Driving the Graduate Degree Revolution with @ALTIS Higher Education | Multi-Directional Speed and CPD Services @STRcoachcurrics | Lead S&C @gbbasketball 3x3
US/UK
Joined October 2012
- Tweets12.3K
- Following1.1K
- Followers6.2K
- Likes7.8K
Rich Clarke retweeted
I was asked by the Wall Street Journal yesterday how @tkelce "plays faster." I have been sharing it and everything for the last 8 years. Appropriate "Game Speeds," body positions, and foot placementsbcreate the best ways to change directions FASTER and "play faster." – at Pine Ridge, FL
Discuss away @YorkStrength17 @clh_strength @leetaft!! This is only for 45 degree attack cut when it is planned. Plenty more videos like this by @AnquanBoldin and others for EVERY angle for EVERY position. Auburn DE Legend @carllawson55 video up next shortly.
Rich Clarke retweeted
Netflix told writers to have characters announce what they're doing to deal with divided attention.
Writing is doing the same. Short. Punchy. Every paragraph three lines. Designed for skimming.
I call it Instagram writing. And it comes with a cost: stevemagness.org/p/instagram…
Rich Clarke retweeted
Patrick Collison's advice to people in their 20s: find where the highest standards are, and go experience them firsthand.
"When I talk to people in other domains, this is so frequently the thing that I hear from them."
"That when they worked with X person or Y organization or in Z environment, they learned what great actually is, and that just permanently changed their sense for what their own standard for their work ought to be."
"Maybe one version of what people in their twenties should do is... figure out, where can you learn the highest standards? Where are the highest standards embodied, and where can you go and experience that firsthand?"
@patrickc w/ @dwarkesh_sp (Feb 2024)
Rich Clarke retweeted
All roads lead back to 9 PM bed time, 5 AM wake up, 4 hours of deep, focused work creative work first thing, leaving your notifications off, work out mid day to break it up, admin & calls in the afternoon, hang with friends and loved ones in the evening, repeat forever.
Rich Clarke retweeted
Lazy work used to mean too little output.
Now, with AI, it often means too much and more work for everyone else.
@tobi call it "slop grenades."
A "Slop Grenade" is when you let AI produce the work and pass it on without adding any value (including checking it).
Someone else has to wade through it, catch the mistakes, and clean up the mess.
You save time and look productive but someone else pays for it.
My third conversation with Shopify co-founder and CEO @tobi.
0:00 How Shopify Uses AI
7:18 River: Shopify's Internal AI
8:55 How to Encourage Osmosis Learning
10:52 AI Dreaming and Self-Reflection
11:53 How to Use AI for Strategic Decision Making
14:11 The One Thing AI Cannot Do
16:04 What AI is Making Worse at Shopify
19:46 Predictions: Where AI is Headed Next
21:55 The Future of AI-Powered Software
24:40 Will CEOs Be Replaced with AI?
27:54 Can Superintelligence Be Controlled?
31:13 Critical Skills in AI Age
34:22 Why Complex Solutions are Usually Wrong
36:33 Conditions Needed for True Intuition
38:02 The Best Path Doesn't Have Instant Feedback
44:51 How Affirmations Can Shift Your Behavior
50:44 The Inobvious Thing Hurting Companies
52:37 Relationship Between Beauty and Creation
56:23 How SpaceX Moves Forward By Subtraction
1:00:24 Why Companies Need Refounding Events
1:01:50 Books as Cheat Codes
1:02:39 Three Books to Change Your Thinking
Enjoy!
(Includes paid promotions.)
Rich Clarke retweeted
Showtime Dr. Strange never fails to come ALIVE on the biggest stage 🥶🇷🇸🔥
#3x3Europe
Rich Clarke retweeted
1. Does Reactive Strength Index Ratio provide useful information beyond height and contact time considered separately.
Fifty one athletes, examine the relationship between CT, Ht, RSI and Velocity.
I'm not defending the drill as such - more just trying to see if the ED stance has any real nuance to it
But as previous, its nuance for the specific task and a need to challenge assumptions IMO - but just stimulating thoughts - hope you’re enjoying them 😂
I like CST but I don’t see it = never broken down, just it has to eventually spend time whole again & the relationships between parts appreciated as 🔑 If adapt a part, be very aware that you don’t know how the syst will change based on it
Lots of research supporting part prac
I think that dynamical systems lang is useful here
Will the addition of missing info change the control parameter, and result in a phase transition into a new pattern?
If not, & the mov pattern is the same, with a diff distribution of info, then how important is it? What %?
Yes a good article but my push back is because of assumptions. There are lots of Q’s:
Is the representative info for ball control actually missing?
Would this coupling genuinely change the ball protection skill?
Is the drill sufficiently ‘together’ already for effectiveness?
what % diff will it make to the particular purpose this has?
Maybe what is gained by adding more representative constraints and vis info - creates a net -ve elsewhere in the system? I.e stress on other people, risk, distraction from the primary goal.
Can you find the positives though fellas?
Maybe the ath are perceiving the proprioceptive feedback of ball protection, reinforcing secure carry against unpredictable external forces
Yes the info isn’t exactly the same…but
Yes 100% agree and this is where I align much more. And I think taking this stance is the key to reconciliation.
But convos are almost always visual dominant, and it’s made out that the vis/other person perception is much more influential that it is in many actions IMO
That is the interpretation that I and many other people have about the way it is proposed. ED right, everything else wrong
[Oh look at x drill, it doesn’t have representative vis percept - look how useless it is]
Interesting when I don’t even think the evidence is always there
I get this and I’m not saying you explicitly say that. But as someone who has observed the ED movement for 10years, had many conversations and uses lots of ED concepts…
Do you think learning to drive a car has ecological validity to learning to perform high intensity actions in sport?
One is sat down, with basic limb mov
The other is a whole body action against gravity with a ton of perceptual/vestibular inputs
That’s the important nuance