Representative Press

Need a stocking stuffer that actually gets a laugh? This real pen is a pisser: sites.google.com/view/pissin… #PissingPen #Piss

"However, additional reporting has revealed an important detail about the incident: The “Jew-Free Zone” sign was reportedly placed on the storefront by Dan Park, a controversial Swedish street artist, rather than by the store’s owner. The business had displayed the separate “Apartheid-Free Zone” sign, and Park said his addition was intended as a provocative interpretation of its message." and "intended to provoke thought and challenge prevailing attitudes. " Yet you are manufacturing antisemitism by falsely portraying this as an antisemitic incident. Why hav't you deleted this post?

Airlines are not banning COVID-19 vaccinated passengers or pilots. Fact Check Details The Claim: Viral social media posts and videos frequently claim that airlines are banning people who received COVID-19 vaccinations from flying—or firing vaccinated pilots—due to unverified claims about blood clots, heart attacks, or adverse side effects. The Official Stance: Major airlines, aviation authorities, and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) have repeatedly confirmed that no such bans or restrictions exist. Medical Context: Health agencies and medical experts state that there is no scientific evidence linking COVID-19 vaccines to an increased risk of blood clots during air travel, and vaccine-related clotting conditions are distinct from travel-related deep vein thrombosis. share.google/aimode/GCEKW9GL…

Monsieur Guy Gadbois at your service. #CatherineSchell #PeterSellers

Five links, Mr. Goldfeder. FIVE. And not one substantiates your claim that Rashida Tlaib ever said it was "all about Netanyahu." In 2018, she defended Palestinian refugees' right of return, discussing relatives displaced in 1967. In 2019, she discussed Palestinian dispossession surrounding Israel's creation. In 2020, she criticized structural inequality and segregation. In 2021, she challenged U.S. military aid and discriminatory policies. In 2023, she again advocated equal rights and peaceful coexistence. These are historical and systemic concerns, not grievances she attributed exclusively to one prime minister. Yes, she has repeatedly condemned Netanyahu's policies. But criticizing Netanyahu is not the same as claiming that Netanyahu is the sole cause of Palestinian suffering, or that replacing him would magically resolve decades of dispossession, occupation, and inequality. Her latest statement is entirely consistent with that longstanding position. What's remarkable is that you went to the trouble of assembling five sources, apparently without recognizing that they actually document the distinction you're trying to erase. Five citations are not evidence when none supports the proposition. Can you provide even ONE quotation in which Tlaib actually says Palestinian oppression is only about Netanyahu and would end with his departure? That's your claim. That's what you need to substantiate. The October 27, 2026 statement you were responding to specifically argued that changing Israel's prime minister would not, by itself, resolve Palestinian grievances, and called for an arms embargo and sanctions.

Here: GAS PRICES BY PRESIDENT — IN TODAY'S DOLLARS Average U.S. regular gasoline price per gallon, adjusted for inflation to September 2026.

GAS PRICES BY PRESIDENT — IN TODAY'S DOLLARS Average U.S. regular gasoline price per gallon, adjusted for inflation to September 2026.

Front mud flaps are not illegal under California law, and passenger vehicles are generally not even required to have mud flaps at all. And: Legal Status: No federal or state laws explicitly ban front mud flaps on standard passenger cars, trucks, or SUVs. Regarding the specific incident, a viral video circulating on social media shows a Berkeley Police Department officer claiming front mud flaps are illegal. In the clip, the officer uses the presence of front mud flaps as the justification for pulling over a driver. Legal experts and critics point out that this is an example of a "pretextual stop"—where law enforcement uses a minor or misapplied traffic infraction as an excuse to pull over a driver and search for other potential violations. Under California Vehicle Code Section 27600, mudguards (fenders or flaps) are only mandated on the rear wheels of certain vehicles (such as trucks, trailers, or vehicles where the body doesn't sufficiently block debris) to prevent throwing rocks backward. The law contains no provisions banning mud flaps on front wheels. share.google/aimode/Pxf2Rfhk…

"he is wrong on that point.⁠En-wikipedia-org.translate “Vaccine-preventable disease” (VPD) is a standard public-health term used by the CDC, WHO, and others. It simply means an infectious disease for which an effective preventive vaccine exists (e.g., measles, polio, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Hib, hepatitis B, HPV, and many others). The claim that the concept has been “proven laughably false” does not match the evidence. ... Vaccines are not 100% effective in every individual, do not eliminate every risk, and some diseases (like flu) are harder to control due to mutation or other factors. That does not make the category of vaccine-preventable diseases invalid or “false.” Outbreaks still occur where vaccination rates drop, which is consistent with the evidence rather than a refutation of it. The poster’s broader analogy critique (seat belts vs. vaccines) can be debated on policy grounds, but the specific assertion that “vaccine-preventable disease” is a false claim is not supported by the data. “teapawt.org/i/grok/share/c2hhcmQtM…

You seem to have overlooked what the Bible actually says about Abraham. Galatians 3:7 explicitly says that those who have faith are Abraham's children. Galatians 3:29 declares that those belonging to Christ are Abraham's descendants and heirs according to the promise. Romans 4 describes Abraham as the father of believers beyond the Jewish people. And Muslims also regard themselves as followers and spiritual heirs of Abraham. The Qur'an explicitly identifies Abraham as a model of submission to God. Abraham himself was called the father of many nations (Genesis 17:4–5), not simply one. But here's something especially relevant to your argument: Ezekiel 47:21–23 expressly instructs Israel to give resident foreigners an inheritance in the land alongside native-born Israelites. Leviticus 19:33–34 commands that foreigners be treated as native-born and loved as oneself. So how exactly are you deriving a divine mandate to deny non-Jews rights from these scriptures? And what does the size of the Arab world have to do with anything? A Palestinian family living in its ancestral home does not lose its rights because someone speaks Arabic in Morocco or Saudi Arabia. Palestinians are not interchangeable with hundreds of millions of people living in other countries. You can acknowledge the Jewish people's historical and religious connection to the land without pretending Palestinians have no connection or rights of their own. An ancient religious promise is not a legal deed authorizing the dispossession or disenfranchisement of people living there today. According to the New Testament, Abraham's heirs are not limited to his biological descendants, and according to Islam, Muslims also regard themselves as heirs to Abraham's religious legacy. Even more importantly, the Bible explicitly instructs the Israelites to recognize the rights of foreigners living among them—including, in one remarkable passage, the right to inherit land.