IKD56 retweeted
You may remember Patrick O'Brien, an Irish man who approached two visibly Jewish people in a French 🇫🇷 market, making threatening remarks and saying he was sorry Hitler didn't "finish the job".
A French court has now handed Patrick a 6-month suspended sentence. He was also ordered to pay the woman and her husband €500 each.
On the day of the incident, Patrick tried to run away from his hateful act. Now, it has caught up to him with a harsh life lesson.
IKD56 retweeted
THEY RAPED MORE THAN 1,000 CHILDREN IN TELFORD. SOME WERE 11. LUCY LOWE WAS 14 WHEN SHE HAD A CHILD BY THE MAN WHO WAS ABUSING HER. SHE WAS 15 AND PREGNANT AGAIN WHEN HE SET FIRE TO HER HOME AND BURNED HER TO DEATH WITH HER MOTHER, HER SISTER AND HER UNBORN CHILD. AFTER HER MURDER THE MEN USED HER NAME TO KEEP THE OTHER GIRLS QUIET, TELLING THEM THEY WOULD BE NEXT IF THEY EVER SPOKE.
The police and the council knew what was being done to those girls and left them to it for another twenty years. When the truth finally came out, the Labour leader of the council wrote to the Home Secretary to stop an inquiry. The man who tried to stop it went on to become MP. He has now been promoted to Labour Government Whip.
In July 2022, Tom Crowther KC's independent inquiry concluded that an estimate of up to 1,000 children sexually exploited over three decades was reasonable, and recorded that those who knew the cases called that figure conservative.
The police, the council and the other agencies had the warning signs in front of them for years and did nothing with them. The girls were written off as prostitutes and blamed for what grown men did to them. Crowther found that nervousness about race had discouraged investigations. The girls had told him the men were Pakistani. He wrote their word down once, as their description, and then gave his own finding as men of "southern Asian heritage". The nervousness he found in the police and the council runs through his own report.
The police knew who the men were. The council knew which girls were being passed between them. Lucy Lowe's murder told the girls of Telford who were thinking of speaking exactly what it would cost them.
Then the council leader tried to stop anyone looking. On 22 September 2016, Shaun Davies, the Labour leader of Telford and Wrekin Council, wrote to the Home Secretary that "we do not feel at this time that a further inquiry is necessary". For two years the council found reasons to say no.
Lucy Allan, Telford's MP at the time, listed them in the Commons. The national inquiry would cover Telford. An inquiry would cost too much. Ofsted had given the council a good report. There was nothing to see. Only after sustained pressure from survivors and campaigners did Telford commission Crowther's investigation.
THE INQUIRY TELFORD GOT HAD NO POWER TO COMPEL A SINGLE WITNESS. THE DETECTIVE WHO RAN THE LUCY LOWE CASE AND THE COUNCIL'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE STAYED AWAY FROM IT.
The survivors asked for a statutory inquiry with the power to summon witnesses. Davies gave them one without it. Crowther took evidence from 170 witnesses.
- Eleven people refused to give evidence, provided very limited evidence, or refused permission for their contact details to be passed to Crowther's inquiry.
- Another 20 people could not be interviewed. Seven could not be located despite repeated attempts. Another 13 had known contact details but failed to respond despite repeated attempts.
- Victor Brownlees, chief executive of Telford & Wrekin Council from 2009 to 2011 and formerly acting director of children's services, declined to meet the inquiry. He submitted a very brief statement by email and said he had retained no council documents after leaving.
- Clive Harding, a West Mercia Police Detective Chief Inspector who led the Lucy Lowe triple murder investigation, declined to speak to the inquiry. He argued that the original investigation records contained everything relevant. Crowther wrote to him again, but Harding did not reply.
- Geoff Harding, a retired West Mercia Police Detective Chief Inspector who subsequently worked for Telford & Wrekin Council as an Integrated Services Manager supporting children and families, declined to meet the inquiry. He submitted a very short written summary through West Mercia Police. Crowther described his inability to recall relevant child sexual exploitation cases as remarkable.
- Shropshire Council, whose predecessor had responsibility for children's social services in Telford until 1998, provided responses Crowther described as potentially combative. A request for historical taxi licensing information remained partially outstanding when he published his report, although Crowther did not believe the council had deliberately withheld documents.
Crowther said the four witnesses he named for staying away did not materially affect his conclusions. I do not accept that. Davies himself admitted to Parliament on 21 January 2025 that people the inquiry wanted to talk to did not come forward.
An inquiry that 31 people could refuse, dodge or vanish from, that a former chief executive could answer by email, and that a neighbouring council could stonewall was the inquiry Shaun Davies chose for Telford's children.
AND TELFORD TODAY.
In July 2024, Shaun Davies became Telford's Labour MP. In May 2026, he was appointed Assistant Government Whip. On 22 July 2026, he was promoted to Government Whip, formally Junior Lord of the Treasury. The man who argued against a further inquiry into the rape of Telford's children enforces discipline among Labour MPs.
Anne Longfield chairs a statutory inquiry with the power to compel the witnesses Crowther could not. Telford is not on her list. On 17 July 2025 the council's Labour leader, Lee Carter, passed a motion that welcomed any role the inquiry might give Telford and wrote to the Home Secretary to say so. He did not demand a local investigation. Neither has Shaun Davies.
If Longfield has any desire to expose the cover up, she must name Telford herself. Maybe I can help her.
Last night, I drove to Telford to meet with a whistleblower. What I know now will destroy the council. It will also expose the Labour Party's part in the rape gang cover up in a way nothing before it has. When it is published, Longfield will have to name Telford. It is my intention to publish this weekend.
Raja Miah MBE
_________
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite every attempt to stop us, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next. Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it. Over a million people engaged in my content this week. Only a small fraction followed up with a subscription to my newsletter This is becoming impossible to sustain.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
Have a look around you. No on else in this country is doing the work that I do, never mind for nearly a decade. All I'm asking in return is that you sign up to a newsletter and add weight to our ability to take on the government. Is that too much to ask?
Raja Miah MBE
IKD56 retweeted
Hamas leader Ghazi Hamad has never hidden the real goal of “Palestine.”
He never described a state beside the Jews. He described the opening stage of something larger: “Palestine” is the first stage of the global Islamic caliphate.
Islam is a colonial death cult.
Share if you stand with Israel, and don’t forget to follow @LizaRosen0000 - @TheWesternWatch - @YossiBenYakar and @Michaeach3
IKD56 retweeted
Jihad in Gothenburg, Sweden.
Muslims took to the streets to celebrate the third anniversary of October 7 as a victory for Islam.
A brave Jewish man walked into the crowd that was openly celebrating the massacre of more than 1,000 Jews. Jihad flags were everywhere. Portraits of Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Abu Obeida were displayed. Organizers from the group Floden, named after Hamas’s “Al-Aqsa Flood,” had already greeted followers with “Happy October 7.”
These people do not care about peace, human rights, or freedom. They celebrate the rape, murder, and kidnapping of non-Muslims as part of jihad. On Swedish streets they treat the slaughter of Jews as something to be proud of.
This is not a protest. It is the Islamic death cult performing in public. The same ideology that crossed the border on October 7 is now telling Jews in Sweden that they have no right to exist.
Share this. Wake up Sweden.
IKD56 retweeted
Britain's Demographic Transformation: The Promises Broken, The Questions Never Answered
By 2027, Khan is projected to overtake Smith as the most common surname among newborns in England and Wales. According to Telegraph analysis of ONS figures, Smith has declined by 44 per cent since 1996, while Khan has more than doubled. Muhammad has also topped the boys' first-name rankings since 2023. The names themselves are not the problem. What matters is the profound demographic change they reflect, the policies that helped bring it about, and the promises successive governments made to the British electorate.
For fifteen years, governments have pledged to reduce immigration. Yet ministers repeatedly introduced or maintained policies that encouraged arrivals on a scale far beyond what voters had been led to expect. Net migration eventually approached one million annually. Nobody can seriously argue that the long-term demographic consequences were unforeseeable. Oxford University's Migration Observatory identifies two principal factors behind the changing surname rankings: immigration, particularly from South Asia, and differing birth rates.
The fertility figures deserve far greater attention. Since 2008, births to British-born mothers have reportedly fallen by 29 per cent, while births to foreign-born mothers have risen by 18 per cent. Among mothers born in Asia and the Middle East, the increase was 41 per cent. These figures raise a question successive governments have largely avoided. Why has Britain become a country where so many of its existing citizens struggle to afford children, while economic policy increasingly relies on importing workers and their families?
Housing costs, stagnant living standards, expensive childcare and insecure employment have all made family life harder. Rather than confront these failures, governments repeatedly turned to immigration as an answer to labour shortages and economic growth. The consequences extend well beyond the labour market. Immigration on this scale inevitably changes the population's composition, its religious profile, its cultural character and the demands placed upon schools, housing and public services. Whether those changes strengthen or weaken national cohesion depends partly on the pace of immigration and the success of integration.
Yet integration cannot simply be assumed. Shared citizenship requires more than living within the same borders. It demands a common language, respect for British law, acceptance of democratic institutions and a willingness to participate in the wider national community. Governments have a duty to consider how rapidly changing populations affect the society they govern.
Sunder Katwala of British Future argues that the real challenge is ensuring tomorrow's Smiths and Khans live together successfully. That is a worthy objective. But it evades the prior question: who authorised the scale and speed of the transformation? Rob Bates of the Centre for Migration Control calls it demographic change imposed without a democratic mandate. His criticism goes to the heart of the matter. Britain’s demographic transformation was not simply an accident of history. Immigration rules, visa policies and recruitment strategies were deliberate government choices. Ministers knew these decisions would have lasting consequences, even if the precise outcomes could not be predicted.
That does not prove a secret scheme to manufacture new electorate. It establishes a serious failure: successive governments pursued policies with profound national consequences while repeatedly failing to deliver the immigration control they promised. The scandal is not that Khan may overtake Smith. It is that the country was promised one future while political decisions helped deliver another. A nation cannot consent to its future when its governments fail to honour their promises about how that future will be shaped.
"Immigration on this scale inevitably changes the population's composition"
IKD56 retweeted
“250,000 white British girls have been raped in the last 25 years, over 90% by Muslims.”
Lord Pearson, House of Lords.
IKD56 retweeted
The UN accused Israel of genocide, and one of the 3 commissioners behind that accusation just admitted, in front of a live audience, that they never independently verified one of the most explosive statistics in their own report.
Chris Sidoti insisted that his commission conducts independent investigations and doesn't simply rely on media reports.
Except paragraph 21 of their official genocide report claims that 83% of those killed in Gaza were civilians. The footnote cites The Guardian.
When asked whether the commission had actually verified that figure, Sidoti admitted:
“No, we didn't… we literally do not know.”
Now watch how this works.
The Guardian publishes a statistic. The UN cites The Guardian. TIME and other media orgs then repeat the statistic while reporting on the UN's genocide findings, giving readers the impression that they're looking at an independently established fact.
The media quotes the UN, the UN quotes the media, and somewhere along the way a newspaper's claim gets transformed into an authoritative finding of international investigators.
This is how information gets laundered. Each new citation adds another layer of credibility without necessarily adding a single piece of independent evidence.
But the commissioner himself admits they never verified the number.
We're talking about an official UN report accusing the Jewish state of the gravest crime in international law, circulated around the world as authoritative evidence, while one of its own authors acknowledges that they literally do not know whether a central statistic they published is accurate.
How many other claims in that report have been through the same process?
IKD56 retweeted
CAA has obtained footage which appears to show a Thameslink supervisor downplaying the atrocities which Hamas carried out in Israel on 7th October 2023.
The exchange, which was caught on camera, allegedly occurred after a Jewish member of the public questioned why a different Thameslink staff member was wearing a divisive Palestine badge.
This needless politicisation of public transport has absolutely no influence over the situation in the Middle East – all it does is make many Jewish Londoners feel deeply uncomfortable.
Our polling shows that a staggering 70% of British Jews would not feel comfortable physically or verbally disclosing their Jewish identity on public transport.
You can see why.
youtube.com/post/UgkxPCxneLR… – at Street, England
IKD56 retweeted
BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL TOOK GIRLS INTO CARE. IT PLACED CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 13 IN HOMES IT KNEW THEY WERE BEING TAKEN FROM TO BE RAPED AND TRAFFICKED.
When the girls reported rape, the council recommended teaching them which condoms to use and how to deal with pimps and their clients. The police cautioned the children for soliciting. Some were charged. The men were not.
When Birmingham finally commissioned its own research, its researcher, Dr Jill Jesson, reached a devastating conclusion. The care system itself was contributing to the girls' exploitation, because it was failing to meet their needs.
To all intents and purposes, Birmingham City Council was rounding up little White girls and pimping them out to gangs of Asian men.
I do not say this lightly. The council took responsibility for these girls. The men exploited them. The council's report proposed teaching them how to deal with pimps and which condoms to use. The police then criminalised the children before the council covered up what was taking place.
No one knows how many children were involved.
In 1995 twelve Birmingham councillors voted against finding out. In 2025 JESS PHILLIPS, the Birmingham MP who was the safeguarding minister, refused a national inquiry that would have found out.
Phillips knew that a national inquiry was the only thing that could reach the council in her own city. She knew all about the gang rape of little White girls by Pakistani men. In September 2025 she told parliament that girls had been telling her for years that police were involved in the abuse.
So why was it that JESS PHILLIPS tried to prevent a national inquiry? Could it have anything to do with the demographic of the men she relied on to stay in power?
Is Jess Phillips yet one more Labour politician that sold little White girls for votes?
________
AS FOR BIRMINGHAM TODAY
98 live child sexual exploitation investigations. Six suspected grooming gangs on the streets that the police know of. Two private hire drivers stripped of their licences following police intelligence about potential sexual offences against children.
And the ethnicity of the men involved is still hidden.
Under pressure, the council has now republished what it calls the Jesson Report. It is the version its own Director put in front of councillors in 1995 to close the matter down, with the ethnicity of the men taken out and his paper on the front saying the concerns had been "deliberately manufactured".
The original has not been published.
Read my analysis of what the council has released and what it has kept back, and look out for my live transmission where I go through the Jesson Report line by line.
Raja Miah MBE
redwallandtherabble.co.uk/fo…
________
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it. This is becoming impossible to sustain.
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me it means that when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. If you are yet to do so, and can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Raja Miah MBE
IKD56 retweeted
🚨 READ THIS. SHARE THIS. BECAUSE NOBODY IN POWER WILL. 🚨
HE LIVES IN OUR COUNTRY.
HE TAKES OUR MONEY.
HE CALLS OUR HOME "THE ABODE OF INFIDELS."
AND HE JUST REPORTED A BRITISH MP TO THE POLICE FOR DISAGREEING WITH HIM.
His name is Roshan Muhammed Salih. He runs 5Pillars. And what you are about to read will make your blood run cold.
Not because it is shocking. Because every single word of it is documented, sourced, and sitting in plain sight. And nobody. Not one single authority in this country. Has done a damn thing about it.
Let's start with Hamas.
On October 7th 2023 Hamas butchered 1,200 of our allies. They raped women next to the bodies of their murdered friends. They dragged grandmothers through the streets. They burned families alive. The world watched in horror.
Roshan Salih told his 210,000 followers on X that the IDF probably killed their own people and made the whole thing up.
He called the United Nations rape investigation "a complete fraud."
He has never. Not once. Condemned Hamas.
Not once.
Because in his own words, published in the Guardian, in black and white, with his name on it, Hamas are "legitimate actors." His words. The Guardian. 2009. Go and read it.
Now let's talk about the Taliban.
While British soldiers were coming home in body bags from Afghanistan. While Gold Star families were burying their children. While the nation grieved. Roshan Salih went on camera and said "I am supportive of Taliban, wish them a lot of success."
This year, in August 2026, he published a piece celebrating five years of Taliban rule calling Afghanistan "more Islamic, largely at peace."
More Islamic.
Girls banned from school. Journalists executed. Women flogged in the street.
More Islamic. That is his measure of success. Written on a platform operating out of London. Out of our country. Using our laws. Hiding behind our press freedoms.
Now here is where it gets truly ugly.
This man spent five years as the head of news for Press TV in London. The Iranian regime's propaganda arm. The channel Ofcom banned from our airwaves for taking editorial orders directly from Tehran. The channel that to this day is linked to Iranian intelligence operations on British soil. He was their man in London. Their first London news editor. Their voice in our capital city.
And while he was there he wrote in the Guardian that the Iranian government is "fundamentally decent."
The Iranian government that bankrolls Hamas.
The Iranian government that arms Hezbollah.
The Iranian government that hangs gay teenagers from cranes.
Fundamentally decent.
Before Press TV he was at Al Jazeera. Qatar's state-funded Muslim Brotherhood-aligned propaganda network. Before that the Islam Channel. Fined by Ofcom for antisemitic hate speech. His entire career is a tour of our enemies' payrolls. 18 years of Saudi, Qatari and Iranian money flowing through his bank account. 18 years. And then he had the nerve to tell you he was "completely independent."
He is not independent. He never was.
Now look at who he surrounds himself with.
His book was launched by the Islamic Human Rights Commission. A charity now under ACTIVE statutory inquiry by the Charity Commission. Breach of trust. Funding extremist activities. Their chair has been linked to Hezbollah support. This is where Salih chose to launch his book. Not Waterstones. Not a university. A charity being investigated for funding extremists.
His 5Pillars co-founder Dilly Hussain platforms Taliban spokespeople. His website has published content from Moazzam Begg. Arrested at an Al-Qaeda safe house in Pakistan. That Moazzam Begg. His platform gave an interview to Mark Collett. An actual neo-Nazi. An interview even the press regulator ruled was discriminatory.
One platform. The Taliban. Al-Qaeda. Neo-Nazis. Hamas denial. Iranian regime propaganda. Hezbollah support.
All of it under his editorial control.
All of it hosted on servers paid for with our charity money.
Yes. Our charity money.
In 2020 5Pillars received a £3,000 COVID emergency grant from the Public Interest News Foundation. British charity money. Taxpayer-adjacent money given to help journalism survive a pandemic. Three days later his platform published a video calling homosexuality "a gross crime against Allah." When the regulator found them guilty of inciting hatred against the LGBTQ community he did not apologise. He quit the regulator. He called for a separate Muslim press regulator outside British standards. Outside British law. Outside British accountability.
Because British standards do not apply to him.
Nothing does.
His 5Pillars company at Companies House has a confirmation statement that is currently overdue. He cannot even be bothered to file basic legal paperwork while running a terror-adjacent media operation in the heart of London.
And it gets worse. It gets so much worse.
In 2017 under his editorship 5Pillars produced a video that former government Extremism Commissioner Sara Khan documented in detail. A video explicitly promoting "physical jihad." The caliphate. Islamic penal codes. Stoning. Amputation. The exact ideology that sent British Muslims to join ISIS. Produced. Edited. Published. Under his name. On his platform.
Physical jihad.
From London.
In 2024 he declared on camera that "our focus as Muslims must be to ensure that Israel ceases to exist, no matter how long it takes."
No matter how long it takes.
From our country.
And now this week. Today. October 8th 2026. The day this post goes out. Fresh from his keyboard. 5Pillars reported Reform UK MP Robert Jenrick to the Metropolitan Police and the Prevent counter-extremism programme.
Why?
Because Jenrick said the Islamification of Britain is one of the greatest threats to our way of life.
Because Jenrick wants to ban the burqa.
Because Jenrick wants to end Sharia courts.
Because Jenrick wore a hoodie saying Hamas are terrorists.
For this 5Pillars wants him arrested under the Public Order Act. Referred to Prevent. The programme built to stop terrorism. Being used against a British MP by a man who called Hamas legitimate actors and praised the Taliban on camera.
Read that sentence again. As many times as you need to.
The man who promotes physical jihad wants to Prevent the man who says Hamas are terrorists.
This is not hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is accidental. This is a strategy. Deliberate. Calculated. Relentless. Use our laws against us. Weaponise our tolerance. Report the patriots. Shield the extremists. Scream Islamophobia at anyone who looks too closely. File police complaints against MPs while filing zero about yourself despite 28 years of documented pro-terror content sitting in plain sight on the internet.
He called Reform UK voters "outright racists and Islamophobes."
He called Jewish interfaith volunteers "Zionist infiltrators."
He dismissed the grooming gang scandal as "fake noise" designed to help Nigel Farage.
He said Muslims in Britain should pull their children out of school especially the girls.
He called for a mass physical training programme for Muslims to defend themselves.
Defend themselves against what?
He does not say.
He does not need to.
His audience knows.
This is who is operating in our country. Right now. Today. With 210,000 followers being fed a daily diet of Hamas apologia, Taliban celebration, Israeli elimination, Prevent manipulation, and anti-British hatred dressed up as news.
28 years.
Not one charge.
Not one arrest.
Not one serious parliamentary debate.
Not one serious newspaper investigation beyond what you are reading right now.
Just a man in London calling our home the Abode of Infidels while we pay for his charity grants, protect him with our laws, and allow him to report our elected politicians to the police for saying what the majority of this country believes.
The Charity Commission is circling his IHRC allies.
The press regulator already convicted him twice.
His own company is delinquent at Companies House.
His own words are the prosecution case.
We do not need new laws.
We do not need new powers.
We need the authorities we already have to do the job they already exist to do.
And we need every single person who reads this to share it until someone in power cannot ignore it anymore.
Because Roshan Muhammed Salih has had 28 years to love this country.
He called it the Abode of Infidels.
He made his position clear.
Now it is time we made ours.
SHARE THIS POST. TAG YOUR MP. TAG YOUR MEDIA. TAG EVERYONE.
BECAUSE SILENCE IS HOW WE GOT HERE.
IKD56 retweeted
Britain Is Changing One Minute at a Time. Nobody Asked Us.
Somewhere in Britain today, once every minute, a stamp is placed on a document and settlement or citizenship changes hands. Nearly 200,000 people received indefinite leave to remain this year, a 16-year record. A quarter of a million more became citizens. Shabana Mahmood is preparing reforms to slow this. Her own backbenchers are already working to gut them before they pass, exempting care workers and refusing to apply the rules retrospectively, so the 1.2 million migrants already approaching eligibility will sail through regardless of what Parliament decides.
The government cannot explain this contradiction because there isn't a clean one to give. Its own forecasters, the ONS, say Britain needs net migration near 230,000 a year simply to stop the working-age population collapsing before 2030, a figure they themselves call historically high and massively unpalatable. Two thirds of the public want it below 100,000. Ministers are therefore asking a shrinking, ageing workforce to fund immigration on a scale the public has repeatedly rejected.
The OBR has already done the sum the government won't say aloud. Low-skilled migrants cost more in public spending than they contribute in tax over a lifetime. Yet the visa data shows precisely this pattern taking root. Just 3.3 per cent of Zimbabwean workers have left Britain since arriving, 4 per cent of Nigerians and 4.5 per cent of Ghanaians. Compare that with 61 per cent of Saudis, 40 per cent of Belgians and 39 per cent of Germans. The routes Britain opened widest were those feeding the care sector at minimum wage, and they are the routes people do not leave. This was a conscious decision, repeated year after year, by governments that knew the costs.
And the consequences are not confined to spreadsheets. Mass immigration on this scale, without the integration needed to bind people into a common society, changes the character of the country itself. It alters the language, customs, schools, neighbourhoods and town centres around us. It changes what is taught, what is spoken, what is celebrated and what is regarded as normal. Most seriously, it weakens the shared culture and common assumptions that allow millions of people, many of whom have never met, to feel they nevertheless belong to the same country.
This did not happen by accident. Successive governments expanded migration routes, lowered barriers and encouraged recruitment from abroad while repeatedly ignoring warnings about housing, public services, wages, integration and social cohesion. They knew millions of newcomers would permanently change the composition of the population. They knew integration was not keeping pace. They carried on regardless.
Mahmood's reforms will pass in some diminished form, applying to almost no one already here. The dependency ratio will keep tightening. The country that has changed will not simply change back. Lowering the inflow does not undo the transformation already created.
There is no minister, in this government or the one before it, who has ever stood before the country and said plainly: this is the scale of immigration we have chosen, this is what it will do to our economy, our communities and our national identity, and this is the price we are asking you to pay. That reckoning never came. The price was simply spent, a minute at a time, until there was nothing left to ask permission for.
"They knew millions of newcomers would permanently change the composition of the population. They knew integration was not keeping pace. They carried on regardless."
IKD56 retweeted
Islam is the obstacle to peace!
🤖 Made with AI
Netanyahu did not invent the jihadist death cult in Gaza. Islam did.
Hamas broke the fence after convincing our government an economy would deter war. They broke it because the Islamic doctrine they were raised on orders the murder of Jews.
We were naive. I was naive. I supported work and medical permits for Gazans to enter Israel. The theory was Western and simple: give them something to live for and something to lose, and war becomes too expensive. If they saw we meant no harm, they might see the Islamic sermons as a lie.
They noticed nothing. Gazan Muslims with Israeli work permits mapped targets for Hamas. Gazan patients we treated in our hospitals did not stop worshipping Islam’s cult that loves death as Jews and Christians love life.
Some cultures protect their children. Islam sacrifices them.
In Britain the same doctrine found a second audience that never opened a Quran. Non-Muslim Britons adopted the jihad against Jews because hating Jews became a status symbol. A keffiyeh in a common room. A chant on a march. A post that draws the right nods. They did not convert. They performed. Jew-hatred was the costume that signalled morality, modernity, and the correct side. The sermons supplied the words. The British middle class supplied the applause.
It is easy to blame the Israeli prime minister from a country that houses the same jihadist threat in hotels and fills the streets of England with countless more.
Your government has pressed Israel to let Hamas survive since 2014. Every ceasefire you demanded bought another year of tunnels, another year of children’s television counting virgins, another year preparing the massacre. You did not do it for peace. You did it so the jihad stayed on our side of the sea, and so those who wear it as a badge at home kept their status.
You do not care about October 7. You want the anti-Israel stamp. Keep it.
The enemy that burned families on October 7 is the enemy Labour imported into your streets, waving the same flag, shouting the same Allahu Akbar, with the non-Muslim Briton beside them chanting along because the chant is fashionable and the Jews are not.
Rub salt in the wound if you like. It changes nothing.
Demonize us. Dehumanize us. We will still not wish harm on the innocent, however stupid the theory that they could be bought off, and however cheap the status symbol that made you join the chant.
Israel stopped a genocide on October 7. It did not commit one.
My message for the British people who stand with us against jihad: vote the entire globalist establishment out of every position of power.
The next British government must deport the jihadists. Defend your borders. End the censorship and abolish the two-tier system against white British people. Give the jihadists no benefit of the doubt, and stop treating their war on Jews as a lifestyle accessory.
IKD56 retweeted
Remember that the @metpoliceuk told everybody that they could not ban the Pro Palestine march today in London because they can’t stop a “peaceful” protest, and they refused to ask the Home Secretary to ban it…
Does this look like a peaceful protest to any?
This is the sickness of jihadism and Islam that this leftist government has allowed into this country and allowed them to take over. This is what they are. This is all they know. And their hate may be towards the Jews when they shout their slogans. But make no mistake this is about the entire western world.
There is nothing peaceful about this. There was never going to be anything peaceful about it. We all knew it would be like this. And yet the police supported it and allow this to happen freely on every street. This country has only shame on it. It’s disgraceful.
IKD56 retweeted
🚨Breaking.
Hannah Spencer’s campaign manager ADMITS mosques secretly endorsed the Green candidate despite charity rules forbidding it.
I said this happened at the time.
They cheated.
Link below.
IKD56 retweeted
Netanyahu did not invent the jihadist death cult in Gaza. Islam did.
Hamas broke the fence after convincing our government an economy would deter war. They broke it because the Islamic doctrine they were raised on orders the murder of Jews.
We were naive. I was naive. I supported work and medical permits for Gazans to enter Israel. The theory was Western and simple: give them something to live for and something to lose, and war becomes too expensive. If they saw we meant no harm, they might see the Islamic sermons as a lie.
They noticed nothing. Gazan Muslims with Israeli work permits mapped targets for Hamas. Gazan patients we treated in our hospitals did not stop worshipping Islam’s cult that loves death as Jews and Christians love life.
Some cultures protect their children. Islam sacrifices them.
In Britain the same doctrine found a second audience that never opened a Quran. Non-Muslim Britons adopted the jihad against Jews because hating Jews became a status symbol. A keffiyeh in a common room. A chant on a march. A post that draws the right nods. They did not convert. They performed. Jew-hatred was the costume that signalled morality, modernity, and the correct side. The sermons supplied the words. The British middle class supplied the applause.
It is easy to blame the Israeli prime minister from a country that houses the same jihadist threat in hotels and fills the streets of England with countless more.
Your government has pressed Israel to let Hamas survive since 2014. Every ceasefire you demanded bought another year of tunnels, another year of children’s television counting virgins, another year preparing the massacre. You did not do it for peace. You did it so the jihad stayed on our side of the sea, and so those who wear it as a badge at home kept their status.
You do not care about October 7. You want the anti-Israel stamp. Keep it.
The enemy that burned families on October 7 is the enemy Labour imported into your streets, waving the same flag, shouting the same Allahu Akbar, with the non-Muslim Briton beside them chanting along because the chant is fashionable and the Jews are not.
Rub salt in the wound if you like. It changes nothing.
Demonize us. Dehumanize us. We will still not wish harm on the innocent, however stupid the theory that they could be bought off, and however cheap the status symbol that made you join the chant.
Israel stopped a genocide on October 7. It did not commit one.
My message for the British people who stand with us against jihad: vote the entire globalist establishment out of every position of power.
The next British government must deport the jihadists. Defend your borders. End the censorship and abolish the two-tier system against white British people. Give the jihadists no benefit of the doubt, and stop treating their war on Jews as a lifestyle accessory.





















