>Nick says people who play single player games have something wrong with them.
>one of the most legendary single player game developers shuts down the next day.
Thoughts? π€
Why is racism always associated with ignorance?
Some of the smartest people who have ever lived were racists.
Secretary Rubio says only a minority of Americans βhateβ Indians and that they are stupid for feeling that way.
Follow: @AFpost
It's weird not to be motivated by the things most people care about.
Women, money, status...
I don't care about any of it.
My goal is to find out why God put me here, and then do it.
Weaver Whiteheart π»π¦ retweeted
ππ ππ₯πππ πππ₯π¦π§ π¨π‘π§ππ πͺπ πππ
Oh look another fake Groyper article to manufacture the illusion of Nick having any political influence.
Cruz did not say he βcanβt fill staffing positions because there are so many Groypers.β He said that, for one vacancy, roughly half the applicants couldnβt stomach his position on Israel.
Those are not remotely the same claim.
Opposing Ted Cruz on Israel does not make someone a Groyper. It does not make them a Nick Fuentes supporter. It does not even establish that they watch Nick Fuentes.
But that distinction has to disappear, because the entire sales pitch depends on making a relatively small online faction look like some enormous electoral force.
So the formula becomes:
Anti-Israel young person = Groyper.
Edgy Republican staffer = Groyper.
Anonymous estimate = demographic fact.
Online engagement = voters.
Media coverage = proof of mass support.
Then the inflated claim gets reposted as evidence of how powerful the movement supposedly is.
Meanwhile, an actual survey found only 6% of registered voters could accurately explain what βGroyperβ even means, and a 2026 More in Common survey found only 24% of Trump voters had even heard, read or seen anything about Nick Fuentes.
And that famous β30β40% of young GOP staffers are Groypersβ number? It wasnβt a survey. It came from an unnamed insider. When another reporter actually called people across Capitol Hill, the White House and conservative organizations, every source she contacted said the number was badly inflated.
This is why the constant propaganda about their size matters.
If you actually commanded the constituency you claim to command, you wouldnβt need to continuously convert unrelated political attitudes, anonymous anecdotes and engagement metrics into fake membership numbers.
A movement with real mass political power can show you the voters.
A movement built around the appearance of mass political power has to keep telling you how huge it is.
Women will lay out their tits then wonder why you're staring.
Like bitch are you showing them off or not?
I'm tired of society making us feel like we're bad people for being pissed off about our nation's wealth being siphoned by foreigners.





















