Kavitha Murali retweeted
OK just how many ants are in this kitchen???? reuters.com/technology/forme…
Kavitha Murali retweeted
A moment of silence for the disrespect we tolerate at work just for the salary.
Kavitha Murali retweeted
Wait, when they said Viksit Bharat by 2047, were they referring to the year or the AQI?
Kavitha Murali retweeted
Heard a remarkable story about management consulting, women's empowerment, and motorcycles. Fasten your seat belts.
Kavitha Murali retweeted
Consider the implications of the proposed LRS restrictions.
An NRI may be able to repatriate up to USD 1 million annually from eligible NRO balances, subject to conditions. Under the proposed framework being discussed, a resident Indian could face a ₹50 lakh ceiling for current-account remittances and no automatic-route facility for capital-account remittances.
If NRIs were also granted more favourable long-term capital gains treatment, the disparity in financial flexibility could widen further.
An Indian taxi driver in the UAE could enjoy greater freedom to move eligible wealth across borders than a doctor or engineer earning, saving and paying taxes in India.
But the economic consequences extend beyond fairness.
Restrict residents’ ability to build and diversify wealth, and you risk making households more cautious about spending on homes, cars, travel, education and other goods and services. Weaker consumption can weigh on business revenues, investment and employment.
Capital controls may seek to conserve foreign exchange. But if they also discourage wealth creation and weaken household confidence, the wider economic trade-offs deserve serious scrutiny.
Also forcing Indians to confine their capital to domestic markets will only inflate Indian real estate beyond the reach of the common man and create exit liquidity for FIIs in the equity market.
You cannot squeeze the avenues for wealth creation, constrain financial mobility and expect domestic consumption to keep powering growth indefinitely. That is how a policy intended to protect the economy risks becoming a race to the bottom.
@1shankarsharma @WeekendInvestng @ActusDei @suchetadalal @manoj_216
Kavitha Murali retweeted
Applications for WINBoard 5.0 are open!
As a woman leader, you already drive huge impact. WINBoard 5.0, presented with XLRI Delhi-NCR through CGEIL, equips you with the knowledge, practice & connections to take that expertise to the boardroom.
Apply now:
winboard-afh.com
Kavitha Murali retweeted
made my first apple pay transaction today. felt weird initially, but was smooth. might end up spending more than i did via UPI.
Latest article on Girl At Work: Workplace Bridges - Build or Burn? #workingwomen #relationships
girlatwork.substack.com/p/is…
39
Kavitha Murali retweeted
One of the wildest "what could have been" story for India’s venture capital industry..
That’s because back in 2009, three venture firms - Elevation Capital (then SAIF Partners), Tiger Global and Norwest Venture Partners - collectively held about 10% stake in NSE.
But when NSE lists on September 24 at Rs 4.42 lakh crore ($46 billion) valuation, these firms won’t be seen prominently on its cap table in what is India's second largest IPO.
The three firms had all picked up the stake at a valuation of around Rs 10,000-15,000 crore ($1-1.6 billion as per exchange rates now) for NSE.
This would have meant over 40 times returns by now, and an outcome collectively worth over Rs 40,000 crore or about $4.5 billion at the IPO.
While SAIF had picked up the largest stake (5%) in 2007, Tiger (3%) and Norwest (2%) picked up post financial crisis in 2009.
But then came the long wait for an IPO.
By late 2015 and early 2016, foreign investors sent formal notices to the NSE board saying that the management was "dragging its feet" on its listing. NSE management was resisting because law required it to cross-list on a rival exchange (like the BSE), exposing them to a competitor's regulation.
By December 2016, NSE filed for an IPO at Rs 45,000 crore valuation. But it was shelved after the co-location data-access scandal triggered years of SEBI show-cause notices and the governance saga around former CEO Chitra Ramkrishna. The plans for listing stayed frozen.
Rather than wait it out, most of these investors started selling down gradually from 2018-19 given the typical venture fund life is 10-12 years.
By 2023, they sold off their shares in tranches, when the peak grey-market valuation for NSE was roughly Rs 1.9 lakh crore ($20 billion).
This would mean that they would have made about 8x to 16x returns for all these investors - which are still good returns.
But not close to over 40x they would have made through the IPO if they still held stake, given the valuation surge over the last few years.
Tiger Global is the exception among the three, as it still holds 0.64% stake after partially exiting most of its holding over the years. It is not selling in the IPO.
This unsold stake is worth Rs 2,830 crore ($300 million) at the IPO price.
Kavitha Murali retweeted
Three basic life saving measures in our country - never do adventure sports, avoid attending large religious gatherings, never argue on the road with strangers even if they're wrong.
8-year-old among 2 dead in electrocution incident in Ganapati pandal in Mumbai's Lalbaug; 4 injured
livemint.com/news/india/8yea…
Thamizha Thamizha on the Veena. Tougher than I thought it’d be but also easier once I cracked the bit. #music @arrahman #veena
youtu.be/dCpJK8FssGA?si=g8MJ…
1
201






















