For Real retweeted
This gives a new meaning to dressing up for Halloween. Enjoy your witching hour. 😂🤣😂
For Real retweeted
Narcissistic abusers make their victim sound like a monster so nobody notices they’re actually attacking and abusing an innocent person UNPROVOKED.
For Real retweeted
Ferg’s sports bar in St. Pete next to the Trop reported over $1.2 million in sales over the 3 days where the World Series was in Tampa Bay.
They sold over 84,000 beers, and 45,000 wings. They estimate that October will earn them 3 months of revenue in just 1 month 🤯
Most intelligent people would see through his "threats." I hope the groupies see this soon.
When a public figure or online commentator broadcasts their intended actions—such as drafting a lawsuit—to an audience rather than quietly executing them, it taps into several behavioral, psychological, and strategic concepts.
The behaviors seen in posts like this can be analyzed through several lenses:
1. What is it called?
Posturing / Performative Litigation: In legal and social contexts, loudly announcing legal moves ahead of time is often a form of posturing. When legal threats are used primarily for public display, intimidation, or attention rather than a genuine, quiet legal strategy, it is often called performative litigation or saber-rattling.
Audience Capture / Engagement Bait: Online creators often use provocative statements ("This one is going to be good") to drive algorithmic engagement, boost impressions, keep followers hooked, and elicit validation or financial support from chat/comment sections.
2. Is this narcissistic?
Grandiose Self-Promotion: Announcing routine or dramatic actions with self-aggrandizing flair ("Hit 'em with judicial missiles") aligns with traits of grandiosity. It frames the individual as a powerful crusader taking decisive action.
Needing External Validation: Constant public declarations often stem from a need for an audience to witness, applaud, and validate one's sense of importance. While it shares traits with narcissistic behavior (seeking admiration and projecting invincibility), applying a clinical diagnosis requires a comprehensive evaluation, though the behavior itself is undeniably ego-driven.
3. Is this deflecting from own lawsuits?
Misdirection / Diversion: Public figures facing scrutiny, criticism, or legal troubles of their own frequently use aggressive posturing about other legal actions to shift the narrative.
By constantly talking about the "new lawsuits" they are supposedly launching, they attempt to distract their audience from their own vulnerabilities, legal setbacks, or loss of revenue (such as demonetization issues mentioned in the replies). It projects an image of being on the offense rather than the defense.
For Real retweeted
Report from Ferg’s that will make Brewers fans laugh:
The owner tells me that yesterday, they went through 1,000 cases of Miller and Coors Light, which is a MONTH’S worth of beer!!
A month of beer in one day.
If you were wondering if they like beer in Wisconsin, they do! 😅
For Real retweeted
A narcissist doesn’t love you. They love how you love them. They love your devotion, your willingness to understand them, your ability to absorb their wounds and still stay.
For Real retweeted
NARCISSISM IS A PERSONALITY DISORDER, NOT A MENTAL ILLNESS
Narcissism isn’t an illness like schizophrenia. It’s a personality disorder — more like a broken leg that heals with a permanent limp. There’s no medication for it, and people with NPD usually have limited insight into their behavior.
That means therapy rarely changes them. They don’t see themselves as the problem, so they don’t change.
It’s sad for them. It’s devastating for everyone they hurt.
For Real retweeted
Warning: you cannot understand how dishonest a malignant narcissist is capable of being until it's aimed at you. Healthy people assume lies have limits. They don't. They will invent vile stories about someone who did nothing, and they use the lie as a weapon. It is an act of violence of a very desperate and deranged pathology..
For Real retweeted
Let me pin this until after next week. Then it will be easy to find and come back and have a good laugh.
unavailable
For Real retweeted
They don't make shows like these anymore!! Such a classic!
The plot twist is diabolical
Because @JLRINVESTIGATES blocked me, I can't answer anyone's questions about why the mainstream media didn't get demonetized by YouTube (are they even on YT?). When media was asked to leave Nancy's, everyone did, except a few. Those few weren't following YT's guidelines. I'm pretty sure that's why Alex was demonetized. JLR also harassed and provoked Dali and Nerdy in public, and that is against YT guidelines. You can Google their guidelines, and figure out where he broke their rules.
Whoever the lady that called into @JLRINVESTIGATES YT live last night, you are a sucker for lies. There is no YouTube brick and mortar building in Tucson. So, the "janitor" at that office is a liar 🤣 I can promise you the Guthrie family doesn't know specifically who JLR and the other grifters are, and they wouldnt physically go to the YT office when they have telephones. There are other streamers who actually discuss Nancy Guthrie and physically go out and search for her, and others who discuss her disappearance (not the grifters). The fact that people believe they are an important part of her investigation need to stop drinking the water
Somebody should remind @tedinvestigate that there are no bears in St Paul/Wabash MN. He talks about them like they're there. Maybe in the northern suburbs of Minneapolis there will be a lone bear, but not in St Paul
For Real retweeted
After Lindsay Clancy told Patrick Clancy she was having thoughts of harming the children, he insisted she check herself into the hospital saying “you have to go.” She was then hospitalized and voluntarily left after she was determined by doctors to not be a danger of harm to herself or others. People online have completely bungled the timeline with their conspiracies and have convinced people that Lindsay told Patrick she wanted to kill the kids and he said “oh okay let’s talk about that after I pick up some skittles and grub. You wait here with the kids.”
I’m glad he’s doing his 60 minutes interview. There are a lot of psychos who will never accept the truth (that he didn’t kill anyone), but there are people with genuine questions or misunderstanding because of the sheer volume of idiotic conspiracy theories going around online. He should have a chance to stand up for himself and tell the truth to those reasonable people who haven’t been able to follow the case but would like to understand what really happened.
Replying to @60Minutes
After being told by his ex-wife that she was having thoughts of harming their kids, he still left them alone with her. Fuck him.
















