
keen on politics and business. #noconversion.
hubli, karnataka
Joined July 2010
- Tweets181K
- Following2K
- Followers1.7K
- Likes14.1K
Arundhati Lokare retweeted
Baba Kayani, who made guns like ATAGS for India, faced an SC/ST Act case over a land dispute.
Filed 11 years after the 2007 incident, the case has now been called a classic example of misuse by Karnataka HC.
Why must misuse of this law be prevented? @pujaranaa explains.
Arundhati Lokare retweeted
No citizen - not even the worst rogue citizen- of any nation on this planet- has done what RahulG did yesterday in Hyderabad.
Invited a politician from Italy to abuse PM of his country.
सत्ता पाने के लिए भारत के राजनीतिक इतिहास में ही नहीं दुनिया के किसी राजनीतिक इतिहास में किसी व्यक्ति ने इतनी नीचता इतनी गद्दारी नहीं की होगी जो अब राहुल गांधी कर रहा है
कभी यह कांग्रेसी दोगले कहते हैं हमने विदेशियों को भारत से भगाया
आज वहीं कांग्रेसी दोगला राहुल गांधी सत्ता के लिए विदेशियों को भारत में अपनी रैली में बुला रहा है और ऐसे विदेशी जो भारत से हिंदुओं से हिंदुत्व से घोर नफरत करते हैं
आज हैदराबाद में राहुल गांधी ने कांग्रेस पार्टी के कार्यक्रम में इटली के सोशलिस्ट पार्टी के नेता को भाषण देने के लिए आमंत्रित किया था
इटली के नेता और यूरोपीय सोशलिस्ट पार्टी के महासचिव जियाकोमो फिलिबेक ने "वोट चोर, गद्दी छोड़" के नारे लगाए
जियाकॉम तो इटली में मुस्लिम शरणार्थियों के बसाए जाने का कट्टर समर्थक है अब राहुल गांधी सत्ता के लिए विदेशी ताकतों का खुलकर मदद ले रहा है
अब राहुल गांधी को लगता है कि देश की जनता तो उसे भारत का प्रधानमंत्री नहीं बना रही अब उसे अमेरिका के कट्टरपंथी मुस्लिम नेता इलाहान ओमर या फिर जॉर्ज सोरेस या ब्रिटेन का कट्टर इस्लामी समर्थक जिमी कारविन या इटली का ज़ियाकोमो यह सभी ताकते मिलकर उसे प्रधानमंत्री बना देंगे
.
#Italy #RahulGandhi #GiacomoFilibeck
Resentment is the correct word !
The discontent is due to policies demonizing the GCs, not Ajeet Bharti. Bharti is merely a manifestation of the discontent, not its root cause.
The anger is far bigger than any single individual. Even if Bharti were to withdraw from the issue tomorrow, which, of course, he won't, the resentment on the ground would remain unchanged. In fact, this targeting only projects arrogance, giving the public the impression that shooting the messenger is preferred over resolving a grievance.
Logically, it is also pointless. You literally have people like Sayoni Ghosh in your alliance who were posting extremely offensive cartoons mocking the Shivling not very long ago, while on the other hand, you are attacking Bharti for having communist views a decade back. Ghosh is not alone; many more have joined the BJP, and some have even become ministers.
A person's past is irrelevant unless their current argument is misleading. Concerns surrounding UGC, reservations, and the Atrocities Act are real, and many policies feel openly discriminatory toward the GCs.
While I don't have a knack for ground politics to gauge how much this will impact the UP elections, it is undeniably a massive issue online that is eroding the BJP's core support base. Unless the party is prepared to face the electoral brunt of this alienation, it must stop deflecting and address these concerns proactively.
17
No clean chit to congress…
It’s obvious.
Why are you accusing him of that?
Why ajeet gives clean chit to Congress? Has @INCIndia said they're against GC? If yes show where.. if not then why doesnt Ajeet Bharti ask questions to Congress same as BJP?
Why entire raita wing gives such clean chit to Congress?
You're not BJP ke ghulam but you're congress'?
1
29
Arundhati Lokare retweeted
JUST IN: Petition to reinstate Jensen Huang as CEO of Nvidia $NVDA reaches 100,000 signatures.
Arundhati Lokare retweeted
This whole Jensen story makes me think of something.
Jensen made serious mistakes. He owned them, and he stepped down. That's the rule, and it's fair.
But look at how people are reacting. Even in the middle of the scandal, almost nobody disputes what he built. 33 years at the helm of a company that became the infrastructure of the entire AI revolution. A technology the whole world now depends on.
And I think that's exactly what bothers a large part of the political class.
Ask yourself: which politician, on the day of their downfall, will people defend by saying "yes, but look at everything they built"?
None. Or almost none.
Most politicians aren't problem solvers. They don't think like engineers. They don't ship anything, and they're never confronted with the brutal reality of a product that works or doesn't. Their job is staging. Actors, often not very good ones, who were handed a good set.
For decades, that was enough, because people couldn't tell the difference.
What's changing is that humanity is starting to sort it out.
On one side, the people who create net value. They take risks, build something that didn't exist, and leave the world richer than they found it. Jensen. Elon. Travis Kalanick.
On the other, the people who capture value. Bureaucrats, career politicians, and those who figured out that with enough money you don't need to build anymore. You just buy influence. Bill Gates built Microsoft, then chose a different game. George Soros has only ever played that one.
The first group is judged on what they produce. The second on what they say.
We're living through a real split. A whole generation is realizing that wealth isn't decreed, doesn't come out of a parliamentary committee, and isn't redistributed by magic. It's built by people who code, manufacture, and take risks.
The heroes of the 20th century were politicians. The heroes of the 21st will be builders.
And the people who never built anything know it.
JUST IN: Petition to reinstate Jensen Huang as CEO of Nvidia $NVDA reaches 100,000 signatures.
Cc @RajeevRC_X
I don’t think Rahul Gandhi or his party were in ‘shock’ for a decade…
They thought after 5 yrs anti - incumbency will come- after all bjp does nt know how to rule- and we will be back in power !
But it didn’t happen.
14
I don’t think Rahul Gandhi or his party were in ‘shock’ for a decade…
They thought after 5 yrs anti - incumbency will come- after all bjp does nt know how to rule- and we will be back in power !
But it didn’t happen.
Great description.
I hv read Sundar kaand ( in Sanskrit) - that one also is great writing by Valmiki.
It’s like one is watching the scenes - the events that took place.
Stunning descriptions.
This part, especially showing Rama running (not climbing) up a tree, was a Marvel Studios or Disney World-like treatment that Namit Malhotra’s Ramayana gave to the epic.
What actually happened, as per the Valmiki Ramayana:
After Lakshmana cut off the nose and ears of Shurpanakha, she went crying to her brother Khara, the commander of Janasthana.
Khara sent 14 Rakshasas to kill Rama. Rama killed them all.
Shurpanakha then returned, and Khara ordered Dushana, his general, to march with an army of 14,000 Rakshasas to Janasthana to kill Rama, Lakshmana and Sita. Khara himself followed, with Trishiras.
Rama sent Lakshmana and Sita into a cave and stood alone to face the army.
The Rakshasas showered Rama with arrows, spears, maces, rocks and trees. A terrible darkness fell.
Rama, alone, covered the sky with arrows. With his Gandiva-like bow, he broke their weapons, cut off their arms, heads and legs, and killed elephants, horses and charioteers.
Within about one and a half muhurtas, all 14,000 Rakshasas except Khara, Dushana and Trishiras were killed.
Valmiki describes the battlefield strewn with bodies, blood flowing like a river, and the gods watching in amazement that one man had destroyed such an army.
Dushana, enraged, rushed at Rama with a huge mace like a mountain peak.
Rama cut off the mace with arrows. Dushana then lifted a huge sala tree and hurled it at Rama.
Rama cut the tree into pieces with arrows.
Dushana then took up a parigha (iron club) and charged.
Rama shattered the parigha with arrows, and then pierced Dushana's chest with a shower of arrows. Dushana fell to the ground, vomiting blood, and died.
Valmiki says he fell like an elephant killed by a lion.
Trishiras, the three-headed Rakshasa, then attacked Rama in his chariot with three arrows at once.
Rama cut off his chariot, bow and flag. Then Rama cut off his three heads with three crescent-headed arrows.
Trishiras fell dead.
Khara alone remained. He fought Rama on foot after Rama broke his chariot, bow, and standard.
Khara took up a huge mace and rushed at Rama, roaring.
Rama moved back, then with a sharp arrow cut off Khara's raised arms along with the mace.
Rama then, as Valmiki describes, struck Khara in the chest and cut off his legs with arrows, so Khara fell to the ground, his limbs severed.
Finally, as Khara lay struggling on the ground, Rama took a sharp arrow and cut off his head.
Khara fell dead like a tree cut at the root.
With that, all 14,000 Rakshasas, Dushana, Trishiras and Khara were dead.
The sages of Dandaka then came to Rama and rejoiced, saying his residence in Dandaka had become safe.
---
I follow the two-volume Ramayana published by Gita Press offline and the Ramayana by IIT Kanpur (heritage.iitk.ac.in/VRAMonli…) to check whether anything claimed about the epic is true to the scriptures. What do you follow for the fact-check?
13
Arundhati Lokare retweeted
How many people know this?
In the 1950s, India was 6th largest economy in the world
In 1991, India was the 19th largest economy in the world
From 6th to 19th!
This is what ~40 years of Cong rule did to India...
Just blackmail… nothing else.
"ये upper caste होता कौन है आरक्षण हटाने वाला? उधर जंतर मंतर पर कर रहे, गलती से इधर मत आना, वरना दिखा देंगे!
आरक्षण हमारा और indian state ka contract है, उसी ने हमको indian state से जोड़ रखा है! ये Upper caste ke 8 साल के चिंटू और 80 साल ke चमन ko पता तक नहीं आरक्षण क्या है, किस धारा में आता है, ये हमारा आरक्षण हटाएंगे!"
- GC के खिलाफ नफ़रत से भरे इस भाषण को सुनिये, जो दिया जा रहा है अम्बेडकरवादी राहुल सोनपिंपले द्वारा
इतनी नफ़रत और हिंसात्मक भावना से भरे हुए इस भाषण पर कोई कार्यवाही नहीं होगी!
उल्टा ऐसे लोगों को सिस्टम में भरा जा रहा है सामाजिक न्याय के नाम पर!
सोचिये ऐसी सोच वाले लोग पुलिस, ज्यूडिशियरी, aur अन्य सरकारी संस्थाओं में भर दिये जायेंगे, तो आगे देश का क्या भविष्य होने वाला है??
20
Ofc.
So margin of winning will be too thin- if at all bjp wins in UP.
He is just telling his target- what’s wrong with it?
Perhaps he hasn’t given thought to recent Bhim- Owaisi team up…
Pls reply.
BJP should come down to 210-220, but SP won't win more than 110-115 seats. What electoral math is this? Because, last I checked, the assembly had 403 seats.
18
Not read the book yet… but since main stream media is awash with only Sonia Gandhi’s book-
I hv yet to find anyone explaining why Sonia Gandhi decided to bcm congress president , when after Rajiv’s tragic assassination, she remained out of politics for many years.
WHAT made her join politics?
Pls do reply.
Gargi Rawat comes across as pure, unfiltered fluff. Too overwhelmed, too overawed. Ankit Tyagi, much the same.
Padmaja, Vasudha and you come across as a tad more mature, but, all in all, seem to be struggling to explain away glaring omissions by taking refuge in that subtle distinction between a memoir and an autobiography.
As a citizen of this country and a keen observer of its politics, may I remind you that Sonia Gandhi was, for a decade, the most powerful extra-constitutional authority in this country.
She presided over a government that was, ostensibly, a democracy, while exercising power through an extra-constitutional body, the NAC. Power without direct accountability. Influence without constitutional responsibility.
She was not merely a bahu who found herself having to run a household in the aftermath of tragic circumstances.
She was a political actor who consciously assumed the reins of power, albeit without holding constitutional office, and exercised extraordinary influence over the governance of a country of over a billion people.
The country’s future was, in many ways, treated as though it were hers to shape and dispense with.
To dismiss this book as her prerogative, to reduce it to a simple narrative of a love story, family and personal experiences, is precisely the problem.
It is this very framing that helps explain how she managed to exercise such power while remaining insulated from scrutiny.
Sorry, but you all didn’t sound like political journalists.
You sounded more like ladies who lunch, dazzled by the Gandhi family’s food, tastes, sensibilities and domestic anecdotes. Far too enamoured of the people to examine their politics.
And yes, Rahul you are right about one thing: the Gandhis occupy a unique space in our political landscape. But perhaps the more uncomfortable question is why?
Is it because, even decades after Independence, we remain mentally shackled? Still colonised in our imagination? Still predisposed to treating one political family as royalty, whose private world deserves reverence rather than scrutiny?
That chai session only reinforced the point.
@ShivAroor @ndtv @Rahulshrivstv
1
23
Not exactly a messiah of upper caste… but he is pointing out the politics of splitting Hindus by BJP… which is like backstabbing.
He has said of even bsp , SP “chal sakte hai brahmanon ko saath lekar” -
So why bjp is doing this kind of anti GC politics?
What is the reason for bjp to do so?
Pls reply.
Ajeet Bharti is on an all out war with BJP. As per one of his videos, his aim is to make BJP lose 50 seats in upcoming UP elections restricting it to 205 seats from 255 seats in 2022.
He has risked his relationship with his RW friends, his own safety and is coming up as a messiah of General caste. With his total followers and subscribers count on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and Twitter running into millions; Will he succeed in teaching Yogi-Modi a lesson?
1
43






















