The govts have all been bribed or blackmailed decades ago. All the politicians are actors. They're not coming to save you. The world is being turned into a slavery economy. You need a lifetime blood contract with the global mob to get out of it, most politicians don't have one.

Today, the most brilliant, visionary engineering minds in the world are making the exact same mistake pioneers made in the late 1800s. @elonmusk, in 1900 Clinton Edgar Woods published The Electric Automobile: Its Construction, Care and Operation written right as the 1890s electric vehicle boom outsold gasoline cars across America. In it, Woods laid out how electric machines work and warned that the entire industry would collapse unless builders prioritized the power stations and grid infrastructure required to sustain their genius. They didn’t, and within ten years that first electric revolution was wiped out. Now we are watching the exact same blind spot play out with AI data centers. @elonmusk, you have developed one of the most transformative and potentially profitable technologies in human history, yet failed to prioritize the infrastructure required to sustain it responsibly. Data centers consume enormous amounts of electricity and, depending on their cooling systems, millions of gallons of water while communities already face water scarcity, aging electrical grids, and rising energy costs. Technologies such as closed-loop cooling, liquid immersion systems, wastewater reuse, and dedicated low-carbon power generation already exist. They require investment, engineering, and strategic planning, not scientific miracles. If you can assemble the world’s greatest minds to revolutionize artificial intelligence, you can assemble them to solve its infrastructure challenges. Stop treating environmental and grid sustainability as an obstacle to innovation when it should be a fundamental engineering requirement. Slow expansion if necessary, invest in better systems, and stop transferring the infrastructure costs of your success onto communities. Intelligence without foresight is not progress. You cannot claim to be building humanity’s future while exhausting the resources humanity needs to have one. (Woods’s 1900 handbook is in my pinned archive on my profile.)

It's a long read, but lays out EVERYTHING Mark Carney is doing. EVERY Canadian needs to read this.

No @jneill lockdowns were the response to false PCR results. We had a whole warehouse doing nothing in Canning Town and hospital stuff, so bored they were doing TikTok dances.

On the Elon Musk platform, get paid for Holocaust denial. 😎$$

In 2013, one of the most famous anchors in America gave her daytime show to a mother whose healthy 21-year-old was found dead in bed 18 days after a Gardasil shot. Pharma's response was swift. Two weeks later, the show's cancellation was announced. 🧵

JUST IN: Joe Rogan proposes putting world leaders in a room together on psychedelic mushrooms to end wars & achieve global denuclearization.

And since you dont trust historians here is sociologist of fascism Michael Mann detailing how overwhelmingly Nazi militants described Marxists/communists/socialists as their main enemy

Ukraine is "wisely" full of Nazis. Thank you for that admission. That's precisely the point Zelensky made in the interview with Fox News that you pretended not to see. The Nazi battalions are fully integrated into the Ukrainian armed forces. xitter.cf/CincinnatusPax/status/…

Yes. Pinochet's regime after the 1973 coup against Allende's socialist government systematically targeted Marxists, socialists and other leftists. Thousands were killed, tortured or disappeared; many more fled into exile. Franco and the Nazis likewise suppressed socialists and Marxists as primary opponents.

Elon Musk is promoting a video that rewrites the history of Nazism to suit today’s far right. Here’s what happened in 1933, who made the video, and why it matters. Within weeks of Hitler taking power in January 1933, the organised left was being dismantled. Communists, Social Democrats and trade unionists were rounded up, and Dachau opened in March, initially to imprison political opponents, above all Communists. On 2 May the Nazis smashed the independent trade unions and replaced them with the state-controlled German Labour Front. A week later, students burned the works of Marx and Kautsky, with a fire oath declaring itself “against class struggle and materialism”. Dachau’s first murders came on 12 April 1933, when the SS shot four Jewish prisoners: Rudolf Benario, Ernst Goldmann, Arthur Kahn and Erwin Kahn. Benario and Goldmann were young left-wing activists from Fürth. The very rich were treated differently. Many industrialists had feared the Nazis were socialists, so in January 1932 Hitler addressed Düsseldorf’s Industry Club, playing down his antisemitism and stressing his anti-Marxism to reassure them. Few backed him openly until he took power. On 20 February 1933, Hitler met leading industrialists, Gustav Krupp among them, and told them: “Private enterprise cannot be maintained in the age of democracy.” It was conceivable, he said, only where people had “a sound idea of authority and personality”. They contributed more than two million Reichsmarks to the election fund of Hitler’s coalition. Private ownership was preserved for compliant industrialists, company profits rose sharply, and in the mid-1930s the regime even sold state stakes in banks, steelworks and shipping back into private hands. In 1934, Hitler also had members of his own movement who took its anti-capitalist rhetoric seriously murdered during the Night of the Long Knives. Yes, the Nazis controlled prices, wages and investment, as Britain did in wartime. State control tells you how an economy is run, and the question that matters is whom it serves. The Nazi state crushed independent labour, protected compliant employers, and harnessed the economy to rearmament and conquest. That is why historians place Nazism on the far right, including conservatives such as Ernst Nolte, who saw anti-Marxism as fascism’s defining feature. The word in the party’s name was largely a recruiting device, designed to lure workers away from the real socialist and communist parties. A name settles nothing, any more than North Korea’s makes it democratic. The man Musk is amplifying is Brivael Le Pogam, the Paris-based co-founder of Argil, a Silicon Valley-backed company selling AI video avatars, who boasts of using AI to win hundreds of millions of views. His self-described “masterclass” spends minutes on price controls and the voting habits of American professors. It never once mentions the Holocaust. Race appears once, as “fuel”. He is candid about why. With Hitler on the right, he complains, anyone defending “borders” or “the nation” is “one step away from fascism”. That is “why Milei is far right” and “why people call Elon Musk a Nazi”. A nationalist politics is to be cleansed by relabelling history’s most murderous nationalist. He even cites Leo Strauss’s “reductio ad Hitlerum”, the fallacy of condemning an idea because Hitler held it, and then commits it from start to finish. And his test of freedom is simply the free market, which would place Pinochet’s Chile, with its torture and disappearances, on the side of freedom. So the world’s richest man is promoting an attempt to free the far right from its own history, turning the Nazis’ first victims into props for their persecutors. History records which side Germany’s richest men chose in 1933. It’s worth noticing who is now keen to blur it. It’s polished, confident and wrong, and it’s built to divide: anyone who objects is cast as the enemy of freedom. Freedom for whom? Remember who filled Dachau first.

Lawyer Peter Stassen seems sincere, but he’s evidently following a theory of the case that hinges on Covid being “faked.” Q. If the lawsuit’s assertion fails that COVID or the pandemic was fake, does the whole case fail? Claude: A. Practically, the core case is highly likely to fail. Under Dutch tort principles, plaintiffs must prove an unlawful act (or omission), fault/negligence, causation, and damages. Their pleaded theory is tightly integrated around the premise of a false emergency/project narrative used to induce uptake of injections that were deliberately unsafe or weaponized. If a court finds COVID-19 was a genuine pandemic (supported by extensive epidemiological, clinical, and excess-mortality data) to which vaccines were developed and authorized as countermeasures with contemporaneous risk-benefit assessments, the foundational claim of deliberate deception about the nature of the threat collapses. The bioweapon characterization, genocide-level intent, and group conspiracy elements become extremely difficult to sustain without that premise, and specific causation linking particular defendants’ statements or actions to the plaintiffs’ alleged injuries is weakened. Narrower residual arguments (e.g., isolated misstatements about specific safety data or individual product-liability-style claims) could theoretically remain, but the case as presented and the volume of evidence emphasized by the plaintiffs rest heavily on the overarching “not a real pandemic / Great Reset / bioweapon” framing. Defendants deny the allegations and maintain the measures and products were appropriate responses in a real public-health crisis. In short, the “no real pandemic” element is not a peripheral detail; it is central to the theory of liability the plaintiffs have advanced. // Thus, this case may be designed to fail and let Gates, Rutte, and others off for their roles in forcing Covid shots on the world.

Elon Musk is promoting a video that rewrites the history of Nazism to suit today’s far right. Here’s what happened in 1933, who made the video, and why it matters. Within weeks of Hitler taking power in January 1933, the organised left was being dismantled. Communists, Social Democrats and trade unionists were rounded up, and Dachau opened in March, initially to imprison political opponents, above all Communists. On 2 May the Nazis smashed the independent trade unions and replaced them with the state-controlled German Labour Front. A week later, students burned the works of Marx and Kautsky, with a fire oath declaring itself “against class struggle and materialism”. Dachau’s first murders came on 12 April 1933, when the SS shot four Jewish prisoners: Rudolf Benario, Ernst Goldmann, Arthur Kahn and Erwin Kahn. Benario and Goldmann were young left-wing activists from Fürth. The very rich were treated differently. Many industrialists had feared the Nazis were socialists, so in January 1932 Hitler addressed Düsseldorf’s Industry Club, playing down his antisemitism and stressing his anti-Marxism to reassure them. Few backed him openly until he took power. On 20 February 1933, Hitler met leading industrialists, Gustav Krupp among them, and told them: “Private enterprise cannot be maintained in the age of democracy.” It was conceivable, he said, only where people had “a sound idea of authority and personality”. They contributed more than two million Reichsmarks to the election fund of Hitler’s coalition. Private ownership was preserved for compliant industrialists, company profits rose sharply, and in the mid-1930s the regime even sold state stakes in banks, steelworks and shipping back into private hands. In 1934, Hitler also had members of his own movement who took its anti-capitalist rhetoric seriously murdered during the Night of the Long Knives. Yes, the Nazis controlled prices, wages and investment, as Britain did in wartime. State control tells you how an economy is run, and the question that matters is whom it serves. The Nazi state crushed independent labour, protected compliant employers, and harnessed the economy to rearmament and conquest. That is why historians place Nazism on the far right, including conservatives such as Ernst Nolte, who saw anti-Marxism as fascism’s defining feature. The word in the party’s name was largely a recruiting device, designed to lure workers away from the real socialist and communist parties. A name settles nothing, any more than North Korea’s makes it democratic. The man Musk is amplifying is Brivael Le Pogam, the Paris-based co-founder of Argil, a Silicon Valley-backed company selling AI video avatars, who boasts of using AI to win hundreds of millions of views. His self-described “masterclass” spends minutes on price controls and the voting habits of American professors. It never once mentions the Holocaust. Race appears once, as “fuel”. He is candid about why. With Hitler on the right, he complains, anyone defending “borders” or “the nation” is “one step away from fascism”. That is “why Milei is far right” and “why people call Elon Musk a Nazi”. A nationalist politics is to be cleansed by relabelling history’s most murderous nationalist. He even cites Leo Strauss’s “reductio ad Hitlerum”, the fallacy of condemning an idea because Hitler held it, and then commits it from start to finish. And his test of freedom is simply the free market, which would place Pinochet’s Chile, with its torture and disappearances, on the side of freedom. So the world’s richest man is promoting an attempt to free the far right from its own history, turning the Nazis’ first victims into props for their persecutors. History records which side Germany’s richest men chose in 1933. It’s worth noticing who is now keen to blur it. It’s polished, confident and wrong, and it’s built to divide: anyone who objects is cast as the enemy of freedom. Freedom for whom? Remember who filled Dachau first.

ELEPHANT was released 23 years ago today. Gus Van Sant’s austere, long-take drama won both the Palme d’Or and Best Director at Cannes, yet its refusal to explain or sensationalize school violence still divides audiences.

“A LEAKED DOCUMENT REVEALS HOW FAR CARNEY WANTS TO GO WITH THE EU. Digital IDs. Artificial intelligence. Your personal information. Pandemic surveillance. Even the rules governing Canadian businesses. This isn’t speculation. A draft Canada–EU joint statement, dated September 22, 2026, was circulated to European officials ahead of the October 29–30 summit in Montreal. The document was obtained by POLITICO and subsequently reported on by The Canadian Press on October 15. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms has also raised concerns about its implications for Canadian sovereignty. Here’s what’s being discussed: 🇨🇦 Digital identity: Making Canadian and European digital identification systems compatible. Artificial intelligence: Aligning AI regulations and standards. Personal information: Facilitating cross-border data transfers. Pandemic preparedness: Expanding disease surveillance and emergency-response cooperation. Government regulation: Joint discussions on major policies and regulations before they’re introduced. That last point should concern every Canadian. Why should European officials be involved in discussions about Canadian regulations before Canadians even see them?”

DO MOST EVEN KNOW THIS? Since 2022, we've trained 68,000 Ukrainian troops in Britain. That's an extraordinary number roughly equivalent to our regular army. Various hacks are ongoing too & we get doomsday instructions on emergency rations. What's going on? Are we at war now?