I’m not going to deny my past mistakes. Yes, my research is fully AI-assisted, and yes, I made many mistakes last year. I’ve acknowledged them and apologized to Immunefi privately countless times. But those mistakes are precisely what allowed me to improve my AI-assisted research workflow and become the researcher I am today. People make mistakes. People learn. People evolve. My current track record speaks for itself, and I’m not hiding any part of my past. Immunefi itself introduced a program to give banned researchers who had improved their skills a second chance. Isn’t that exactly what this program was created for? Despite my independently verifiable portfolio, I haven’t even been given the opportunity to demonstrate that progress. And what disappoints me most is that Yassine personally promised to review my case and provide an answer by the end of September. He also offered to help me report vulnerabilities in the meantime. Neither commitment was honored. Instead, I was repeatedly ignored and ultimately blocked. And since you mentioned @0xTimofey, I encourage you to contact him. I’m currently working on vulnerability reports involving companies collaborating with CertiK. Feel free to ask him for a reference regarding my current research and professionalism. I’m not asking you to erase my history or excuse my mistakes. I’ve taken responsibility for them many times. I’m simply asking you to recognize that people can genuinely improve and to honor the second chance your own program was designed to offer.