you deserve nothing.
- Homer Pavlos
11 milyon insan öldüren Hitler müslüman değildi .
20 milyon insan öldüren Stalin müslüman değildi .
20milyon insan öldüren Mao müslüman değildi.
200 bin insanı öldügü Hiroşima ve Nagazaki'ye atom bombasını müslümanlar atmadı.
3 milyon insanın öldüğü Kamboçya'daki savaşı müslümanlar yapmadı.
12 milyon insanın öldüğü Irak'taki savaş müslümanlar yüzünden olmadı
500 bin ölümün olduğu Bosna ve Kosova savaşını Müslümanlar baslatmadı.
400 bin insanı öldüren Musolini müslüman değildi.
Milyonlarca insanın öldüğü Afğanistan'daki savaşı müslümanlar baslatmadı .
17 milyon insanin öldüğü 1.ci Dünya savaşını Müslümanlar başlatmadı.
55 milyon insanın öldüğü 2.ci Dünya savaşını müslümanlar baslatmadı .
Ruanda katliamini müslümanlar yapamadı
Cezeyir soykırımını müslümanlar yapamadı .
Sizce terörist kim ?
Jim Matkin retweeted
🇪🇺 Séisme industriel en Europe : l'interdiction des moteurs thermiques en 2035 est officiellement morte.
🇫🇷🇩🇪 L'axe franco-allemand a tranché en faveur du pragmatisme économique face à l'idéalisme climatique.
Voici le décryptage de cet accord historique et du "donnant-donnant" entre Paris et Berlin. 👇
🛑 Le mur des réalités
L'Europe risquait la désindustrialisation face au rouleau compresseur chinois 🇨🇳 (BYD, MG..) qui domine la chaîne de valeur du 100 % électrique. Le passage forcé au "tout-batterie" se heurtait à une demande grand public en berne, freinée par des prix inaccessibles et la baisse des subventions. L'Europe a compris qu'elle ne pouvait pas décarboner en détruisant sa principale industrie.
🇩🇪 La victoire allemande : La survie par la technologie
Pour le chancelier Merz et l'industrie allemande, c'est la fin d'un dogme mortifère. Berlin obtient le retour à la neutralité technologique :
🔹 Les moteurs thermiques survivront grâce à l'hybridation et aux carburants de synthèse (e-fuels).
🔹 L'excellence mécanique allemande et le Mittelstand (le puissant réseau de PME sous-traitantes) sont sauvés.
🇫🇷 La contrepartie française : Protectionnisme et Nucléaire
Paris n'a pas signé de chèque en blanc. En échange de cet assouplissement, la France a arraché 4 victoires stratégiques majeures :
🔹 La sauvegarde de la voiture populaire : Maintenir des citadines hybrides abordables (Renault, Peugeot) pour éviter une crise sociale brutale sur la mobilité (le spectre des Gilets Jaunes).
🔹 Le "Buy European Act" : L'Allemagne, historiquement hostile au protectionnisme par peur des représailles, accepte un front commun européen contre le dumping automobile chinois (éco-conditionnalité, barrières tarifaires).
🔹 La "Vallée de la batterie" sécurisée : Les milliards investis dans les gigafactories françaises (Hauts-de-France) sont garantis par des quotas de flottes d'entreprises et une préférence pour les cellules européennes.
🔹 Le triomphe de l'atome : L'Allemagne lâche du lest sur le nucléaire. L'électricité atomique est reconnue pour produire l'hydrogène "bas carbone" indispensable aux futurs e-fuels automobiles.
🛑 L'Allemagne sauve son génie mécanique, la France protège son marché populaire et impose son modèle électrique. L'Europe 🇪🇺 passe enfin à un pragmatisme de survie : la transition écologique se fera, mais pas au prix d'un suicide géopolitique.
#Automobile #Industrie #Europe #Geopolitique #Climat
Jim Matkin retweeted
The leftists unlocked the key to their leftist conquest:
Every city, in every part of North America, requires cheap low-skill labor from South America, Africa, South Asia.. They also require high-skill cheap labor (Ph.Ds from fake universities from South Asia and Middle East).. All for Hospitals, Academia, or low-skill for Hospitality/Hotels, Office Cleaning, City-Services, everything -- every city is becoming more leftists every single month. Every single city. Canada / UK is much worse but it's happening in the US.
Jim Matkin retweeted
Yes Peter, perfectly said "Socialism has become aligned to new globalism: controlling industrial policy, rationing energy access and demanding trillions in cross-border wealth redistribution - code for the UN-controlled carbon credits scheme".
#climatescam
When you peel back the layers of extreme worst-case scenarios, the picture becomes clear: we are witnessing an unprecedented transfer of wealth and sovereignty, designed to secure political control before the climate narrative bubble bursts.
Today, people everywhere face a carefully manicured double barrier: an energy agenda shrouded in dense scientific jargon, and a United Nations framework that is utterly opaque. Just voicing a valid common-sense concern has been effectively criminalised. The greatest weapon of this climate campaign is its deliberate complexity.
These same actors are quietly dismantling national sovereignty and replacing local democracy with a centralised, unaccountable regime. This is not just bureaucratic overreach; it is a psychological operation executed through calculated PR hits.
When the UN leadership deploys terms like 'global boiling,' it signals a shift from empirical debate to emotional blackmail. By anchoring public policy to extreme scenarios, the architects of this agenda aim to manufacture a permanent state of hyper-emergency.
Under the banner of saving the planet, a deeper political transformation is taking place. Behind the visible leadership of figures like António Guterres stands a vast, unelected apparatus - thousands of faceless bureaucrats embedded within the UN payroll. Beyond them lies an eager corporate sector, waiting to cash in on an energy transition projected to absorb $275 trillion.
This supranational network operates a form of ultra-socialism on a global scale. Socialism has become aligned to new globalism: controlling industrial policy, rationing energy access and demanding trillions in cross-border wealth redistribution - code for the UN-controlled carbon credits scheme.
Jim Matkin retweeted
Amis étrangers, je vous explique pourquoi les français manifestent autant et si efficacement.
1/ En France socialiste, manifester est devenue le meilleur moyen d'améliorer son niveau de vie.
L'Etat contrôle 57% de l'économie. La France est #1 mondial en termes de dépenses publiques par habitant.
La France est un pays crypto-communiste où l'Etat contrôle la tirelire.
Donc pour avoir accès à la tirelire public, il faut soit voter soit manifester.
Le vote est phagocyté par le bloc retraité et pré-retraité qui représente de très loin le plus gros bloc électoral et s'attire sans violences les subsides étatiques.
Pour le reste, La manifestation est la méthode la plus adéquate pour se faire entendre par les élites.
Particularité du communisme à la française, il est relativement libertaire en termes de maintien de l'ordre et autorise de manifester sans finir au Goulag.
Donc, tout le monde s'y met naturellement.
Chaque euro gagné par le travail au-dessus du salaire minimum est taxé à 70%.
Chaque chèque de subvention est peu ou pas taxé.
Le français reste un homo economicus comme les autres. Le choix de manifester est vite fait car c'est le meilleur choix rationnel à court terme.
2/ Il y a une incitation très forte à tout casser et à faire un maximum de grabuge.
Vu que tout le monde manifeste et se plaint, l'Etat ne sait plus où donner de la tête.
Malgré des moyens quasi-illimités, l'Etat français ne peut pas donner de l'argent à tout le monde.
Il doit choisir.
Alors il choisit de de flêcher ses aides vers les groupes les plus bruyants, les plus destructeurs et qui menacent le plus la sécurité des élites.
Naturellement se lance une surenchère pour savoir qui sera le "meilleur manifestant".
Depuis quelques décennies, un groupe se détache clairement par sa capacité à tout casser: le jeune de banlieue issu de l'immigration.
Nos politiques sont effrayés (à raison) et envoient toujours plus de milliards d'euros vers les quartiers à majorité issue de l'immigration.
Comme ça marche, il y a une incitation à toujours plus casser et terrifier.
Un cercle vicieux, sans fin
3/ Les prisons sont pleines et l'Etat français est incapable de simplement concevoir le nombre de places indispensables à un maintien de l'ordre basique.
De très dangereux criminels sont tous les jours relachés faute de places.
Pour un juge français, mettre un manifestant en prison pour un "simple" pillage ou une charge sur la police apparaît comme tout simplement saugrenu.
Donc forcément, tout le monde continue.
Casser et brûler sont devenus une sorte de divertissement sans risque pour une partie de la jeunesse
4/ Peut-être le plus important, la manifestation et la révolte sont perçues comme des actes romantiques en France.
Que ce soit à l'école, dans les livres, dans les films, dans les médias, la révolution et la "lutte populaire" sont portées aux nues.
L'histoire du pays est présentée comme celle d'un peuple qui s'est battu contre ses élites pour arracher toujours plus de droits.
Nos romans les plus célèbres magnifient les révolutions.
Notre tableau le plus célèbre représente des barricades en plein Paris.
Nos élites vivent encore sur le souvenir romantisé de Mai 1968.
Manifester n'est pas un "trouble de l'ordre public" mais un devoir pour tout français qui se respecte.
En temps normal, la France pouvait gérer sans problème ces manifestations incessantes et des révoltes épisodiques.
Cela faisait presque partie du "folklore" du pays.
Sauf qu'on arrive à la fin d'un cycle.
L'Etat est en situation de quasi faillite et ne peut plus se permettre de donner plus.
Les changements démographiques rapides font courrir un véritable risque de guerre civile au pays
Tout le monde le sent. La nature des revendications change et devient de plus en plus agressive.
Le pays pourra-il sortir de ce cycle infernal?
Rien n'est moins sûr.
