Replying to @elonmusk @StephenKing
Stephen King is brainwashed. It's really sad.
Replying to @elonmusk
That certainly is a strange way to spell: Tala-freak-o π
Replying to @StevenCheung47 @NICKIMINAJ
Wouldn't that be awesome!!!
Replying to @crashresq29
Oh that's right. They had Abdul winning in a landslide and he barely won. I hate these lying pollsters.
Replying to @tenuousgrail
I think it may have the opposite effect. The left will think: we're going to win, no need to get out and vote.
But then again, maybe that's why the polls always tighten. This makes the activated voters worry that their candidate (who was way ahead two weeks ago) won't win, so they show up and vote.
Replying to @lawyerkev
Yeah, but I think it has the opposite effect of driving Republicans to vote. Yeah, the low-interest voters + a get out the vote drive makes sense.
Every election cycle, fake polls (see NY Times fake poll controversy) show the Democrat candidate (like Tala-Freak-o) up big. Then a week or two out (like now) the race always becomes even or very close.
Why?
What is the game the Democrats and their fake polls are playing?!?
The chaos in Europe is a ripple effect from not helping the U.S. end the Iran conflict sooner. Virtue signaling has unintended consequences.
Clashes erupt in Paris after largely peaceful protests across France bbc.in/4jyPz62
Replying to @ThePoniExpress
Well he has a better toupee than Drew Allar.
Replying to @espn
Arch Manning sucks, and have you noticed he's always fixing his hair on the sidelines to hide his receding baldness. I think he's wearing a toupee right nowπ
Whatever NFL team drafts him will think they're getting a Peyton or an Eli Manning, but they're getting Bald Noodle-Arm Manning.
Replying to @RookieWatxh
No, he looked ridiculous. And he's always fixing his damn hair on the sidelines (to cover up his receding baldness hairline). What an embarrassment to the Manning name. He's 3rd round pick that will probably go in the 1st round due to the Manning name. Bald-Arch Manning LOL
OSINT analysts who have been bashing @ElonMusk for days over this don't get it. Russia has the capacity to blow up satellites in space. They proved this on November 15, 2021, by firing a PL-19 Nudol missile at an old satellite of their own.
The impact created a large debris cloudβmore than 1,500 trackable fragments plus hundreds of thousands of smaller pieces. The International Space Station was forced to implement safe-haven procedures: the seven-person crew (including Russian cosmonauts) sealed hatches and sheltered in the docked Soyuz and Crew Dragon spacecraft for several hours as the debris cloud repeatedly crossed their orbital path.
The ISS even had to perform thruster burns on multiple occasions over the following months to avoid the debris cloud orbiting the Earth.
If Russia decides that the civilian Starlink satellite network is weaponized and fair game, we risk a serious Kessler syndrome. First modeled by NASAβs Donald Kessler and Burton Cour-Palais in 1978, it describes a scenario in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit gets so high that collisions start producing debris faster than natural processes (mainly atmospheric drag) can remove.
Each collision creates more fragments, which raise the odds of further collisions, leading to a self-sustaining cascade, a runaway cloud of satellite debris that can make certain orbital bands increasingly hazardous.
Space could become unusable for years to centuries.
You like driving around with GPS? Starlink MUST remain a civilian entity.
Nick Flor π₯+πΊπΈ retweeted
Replying to @FilmLadd
This is indeed one of the main reasons that Starlink must remain a civilian operation.
It can be used for infrastructure that is military, but it cannot be used for unequivocally offensive strikes that make it fair game to be struck back.
An adversary blowing up Starlink satellites would create a domino effect of destruction that would generate a vast field of debris making space unusable.
Replying to @elonmusk
Talarico will 100% lose if all Republicans go out and vote.
Replying to @SenatorBennet
Nah. I trust Elon Musk. You're a Democrat clown spewing laughable nonsense. Democrats will not win the House. No one likes the Democrats and their woke, America-hating agenda.
Replying to @VanLan40646 @mhmck
These are just ridiculous psyops by Ukraine, to influence United States citizens into voting for policies that benefit Ukraine. So obvious. So ridiculous. Ukraine, fight your own battles. We'll help defend, that's it.
Replying to @mhmck
LOL, no. They violated their terms of service. Elon explained it. Starlink is provided free of use, but only for defensive purposes. Stop the nonsense propaganda. America laughs at you.
Replying to @JulieBorowski
LOL I see what you did there.
Replying to @AGToddBlanche
Thank you for exposing the stupid Democrat corruption!




