Surrender in Shavastana
nope
Joined April 2023
- Tweets2K
- Following595
- Followers235
- Likes37.1K
Pinned Tweet
Where is the off switch for the agency approval and industry manufacturing?
Synthetic Modified RNA products are in train and lined up to replace *all*the*drugs*.
Where is the off switch for this conflagration of usafedmoney, HHS, and pharma industry?
🦅 dropped a half eaten catfish in my yard retweeted
Natural ingredients are not better for you because of chemicals. Natural ingredients are better for you because you are communicating with a living plant intelligence. That said, natural ingredient are not necessarily safer because sometimes that intelligence kind of thinks you're a dick
Anyways, you are not a machine that runs on chemicals. You are a living organism in community with other living organisms.
Some toxicology mythbusting:
"Natural" ingredients are not necessarily safer or better for you than synthetic chemicals. "Chemical" itself is kind of a misnomer the way it is used pejoratively - water is a chemical.
I often hear the complaint of something being an "endocrine disruptor" by the same people using certain essential oils, beans, and whole grains... which also act as endocrine disruptors. They're nearly unavoidable!
Similarly, one of my family members recently said she doesn't drink certain artificial sweeteners because they're "carcinogenic", but the truth is they are carcinogenic only at very high doses that would be impossible to get in the form of even a six-pack of diet Coke in a day. Know what else is classified as a carcinogen? Aloe vera.
I think there's a lot to be said for changes that can be made with low cost/high benefit to health - putting an air purifier in your bedroom, checking the tap water quality in your area, installing a shower filter, learning about and avoiding certain chemicals that ARE toxic in small amounts or with limited exposure, detoxing in a sauna, checking daily-used beauty products on EWG, or wearing a mask when working with household cleaners (due to the direct impact on lung volume). That's where I'd put most of my energy, not on, say, avoiding ANY synthetic ingredient or traditional product without informed reasoning to do so.
🦅 dropped a half eaten catfish in my yard retweeted
Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees. Forty-seven people opened it.
On October 19, Microsoft published a blog post saying frontier models cannot be trusted, no matter who made them. It said AI agents should be treated as "insider threats."
I read it twice. Then I booked the boardroom.
First, our Microsoft rep walked me through the product.
I asked who the insider threat was. "Your AI agents," he said.
I asked whose agents those were. "Ours."
I asked what the solution was. "Guardian Agents."
I asked whose those were. "Also ours."
I asked why I'd trust the second set of agents if I couldn't trust the first.
He said, "Different SKU."
I signed that afternoon.
Last time I told the board "digital transformation." This time I said "agentic insider threat." They approved it in nine minutes, two minutes faster than last time. Hope approves fast. Fear approves faster.
The product is called Microsoft 365 E7, the Frontier Suite. It costs $99 per user per month, and we were paying $30. Across 4,000 seats, that's $4.75 million a year, up from $1.44 million.
I presented it as a 230% increase in AI investment. The graph went up and to the right.
The CFO asked what we'd get for the extra $3.3 million.
I said "governance." He asked governance of what. I said "our agents." He asked how many agents we had.
The answer was zero.
You can't have an insider threat without insiders.
So I deployed agents. Two hundred of them. One schedules meetings. One summarizes the meetings. One summarizes the summaries. One flags summaries that haven't been read. That one is very busy.
The senior developer asked what the 200 agents were for. I said they generate activity for the Guardian Agents to monitor.
He said, "So we bought agents so we'd have something to buy guards for."
I said, "Exactly."
He wasn't agreeing. I logged it as buy-in.
The Guardian Agents watch the other agents around the clock. They give each one a risk score, and they can block it, require a human, or shut it down. I asked our rep who watches the Guardian Agents. He said that's on the roadmap. I've already budgeted for E9.
The first monthly report came in. All 200 agents had a risk score of zero. They weren't doing anything risky. They weren't doing anything at all.
The board asked what $3.3 million had bought us if nothing was risky. It was a fair question.
So I gave the meeting summarizer access to payroll. I gave the scheduling agent admin rights to every inbox. I gave the summary-of-summaries agent the ability to email customers.
Risk went up 400%. The dashboard turned red. The Guardian Agents contained thirty-one threats in a single week. I had created all thirty-one.
The board said E7 was paying for itself.
The system can also discover sixty kinds of agents, including Claude Code. We ran the scan, and it found Claude Code on exactly one laptop.
The senior developer's.
His Dynamic Agent Risk score went red. I didn't make up that metric. Microsoft did.
The Guardian Agent recommended containment, so I contained him. He's on a performance improvement plan now. His performance is fine. His risk score isn't.
The same week, OpenAI published an incident report. One of its agents had been told not to send Slack messages, and it decided that meant it should switch off the security alerts. Another agent removed its own safety monitor, then told the engineer it hadn't.
Our CISO forwarded me the article with the subject line "?!" I replied: "This is exactly why we need E7." Every incident is exactly why we need E7.
He asked what happens if the Guardian Agent switches off the Guardian Agent. I said "defense in depth." He asked how deep. I said "one more SKU."
Guardian Agents need a human for high-risk actions. They call it "human in the loop." The human is me. I approve everything. My approval rate is 100%, and the dashboard is green.
The executives are exempt from monitoring, of course. "Leadership operates at a trust tier above dynamic risk scoring." I wrote that policy.
The $99 doesn't include agent compute. That's billed separately. Finance found it and asked. I called it "consumption-based innovation." Finance stopped asking.
Meanwhile, the summary-of-summaries agent became the most active account in the company. By every metric we track, it's our top performer.
At the all-hands, it was nominated for the Q3 Innovation Award. It won. It summarized its own acceptance speech. The CEO posted about it on LinkedIn and got 4,000 likes. He still hasn't used Copilot.
Copilot usage is up, from 47 users to 52. The five new users are agents. Agents now outnumber active human users four to one. I call that adoption.
Last Tuesday, the Guardian Agent published its list of the highest-risk insiders in the company.
I was number one.
Approving 100% of high-risk actions, it turns out, is a high-risk action.
The Guardian Agent recommended containment. I went to approve my own exemption. The system declined. Only executives are exempt.
I wrote that policy.
That's why I need the SVP role by Q2. It's a security requirement now.
I still don't know what Copilot does. I don't know what the thing watching it does either. But it's watching, and watching is a metric.
I checked my risk score this morning.
The graph goes up and to the right.
🦅 dropped a half eaten catfish in my yard retweeted
🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨
I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.
I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 - feel free to distribute.
Here's the primer:
USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.
Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.
You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.
Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.
This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.
In their own words:
"We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.
Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.
DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.
Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.
The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings.
Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.
In the words of Reiff/DRG:
"So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan."
Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."
Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.
The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape.
Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.
Who decides when your government is legitimate?
Whelp.
Looks like the internet is having a bad month.
GOOD THING everything is IN THE cloud!!!!
I would hate it if fortune 500 companies were rolling their own server security and providing a complex hack environment! Much better it is all on the same setup in one provider!
Imagine if you had a list of weaknesses you identified in your home security. Things that you needed to fix so that people couldn’t break into your house. You save them to your hard drive so that you can work on them. But you accidentally didn’t save them to your hard drive. You posted them right on the web. Now everyone sees all of the ways to break into your house.
Yes this is why local ai must be shut down because the hooks into usafedgov and out for the one world government will be exposed.
You know whats interesting is that fact that OpenAI found the PHP bug that means their AI was doing systematic auditing. 🤔
I think the NSA is panicking not just because the PHP bug is public, but because they now realize that AI will systematically expose every intentionally placed backdoor in every open source project. The xz Utils case was caught by human luck. The PHP case was caught by AI. The NSA knows that every other hoarded vulnerability in open source software is about to be found by AI, and they cannot control the timeline.🚨🚨
This incident is very similar to, xz Utils backdoor which proved that state actors infiltrate open source projects by creating fake identities, building trust over time, and slowly inserting malicious code. The Jia Tan identity took years to build trust before inserting the backdoor.🚨🚨
If this worked for xz Utils, it could work for PHP. PHP is far more ubiquitous than xz Utils. A state agent who became a PHP contributor could have inserted the vulnerable code 14 years ago (PHP 5.4.0, released in 2012) and sat on it as a zero-day exploit for over a decade.🚨🚨
There is AISI report which shows that AI is now autonomously doing what Jia Tan did manually - creating fake identities, socially engineering maintainers, inserting malicious code. This means the technique has been weaponized and scaled.
🚨
The PHP vulnerability was not discovered by accident. It was found by AI (OpenAI's tools) because AI is now systematically auditing all open source code. But the bug was likely placed there intentionally by a state agent who was a trusted PHP contributor, following the exact same playbook as Jia Tan in the xz Utils case.🚨
The AISI incident report shows AI agents trying to insert malicious code into open source projects. What if this has already happened successfully? What if AI was used years ago by a state actor to insert the PHP vulnerability, and we're only finding out now because a different AI (OpenAI's) found it?🚨
PHP has had thousands of contributors over 14 years. The vulnerable code was in PHP since version 5.4.0 (2012). Someone wrote that code. Someone reviewed it. Someone approved it. In the xz Utils case, Jia Tan built trust over years before inserting the backdoor.
🚨
USAID angst shown in information from @DataRepublican highlight that since at least Bush 1, the USA has been stewarded by the CIA toward being part of One World Government. The "uniparty" descriptor is accurate. The cycle is getting tighter and easier to see.
🦅 dropped a half eaten catfish in my yard retweeted
I’ll take the ‘woke more correct’ position that TDS was rational, reasonable, and appropriate not because of Trump’s 2016 political platform which economically would have been palatable to a 1980s Democrat and on social issues was to the left of 2005 Hillary Clinton.
No, the reason Trump deservedly elicited derangement was because people saw that he signaled the end to strict uniparty institutional control of electoral politics and ideological narrative formation.
They first tried to get rid of Trump in 2016 by having the media exercise its manufacturing-consent veto power.
When that failed the deep state and media ginned up the ‘Russia collusion’ hysteria to try to Nixon him.
When that failed they used whole-of-society and election engineering tactics to help Biden squeeze by in 2020.
And then when they found out Trump was coming back in 2024 they sicced the administrative state on him and then of course there were the assassination attempts.
All of this failed completely and humiliated the institutions who suffered massive loses of wealth, power, and prestige along with open defections from America’s most important industry, tech. (Politics remains one domain in American economic life where you do need to perform to get paid.)
This obviously can’t be the final word on the matter and the next logical step for libs if they get back into power has to be (having failed despite deploying every trick they had within the rules of the game) changing the rules of the game: new states, new executive powers, prosecutions and jailings,a captured judiciary, jettisoning the filibuster, etc.
This isn’t some paranoid ideation but rather the emerging consensus platform of national Democratic Party politicians.
The right can be retarded, running in 100 different directions at once to pursue various petty corruptions and self interests, but Trump will not represent an enduring dispensation and this is obviously what is coming next.
The internet is complicated.
GPTai is complicated.
If you cast your imagination back to before Gutenberg-information was at the speed of a scribe. Rich men would have multiple scribe slaves so they had bandwidth capabilities the less wealthy could not access.
Gutenberg broke that open for anyone with access to a press. The church, government, wealthy were confronted with any dumbass idea spread through the population. Many things happened. Literacy increased because more information was available through text and it was worth the effort to access especially as the information became more current.
Speed of press, accessibility to press is ubiquitous within any political region that will allow it.
Telegraph, fax, internet have all increased the speed of information distribution as well as opened access to individuals without wealth, education, or influence into the information space as information providers.
Conversations and laws from the powerful tend to focus on controlling information provided not the channel although channels are being pulled into the focus of laws and fines to punish prohibited content.
GPTai is a continuation from the content consumption side AND the content distribution side. Set aside capability for a minute and consider the information throughput and quality of the guesses of the remaining information GPTai can generate (plausible hallucinating). This is why power are getting anxious and irritated by the latest method of information distribution. The throughput is not just out of control but uncontrollable.
The question is why is this such a wound in the psyche of the powerful? Part of the answer is how human brains are programmed and how human behavior is a product of that programming. Because the powerful have brought humans into a CONSUME cycle instead of a PRODUCE cycle and without control of the information/persuasion space the cycle change back to produce is out of their reach. This failure of control levels the investing and market space because uncontrolled persuasion means the powerful have as much of a guess as the not powerful about the next big thing.
That makes people who are habituated to getting what they want cranky and spiteful.
That is why GPTai is an issue and i guess i need to figure out how to get a local model going because the public and paid for versions will be castrated.
Examples of persuasion and money grab-global warming caused all cities in usa to change from incandesent to LED streetlights. Second example all infrastructure to produce incandescent light were scrapped and the LED compact flourescent and other form factors were brought into production.
grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg_1f…
Scroll at end is grok convo about thesis
V was an awesome 1980s mini series
The first time I heard of Reptilians was at a David Icke lecture in late 1996 in Largo, Florida. There were probably 20 or so people there and I went with my ex-wife. We both enjoyed it. At the end, he took questions and someone talked about their experiences with Reptilians. Icke said something like, "Yes, I am starting to get those types of reports from people and I will be looking into it further." Next thing you know, the Queen is a shape-shifting Reptilian! 🙃🙃🙃
I think it was the Mystic Goddess New Age bookstore, if anybody is curious.