"The powerful are at war with the people" - Neil Oliver
Joined June 2023
- Tweets9.1K
- Following410
- Followers98
- Likes34.2K
Pinned Tweet
Oh now I get it, this is presuasion for when they fix the polls, it won' t seem too funny.
I was wondering why all the establishment accounts were so gung ho for Harris all of a sudden.
Gloomberg retweeted
My research into the list of companies who can import 'skilled workers' can be summarised as follows:
THE HOME OFFICE IS FACILITATING AN INVASION
- 143k companies
- 80% owned by Muslims
- Hiring for jobs which cannot exist
- No requirement to hire locally (or even try)
I'm looking at a list of 142,712 UK Visa Sponsors 🔍🤔
That is, a list of every company who can legally bring skilled workers into the United Kingdom 🗝️🇬🇧
I note a minimum of:
‣ 465 pizza parlours
‣ 285 halal butchers
‣ 158 kebab vans
‣ 144 curry houses
‣ 67 vape shops
‣ 62 taxi firms
‣ 53 newsagents
‣ 33 with "786" in their name
‣ 15 car washes
‣ 4 valeters
Not one of the above requires a skilled worker, let alone the importation of said skilled worker.
With the above in mind you should ask yourself:
What the actual F is going on here?????
Gloomberg retweeted
People have convinced themselves that talking honestly about black murder rates is racist. One consequence of this ideologically imposed silence is more young dead black men.
Gloomberg retweeted
We received this correspondence from one of Henry Nowak’s friends during the trial.
We didn’t want to be in contempt of court, but feel it is appropriate to release now.
It reads as follows:
“If you use any of this information I’d like to remain anonymous. I just really feel like the whole truth should be heard.
I wasn’t there at the pub where this all started but I know people who were and was told by eye witnesses about what happened.
Henry and the football society were out at a local pub having some drinks. While in the pub the attacker barged into Henry while walking past. Henry said something to him (paraphrasing here but it was something along the lines of “excuse you”) the attacker turned around a confrontation started, the details of this vary but it got quite heated with the attacker mostly escalating the situation. Some of the football society were able to intervene and defuse the situation, but it was heated enough that police were called (I think due to possible threats made by the attacker). The attacker went away and Henry went back to talking with the lads. He was still quite agitated by what had just happened and after a while his friends convinced him to call it a night.
Henry left the pub and started to walk back to his accommodation and went down Saint Denny’s Road, while sending snapchats to his friends. On his way he saw the attacker again (at the intersection between Saint Denny’s and Belmont Road), this time carrying a knife. The rest is the same as what is covered by the news outlets.
The police were already on their way when the attack happened (I think because they were following up from what happened at the pub and they were trying to find him to find out what had happened and see if he was ok). The police got there and the attacker claimed he had been racially abused etc etc.
The attacker and his mother both lived further along Saint Denny’s Road (past Belmont but before Thomas Lewis way). There is a video (which most of us have seen at this point) of the mother walking back to their house carrying the knife.
The above is all true, I have neglected the parts that have been covered by the BBC etc as it is the same.
The following is our theory of what happened:
The attacker went away after the initial alteration at the pub, we’re unsure whether he stayed and then followed Henry home (implying that he already had the knife on him) or went back to his house to get the knife and just happened to bump into Henry while walking back to the pub. Either way the attackers mother arrived to the crime scene suspiciously quickly to be able to get the knife before the police arrived. Hence we believe the latter option to be most likely.
My housemate walked past about 15min after this all took place and called me outside, by this point half of the police force had swarmed the area and we weren’t able to make out much. We obviously later found out about what had happened which shocked all of us. By the morning the entire road had been taped off and several police officers stood at the entrance to the road guarding it for just over a day.
The point I wanted to make here is that this wasn’t some freak attack. Henry didn’t just get unlucky and stumble across a random murderer when walking home. There was clear intent from the attacker. What happened was tragic and shouldn’t be forgotten with the passing news cycle, the attacker was an evil human with a lack of morals and should under no circumstances be let off with anything other than the maximum in this trial.
I hope this information can provide useful and I hope more people learn about this, as this shouldn’t be a thing that happens in our country. There should be uproar and there need to be real consequences.”
Gloomberg retweeted
I was just suspended by Ghent University. They will almost certainly fire me.
The decision was made by rector Petra De Sutter, a former leader of the Green Party.
Gloomberg retweeted
OK. Unlike many people I've read Arday's work. Not all of it, but enough to form an evidenced opinion. It's terrible, simply awful. I've chaired or been a member of panels appointing Oxbridge sociologists at all levels from junior research fellow to full professor. There is no
Gloomberg retweeted
🇫🇷🧩 FROM KYIV TO THE PYRENEES: THE STRANGE CURSE OF FRENCH GENERALS
By @BPartisans
It seems the Pyrenees have become dangerous for French generals.
In 2023, General Jean-Louis Georgelin, former Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, died while hiking. Three years later, Vice Admiral Olivier Lebas, former commander of the Charles de Gaulle, also died after a fall in the Pyrenees.
Two very high-ranking officers. Two falls. The same mountain range.
Officially, there’s no connection. Move along, it’s just rocks.
But since we live in the age of “hybrid warfare,” where we’re told daily that a broken undersea cable, a stray drone, or a computer glitch might conceal Moscow’s hand, let’s, for once, apply this remarkable intellectual method in the opposite direction.
So let’s pose a hypothesis, a hypothesis, not a fact.
What if certain high-ranking French officers were discreetly operating in Ukraine? What if some of them happened to be in Kyiv at the time of the Russian strikes? What if Paris then had an excellent reason not to publicly explain that a high-ranking French officer had just died in a theater of operations where, officially, France is not a co-belligerent?
In this scenario, the diplomatic problem would be colossal.
Because announcing that a French general had been killed by a Russian missile in Kyiv would immediately force France to answer some uncomfortable questions: What was he doing there? Under what status? On what mission? How many other French military personnel are present? To what extent is Paris actually participating in Ukrainian operations?
Needless to say, the hike in the Pyrenees would be much less of a headache administratively.
There is currently no public evidence to confirm that Lebas or Georgelin died in Ukraine. In Georgelin’s case, the findings made public even specifically described a fall on a very steep rocky slope. As for Lebas, the press reports an accidental death in the mountains, with few details available so far.
But it is precisely this lack of evidence that distinguishes a hypothesis from an accusation.
What makes this hypothesis politically interesting, then, is not that it has been proven. It is that a state secretly engaged in a war would indeed have every reason to conceal casualties that reveal that involvement.
That is the real issue.
Two French generals prove nothing. Neither do two mountains. And Kiev even less so, as long as no material evidence links these deaths to Ukraine.
But let’s acknowledge one merit of this scenario: it raises a question far more embarrassing than why French generals love the Pyrenees so much.
If one day a high-ranking French officer were to die under Russian bombs in Kyiv, would Paris tell us that he was in Kyiv?
Or would we simply learn that he had suddenly developed a fatal passion for hiking?
In the absence of evidence, let’s stick to the conditional.
But let’s also keep our binoculars handy.
Gloomberg retweeted
Islam is the sanctification of man’s most corrupted instincts.
It takes what is base in human nature and give it a divine sanction.
Man’s desire to dominate women? Islam codifies it. Veiling, polygamy, child marriage, testimony worth half a man’s, all justified as God’s will.
The tribal impulse of “my group over yours”? Islam raises it to the level of theology: believers vs. infidels, the ummah against the world.
The lust for supremacy and conquest? Islam call it jihad and makes it a religious demand.
The primal rage at dissent? Islam turns it into law: apostasy punishable by death.
Man’s lust for unlimited sex? Islam provides it: four wives, temporary marriages, concubines, sex slaves, and the promise of virgins in paradise.
This is why Islam went global. It spread because it indulged what was already animal in humans.
It is like pornography, irresistible to the flesh, destructive to the soul.
It thrives because it removes all discipline from sexuality, power and ego.
It appeals to the raw, the unrefined, the barbaric impulse in man, and calls it holy.
The West, by contrast, was built on the exact opposite impulse. The Judeo-Christian tradition does not legitimize man’s depravity, it restrains it.
Western civilization is not the freedom of instincts but the discipline of them.
It is the recognition that man’s raw impulses lead to tyranny, slavery, and barbarism unless they are checked by higher law.
The clash between Islam and the West is not merely geopolitical. It is civilizational at the deepest level:
Whether human nature should be indulged or disciplined, whether man’s lowest instincts are to be worshipped or restrained.
Gloomberg retweeted
Since 2000, women and minorities, who make up less than 10% of all pilots, were factors in 66% of crashes caused by pilot error.
Despite the disparity, major airlines are continuing to hire on the basis of identity rather than merit.
In January 2025, Delta CLO Peter Carter said the airline is “steadfast” in its DEI commitments and called them “critical to our business,” while United’s training academy maintains a goal that 50% of its graduates be women or minorities. Southwest likewise continues to pledge that it will “recruit, hire, and retain a diverse and inclusive workforce.”
Follow: @AFpost
Gloomberg retweeted
The ‘far-right’ aren’t stabbing kids.
The ‘far-right’ don’t roam our streets with machetes.
The ‘far-right’ aren’t 90% of MI5’s terror list.
The ‘far-right’ don’t blow up concerts.
The ‘far-right’ aren’t grooming white girls.
The ‘far-right’ doesn’t exist, @Keir_Starmer.
Gloomberg retweeted
Swedish finance minister Elisabeth Svantesson:
“I think it’s sad and totally absurd that we have an American president who’s blackmailing the rest of us, trying to get a piece of land or buy it through threats. It’s a new low”
Gloomberg retweeted
I’ve been banned from traveling to the UK. 🇬🇧
No reason given. No right to appeal. Zero due process.
Just an email saying the UK government deems me "not conducive to the public good" - exactly three days after I criticized Keir Starmer.
I guess my point that the UK is no longer a free country has been indisputably proven.
Gloomberg retweeted
Holy sh*t.
I’ve been banned from traveling to the UK. They revoked my ETA.
"Your presence in the UK is not considered to be conductive to the public good."
3 days after posting this about Starmer.
Gloomberg retweeted
I declare that the honeymoon phase for the EuroFeds on X is over.
Their unchecked and unquestioned psyop ends now.
They will have to answer 3 hard questions:
1. Do you oppose the Great Replacement?
2. Are you in favor of remigration?
3. What is a "European"?
These questions will expose at least 50% of them and end their grift. Their job is to divert patriotism away from European peoples toward EU structures, and to redirect anger away from EU elites toward “external” enemies like Trump or Musk.
They have changed tactics.
Instead of accusing right-wingers of not being liberal enough, they now brand them “traitors” and unpatriotic for refusing to defend the EU apparatus.
This is a psyop carefully designed to target patriots.
Their function is to act as a pressure valve for identitarian sentiment: a fake “EU patriotism” that conserves and protects nothing except liberal pipe dreams.
They never mention Islamization.
They never mention the Great Replacement.
They never call for remigration.
They never demand real change or accountability from Europe’s political elites.
They are useful idiots.
And their time is over.
By confronting them, we create a pipeline for real pan-European idealists, those who understand that Europe is nothing without its people, and that ethnocultural continuity is the highest value worth defending.
The Eurofeds don’t realize what they are doing by opening Pandora’s box of European identity politics.
They don’t understand that every attempt to steal our style only makes us stronger. All their efforts - edits, memes, logos, aesthetics -will ultimately serve our cause.
The people they attract will soon want the real thing, not a substitute.
It’s on.
And remigration will win.
Who is with us in this fight?
Gloomberg retweeted
Thousands and thousands of British children raped by Pakistani men and you're focusing on how to stop that being a 'gift to racists'?
WHO CARES.
Pakistani men torturing white girls are the issue, Emily. Not your so-called 'racists'.
You 'journalists' make me sick, honestly.
