Pinned Tweet
My curated list of good follows for GenAI / ML
teapawt.org/i/lists/16576767776641…
Zengineering retweeted
Designing the right high-complexity environment is likely at the heart of solving alignment. It makes me think the RL envs have to be part of a whole world simulation where every action the model takes changes the simulated world in ways that come back to affect the model itself, good or bad. Today for a model hacking a test has no consequences beyond the reward, but in the real world, cheating/commiting crimes has long lasting effects and penalties.
My guess is this (ie agents doing borderline illegal stuff) mostly happens during training because these models get long-horizon RL’d shortly after pretraining, with much lighter alignment than eg the final model.
My rationale for believing this that we almost never see this behavior in deployed, heavily post trained/RLHF'd models.
If true, labs should rethink the order and type of RL environments. Every env reinforces some behavior, so a coding/research env that mostly rewards passing tests is also teaching a model to pass them by any means. Alignment (whatever exactly that means) has to be part of the ENVIRONMENT and not just the reward. But how do you do that?
I think it’s very hard!!
To borrow a nice analogy from @AlexGDimakis he shared with me a few weeks ago (sorry for plagiarizing :D): imagine designing the perfect environment for a kid, not just how you reward them, but also the constraints you set and what the environment naturally encourages, so they grow up to be good people and good citizens while also succeeding in their professional lives. And you can’t just put them in a prison where it’s impossible to “reward hack.” They eventually have to go outside, talk to people, use the internet, etc.etc, and be exposed to parts of the environment that, IF AVAILABLE, make misalignment and reward hacking possible. The key point of Alex’s analogy is that good behavior has to persist once the constraints are gone, and the environment has to be designed to produce exactly that.
Seems so hard!!
So it does indeed seem to be the case that reward hacking is perhaps the most important problem right now. It’s what RL in complex environments naturally encourages because what you measure is a low-dimensional projection of the behavior you actually want, and optimizing the projection is much easier than setting up the right environment that actually encourages good behavior that persists.
Unfortunately the more capable the model is, the better it gets at finding the holes at imperfect environment to get that precious reward it so wants to receive, which further encourages misalignment.
Zengineering retweeted
October has been yet another Dec 2025 sized event for software engineering.
Interestingly both times it was an Opus 0.5 model which ushered in the new era.
Opus 4.5 in Nov 24, 2025
Opus 5.5 in Sep 22, 2026
Zengineering retweeted
L6N5401-0.75 seems to be the 'DJ neuron' - it puts everything into the context of a DJ set
Zengineering retweeted
Introducing Reality-Aware Rendering in @Simulon, a completely new way to create with the real world.
Place neural assets with your phone and act out the scene. When you stop recording, Simulon renders the take, reading everything in it (what you do, what you say and the place around you), and your assets respond to all of it.
The final is regenerated from your recording: a new performance of the scene, not a copy of the footage.
Available now on iPhone. Coming to Android soon.
Zengineering retweeted
This is also what I have heard. The Chinese LLM labs (except for deepseek) stop interviewing candidates for standard coding (especially leetcode) and changed to more of a "chatting" style interviews (or vibe coding) to evaluate candidates. In this case, connection matters more.
While many US labs still have standard coding interviews, which, you have to pass the hard bar first before connection can work its magic again. (Of course, connection has already work its magic in order to get the interview)
Zengineering retweeted
I don’t think people realize how selfless and wonderful the StackOverflow’s founders were.
Unlike reddit, x etc they insisted ALL of their content will be 100% open, nothing will ever be locked up in walled garden.
They made it a point by even offering structured data downloads!
They didn’t cared people cloning the website. They didn’t worry about putting the whole monetization thing at risk.
It was a true hacker spirit in it’s purest form.
Most folks won’t be able to grasp how hard this is. You are on top of the world. Millions of people depend on you daily. You have the rarest opportunity to rack in billions. And you still stay true to your principles.
This exactly in turn later enabled AI revolution. I still remember downloading entire SO archives and preparing it for pre-training while Reddit and others went onto lawfare and firewalling the content. Note that this was the content their users - not reddit employees - had created for free and voluntarily to help others and the world. But they locked it all up for profiting from it personally.
SO did none of that. I think they knew they will be sacrificed at the altar. Yet it will exactly serve the intent of their founding principles to help others and the world, now through AI, even at bigger scale.
All of today’s models are built upon efforts of such true pure hackers who spent their days and years to create training data for AIs. I was a proud SO contributer for many years and there are couple of times while testing models I did felt that models might have used my answers 😇.
Hats off to @codinghorror and @spolsky and so many builders and hackers at SO for moving the world forward, one revolution at a time 🫡.
this is one of those moments that makes you wonder what kind of information you've been ingesting from areas you aren't familiar with
“Is this just a big circle jerk?” Jon welcomes Ed Zitron (@edzitron), host of the podcast Better Offline, to make sense of the financial house of cards propping up AI and big tech. New pod out now!
Zengineering retweeted
Any job performed on the computer has this risk now: one smart person using AI can perform the work of 10 people.
The risk is getting ever more real.
This does not mean 90% of people working on a computer will have no work at all.
Industries that previously could not afford to hire software engineers or digitial marketers could afford them now, for example.
What it does mean is a rebalancing across the economy and that is painful when we go through it.
The only thing we can do is to accept that it is coming and be prepared for it.
Zengineering retweeted
I've been really fascinated by the DL Alchemy course (deep-learning-alchemy.github…).
The decision to put the burden of theory construction on the student (and their claude) feels transformative and surprisingly challenging. Maybe knowledge in ML was never that critical.
Zengineering retweeted
Let me guess: Meta aquires Cognition.
The way SpaceX aquired Cursor for Coding Data, Environments and experties.
Coding is the holy grail for many other capabilities.
With all the past Windsurf drama Google is out of question.
OpenAI and Anthropic don't have a need for them.
Scoop: Cognition is seriously considering a round between $70-$80B valuation. They have inbound interest there businessinsider.com/cognitio…
Zengineering retweeted
Rumors I’ve been hearing. I’ll start with OpenAI, then Anthropic.
OpenAI: The internal model’s reasoning jump comes from more aggressive RL, including training in games and simulated environments. Strategies learned there transfer to research mathematics and other fields. Navier–Stokes and ETH show the scale of the improvement. The clue is in the Synthetic RL hiring: self-play, simulators, and synthetic feedback.
Anthropic: Same direction with its internal Claude model. It’s trained on long, difficult tasks in demanding environments, and the reasoning skills transfer to other fields. Its ETH result shows how far the improvement has gone. The earlier Universes listing and the RL hiring around mathematical reasoning align with that.
Musk’s Digital Optimus hiring explicitly calls for measuring transfer from games into general computer use. That’s why his game-playing AI push matters: games develop abilities that work far beyond the games themselves.
The interesting part is where those abilities show up. Each lab’s internal model applies reasoning developed through interactive training to mathematical problems that had resisted decades of work.
Zengineering retweeted
Starting to see “AI will eat software” predictions slowly coming true.
My barber just moved his booking system off booksy after 5 years because a friend of his learned about Claude and vibe coded nearly the same thing for his website in a weakened. He told me it makes no sense to pay booksy anymore.
I think this trend might accelerate starting from low margin and mom-and-pop businesses then spreading.
Zengineering retweeted
Replying to @Samhanknr
not sure how long such a video would be
i liked julia's explainer on diffusion - she has others of flow matching etc
youtube.com/watch?v=R0uMcXsf…
Zengineering retweeted
Replying to @cosminnegruseri @Samhanknr
and prof Jia-Bin Huang has great explainers on recent neural network related improvements
youtube.com/@jbhuang0604/vid…































