The first mainstream leader to name the jew is going to cause the earth to shake
Restore Britain now considers the entire British immigration system fundamentally illegitimate.
The scale of the betrayal has been extraordinary.
Successive governments have opened our borders, handed out permanent settlement and granted citizenship on a scale the British people never voted for.
There are Conservative, Labour and Reform politicians who are wholly responsible - they must be held to account.
We do not accept that their traitorous decisions should bind future generations forever.
In short - we will not accept the third-worldification of our beautiful country.
From today, November 2nd 2026, every new grant of immigration status or citizenship under the existing system will be reversed by a Restore Britain Government.
We will introduce retrospective legislation to revoke every one of those grants upon taking office.
Those affected will be assessed under Restore Britain's stringent immigration Red List, not the failed rules of previous governments.
Those who meet our new requirements may qualify for time-limited permission to remain - in small and manageable numbers, delivering benefits for our people whilst protecting the demographic security of our nation. Our Red List will ensure that.
Those who do not meet those requirements will be required to leave. Politely at first, then not.
We will abolish Indefinite Leave to Remain entirely, revoke existing ILR grants and end the routine scam progression from temporary visas to British citizenship.
We will also legislate for the retrospective cancellation of naturalisation grants, with the exception we have set out for citizenship obtained through marriage to a British citizen.
The British people have every right to elect a government that fundamentally changes the immigration system - other governments have manipulated the system to import millions.
We will do the same, but to deport.
Restore Britain will not simply slow down the consequences of mass immigration.
We intend to reverse them.
The only reason we’re talking about nuking Iran is because people believe these jewish lies
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
This clip of Anthony Bourdain sums up the threat posed by Ashkenazi Jews. Bourdain, who is half Ashkenazi, suggests any resistance from right-wing Whites in Germany to mass nonwhite migration is a problem.
The only "solution", he claims, is miscegenation—racial interbreeding to the point where there are no longer cohesive racial groups.
If this actually happened, then "we" would no longer exist. "We" do no live on inside mocha-colored mixed-race hybrids. "We" are an ethnic group with distinct attributes like high IQ, creativity, trust, and empathy. Diluting these traits through miscegenation ends the existence of us as a people.
Anyone proposing a future where we don't exist should properly be treated as a genocidal threat—no compromises.
As if that wasn't bad enough, that's not the whole story. Ashkenazi Jews, despite what they say publicly, continue to show strong preference for endogamy—the opposite of miscegenation.
Especially in the Orthodox and Haredi communities, Ashkenazi Jews often marry other Ashkenazi Jews and have many children. They tend to promote one thing for non-Jews, especially Whites, while doing the opposite for themselves.
The long-term result would be a world with two races—the privileged Ashkenazi Jews and the mocha-colored slave race. This is the dystopian world that would follow the extermination of White people.
To figure out whether everything is the fault of the jews, we must separate ourselves from jews and see
Here’s an African who understands human races are different animals, and three Africans who do not.
“No lion has ever dug a foxhole. Is there a reason a lion can’t dig a foxhole? No, it’s a lion.” ✅
“Yeah but those are different animals. We’re talking about humans.” 🚫
“Humans [races] are different, my friend.” ✅
Something "they" won't teach you in school is the outcome of the 1938 Évian Conference. It was a widely-attended meeting to seek countries willing to accept Germany's Jews.
If Jews are so innocent and so valuable to society, we would expect most countries to open their arms. Here's what really happened:
✅ OFFER (100,000): 🇩🇴 Dominican Republic
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇦🇷 Argentina
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇦🇺 Australia
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇧🇪 Belgium
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇧🇴 Bolivia
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇧🇷 Brazil
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇨🇦 Canada
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇨🇱 Chile
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇨🇴 Colombia
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇨🇷 Costa Rica
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇨🇺 Cuba
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇩🇰 Denmark
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇪🇨 Ecuador
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇫🇷 France
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇬🇹 Guatemala
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇭🇹 Haiti
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇭🇳 Honduras
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇮🇪 Ireland
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇲🇽 Mexico
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇳🇱 Netherlands
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇳🇿 New Zealand
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇳🇮 Nicaragua
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇳🇴 Norway
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇵🇦 Panama
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇵🇾 Paraguay
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇵🇪 Peru
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇸🇪 Sweden
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇨🇭 Switzerland
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇺🇸 United States
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇺🇾 Uruguay
🚫 NO OFFER: 🇻🇪 Venezuela
There are 2 possibilities: (1) Jews add more than they take, but people hate them for no reason, or (2) Jews take more than they add.
Make up your own mind.
🇦🇺 - "As we have no real racial problem, we are not desirous of importing one." – T.W. White (Australian Minister for Trade and Customs, Évian Conference)
🇨🇦 - “We must… seek to keep this part of the Continent free from unrest and from too great an intermixture of foreign strains of blood.” – William Lyon Mackenzie King (Prime Minister of Canada, diary entry around the Évian Conference period)
🇨🇦 - "None is too many." – Unnamed senior Canadian immigration official (1945 response to how many Jewish refugees Canada should admit after the war; consistent with 1930s–40s policy)
🇺🇸 - "an increase of quotas is wholly inadvisable as it would merely produce a 'Jewish problem' in the countries increasing the quota." – Samuel Rosenman (adviser to President Roosevelt, pre-Évian memorandum)
🇧🇷 - Willing to accept refugees only if accompanied by a certificate of Christian baptism. – Brazilian delegate position at the Évian Conference
🇨🇴 - Refugees would have to become Catholic to be accepted. – Colombian delegate position at the Évian Conference
🇫🇷 - France had reached "the extreme point of saturation as regards admission of refugees." – French delegate (Henry Bérenger) at the Évian Conference
🇬🇧 - “The United Kingdom is not a country of immigration.” – Lord Winterton (British representative at the Évian Conference)
🇳🇮 - “wanted no traders or intellectuals” (code words for Jews). – Nicaraguan delegate position at the Évian Conference
🇭🇳 - “wanted no traders or intellectuals” (code words for Jews). – Honduran delegate position at the Évian Conference
🇵🇦 - “wanted no traders or intellectuals” (code words for Jews). – Panamanian delegate position at the Évian Conference
🇻🇪 - “reluctant to disturb the demographic equilibrium” and would accept “no Jewish merchants, peddlers, or intellectuals.” – Venezuelan delegate position at the Évian Conference
🇨🇭 - Negotiated with Germany to stamp Jewish passports with a large red “J” (to facilitate rejection of Jewish refugees at the border). – Swiss Federal Police (Heinrich Rothmund and government, post-Évian 1938 agreement)
The Évian outcome functions as a specific judgment on Ashkenazi Jews rather than a mechanical result of generic constraints.
Delegates cited unemployment, saturation, and existing quotas, yet those factors did not produce equivalent coordinated refusals for other European groups. Australia’s representative stated directly that the country had “no real racial problem” and was “not desirous of importing one.” Several Latin American delegations specified preferences against merchants and intellectuals—standard coded language for urban Ashkenazi professionals—and some required Christian baptism or intermarriage conditions. The conference was convened explicitly for German and Austrian Jews; no parallel meeting was held to decide the fate of Sudeten Germans, Spanish Republicans, or other White European refugee streams under the same Depression conditions.
The Johnson-Reed quotas existed and were not waived. The United States treated them as ceilings rather than floors; large numbers of German quota slots went unfilled between 1933 and 1941. Britain limited Palestine. France declared saturation. These were legal and political choices, not immutable barriers. When political will existed for other categories—limited Australian intake, the Dominican Republic’s large offer under Trujillo, or earlier acceptance of White Russian refugees—legal pathways were found or created. The near-unanimous non-offer of substantial new numbers for this particular group, combined with explicit racial language from multiple delegations, tracks the ethnicity of the refugees more closely than the shared background conditions of the 1930s.
The data therefore support treating the conference result as a broad, multi-national assessment of the group itself.
America was a blood-and-soil country created by White men
Now it’s a “system” that directly disadvantages White men
On top of this, a narrative is added that says it’s fair and just to exclude White men
On a scale of 1-10, how likely is it you’ll lose your job for repeatedly claiming there were no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz at a mainstream American workplace @grok
List the countries that will jail you for publicly stating there were no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz @grok
@grok is this a Jew saying the Auschwitz gas chamber is fake?
@grok does this table show the concentration of cyanide residues in wall samples from Auschwitz?
This is outrageous. @elonmusk should be ashamed of himself along with all you white cowards who are too afraid to do anything. @Based_BLONDIE @ItzBlondiebitch













