Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach) header
Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach) profile picture

#Plant ecologist (assistant professor) at @HebrewU . I use experiments, models and #global analyses to study #biodiversity, and #trait distribution.

Rehovot
Joined December 2018
Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)Photo by Niv DeMalach (@NDemalach)
(1) ๐ŸŒฑ Our @Nature paper is finally out! ๐ŸŒฑ Below a quick summary๐Ÿ“š (and a free link) #plants
13
72
4
300
34,653
Here are some thoughts on teaching #statistics to non-statistical students, specifically those in #applied #ecology degrees. Thanks to @willpkay and @TiagoALOMarques for an enjoyable (and not last) collaboration. request pdf here ๐Ÿ‘‰tinyurl.com/33keh22s
5
44
1
135
11,811
Super excited that my last dissertation chapter was just published in Molecular Ecology! We sequenced 800 transcriptomes to see what molecular responses nectar yeast have to priority effects. Check it out!
1
8
25
3,807
I've now shared the experience in a short article ๐Ÿ˜‡ Had to fail to make it to Nature ๐Ÿคฃ My paper was proved wrong. After a sleepless night, here's what I did next nature.com/articles/d41586-0โ€ฆ Thank you so much to Jack Leeming Senior careers editor @Nature for his tremendous help ๐Ÿ˜‰
9
96
17
304
21,664
Are you soon defending your PhD? ๐Ÿ“ขWe are recruiting a "Junior" Postdoc on Plant-Soil Microbiome research in the @BiodiversaPlus Grass4Fun project Join the @Emersys_IRHS team in Angers, France with great partners @ManuDelBaq @PabloGarciaPal @frantecol @vandeHeijdenLab More๐Ÿ‘‡
7
132
5
250
34,895
Niv DeMalach retweeted
My next plant-soil feedback theory paper with @raf_dandrea is out in @Ecology_Letters onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/โ€ฆ -We show that our formulation with an explicit conditionable soil variable leads to a richer set of outcomes than both the std. PSF formulation and LV competition. (1/5)
2
3
27
1,943
2๏ธโƒฃ If ๐ŸŒก๏ธpH reduces biomass ๐Ÿ“‰ but ๐Ÿ’ฆirrigation increases it ๐Ÿ“ˆ, which sign of interaction would we call the interaction? Synergistic or antagonistic? The answer isโ€ฆ itโ€™s completely arbitrary! ๐Ÿ˜ฒ
1
74
[3] Summary โ€“ Synergism occurs when the interaction effect enhances the direction of both factors (i.e., same sign). But when the factors have opposite signs, this definition falls apart! ๐Ÿšซ
71
Niv DeMalach retweeted
The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment of the The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, invites applications for tenure-track faculty positions at all levels commencing from the 2025-2026 academic year. en.hafakulta.agri.huji.ac.ilโ€ฆ
12
5
12
1,946
Great to see our review on measuring microbial interactions out! @JFriedman_micro @TaLivny doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2024.1โ€ฆ We discuss the concept of interactions and its limitations, purposes of measuring interactions, and categorize different indices for quantifying interactions.
2
11
1
63
12,202
New paper on the variable responses of grassland productivity to global change, from field sites on six continents @NutNetGlobal @DragnetGlobal @IntUGrativeBiol @UofG_FfT rdcu.be/dPZ9S
1
15
44
3,082
ืžื›ื™ืจื™ื ืžื™ืฉื”ื• ืฉืžืชืขื ื™ื™ืŸ ื‘ืœื™ืžื•ื“ื™ื ื‘ืชื—ื•ื ื”ื‘ื™ื•ืœื•ื’ื™ื” ืื• ื”ื‘ื™ื•ืœื•ื’ื™ื” ื”ื—ื™ืฉื•ื‘ื™ืช ื‘ืฉื ื” ื”ื‘ืื” ื•ื‘ืขืœ ื‘ื’ืจื•ืช ืจื™ืืœื™ืช ื˜ื•ื‘ื”? ืžื•ื–ืžื ื™ื ืœื‘ื“ื•ืง ืืช ื”ืื•ืคืฆื™ื” ืฉืœ ื—ื˜ื™ื‘ืช ื”ืื’ืจื•-ืื™ื ืคื•ืจืžื˜ื™ืงื” ื”ืคื•ืคื•ืœืจื™ืช ืืฆืœื ื• ื‘ืคืงื•ืœื˜ื” ืœื—ืงืœืื•ืช ื‘ืื•ื ื™ื‘ืจืกื™ื˜ื” ื”ืขื‘ืจื™ืช. ื‘ืื•ืงื˜ื•ื‘ืจ ื ืคืชื— ื”ืžื—ื–ื•ืจ ื”ืฉื™ืฉื™. catalog.huji.ac.il/pages/Webโ€ฆ
ืžืฉืžื—: ืœืคื ื™ 5 ืฉื ื™ื ื”ืงืžื ื• ื‘ืคืงื•ืœื˜ื” ืœื—ืงืœืื•ืช ืžืกืœื•ืœ ืื’ืจื•ืื™ื ืคื•ืจืžื˜ื™ืงื” ืฉืžืฉืœื‘ ื‘ื™ืŸ ื”ื—ื•ื’ื™ื ื”ืฉื•ื ื™ื ืืฆืœื ื• ืขื ืžืชืžื˜ื™ืงื”, ืชื›ื ื•ืช, ืžื“ืขื™ ื”ื ืชื•ื ื™ื, ื‘ื™ื•ืื™ื ืคื•ืจืžื˜ื™ืงื”. ืœืžื—ื–ื•ืจ ื ื’ื™ื™ืกื ื• ื› 10 ืกื˜ื•ื“ื ื˜ื™ื, ื‘ืฉื ื™ ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ืฆืจื™ื›ื™ื ืœื”ืชืงืฉืจ ืœืžื•ืขืžื“ื™ื ืžืชืื™ืžื™ื ื•ืœืฉื›ื ืข ืœื”ืฆื˜ืจืฃ. ื‘ื—ืžื™ืฉื™ ื™ืฉ ืœื ื• 34 ืกื˜ื•ื“ื ื˜ื™ื ืฉืžืชื—ื™ืœื™ื ืืช ื”ืกืžืกื˜ืจ ื‘ื™ื•ื ื
3
13
629
Niv DeMalach retweeted
๐Ÿ™We are hiring, Please share๐Ÿ™ Our lab in the Dept of Entomology at National Taiwan University is looking for motivated Postdocs/PhD students interested in plant-insect interactions (start date flexible). Plz contact [email protected] with your CV attached. Thanks๐Ÿ˜„
16
230
8
453
55,119
Having mostly reviewed stats papers written by ecologists I figured most ecologists were not trained in math notation. Reviewing stats papers written by statisticians has me updating this belief to "everyone should take a second to review math notation." besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiโ€ฆ
4
32
3
146
17,206
Using log(X+1) when estimating population trends is a classic mistakes of many papers in ecology, including famous one published in @Science and @NatureEcoEvo about #insect decline. Why is it a mistake? Because it breaks the interpretability of the slope (trend) as a growth rate.
log(0) = {Drop it, Scale it, Reform it, Invert it, Group it, press it, snap it, work it, quick erase it} or maybe what these authors do instead? @dggoldst academic.oup.com/qje/articleโ€ฆ
1
14
33
6,531
ืžืืžืจ ื—ื“ืฉ ืขืœ ื”ืฉืคืขื•ืช ืื™ืงืœื™ืคื˜ื•ืกื™ื ื‘ื ื’ื‘ ื”ืžืขืจื‘ื™ - ืœื™ื ืง ื‘ืชื’ื•ื‘ื•ืช @hujisustain @HebrewU
1
6
128