Italy. Milan now. Italian Army Folgore paratroopers patrol the city. Trained for war, now protect citizens, shops and our streets.

The commanding officer of the SAS was subject to a criminal investigation after allegations five of his soldiers were accused of murdering two people, it has emerged. 🔗 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…

Id appreciate your take on my article on the subject Gabriel. I was alerted to this a long time ago by a retired Major. This specific case is the tip of the iceberg, from what Im told. xitter.cf/KingBobIIV/status/2111…

Peres Jepchirchir, the 2021 Olympic and reigning world marathon champion, has been provisionally suspended by the Athletics Integrity Unit. The 33-year-old, who has a marathon PB of 2:14:43 and is currently ranked ninth on the all-time list, tested positive for EPO in an out-of-competition sample collected in Kenya prior to the Sydney Marathon. Jepchirchir subsequently won in Sydney with a mark of 2:18:31 on August 30. She is one of the most decorated marathon runners in recent history, with major wins in New York City (2021), Boston (2022) and London (2024).

Peres Jepchirchir, the 2021 Olympic and reigning world marathon champion, has been provisionally suspended by the Athletics Integrity Unit. The 33-year-old, who has a marathon PB of 2:14:43 and is currently ranked ninth on the all-time list, tested positive for EPO in an out-of-competition sample collected in Kenya prior to the Sydney Marathon. Jepchirchir subsequently won in Sydney with a mark of 2:18:31 on August 30. She is one of the most decorated marathon runners in recent history, with major wins in New York City (2021), Boston (2022) and London (2024).

The way our veterans have been treated by Labour and the Tories is truly appalling. Only Reform UK will properly fund our armed forces and keep Britain safe.

The way our veterans have been treated by Labour and the Tories is truly appalling. Only Reform UK will properly fund our armed forces and keep Britain safe.

In 2022 a shockingly empty chamber of the House of Commons for my debate. It was the Worlds first parliamentary debate on ‘Excess Deaths’ following the Covid ‘vaccine’ rollout. Something which affected every community and every constituency in the country, but your ‘elected representatives’ were not interested. But the BBC were interested and added their own subtitles/captions ( displayed in the images) to the live broadcast. I subsequently had a complaint to OFCom against the BBC upheld. The BBC said they added their own subtitles/captions to give ‘context’ to my speech. The BBC have never done this before or since to any speech by an MP in the House of Commons. It was clearly preplanned and the subtitles/captions were mostly unrelated to what I was saying. Following this outrageous behaviour by the BBC I cancelled my TV licence and gave away my televisions. Now they want all of us to pay the BBC tax again through a tax on our internet access.

Official figures out this morning report that last month, the UK government borrowed £24.5 billion. But the fineprint shows that almost £11 billion of that extra borrowing went on debt interest payments. That's more than £400 per household on debt service costs, in September alone. So far during this financial year, from April to September, the government's debt interest payments amount to £61 billion. Now, this number will barely feature in UK newspapers and across our airwaves. It may be mentioned in passing in out-of-the-way business sections, or on the odd business bulletin. But this huge debt interest bill won't register with the vast majority of our political and media class, or impact the national debate. Let me explain why that's so wrong and so dangerous ... £61 billion is a massive amount of money. It's equivalent to the UK's entire annual defence budget – the money we're paying, increasingly to foreign creditors, simply to service our national debt for six months, not to pay any of it back. £61 billion is equivalent to the money you'd raise over a year from adding a whopping 7 pence to the basic rate of income tax. For £61 billion, you could build around 40 large, state-of-the-art hospitals, or employ more than 100 thousand extra nurses for ten years. £61 billion would pay for free-at-the-point of use social care for everyone who needs it in the UK, for an entire year – three times over. Again, this is the debt interest bill on Britain's spiralling national debt – now more than 3 trillion pounds – over the last six months alone. The UK's public finances are close to meltdown – yet so many MPs and journalists continue blithely to view ever more public spending and borrowing as the answer to every problem. Those who highlight the dangers post by our hugely precarious national accounts are dismissed as cranks, ideologues or worse. But basic arithmetic has no ideology. And there is nothing "progressive" or "kind" or "right-on" about driving the UK ever closer to the fiscal cliff edge, provoking a crisis that will make the "austerity" years of the 2010s feel like a picnic, a crisis in which poorer households will suffer the most. Yes, Britain's national debt is lower than that of France. But because our borrowing has been rising so sharply, and because we're so prone to inflation, our debt service costs are much higher. The UK is spending a disgraceful 3.6pc of GDP on public debt interest, while France spends less than 2.5pc. Endless airtime and column inches are devoted to spurious conversations about a billion or two of additional "fiscal headroom" we may or may not have in three years' time. And, of course, any "extra headroom" is immediately pledged in new spending – which means yet more borrowing. These conversations are a waste of time – and, in fact, are deeply counterproductive. Three-year fiscal forecasts, even one- and two-year forecasts, routinely turn out to be askew by tens of billions of pounds. I'm not saying we don't need fiscal rules - we do, but we need more immediate rules, which actually bite, acting as a meaningful constraint on out-of-control borrowing and spending. Instead, political and media sages present the nation with spuriously precise discussions about fictional fiscal outcomes way into the future – using rules which are deliberately designed to kick arithmetic realities into the long grass .... An increasingly expensive, over-bearing, out of control state is not the answer to Britain problems. But unless we change course, it will certainly be our downfall. Please like/share if you think what I'm saying is important – and if fiscal realities should feature more prominently in our national debate. And for more sharp, plain-speaking economic analysis subscribe to: "When The Facts Change - economic and politics in a fast-moving world, with Liam Halligan"

Please listen carefully and share as widely as possible @elonmusk @joerogan @RealDonKeith @KerryHopkinsTV @CryptoRichYT @the_irascible

Seems the only racists I see are the scrounging foreign dinghy boys. Treating the British people like mugs. Taking all our taxes, sitting on their bums, living for free at our expense while committing crimes against our people and our nation. They're treating us like cash cows. They're the racists.

Farage apparently thinks the question of Englishness is an “academic debate”, in his words, that is not worth engaging in - a simply extraordinary thing to say. We are witnessing profound demographic change across Britain, and the leader of Reform thinks the meaning of English identity is a subject to be brushed aside because he’s scared of being called a few unpleasant names. Englishness is NOT an academic debate. The English are a historic people. We have our own ancestry, heritage, culture, traditions and national identity. Incredibly, Farage disagrees with that. My view, and Restore Britain's view, is clear. We are not simply a collection of passport holders living within a geographical boundary. And acknowledging the existence of the historic English people does not mean denying that others can develop a genuine attachment and belonging to our nation, but that does not make them ethnically English. A government can print a passport, sadly we all know that - it CANNOT falsely manufacture centuries of history or ancestral roots. The historic English people have a home - it’s called England, and we have nowhere else to go. And yes, in that home, the English are being demographically replaced. That’s just a fact. It’s happening all over Britain, it’s happened all over Britain. Go to East London, Rochdale, Luton, Birmingham, Blackburn, Bradford. I could go on. This is NOT an academic debate. This is our home, or at least it was. Farage is simply not the man to save it. You cannot claim to defend a nation when you refuse to even acknowledge its historic people because you might get your feelings hurt. The hour is simply too late for that pathetic level of gutlessness. The English are not an academic abstract afterthought. We will not have our history and entire existence erased because cowardly politicians don’t have the courage to state the truth. We are a people, and England is our home. Restore Britain will defend it.

The public have made more than enough sacrifices over the past few years. Britain is in serious decline. It’s time to put the public first. It’s very easy for those who are least affected to tell everyone else to make even more sacrifices.