Pinned Tweet
Here is mine:
Check out my budget personality! Play the game to find out yours: futurebudget.org/personality…
Andre de Souza retweeted
Such a difference to have Rashee Rice back. Gotta have more depth overall, but this is such a big difference than Week 7.
Andre de Souza retweeted
Because it’s not about quality of play. Again, everyone wanted accountability and standards the last few years. Now he does it and no one likes it. What does this fanbase want? Getting benched for an entire game and now he’s getting benched again and it’s the coach’s fault, not the player’s? We need to be asking what Kingsley is doing that’s causing multiple benchings in one month.
Andre de Souza retweeted
Offensive line is struggling. LT doesn’t want to work, LG doesn’t show up to work on time, and the center can’t snap
Andre de Souza retweeted
Creed Humphrey might be the best center in the NFL, but he has at least one of those snaps every single week. It’s baffling.
This guy should just go away. I can't buy RAM because of his bullshit.
Andre de Souza retweeted
funny how we worry basic income will make people stop working but never ask that about inheritance
This is a lot of words to be wrong. In ranked choice voting, if republicans were really confused as to which Dan was the one they wanted, they would just put both as 1 and 2.
The Alaska ballot situation is unique because of its Rank Choice Voting. If it was First Past the Post, the inclusion of a similarly named Independent or Third Party candidate to the Republican candidate wouldn't be that big of deal, because what few votes such a candidate took away from the Republican would get balanced out by the votes that would get taken away from the Democratic candidate. And that's why this unprecedented situation doesn't have any neat laws to deal with it.
But with RCV, it's an entirely different reality, since voters for whom the Republican candidate isn't the first choice might still choose that candidate as their second or third choice, Democratic voters can choose their candidate first and the potemkin candidate as their second to inflate the distortion, and the entire model of voting gets corrupted as the Republican candidate loses votes for first, second, third, and on down the list, with the impact on the integrity of the vote getting more pronounced with each simulated runoff. It conpletely turns the benefit of RCV upside down by ensuring muddied runoff results for one contender in hopes that the other benefits.
In my view, since we now know this was coordinated, this is most definitely an attempt to defraud voters. But how Alaska deals with the situation is anyone's guess because, as I said, the laws are not well equipped to handle this novel question.
At the very least, I hope the recruited pretender is suspended as a legitimate candidate, and if the ballots cannot be corrected in this short window, then an effort should be made to notify the public and some kind of understanding made where the Republican candidate gets at least a portion if not all the votes that might still go to the recruited pretender.
"It seems to me that you have an election, the person who wins the most votes should win"
OH REALLY VANCE? Are you sure you want to go this route?
JD Vance on ranked choice voting: "I don't understand it. It seems to me that you have an election, the person who wins the most votes should win. That seems to be not what happens with ranked choice voting. The fact that it's so confusing to a person who pays pretty close attention to politics I think suggests we should do our elections in, like, the normal way."
Andre de Souza retweeted
Untitled (flipped), by Georges Mathieu, mid-20th century, 📸 by @scottrovak
Andre de Souza retweeted
Kansas Democrats picking up the phone when a pollster calls
We polled Kansas. Democrats wanted to talk. Republicans, not so much. Gift link -> wapo.st/4yUVruu

























