Same story in the UK. Any transmission buildout means years of consultation theatre while the grid connection queue keeps growing. This is exactly why we can't build anything fast.
Why are they so terrible at communicating?
We absolutely need more power and transmission but this ineptitude can only poison the well
wsj.com/us-news/homeowners-f…
Nathan Handyman retweeted
1) I'm planning a teardown video schedule.
2) I hired a videographer/editor to make it work.
3) I need repeat sponsorship to make it work
If you want to sponsor teardown videos, get in touch!
(Apparently if you say what you want then sometimes it happens!?)
Nathan Handyman retweeted
The materials discovery timeline is compressing from months to minutes — and R&D investment models need to catch up.
At AI Salon Montréal, Dr. Amirreza Ataei has been spotlighting how AI-driven approaches are fundamentally reshaping the front end of materials science. Instead of iterative lab cycles that consume quarters of calendar time and significant budget, AI systems can now screen candidate materials, predict properties, and narrow viable options at a pace that would have seemed implausible five years ago.
For research investors and fund managers, this is a paradigm shift worth understanding:
→ Shorter discovery cycles mean faster paths to IP and commercialisation
→ Reduced wet-lab iteration means lower burn rates for materials-focused startups
→ Portfolio companies in advanced materials, pharma excipients, and specialty chemicals all stand to benefit from compressed timelines
→ The competitive moat is shifting from "who has the best lab" to "who has the best AI-augmented workflow"
This is exactly the kind of shift we built the Material-to-Product Engine around. Our platform lets users scan or upload photos of physical materials, then deploys up to 22 specialist AI agents — including Material Analyst, Chemical Engineer, Cost and Procurement, and Technology Scout — to move from raw material to product concepts, CAD files (STEP/STL), engineering drawings, and full manufacturing plans.
We've already designed 42+ products from real scanned materials. The thesis is simple: if AI can compress discovery, AI can also compress the entire pipeline from material identification through to manufacturable product.
The labs that integrate AI across the full materials-to-product chain won't just discover faster — they'll commercialise faster.
#MaterialsScience #AIinResearch #DeepTech
Toolhive, CRIBWISE and TDM Systems bring together digital solutions for smarter tooling data and inventory management. Tune in to discover how Sandvik's Tool Flow Solutions portfolio, is helping manufacturers take a more connected approach.
ow.ly/M7uV5102UAk
Would be interesting to see the manufacturing split in this. My bet is pilot projects everywhere, deployment nowhere.
#AIadoption survey report 2026-How #UK businesses are adopting #ArtificialIntelligence- @GOVUK
#Bigdata #AIAgent #Automation #AISkill #Fintech #Finserv #Futureofwork #Regulation #Regtech
@Damien_CABADI @bamitav @mikeflache @Corix_JC
@jasuja @Nicochan33
gov.uk/government/publicatio…
Nathan Handyman retweeted
New blog post on VLAs!
VLAs are one of the hottest topics in Robotics and for good reason. This blogpost walks through the recent advancements in architecture from RT1 to MolmoAct2, my thoughts on it.
Please do check it out, and RT/QT for the reach:)
So the detector is only for regulators, journalists and enterprises, while I pay monthly and can't even check my own text. What could go wrong.
Replying to @_junaidkhalid1
Guys, you NEED to start exploring alternatives like locul.ai.
I’m NOT delusional, I know Opus 5.5 is LEVELS ahead of open weights and I use it too.
But to gradually transition from 100% work being done with Opus to maybe 50% Opus, 50% open weights. I currently have 80+ bots, and yesss the ones that generate landing pages or video editing use Opus, but TRUST ME, you do NOT need it for MOST of the work like checking my emails and drafting replies. Doing most of the low level coding work, etc.
So MANY of my bots are using qwen 27B on a BIG ASS GPU system that I rent via runpod at $0.30/hr. And it bills per second, turns on auto if I need it, and then shuts off.
HARDLY $10/mo in usage.
Try it.
Will try this. When I built my first Fusion 360 add-in, most of the time went into working out requirements myself. This would have saved me a day at least. Does it handle CAD tooling ideas too?
Every time I have an idea, I throw it into Claude Code and let the Brainstorming skill kick in
We start iterating through questions, exploring different approaches, discussing trade-offs, and refining the idea
The skill helps me clarify requirements, break down the design, and validate each part before documenting the final approach
By the end, I have a much clearer picture of what I actually want to build, before writing a single line of code
Install:
npx claude-code-templates@latest --skill development/brainstorming
aitmpl.com/component/skill/d…
so the moat in specialized robotics models was never real if your task can be framed as computer use. rough news for the vertical stack startups
All for moving fast on AI. But 'perception matters more than truth' from the CEO of a privacy company? The product is trust. That's the whole product.
This is the scientific confirmation of what I've feared for a while: AI manifests now sound like LLM output. Proton really speedran that.
I encourage anyone who is leading an engineering org to read this in its entirety. It is short, extremely well written, and very much directionally correct. The job and the organization needs to entirely change to take full advantage of these tools.
That path is largely a human alignment challenge at this point. If you are a leader, your job is to get people on the new ship, and get them sailing together. The old ship doesn’t exist anymore, although many people wish it did and are incentivized to continue to believe it exists.
Software Engineering is an entirely different thing now, and the faster you can get your org to understand this and align on how to work now, the less painful it will be for you long term. If you don’t do it, I simply believe your org won’t exist because it will get disrupted by an org that does
Do companies adopt this on their own, or does it take another Hugging Face-style incident before everyone switches? Would be interesting to know.
"sandboxing is an antiquated technology to apply to agents"
That's Ali Golshan, who leads NVIDIA's open source agent runtime called OpenShell, which is now built into Anthropic's Claude Managed Agents.
I sat down with Ali at GTC Berlin to talk about where AI security is headed and what makes OpenShell different:
> agents start with zero privileges
> more access is given only if necessary
> secrets stay out of the containment, without the agent being able to access them directly
what we discussed:
1:15 Are AI security risks overblown?
6:06 Do we need new AI regulations?
7:47 What is OpenShell? And what’s the difference with a sandbox.
10:20 Would OpenShell have stopped the Hugging Face incident?
13:44 Alignment vs. Security
16:04 Advice for getting into AI safety
Huge thanks to @nvidia for inviting me and setting up this interview.
Nathan Handyman retweeted
I'm tickled to death that we executed this flawlessly in our first week of beta testing. We finished within 3 minutes of our promised delivery time, perfectly capturing every step of the process as it happened.
We are faster than 3D printing by a long shot.
The problem framing is right, the number is a rounding error. £7.125m across eight projects, 33 months, a four-day sandpit. I've worked on tooling budgets bigger than this. Grants generate proposals. Purchase orders build things.
ukri.org/opportunity/nmip-sa…
Nathan Handyman retweeted
Full as-designed power operation on this timeline is LEGIT. Excited for startup!
Radiant has secured U.S. Department of Energy (@ENERGY) approval of its Documented Safety Analysis for Kaleidos, making it the only microreactor to be reviewed and approved by the DOE for full power operations.
The approval is not just for criticality, but for Radiant’s full power, full temperature testing at the Idaho National Laboratory. Radiant will test the complete reactor system using the same design it will manufacture at scale.
Next up in the path to commercialization: Readiness Review.
Read more here 🔗 radiantnuclear.com/news/radi…
Nathan Handyman retweeted
Google's API milestone of 32 billion tokens per minute (533M tokens/sec) marks the transition of LLM inference into utility-scale throughput:
The systems ledger behind 533M tokens/sec:
- Silicon allocation: Requires an active footprint of roughly 650k TPU sockets operating under high batching efficiency.
- Grid commitment: Sustains ~240 MW of continuous electrical load exclusively for first-party model serving, before factoring in Search AI Overviews.
- Network density: Supporting distributed MoE routing at this scale drives continuous 800G optical transceiver traffic across Google's Apollo OCS fabric.
Inference at tens of trillions of tokens per day shifts competitive advantage from peak training FLOPS to vertical ASIC cost structures. Running this volume internally on TPUs shields Alphabet's operating margins from merchant accelerator premiums.
Nathan Handyman retweeted
Here we go Taiwan! 🇹🇼
Hon Hai Tech Days is kicking off in Taipei, hosted by @HonHai_Foxconn.
I just sat down with Leo Guo, their GM of Robotics, who walked me through Foxconn’s robotics program and where they’re currently putting their focus.
I really liked their deployment approach.
So, they build their own hardware (robot arms, humanoids) and their own AI models, but they also deploy third-party robots and layer their own software on top.
They experiment a lot, look for new use cases, and are very curious.
Looking forward to learn more here on-site!
Stay tuned for more content! 😎
~~
♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news → ziegler.substack.com
Same actuators across 5 embodiments means one training pipeline transfers between all of them. The modularity is the smart part. Curious how the 7-DoF arm holds up on repeatability vs a dedicated unit.
Introducing Laika, by Lucen Robotics.
An open, modular robotics kit for anyone building physical AI. Biped, 7-DoF arm, dual arms, wheeled robot, quadruped — reusable, repairable, open.
For under $6k, one kit converts into 4 embodiments instead of buying 4 robots, 3 times cheaper than Unitree EDU. Arm-only kits start at $1,999.
We're fortunate to have early support from @fdotinc.
Pre-orders are open, limited to 100 units, shipping in December. lucenrobotics.com

































