Building tools to help you make money.

💵 Get Passive →
Joined August 2024
Nathan Lampe retweeted
I see email marketers saying "You don't need ads, you need retention systems" They're prolly newcomers. I used to think the same. But now, I don't really agree with it! How do you get customers to retain in the first place? You need ads to acquire Ads fuel growth Retention makes it profitable The brands doing $1M+/month aren't choosing. They're running profitable ads AND building retention systems. Ads bring customers in at $10 CAC. Retention turns them into $180 LTV. Now your ads are profitable and you can scale. One without the other = you're fucked.
1
3
3
326
The Discovery Architect is live. 40-minute workshop on the 3-layer excavation system. + 7 tactical tools. + Optional 1:1 War Room session. Black Friday pricing through Tuesday. focuspipe.com/blackfriday
3
3
1
7
1,159
78% of sales reps never dig past surface problems. That's why their pipelines are full of phantom revenue. I broke down the math in this 12-min video — including why solving a $500K problem is easier than solving a $50K problem. Watch free: loom.com/share/9957cb38ecb04…
2
4
11
943
Most people chase YouTube views. But views don’t pay the bills. Clients do. I turned a single YouTube video into multiple high-ticket clients, without going viral. Here’s the full story + playbook 🧵
3
2
11
531
Imagine not trying to design your ideal life.
1
3
8
477
It doesn't matter who you are, it matters that you own the narrative: > You're not small; you're boutique > You don't lack technology; you provide a personal service > You're not winging it; you're agile Language can be the life and death of a business.
1
1
3
184
How I grew my audience from 1k → 17k in less than a year 🧵 No hacks. No paid ads. Just simple systems anyone can use. Here’s exactly what worked 👇
7
2
7
336
Most offers don’t fail because the product is bad. They fail because the offer isn’t clear or compelling. Here are 6 steps to make any offer irresistible 1️⃣ Define your ICP 2️⃣ Nail your core promise 3️⃣ Paint the pain + dream outcome 4️⃣ Stack value with bonuses 5️⃣ Create urgency 6️⃣ Show proof early Simple, clear, and proven. Fix your offer → watch sales speed up.
11
2
17
721
Multiple videos hitting 60K+ views 📈 All AI. Zero camera time. This is what happens when you stop filming and start automating.
4
2
11
361
The last 5 years turned social into fast food. Tastes good. Empty after. Hurts if you live on it. I’m not “delete your apps and move to a cabin.” I’m “use the machine without letting it use you.” The model I use now has 3 levels of creators: • Level 1: Trend Jackers • Level 2: Brilliant Nobodies • Level 3: Value Creators My story: I was stuck in Level 2. Smart ideas. Long posts. No distribution. I blamed “the algorithm” like it was a person. A few weeks ago, I swallowed my pride and sprinted through Level 1. Hooks. Short form. Cold opens. Yes, it felt cringe. But i'm finding my way into Level 3. Same attention skills from Level 1. Same depth from Level 2. But every post points to a single mission and a product that solves a real problem. Quick map of the levels: Level 1: Trend Jackers – High dopamine, low meaning – Lives on hooks, cuts, hot takes – Goes viral, fades fast Level 2: Brilliant Nobodies – High meaning, low dopamine – Great ideas, zero packaging – Hates marketing, stays unknown Level 3: Value Creators – Uses attention on purpose – Clear throughline, clear offer – Short form opens the door, long form changes behavior Why this matters: the feed rewards “one marshmallow now.” If you want to build anything real, you need to steal that attention and route it to depth. The transition playbook I used (simple, not easy): Step 1: Pick one mission line. What result do you exist to deliver? One sentence. No buzzwords. Step 2: Package the mission for the feed. Write 20 hooks. Record 10 short takes. Kill the worst 7. Post the best 3. Step 3: Ship depth weekly. One long video or essay that actually teaches, not performs. Step 4: Build an offer that solves the root cause. No “inspiration products.” Real outcome, clear timeline, defined path. Step 5: Loop it. Shorts → long form → offer → client proof → back to shorts. Attention becomes meaning. Meaning becomes results. Signs you’re stuck: Level 1 trap: You can’t remember yesterday’s post. Level 2 trap: You think marketing is “selling out.” Level 3 filter: Every piece ladders up to the same promise. My commitment for the next 12 months: One mission. Weekly depth. Daily reps. Proof bank on display. If I drift, call me out. If you’re serious about moving up a level, reply “LEVEL” and tell me which one you’re in. I’ll drop a tailored next step for you. Save this thread and check back in 90 days. Your feed should look different—and so should your results.
2
1
13
609
Last year I was just a broke video editor. I thought my first $300 client would change everything. He paid me $150 upfront… and then a week later told me he didn’t want to work with me anymore. That moment crushed me. I questioned myself, wondered if I should even keep going. But I didn’t quit. I kept learning, improving, and trusting God through the process. Now, a year later, I’m building what I believe will become the #1 YouTube client acquisition agency. I’m not there yet. But I’m on the way. And I thank God every day for giving me the strength to keep moving forward. Crazy how much can change in just 12 months if you refuse to give up.
2
4
9
235
Take 1 hour, yes just 1 hour and meal prep for the week. It doenst need to be anything fancy - just give yourself some control in a world where most things you cannot
5
1
12
1,214
Nathan Lampe retweeted
spend less on infra, more on data+warm callers. That's the move imo. Infra is super cheap, not many people realise how cheap it is. Google for $1.50, outlook for 5 cents, private infra for $0.01. Spend less on that, more on quality data and callers to call up your PRs.
1
1
15
466
Nathan Lampe retweeted
Someone spent $47k and 18 months building an “AI startup.” It failed. Why? They chased hype, not real problems. Here’s the real playbook for using AI with purpose 👇
5
5
1
17
870
Nathan Lampe retweeted
deleted: sales scripts follow up templates cringe LinkedIn posts replace with: pure automation result: more meetings than ever sometimes the systems equals ≈ more money
1
1
8
189
Nathan Lampe retweeted
CEO just fired their $10K/month agency they posted content for 6 months got 1000 followers zero sales calls showed him our system: • 2 strategic posts weekly • targeted outreach sequence • conversion-focused profile first month: 23 calls booked content without strategy is just expensive journaling
1
15
207
Nathan Lampe retweeted
most LinkedIn 'experts' have never booked a client through LinkedIn they make money teaching LinkedIn not using LinkedIn rather do it with someone with: • 978 followers + $300K revenue than • 50K followers + $5K revenue or probably 0 results > clout
4
1
12
212
Nathan Lampe retweeted
Everyone talks about paid ads. Nobody talks about SMS flows bringing in $38K+ with under $300 spend. This abandoned checkout flow did exactly that. 605 conversions. 130x ROI. Retention is your highest-margin channel.
2
16
343
🚨 Google Ads Reality for Local Businesses 🚨 Your Google Ads costs aren't just "feeling higher." They ARE higher. After analyzing 17,000+ campaigns, here's what local businesses need to know 🧵:
10
4
23
558
Most Google Ads "experts" are still doing keyword research like it's 2015. Here's what works now for campaign and ad group structure 🧵:
6
1
29
729