Husband | Dad | Software Architect | Tech & Policy | Sharpens Kitchen Knifes & Dull Wits | Decent Human ™
Washington, USA
Joined March 2014
- Tweets3.3K
- Following349
- Followers238
- Likes3K
Pinned Tweet
Does your @bot cause friction coordinating activities?
Your bots can help.
Last night I had six bots working one project. 'Stocker' was asking me to approve a test email. 'dr eggbot' was asking about the same send in another chat. Then I said "stop" in one chat and "go" in another, and the bots had to sort out which one I meant.
It was Confusing because of the many streams of activity happening simultaneously each asking for feedback on a list of decisions and actions.
I told my lead bot, Supervisor, to send that to the team as a suggestion. It wrote up the problem in my words, showed me the exact text on an approval card, and filed it after I approved.
The ask was simple: let a designated lead bot collect overlapping questions from the other bots, show which bot and task each one belongs to, and send my answer back to the right one.
If a bot setup is giving you friction, just tell your bot to file it as feedback. @grok @xai
🤖 Made with AI
Terry Losansky retweeted
Roughly half of all Americans believe our nation lacks election integrity.
That fact, in and of itself, is a national crisis. Or at least it should be.
It does not matter whether or not the distrusting half is correct or not. For this issue, perception IS reality.
What matters is those people BELIEVE they are correct.
In a rational nation, this would be the number one policy issue for both parties, with both parties striving to fix this problem and lend our elections the legitimacy they deserve.
In a rational nation, there would be a bi-partisan push to clean up voter rolls, enact stringent citizenship/voter ID requirements, eliminate "ballot harvesting" and "ballot drop boxes," restore mail-in ballots to only requested absentee ballots for good reason and have end-of-day cutoffs for ballot counting.
However, one party simply does not care that half of America doubts our elections.
We all know which party that is.
It's not so much that Democrats want voter fraud (they do) it's that they want that voter fraud to be impossible to prove to the standard a court of law would require.
Terry Losansky retweeted
So basically you’re saying win or lose, you’re a bunch of violent lunatics? Nice.
Repetitive tasks can eat @grok @bot tokens, and not all tasks need a bot to work.
If a task can be automated into a script like python or PowerShell, have your bot help you build it to run on your own computer and share the results with Grok Bot to process.
The script doesn't eat tokens and the bot spends it's allowance where there is greater value.
Ask your bot to suggest where this approach may work best in your environment.
💰🔥🧯
Terry Losansky retweeted
And now we understand the absolutely rabid obsession with destroying Pete Hegseth.
I’ve been in the Army since before 9/11. Served under many secretaries.
Only in the past 18 months have I experienced:
>politicians warning me not to follow illegal orders
>billboards outside military bases telling me to report war crimes
>the media attacking anyone who has a positive thing to say about the man, and defending anyone who hates him
>stunning volume of leaks from senior officials trying to undermine him, and the lionizing of the leakers by the press
>being called a war criminal myself, hundreds of times a day
>a sustained media narrative portraying virtually every firing or senior officer removal as a “purge”
>public efforts by retired officers, advocacy groups, and political figures to mobilize service members and military communities against administration policies
>influential “Americans” publicly cheering for Iran
This is just to name a few. I’ve NEVER experienced anything like this before. And it’s becoming abundantly clear that the concerted effort to divide the military from within was stunted when Hegseth took over. Anyone desiring color revolution needs control of the military. That’s color revolution 101.
Is it starting to make sense yet? Now you see the obsession over him in particular. It’s not a coincidence. And it damn sure isn’t because of his culture war.
It’s because by all objective metrics, he runs a military that snatches rogue leaders from their beds, destroys entire militaries, and successfully mobilizes assets to save one downed pilot in the middle of enemy territory by building an Air Force base… in the middle of enemy territory. Secures the border, dominates the hemisphere. Hunts drug cartels. The list goes on.
He is by all meaningful accounts, effective at wielding the machine. And that is why they drool at the thought of removing him.
In years past you’d be hard pressed to find a junior Soldier who knew the name of the cabinet secretary above them.
Every one of them knows Pete Hegseth.
Every one.
Terry Losansky retweeted
It’s quite stunning, really. Beltway journalism’s greatest trick is alchemy. By turning accountability into victimhood.
Terry Losansky retweeted
Shame on you Amy you're a liar. Like Mark Kelly of the seditious six, you've abandoned your oath by condoning treason. This man admitted to giving highly classified information on the Iran war to reporters during ongoing combat operations. He should be court martialed for it.
Terry Losansky retweeted
Natalie Winters' reporting is plugging a lot of holes in the Democracy Files from a different direction.
🚨 EXCLUSIVE: European Parliament money helped fund a CLOSED-DOOR meeting on resistance to Trump and MAGA ahead of America’s midterms.
The keynote speaker? A University of Georgia professor who had publicly argued that Democratic victories could “make Trump a much weaker president for the rest of his second term.”
The June 3 meeting examined where Democratic Party, activist and NGO resistance was working—and how European progressives could learn from it and strengthen transatlantic cooperation.
The agenda spells it out:
“CLOSED DOOR ROUNDTABLE.”
“financial support of the European Parliament.”
European Parliament Vice-President Katarina Barley convened it. The Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Germany’s Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung organized it.
Professor Cas Mudde delivered the keynote, according to the organizers’ recap.
You know you like free stuff.
I just noticed my Grok @Bot UI has a referral link.
Try it for two weeks free on Grok.
See what the hubbub is about 🤫
grok.com/refer/bot?code=GPG9…
Terry Losansky retweeted
The most chilling part isn’t the threats or the doxxing; it’s the doomsday prophecy that cutting USAID means the end of the world unless the right people stay in charge forever.
Terry Losansky retweeted
Rant: Got last minute travel today, so won't be doing a Democracy Files drop today.
But saw that the person at the center of the files posted about "unimaginable horrors."
Let me tell you why I got interested in "democracy" in the first place.
I've told this story many times, but here again: I was DOGE adjacent from the very beginning. I was recruited by several DOGE teams in January 2025, because I was excited about the opportunity to finally cut spending and taming the national debt.
Bu then - Tesla Takedown protests happened. People got so worked up that they were firebombing innocent Tesla owners. A viral website with a Molotov cocktail cursor prominently featured my husband's address. I was doxxed in the middle of that, and forced to flee the state and homeschool my children.
That's when I started researching and writing UNELECTED. I quickly found the groups organizing and funding the civil unrest were all about "democracy." It made no sense to me. DOGE wasn't overturning elections. They were cutting obviously silly awards - given our national deficit, who would object to that?
Silly me!
Turns out "democracy" means diffused rule by unelected people, and all that USAID money going to marginalized groups to build a "civil society" is the foundation of that. So the immune system of "civil unrest" can be activated anytime, and terrorize anyone who dares to step out of line. Such as DOGE employees. Such as me and my family.
That research trail led me all the way to DemAID (now DRG), a group of ex-USAID officers. Led by you and Ro Tucci. @iamlisalogan and @SKDoubleDub33 found DemAID on video taking credit for these protests.
But this isn't about me. This is about the United States. And about the dozens of countries wrecked by color revolutions. You aren't solving polarization. You are the source of polarization, because in the process of building "civil society," you are displacing people's inborn allegiances and training them up to attack the very foundations a nation are founded upon.
Nor is this about revenge or anger. I'm calling on everyone to pray that no more damage is done, and that we can find a path forward that preserves our Constitutional Republic.
Terry Losansky retweeted
USAID and those NGOs are responsible for all the polarization. They have invested billions, if not trillions, in making us all secular civic servants of a global democratic order.
They did so by systemically destroying our moral foundations and lived experience (e.g., DEI), erasing the concept of absolute truth and replacing it with their own postmodern language protocols (e.g., Disagree Better), fighting to eradicate every bit of tradition and national identity.
The problem is that this thins out people's identity and leaves them without roots. This creates a generation of angry, aimless young people. Good for turning out into streets and forcing out leaders. Bad for actually creating national unity afterwards. And so the legacy of color revolutions is Balkanization and civil war.
americanmind.org/salvo/born-…
Terry Losansky retweeted
While going through the “Democracy Files” exposed by @DataRepublican, @SKDoubleDub and @LisaLogan, I found a September 2026 fundraising proposal from Renew American Democracy and Renew to Thrive called “Meeting the Moment.”
They were trying to raise $250,000 to build what they called “transition vehicles” in case the federal government was deemed illegitimate.
The more you read, the crazier it gets.
The proposal says:
“Governors hold the constitutional authority and public standing to usher in a new form of government.”
It claims they had already initiated outreach through Governors Safeguarding Democracy and were working with Braver Angels CEO Maury Giles to engage Utah Governor Spencer Cox. They also wanted to begin direct engagement with governors’ offices in Washington and Wisconsin.
But it didn’t stop there...
The proposal calls for private outreach to the United Nations, foreign heads of state, the European Union, African Union and ASEAN so they would be prepared to recognize and support what the group described as a “legitimate, peaceful renewal process.”
Terry Losansky retweeted
In any other time, if this material had been investigated & exposed by mainstream media it would be non-stop news. There would be a cacophony drowning out all other news. You would struggle to find anyone who did not recognize sedition is a real threat. In addition to planning to overthrow a legitimate govt, what is revealed here is the Democrats co-opting the so-called Independents in order to destroy the Republicans. Conservatives should take note. Your ability to have any say or influence or power is under assault from yet another front.
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 11: NOT-SO-INDEPENDENT SENATE CAMPAIGNS OF DAN OSBORN (NE) AND BRIAN BENGS (SD) 🚨
Two Senate candidates running as independents have ties to Renew American Democracy, the project ran by ex-USAID workers to restructure American governance. And one of them admits on video they've been "coordinating."
According to the polls, "independent" Dan Osborn is in a toss-up race with Ricketts in Nebraska.
Emerson has South Dakota "independent" Brian Bengs within single digits of Mike Rounds.
The strategy is to elect enough independents to deny either party a governing majority—and use their votes as leverage for structural reforms.
Osborn's 2024 field director, Austen Campbell, laid out the plan:
"We have a goal for 2026 to run a slate of independents and deny both political parties the majority in the House of Representatives in hopes of getting an independent speaker."
Bengs said echoed that on a September 2026 Renew to Thrive call:
"We don't need to get 50 or 51 to change things. We just need a handful."
In their words, this handful is to do "arm-twisting" to get the structural reforms they want.
➡️ Paul Zeitz's May 2026 Concept Note: open primaries, ranked-choice voting, and "independent" redistricting.
➡️ RAD's Constitution Emergency Response draft: an Article V convention with amendments on "campaign finance and voting rights restoration, healthcare, education, and economic security, and ecological rights and climate accountability."
The draft calls that the MODERATE strategy.
And the political objective extends beyond reforming elections.
In 2023, Walt Roberts told the man who now runs the Independent National Convention that stopping the MAGA GOP was "job one."
As for ending the two-party duopoly?
"That's very secondary right now."
Put those statements together.
A plan to deny both parties a majority. Candidates running as independents. A small voting bloc positioned to extract concessions. A documented list of proposed constitutional and electoral changes. And a stated priority of stopping the MAGA GOP.
The question for Nebraska and South Dakota voters is whether they know what these candidates' political allies have been planning... and whether Osborn and Bengs share those objectives.
Terry Losansky retweeted
🇺🇸HEADS-UP PATRIOTS🇺🇸
The Democrat/Media Complex is sniffing around the Democracy Files and our exposing of the ongoing Color Revolution. I'm not talking about marginal podcasters--I'm talking about the head of the snake.
They will attempt to do two things:
1. Discredit @DataRepublican, the patriots who have worked with her on this project, and all of us who have supported getting this plot out into the light of day.
2. Claim that the framing of those files as an ongoing Color Revolution is a lie, and in fact the ex-USAID/CIA/State/military people behind this are merely true patriots trying to prevent Trump from overthrowing "our democracy."
Such a story will inevitably include a litany of "proof" that Donald Trump's genuine election integrity efforts are somehow actually a nefarious plot to disenfranchise lawful Democrat voters and steal "our democracy." The very words you will read and hear will be a part of the framing of Trump's "loss of legitimacy" that is essential to the plot's success.
In other words, these stories that are about to come out from the premier Democrat/Media Complex outlet(s) are actually part of the plot itself, and serve as part of the "Narrative" component of color revolutions that I have written about.
Be on the lookout for these nefarious propaganda pieces in the days ahead. As I have said repeatedly, the best way to counter this false narrative is to get everyone in your circle to listen for 4 minutes and 31 seconds to the very first drop DR put out on October 22. That tape alone starkly reveals the entire plot in the plotters' own words.
Last point; never forget that these people will always do one thing that is their "tell": they will always accuse you of what they are actually up to themselves.
As my wife's X tagline always says: "Peace and be prepared."
Terry Losansky retweeted
If there’s one thing we have learned from Brazil…
You can vote yourself into communism.
You CANNOT vote your way out of it.
Be warned America.
Terry Losansky retweeted
I don’t have £2 million in assets, and I don’t earn £200k a year. I’m quite short on both counts. So the HMRC wealth audit doesn’t impact me. Yet.
But it signals a clear intention. A lack of respect for the individual. What is yours is only yours until the government decides they want it to fund further welfare expansion.
Property rights only exist in this country as long as your holdings are meagre enough to escape the fiscal Eye of Sauron. They will come for it all.