Muzz C (@MuzzC1) header
Muzz C (@MuzzC1) profile picture

Zetatalk https://teapawt.org/t.co/CPsczn1iJJ and https://teapawt.org/t.co/NSzQKAnbJ1 Satire Account

Joined April 2022
Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)Photo by Muzz C (@MuzzC1)
Dear @Westpac, I recently helped a friend move money to crypto exchange.... Thanks to imposed $10k monthly limit. This limit is not to help, it is control. Scammers will always scam, people will always gamble. Do you also limit pensioners using their westpac account at gambling venues? Let's be honest, you just dislike deposits leaving your bank. To all the readers here is hoe you easily get around this: 1. Open a Revolut bank account 2. Move whatever you like there max $20k a day 3. Transfer from Revolut to your favourite crypto exchange. Then you will lrealise, hey, I can just use Revolt and close your Westpac account.
6
4
68
5,602
Muzz C retweeted
BREAKING: Anthony Albanese has been caught red handed trying to buy off a One Nation MP with a $200k taxpayer funded staffer. Pauline Hanson immediately shut it down. Anthony Albanese secretly offered David Farley, the Member for Farrer, an unsolicited Personal Adviser 3 position, worth up to $200,000, in a letter dated 26 October. Hand delivered to his Parliament House office. Farley never asked for it. No reason was given. It sat completely outside One Nation’s long running request for fair, transparent staffing. For months One Nation has been demanding an objective, independent process so the Prime Minister doesn’t personally control the resources available to his political opponents. Albanese ignored those calls. Then he went behind Pauline Hanson’s back with private meetings he initiated, followed by this side deal. Pauline Hanson’s response was blunt: “David did not request this allocation of staff. No reason was provided by the Prime Minister, these actions have left David and One Nation deeply concerned that the government is seeking to use taxpayer funds to exert undue political influence over politicians. We have decided to expose these grubby dealings because the public deserves to know what the Albanese Labor government is doing behind closed doors.” Farley rejected the offer outright and told the PM that all future talks go through Pauline Hanson. One Nation will not be bought or divided. This is the same Prime Minister who has weaponised staffing allocations while stonewalling One Nation’s legitimate requests for equity. Pauline has stood firm, the PM should not personally control the resources available to those whose job is to scrutinise him. One Nation will always put Australians first, not Canberra power plays. Albanese’s office still hasn’t properly explained why the offer was made. Classic Albanese, control, divide, and hope no one notices. Pauline Hanson and One Nation just put the public interest ahead of a personal perk. That’s the difference.
26
156
8
546
7,482
BINGO!
11-3-26 elections are part of a HUGE teaching moment for the sleepers👇It's gonna be rough.
20
1
122
1,630
Epstein is still alive at GITMO! In public Epstein is dead. Outside the public eye Epstein is alive and being held by The White Hats at GITMO! The question is how long will Epstein remain alive?
🚨 BREAKING: JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S BROTHER JUST SAID TRUMP MIGHT BE BEHIND HIS DEATH - ON LIVE TV. On Piers Morgan, Mark Epstein dropped this: “Maybe Trump is behind it. I wouldn’t write that off.”
4
26
1
83
3,121
Muzz C retweeted
WHERE IS THE REAL VLADIMIR PUTIN? 👀 Take a very close look at these two photographs of Vladimir Putin, from 2009 and 2015. Just six years separate them, yet the differences in his facial appearance are startling. Study the eyes, nose, forehead, cheeks and jawline. Do these really look like the same face to you? There are also circulating allegations that Putin was arrested, taken to Guantánamo Bay (GITMO), subjected to a military tribunal and executed. THE FACE SHAPE: The 2009 photograph shows a longer, leaner face with a more angular appearance through the cheeks and lower jaw. In 2015, the face appears noticeably broader and rounder, particularly around the cheekbones and lower half. THE EYES AND EYEBROWS: Look closely at the eyes. In 2009, they appear more open and rounded, with prominent under-eye lines and distinctly shaped brows. In 2015, the eyes look narrower and more hooded, with a flatter, heavier brow area. The entire expression around the eyes looks remarkably different. THE FOREHEAD AND HAIRLINE: The earlier photograph reveals a high, shiny forehead, pronounced temple contours and clearly visible horizontal lines. The later portrait shows a smoother forehead, differently arranged hair and a softer appearance around the temples. The change in overall facial framing is particularly noticeable. THE NOSE: In the 2009 image, the nose appears slimmer, with a more sharply defined bridge and tip. In the 2015 portrait, the lower nose looks broader and more rounded. Compare the shape of the nostrils and the transition from the nose into the upper lip. THE MOUTH AND LIPS: The earlier image shows a slightly open mouth, a comparatively thin upper lip and pronounced lines running towards the corners. The later portrait shows a closed-mouth smile, with fuller-looking lips and a softer appearance around the mouth. THE CHEEKS, JAWLINE AND CHIN: Perhaps one of the biggest apparent differences. The earlier face has pronounced hollows beneath the eyes, stronger facial contours and a narrower lower jaw. The later face appears fuller through the cheeks, with a softer jawline and rounder chin. The overall silhouette looks substantially different. THE SKIN AND FACIAL TEXTURE: The earlier photograph reveals prominent forehead creases, fine lines around the eyes and uneven facial texture. The later portrait looks considerably smoother, although image enhancement may account for some of that difference. Look at the photographs again. Compare the facial proportions, the eyes and the shape of the lower face. The differences deserve a closer examination, even though photographs alone cannot establish that a substitution occurred. If the allegations about Putin's arrest and execution were true, who would we be looking at today? WHERE IS PUTIN? 👀
39
59
6
153
6,642
We won't confirm nor deny
CENTRAL CASTING: IS MARTIN SHORT PLAYING HILLARY CLINTON? 👀🎭 Two remarkably similar faces. The same broad smile, comparable facial dimensions and strikingly similar expressions. Imagine what Hollywood's finest prosthetics and a carefully fitted latex mask could achieve 👺
8
32
3
200
2,804
Replying to @MuzzC1
Following
1
1
7
Replying to @MuzzC1
Head rolled 💯
1
2
42
She met her Twin and its Head rolled
And executed shortly after that
1
1
61
BINGO!
Executed and was not a lady - inversion - the Satanic Ritual
1
3
18
1,697
BINGO!
And… you have been executed already
6
23
913
BINGO!
And executed shortly after that
2
14
484
Just got a feeling things are a little off? Do yourself a favour and follow These “Judges” are the inside of the inside - we all are in very good hands teapawt.org/royalmrbadnews?s=11
2
5
14
287
The White Hats will have their actor. BINGO!
In this case this double will be a clone of the original. And white hats will have their actor
6
33
1,713
One Nation would remove Australia from WEF and WHO More reasons to vote One Nation 🇦🇺🇦🇺🧡
9
59
1
380
2,109
Good morning
Доброе утро... #Su30SM
2
19
919
I fall to see any problem here ! Who is it Judges ?
Would be interesting if we name that Celebrity.
1
1
8
217
HAPPY 9 YEAR DELTA OF THE DAY THE HEAD WITCH WAS ARRESTED I KNOW I’LL BE FRONT AND CENTER TO WATCH THE ANALOG VIDEO REEL OF THIS EXECUTION HOW ABOUT YOU
47
192
15
653
10,625
Yes
Yes. And look into the pink ribbon.
1
2
4
150