Berkley idealism seems logically consistent But logic must be prior or it wouldnt. A relational substrate must be prior, too. An unbounded mind has nothing to differentiate itself. A mind cant experience this vs that w/o a relational substrate to hold the distinction
@HetkeBrian
VSA-TOE retweeted
Many times, scientists are also making metaphysical claims, particularly physicalist claims, and presenting them as science. Including this guy.
This also hurts science and for the same reason.
Scientists & science journalists decry the public's rejection of science, but are oblivious to the major cause: the perception, sometimes correct, that scientists are just another political faction. Among the guiltiest perpetrators are the recent editors of Scientific American, who turned this once-beloved treasure into a left-wing propaganda rag. This absolutely does not justify the Trump administration's unconstitutional meddling, but the new owners are right to restore it to its mission of explaining science to Americans. The Nation reports on The Fall of “Scientific American” thenation.com/article/societ…
Extending a hand to mutual scientific discovery only works if the other person is actually interested in the truth rather than protecting their brand.
Hey @StuartHameroff and @MillerLabMIT. I'm not a neuroscientist. I know its presumptious as hell, but if either or both of you would be interested in development, I'd really appreciate it, because i consider you both the best in the necessary fields.
