NJ StandsUp retweeted
Let’s be clear:
If I’m not going to sleep with you, I don’t need to know anything about your sexuality.
And children—who are not going to sleep with anyone—certainly don’t.
Your sexuality is not sacred. It’s not a personality, it’s not a protected class of performance art, and it’s not the center of anyone’s moral universe but your own. Unless we are in a relationship, I am not obligated to acknowledge, affirm, or be exposed to your private desires—especially not in public, and especially not in front of children.
This used to be understood. Now it’s called hate.
No, We Don’t Owe You an Audience
Sexuality belongs in the private realm. It is intimate by definition. If you feel compelled to wear your kink on your sleeve—or on a float, or in a first-grade classroom—you are not inviting understanding, you are demanding submission. You are violating others’ right not to participate.
Consent doesn’t vanish because your fetish is “progressive.” If anything, the burden is higher.
No one consents to being flashed on the subway. No one consents to a stranger’s arousal. No one consents to a stranger telling their child about masturbation, kink, gender identity, or pornographic categories under the guise of “inclusive sex ed.” Yet all of this is happening now—in public parks, in classrooms, in televised programming.
It is not tolerance. It is invasion.
Children Are Not Here to Validate You
Children are not queer. Children are not sexual. Children do not need to “see themselves represented” in a spectrum of adult desire. This idea—that identity is only valid if sexualized and mirrored—is narcissism, not pedagogy.
There is no legitimate reason to initiate a child into the language of sexual preference, gender identity, or alternative lifestyles. The only people who benefit from that dynamic are those looking to normalize boundary violations.
Let me state it plainly:
Children who are not going to have sex do not need to be exposed to sexuality.
Period.
Any adult who insists otherwise is not confused. They are grooming.
Public Fetishism Is Not Liberation
There is a vast difference between being gay and demanding the right to simulate sex acts in front of children. Between being transgender and insisting on teaching kindergartners about breast removal. Between being proud of who you are and insisting the whole world observe your kink play in the street.
This is not diversity. This is decay.
Men in dog masks being walked on leashes by their lovers are not brave—they are forcing strangers into their psychodrama. This is exhibitionism, and when children are present, it becomes criminal exhibitionism.
We used to know this. Peeping, flashing, voyeurism—these were considered red flags. Dangerous behaviors. Early signs of escalation. Now they’re filmed, hashtagged, and funded by public grants.
Stop Calling It Love—It’s Entitlement
This is not about who you love. It’s about how you demand to be seen. If you need the entire public to witness, applaud, and adapt to your sexuality, you’re not a pioneer—you’re an emotional colonizer.
Love does not demand a captive audience. It does not parade past toddlers. It does not demand that schools teach four-year-olds about “preferred pronouns.” Love protects children. Love guards modesty. Love waits.
And if you can’t wait—if you need to be seen, affirmed, and obeyed—you’re not talking about love. You’re talking about power.
Consent Applies to Culture, Too
We teach children that consent is sacred—so why are we failing to apply that lesson to public life?
No child consents to drag queen story hour.
No parent consents to leather harnesses on city floats.
No woman consents to being exposed to male sexuality in the ladies’ room, or in the school library, or anywhere she cannot opt out.
Consent is not just for sex. It’s for everything.
Attention. Language. Presence. Ideology. Imagery.
And we are done pretending we don’t notice when it’s violated.
The boundary is back.
And we are drawing it in bold.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
I'm a Board Certified anesthesiologist and have been in practice for 24 years. I just learned that the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia where I trained has launched a program to increase flu vaccine uptake among children by vaccinating them while under anesthesia.
The program is called "Close your Eyes. We'll Immunize"
This is stunningly irresponsible. Here's why:
Anesthetists are extremely risk avoidant and endeavor to minimize patient exposure to anything which carries potential side effects. This is particularly true of pediatric patients who very often have never been exposed to anesthetic medications. We simply cannot know how an individual child will respond to these drugs for the first time.
Every single medication we administer during an operation can potentially trigger untoward or allergic responses. When this occurs our primary responsibility is to stabilize the patient. Our secondary responsibility is to identify the offending agent. There is absolutely no justification of introducing another agent, in this case a flu vaccine, which carries a risk of harm and contributes nothing to the success of the operation.
Some of the more common side effects of flu vaccines are fever (11-16%) and less commonly, a rash (1%). There is also an non-zero risk of severe allergic reactions and high-grade fevers which can develop over the course of minutes.
What if a child under anesthesia receives a vaccine and develops a rash and/or fever? Is it from the antibiotic that the surgeon requested? Is it from the narcotic? The anxiolytic? The barbiturate?
Anesthetic gases can also (rarely) trigger a life threatening response called Malignant Hyperthermia which commonly presents as a high fever. Without subsequent testing we cannot know which agent was responsible. Most commonly the testing is never done and the child’s record will forever reflect the possibility that some or all of the drugs which were used are responsible for their reaction. This makes future anesthetic care significantly more challenging and will require the use of alternatives which may not be necessary.
Advocating for a flu vaccine while a child is anesthetized reflects the pervasive yet inaccurate attitude among the medical establishment that vaccines are perfectly safe. I simply cannot believe that my mentors would have ever supported this initiative when I was a resident there. Close your eyes indeed.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
🚨Instagram just SUSPENDED Children’s Health Defense. Hey Mark Zuckerberg, what happened to “no more censorship”? @finkd
No clear explanation. No specific post identified. Just a vague claim that we violated “Community Standards.”
What exactly did we violate? If you’re going to silence a non profit organization that is sharing the truth, the least you can do is tell us why.
Thank you, @elonmusk, for providing a platform where we can continue speaking freely and share vital information so parents can make informed decisions.
We will not be silenced.
Tag @finkd and let him know if you stand with CHD.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
For the past few weeks, I’ve been fighting a battle very close to home. To everyone who has followed along, supported me, and stood beside me, thank you.
We made headlines. We demanded accountability. We put pressure on a school board and superintendent whose conduct and decisions deserved public scrutiny. And we reminded those in positions of authority that they answer to the people they serve, not the other way around.
I don’t believe this fight is over. But if there is one thing I hope comes from it, it’s this:
Pay attention to what is happening in your own backyard.
Get involved. Ask questions. Demand transparency. Know who you’re electing to your school boards, town councils, and local committees. And more importantly, pay attention to what they do after they get elected.
Too many people focus on what is happening in Washington while overlooking the decisions being made right down the street, decisions that directly affect our children, our families, our communities, and our tax dollars.
Accountability doesn’t start in Washington. It starts at home.
Never underestimate the power of informed, engaged citizens who refuse to look the other way.
And never forget: Public officials work for us. We do not work for them.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
Legality of Mandates
In Public Health
Mary S. Holland JD
Health Is Number One
Sat. 10am ET October 17, 2026
860AM 97.5FM-HD2 WWDBAM.com
To follow on @spotify @applepodcasts @iheartradio @podbean
NJ StandsUp retweeted
I didn’t really get the problem with gender ideology at first.
I’m liberal-minded about most things. ‘Live and let live’ has generally been my motto. I believed in inclusion, kindness and not causing unnecessary offence.
I knew some adults chose medical treatments or surgery to resemble the opposite sex. That seemed to me a matter of personal autonomy. Adults can do what they wish with their own bodies.
What I hadn’t realised — and I feel slightly embarrassed admitting this — was that I’d misunderstood what was being claimed.
I thought “transgender” meant a form of self-expression. A man who liked wearing women’s clothes. Someone changing their name. Gender non-conformity.
What I hadn’t grasped was that some activists weren’t just asking for tolerance. They were asserting that declaring yourself the opposite sex made you the opposite sex. Not metaphorically. Literally.
And that this wasn’t just cultural. It had legal consequences.
It meant men who said they were women were demanding access to women’s sports, prisons, domestic violence shelters and hospital wards.
It meant the rewriting of healthcare language — “pregnant people”, “bodies with cervixes” — to avoid saying “women”.
It meant children struggling with identity being affirmed onto medical pathways with lifelong implications.
And also redefining same-sex attraction. Lesbians called ‘bigoted’ for not wanting relationships with men who identify as women. Gay men accused of prejudice for saying they’re not attracted to female bodies.
I’d also overlooked how deeply this had spread into public institutions, schools and workplaces.
And how easily disagreement was framed as cruelty. Speaking up felt risky — because others were being publicly humiliated for doing so.
None of this is abstract.
Because sex is the basis on which safeguarding works. On which data is collected. On which cancer screening programmes run. On which fair sport and single-sex spaces depend. It’s written into law — including the Equality Act — because material differences matter.
If sex becomes a ‘feeling’ rather than a biological category, those protections become unstable.
And once reality becomes negotiable, everything does.
Once I saw it, I couldn’t unsee it.
But I needed to be sure.
So I read. Books, research papers, policy documents. When I finally spoke publicly, there was backlash from all directions.
Many women thanked me, while some feminists criticised me for speaking too late.
Others were angry about a past interview I’d done with the parent of a transgender person, accusing me of promoting harm.
It takes courage to speak when you know your reputation, friendships or livelihood may be on the line — when you know raising your voice could strain, or even end, relationships you value.
Once I understood what was at stake, staying silent was no longer an option.
I lost my livelihood simply for saying I didn’t like the phrase “pregnant people”. That alone tells you something is deeply wrong.
It shouldn’t be this way.
I don’t expect praise for admitting it took me far too long to understand what was happening. Or to say so publicly.
I can only be honest about what I believed then and what I understand now.
But it does take courage to admit publicly that you got something wrong. All I hope is that by acknowledging I wasn’t paying enough attention, another woman (or man) might feel emboldened to do the same.
Because, as many of us know first-hand, there can be professional, social and financial consequences to speaking out.
And I won’t pretend I understood something before I did, simply to make myself more acceptable to those who got there sooner.
Which is why I will never judge another woman for how long it takes her to find her voice.
Because every voice matters. Whenever it is raised.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
.@POTUS and @SecKennedy are building a health system that listens to patients and families who report vaccine injuries, follows the evidence, and uses what we learn to make vaccines safer.
From opening a new @NIH clinic to strengthening physician reporting, improving electronic health records, and modernizing @CDCgov's vaccine safety monitoring system, HHS is taking action to better identify and investigate potential vaccine injuries while improving patient care.
Thank you, @POTUS, for empowering HHS to follow gold-standard science, strengthen vaccine safety, and put patients first.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
❗ 11 days remaining ❗
HHS is investigating the relationship between electromagnetic radiation and human health — a clear directive from the MAHA Strategy Report — and has launched a formal Request for Information that closes October 21st.
Learn more and submit a comment here: federalregister.gov/document…
NJ StandsUp retweeted
October is Vaccine Injury Awareness Month.
Throughout the month, we’ll be highlighting members of our community who have turned their pain into purpose by using their experiences to support others, raise awareness, and create change.
You can join us by creating your own Vaccine Injury Awareness Month profile picture frame to show your support: coverse.org.au/profile-photo…
If you’d like to help React19 continue supporting the vaccine-injured community, consider making a donation: react19.org/donate
NJ StandsUp retweeted
And now you understand why people have “gluten intolerance” and why the average age of cancer diagnosis has plummeted.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
If you’re pro-vaccine, still, after everything we know….watch this video. Viewer beware, this is gut wrenching. But this is what vaccines do to children.
Pray for Fox!🙏❤️
NJ StandsUp retweeted
Pneumonic plague, dengue, Cyclospora, E. coli - good time to learn how to protect you or your family. "The ultimate antidote to all bioweapons" - Vladimir Pasechnik (1937-2001), Senior Scientist, Soviet Bioweapons Program. Read all about it: waronchlorinedioxide.com
NJ StandsUp retweeted
Fellow warriors, I have a favor to ask. This Thursday is Florida's public hearing—which was requested by the Florida chapters of the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Pediatrics—to ultimately determine whether the Department of Health is able to remove existing mandatory entry requirements for four vaccines (Hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Varicella, and Pneumococcal conjugate). The ACP and AAP are trying to prevent my courageous husband, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, from removing these mandates, so if you support informed consent, parental choice, and individualized medical decision-making, we need you to show up and support medical freedom. Help us fill that room and make sure the voices of justice are louder than the voices of oppression and control.
With gubernatorial elections only a month away, this is likely our last chance to make this needed change, so please join us this:
📅 Thursday, October 8, 2026
⏰ 9 a.m.–noon ET, or until the hearing concludes
📍 Orlando Marriott Lake Mary
Grand Ballrooms E, F, G & H
1501 International Parkway, Lake Mary, FL 32746
If you’ve ever said, “Thank God for Dr. Ladapo,” please walk the talk and stand with us this week on Thursday, October 8th.
Bring your family. Bring friends. Share this everywhere. Fill the room.
There will be an opportunity to come together with Joe and his team to thank them personally and take pictures.❤️
NJ StandsUp retweeted
When Lauren Friedman showed up at Amherst College, she was surprised to discover that almost every single girl in her dorm and on her athletic team was already taking SSRIs.
Inside jokes about Zoloft & Lexapro were common on campus, and everyone seemed deeply grateful their persistent anxiety and depression from teenage years was magically disappearing from a pharmaceutical drug.
Like her peers, @lololizzle had struggled earlier in life with both anxiety and depression -- so Zoloft seemed like a perfect solution. After all, all of her friends were taking it too, so how bad could it be?
Little did she know, SSRIs are causing a silent epidemic among Gen Zers called Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction, or PSSD. Like untold tens of thousands of other people just like her, Lauren now has completely lost her libido, sensation in her genitals, and even a sense of emotional connection with the people around her... PERMANENTLY.
She says she and others like her were NEVER given informed consent about the risk of developing PSSD, and American doctors will rarely even diagnose the condition at all.
Whether it's birth control being thrown in the faces of teenage girls to magically "regulate your hormones" or Zoloft instantly prescribed to "make you happy," one thing is clear--the young women of Generation Z are being poisoned en masse without any understanding of what may happen to them down the line.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
Weeks ago we learned Fauci and the biomedical state knew the COVID jabs were dangerous but hid it from us.
While that investigation continues, today we sued Pfizer for deceptively marketing the products as safe—making billions—while pregnant women were miscarrying their babies and teenagers were having heart attacks.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
Here is President Trump’s new Surgeon General of the United States nominee, Dr. Casey Means, exposing the health industry and woke medical schools for six minutes straight.
It’s safe to say she is the perfect pick:
📷 RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION CASE WIN 📷
Listen to John Coyle, Esq., describe his win where he represented a groundskeeper whose employer refused to honor his religious exemption (while Muslim employees religious exemptions were accepted) and lost his job.
wabcradio.com/episode/john-c…
NJ StandsUp retweeted
🎥 INTERVIEW IS LIVE!
We asked. He answered. You decide.
NJ Parental Rights Coalition sat down with U.S. Senate candidate Justin Murphy to ask questions that matter to NJ parents and families:
Where does he stand?
▶️ WATCH ON YOUTUBE
youtu.be/-WYDnbWBsIg?is=IHHQ…
NJ StandsUp retweeted
This spine tingling moment just happened at the Sen. Johnson Hospital Protocols Hearing.
I can understand exactly why the room erupted.
Here’s an attorney with 50 years experience.
At the start of covid, he gets flooded with requests to make Hospitals give early treatment protocols.
But the result of his work is the part really blew my mind.
95.8% of the cases he won ,to force the Hospital to administer Ivermectin. Survived.
But then I heard the contrast of what happened when he lost his cases... the patients who had to go with standard of care hospital protocols which included Remdesivir.
Ralph Lorigo Esq. - “Where I lost.... Every. Single. Person. Died”
I’m left speechless.
NJ StandsUp retweeted
💥Attorney, John Coyle secured NJ's first jury verdict in favor of Teddy DeBlasio, a Christian who was fired for a religious exemption from a COVID vaccine mandate & worked as a groundskeeper at Essex County Hospital Center. Awarded $671,000.
@johndcoyle @chdtv @ChildrensHD
