Exactly.... my point, “Show intelligent behaviour that matches a human” does not mean “measure intelligence itself....”
Stanford’s wording says intelligent behaviour, not intelligence as a scientifically defined construct.....
The distinction matters. A behavioural proxy can be useful without being a complete theory or measurement of the underlying capacity.....
A parrot can reproduce human speech....and tuning it more can even make it feel human bhaviour.....it does not settle the question of what it understands or having human intellegence.....
And BTW if you open the very link Standford has stated it too: