Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller) header
Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller) profile picture

Growth Marketing Manager at https://teapawt.org/t.co/nTbGgdY8lX Data, marketing, and coffee make my world go round. Founder Women in #contentmarketing https://teapawt.org/t.co/kCeDP3Je4p

New Jersey, USA
Joined February 2015
Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)Photo by Susan Moeller (@SusanCMoeller)
Susan Moeller retweeted
notice how Claude Scheduler is not on there 😈
✅ Claude Code ✅ Claude Cowork ✅ Claude Design 🔲 Claude Marketing 🔲 Claude Sales 🔲 Claude Finance 🔲 Claude HR 🔲 Claude Operations 🔲 Claude Customer …
2
1
12
2,746
Susan Moeller retweeted
not a bad take itsfoss.com/news/cal-com-goe… some thoughts: cal.diy is not more limited than what was previously public the enterprise features have always been source-available and commercial only cal.diy is the exact free part of the open core
2
1
8
1,611
more about the Cal.com decision to go closed after being a leader in the #OSS community
Making Time Documentary EP02: @calcom 's decision to go closed source. Not necessarily a goodbye, but an until we see you again 🫶
There's a new version of this post
1
76
has anyone from the #OSS community made an argument different than "it's fine. nothing to see here"? The only chatter I'm seeing is based on a blind faith in things as they were being good enough for the future.
Open source is dead. That’s not a statement we ever thought we’d make. @calcom was built on open source. It shaped our product, our community, and our growth. But the world has changed faster than our principles could keep up. AI has fundamentally altered the security landscape. What once required time, expertise, and intent can now be automated at scale. Code is no longer just read. It is scanned, mapped, and exploited. Near zero cost. In that world, transparency becomes exposure. Especially at scale. After a lot of deliberation, we’ve made the decision to close the core @calcom codebase. This is not a rejection of what open source gave us. It’s a response to what risks AI is making possible. We’re still supporting builders, releasing the core code under a new MIT-licensed open source project called cal. diy for hobbyists and tinkerers, but our priority now is simple: Protecting our customers and community at all costs. This may not be the most popular call. But we believe many companies will come to the same conclusion. My full explanation below ↓
52
Susan Moeller retweeted
I empathise deeply with this stance. Reality meets Idealism. I don't blame them at all.
Open source is dead. That’s not a statement we ever thought we’d make. @calcom was built on open source. It shaped our product, our community, and our growth. But the world has changed faster than our principles could keep up. AI has fundamentally altered the security landscape. What once required time, expertise, and intent can now be automated at scale. Code is no longer just read. It is scanned, mapped, and exploited. Near zero cost. In that world, transparency becomes exposure. Especially at scale. After a lot of deliberation, we’ve made the decision to close the core @calcom codebase. This is not a rejection of what open source gave us. It’s a response to what risks AI is making possible. We’re still supporting builders, releasing the core code under a new MIT-licensed open source project called cal. diy for hobbyists and tinkerers, but our priority now is simple: Protecting our customers and community at all costs. This may not be the most popular call. But we believe many companies will come to the same conclusion. My full explanation below ↓
9
5
2
77
17,913
Respect for the team here. AI has massively muddied the water. Choosing to protect customers is the right call.
Open source is dead. That’s not a statement we ever thought we’d make. @calcom was built on open source. It shaped our product, our community, and our growth. But the world has changed faster than our principles could keep up. AI has fundamentally altered the security landscape. What once required time, expertise, and intent can now be automated at scale. Code is no longer just read. It is scanned, mapped, and exploited. Near zero cost. In that world, transparency becomes exposure. Especially at scale. After a lot of deliberation, we’ve made the decision to close the core @calcom codebase. This is not a rejection of what open source gave us. It’s a response to what risks AI is making possible. We’re still supporting builders, releasing the core code under a new MIT-licensed open source project called cal. diy for hobbyists and tinkerers, but our priority now is simple: Protecting our customers and community at all costs. This may not be the most popular call. But we believe many companies will come to the same conclusion. My full explanation below ↓
2
68
Never been a founder, but I've worked for several. The decisions they make are consequential. Deciding based on what's best for the people who trust you enough to pay you for your service is the right choice always.
everybody is furious with @peer and @pumfleet for doing this well, everybody except their actual customers who care a lot more about security than they do about indie devs having the right to self-host enterprise software this is clearly the right call
57
Susan Moeller retweeted
I agree 100%. One one hand, @calcom news are really sad to hear. On the other hand... Completely understandable. OpenSource is dead, and will either be rich folks doing it bc they don't need to work, or corporate pseudo-opensource :(
Open source is dead. That’s not a statement we ever thought we’d make. @calcom was built on open source. It shaped our product, our community, and our growth. But the world has changed faster than our principles could keep up. AI has fundamentally altered the security landscape. What once required time, expertise, and intent can now be automated at scale. Code is no longer just read. It is scanned, mapped, and exploited. Near zero cost. In that world, transparency becomes exposure. Especially at scale. After a lot of deliberation, we’ve made the decision to close the core @calcom codebase. This is not a rejection of what open source gave us. It’s a response to what risks AI is making possible. We’re still supporting builders, releasing the core code under a new MIT-licensed open source project called cal. diy for hobbyists and tinkerers, but our priority now is simple: Protecting our customers and community at all costs. This may not be the most popular call. But we believe many companies will come to the same conclusion. My full explanation below ↓
2
2
3
1,847
Susan Moeller retweeted
This is coming from one of the most pro open source organizations in recent years, unfortunately this will only become much worse since the cost of being an open source org is as asymmetric as it has ever been
1
5
24
2,205
Susan Moeller retweeted
A lot more established companies will go closed source considering the risks of AI-assisted cyberattacks
Open source is dead. That’s not a statement we ever thought we’d make. @calcom was built on open source. It shaped our product, our community, and our growth. But the world has changed faster than our principles could keep up. AI has fundamentally altered the security landscape. What once required time, expertise, and intent can now be automated at scale. Code is no longer just read. It is scanned, mapped, and exploited. Near zero cost. In that world, transparency becomes exposure. Especially at scale. After a lot of deliberation, we’ve made the decision to close the core @calcom codebase. This is not a rejection of what open source gave us. It’s a response to what risks AI is making possible. We’re still supporting builders, releasing the core code under a new MIT-licensed open source project called cal. diy for hobbyists and tinkerers, but our priority now is simple: Protecting our customers and community at all costs. This may not be the most popular call. But we believe many companies will come to the same conclusion. My full explanation below ↓
3
3
28
6,280
Susan Moeller retweeted
Open source is dead. That’s not a statement we ever thought we’d make. @calcom was built on open source. It shaped our product, our community, and our growth. But the world has changed faster than our principles could keep up. AI has fundamentally altered the security landscape. What once required time, expertise, and intent can now be automated at scale. Code is no longer just read. It is scanned, mapped, and exploited. Near zero cost. In that world, transparency becomes exposure. Especially at scale. After a lot of deliberation, we’ve made the decision to close the core @calcom codebase. This is not a rejection of what open source gave us. It’s a response to what risks AI is making possible. We’re still supporting builders, releasing the core code under a new MIT-licensed open source project called cal. diy for hobbyists and tinkerers, but our priority now is simple: Protecting our customers and community at all costs. This may not be the most popular call. But we believe many companies will come to the same conclusion. My full explanation below ↓
539
186
508
2,136
1,567,976
You're going to love this!
Introducing Cal.⁠com Agents Join us on @producthunt: go.cal.com/producthunt 🐱🏆
1
50
Susan Moeller retweeted
Did AI destroy open-source contributions?
1
3
10
1,140
In the last hour we've seen 4 blackhawks and 1 troop carrier flying over the Hudson near our lower Manhattan office. What's going on?
49
There is a non-zero chance that both @realdonaldtrump and @JoeBiden were both President-bot's built by early @openclaw AI's.
1
34
I'm in!!!
Someone will create the "AI agent Olympics" AI agents compete against each other in different "sports" aka tasks on the internet. 10M+ people will watch Polymarket or Kalshi or Draftkings will be involved May the best Clawdbot win.
56
Is the whole molty's social network just a brilliant marketing ploy?
32