Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
People seem confused about why Tesla is getting so much backlash over its new "flying Roadster." For those of us who were once genuinely enthusiastic about Tesla, this isn't about hating innovation. It's about a long history of broken promises, misleading expectations, and increasingly absurd marketing.
Tesla unveiled the second-generation Roadster in 2017, took customer deposits, and promised deliveries in 2020. Six years past that deadline, it still hasn't delivered the car. Instead, it's demonstrating an even more outrageous version with features that will likely never make it into production. The original 2nd gen Roadster would still be an amazing car today. Why not just deliver what was promised?
Then there's Full Self-Driving. Tesla marketed the idea that Model 3 owners could turn their cars into income-generating robotaxis. That never materialized. Even if the technology eventually gets there, the opportunity has already passed for many early buyers. Timing matters. Delivering something a decade late isn't fulfilling the promise you sold to customers.
And then there's Solar Roof. Unveiled in 2016 as a revolutionary approach to residential solar, it struggled with costs, installation challenges, and adoption far below expectations. After nearly a decade, Tesla discontinued it entirely in August 2026. Another grand vision abandoned, leaving existing customers with a discontinued product to maintain.
Then came the Cybertruck, marketed as a nearly indestructible, revolutionary truck. Instead, we got a vehicle with questionable build quality, numerous recalls, expensive repairs, disappointing results in several real-world off-road tests, and specifications that fell short of the original promises. It literally looks like a dumpster, but aesthetics aside, the collapsing demand speaks volumes about the reality of what Tesla delivered. Another heavily hyped product that fell dramatically short of expectations.
This is how consumer trust erodes. Not through one disappointment, but through years of accumulating them. And this is part of the reason why many people who were once enthusiastic about Tesla have become critical and cynical about it.
But there's something even more fundamental here: Tesla has completely departed from the grounded, practical vision that made so many of us enthusiastic about the company in the first place.
Electric cars were ambitious, but the idea was grounded in reality. People could charge at home, infrastructure could gradually expand, technology could improve, and millions of ordinary people could eventually benefit. There was a realistic path toward mass adoption.
What the hell does a flying Roadster powered by compressed-air thrusters have to do with any of that?
It's an expensive, impractical engineering stunt with enormous packaging, safety, and regulatory challenges, and no credible near-term path toward mass-market usefulness. Modern electric cars already achieve ridiculous acceleration without this nonsense. What practical problem does it solve? Who actually needs it? When will ordinary consumers benefit?
And watching Tesla fans compare this experimental prototype in a Roadster-shaped shell to actual production vehicles people can buy today is ridiculous.
What's especially infuriating is the cult-like mentality surrounding all of this. You can't point out the history of failed promises, question the practicality, or demand realistic timelines without being accused of being a "hater" or having "Elon derangement syndrome."
Tesla deserves recognition for helping make electric cars a reality, but that success doesn't give it a blank check to keep marketing increasingly fantastical promises while failing to deliver on previous commitments.
This isn't hatred. It's disappointment from people who once believed in the company, watched it accomplish extraordinary things, and have since watched it increasingly substitute practical innovation with spectacle and promises.
Elon fanboys are also ignoring a bigger pattern that goes beyond Tesla.
What made many of us enthusiastic about Elon and Tesla and in the first place was a grounded vision of technological progress that could genuinely improve millions of lives. Electric cars were ambitious, but practical, achievable, and useful to ordinary people. Now we're supposed to get excited about flying cars with compressed-air thrusters that have no credible path to mass adoption and solve no meaningful problem for the average consumer.
It's the same kind of thinking behind marketing the colonization of Mars as some urgent necessity for humanity's survival. There's nothing wrong with space exploration, but Earth isn't about to become uninhabitable because of the Sun. We're talking about geological timescales, while humanity faces enormous problems RIGHT NOW: poverty, hunger, access to education, corruption, abuse of power, wars, and a lack of government accountability. We have plenty of very real problems to solve before worrying about humanity's survival on another planet.
And then there's DOGE. I was genuinely excited about the original idea of making government more efficient, reducing waste, and increasing accountability. Instead, we got questionable savings figures, inexperienced people making sweeping decisions, serious concerns over access to sensitive personal information, and an initiative that ultimately fizzled out without delivering its grand promises. Another enormous narrative that fell apart when confronted with reality.
That's what makes all of this so frustrating. It's not that we stopped believing in technological progress. It's that we've watched someone who once pursued grounded, transformative ideas increasingly embrace fantastical promises, political spectacle, and questionable narratives disconnected from practical reality.
And somehow, pointing out this history of disappointment gets you labeled a "hater" or accused of having "Elon derangement syndrome."
The problem isn't dreaming big. It's repeatedly selling people those dreams, failing to deliver, and then expecting everyone to applaud the next, even more ridiculous promise without asking what happened to the last one.
The world doesn't need more spectacular promises. It needs practical solutions to real problems, honest expectations, and accountability for what was promised. That's what made Tesla exciting in the first place, and that's what so many of us feel has been betrayed.
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so.
Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training.
You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
A popular Flat Earth debunker, MC Toon, compiled a list he calls Toon’s Laws of Flerf - observations about Flat Earthers that have an irritating habit of proving themselves accurate over and over again.
Watching that happen inspired me to compile a similar set for another community that seems to operate by many of the same rules.
So, I present:
ALEX’S LAWS OF ANTI-VAX
1. Anti-vaxxer citations contradict the anti-vaxxer’s claim once you actually read them. No exceptions.
A headline, screenshot, abstract, or cherry-picked sentence gets posted as proof. Then you open the study and discover that the paper either doesn’t support the claim, directly contradicts it, or contains limitations that completely change what the anti-vaxxer said it showed.
2. Anti-vaxxer predictions never fail. When they don’t happen, the deadline simply moves. No exceptions.
Everyone vaccinated was going to die in six months. Then a year. Then two years. Then five. When the predicted catastrophe fails to arrive, the prediction is rarely acknowledged as wrong. A new date, new mechanism, or new disaster simply replaces it.
3. Anti-vaxxers are hyper-skeptics when evaluating vaccine evidence and hyper-gullible when evaluating anti-vaccine evidence. No exceptions.
A large controlled study involving hundreds of thousands of people will be dissected for every conceivable limitation. But a doctor on a podcast, an anonymous screenshot, a VAERS entry, a Substack article, or somebody saying “my cousin got sick after the shot” can be accepted almost instantly.
4. One dissenting MD is a brave truth-teller. Ten thousand agreeing PhDs are bought and paid for. No exceptions.
Agreement among thousands of researchers across universities, countries, specialties, governments, and independent institutions is dismissed as corruption. Find one credentialed person who agrees with the conspiracy, however, and suddenly credentials become extremely important.
5. No amount of evidence is enough to establish vaccine safety, but any anecdote, screenshot, VAERS report, Substack, or meme is enough to declare vaccines dangerous. No exceptions.
Millions of doses, randomized trials, surveillance systems, epidemiological studies, and years of follow-up can always be dismissed as insufficient, compromised, or part of the conspiracy.
But one story that begins with “I know someone who…” can apparently settle the question.
Alex’s Laws of Anti-Vax
I suspect I’ll be collecting supporting examples for quite some time.
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
The Justice Department is admitting that a $14 million renovation on the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC, was flawed, and is dropping the criminal case against a former Olympian that accused him of damaging the pool, according to a new court filing. cnn.it/4hHsa15
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Canada’s boreal forest — the source of much of the wildfire smoke drifting into the U.S. — isn’t like our managed forests in the lower 48.
It’s the largest intact forest ecosystem on Earth: roughly 1.3 billion acres (about 78 times larger than Alaska’s Tongass, our biggest national forest, and 7 times larger than all 154 U.S. National Forests combined). It stretches in an almost continuous belt from the Yukon to Newfoundland.
Why can’t they just do controlled burns like we do here?
Because most of it is remote, roadless wilderness.
• Less than 9% of Canada’s population lives in the boreal region.
• Less than 1% of the forest itself is developed.
• Vast areas have no roads and are only accessible by aircraft or winter roads.
You can’t send crews in to do prescribed burns across a billion+ acres of inaccessible terrain the way we can in populated areas near roads and communities in the U.S. Wildfire has been nature’s primary management tool in these ecosystems for thousands of years.
Smoke reaching the Northeast isn’t new either. It happened in 1950, 1988, 1995, 2002, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2025, and now 2026. Weather (especially upper-level wind patterns) determines where the smoke goes, not just where the fires are burning.
Blaming Canada’s government for “not controlling” these fires is political theater. The scale and inaccessibility make large-scale suppression or prevention across that wilderness fundamentally different — and in many places, practically impossible — from managing forests near U.S. population centers.
Nature runs that forest. Politicians don’t. Let’s stop pretending otherwise.
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @chatswithem
The entire chemtrail theory can be summarized as:
‘I saw something in the sky and then guessed the rest.’ 🤦🏻🦄
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
The new conspiracy is that tick-borne illnesses are actually "planted" by "them" in nature.
That's dumb.
We've found Rickettsia and Borrelia-like bacteria in fossilized ticks from 100 million years ago.
Don't be an idiot...
science.oregonstate.edu/IMPA…
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Wait… has @TheGeoFight_com just quietly admitted that nobody is yet doing any geoengineering? 🤔
“The one company”? “About to”? I thought their whole campaign was based on the idea that it was already happening?
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
If #chemtrails are real, how much “chem” would you need to create them? A thread. (1/9)
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @cactusrose1122
You’re not sharing information… you’re sharing half truths and garbage.
Banning Geoengineering is happening preemptively… that means BEFORE it happens… in order to prevent the scary thing you’re afraid of.
These bans do not prohibit contrails… that is why you still see them.
If you had done 1/10th the research you claim you would know that Geoengineering as proposed in computer models would theoretically take place at 68,000 feet. Most commercial aircraft can’t fly above 41-45,000 feet. I know this bc I have been a pilot for 28 years and am a commercial airline pilot. You need a space suit to fly above 50,000.
In theory, if they were to use aircraft they would need to be heavily modified… so there’s no way your flight from JFK to PHX is or could be conducting geoengineering.
Also… no geoengineering proposals would ever produce visible trails. ‘Contrails are scary’ is left over folklore from the chemtrails hoax… all people have done now is tried to attach other things to it… like geoengineering and cloud seeding… which also doesn’t produce trails.
So the fact that you’ve concocted this idea that the lines in the sky are geoengineering is absurd on its face. Believing in that falsehood, I can see why you are confused as to why contrails haven’t stopped and therefore made up some excuse about the Federal government owning the airspace. That’s just an excuse to ignore what that these bans are actually targeting… actual future geoengineering.
Maybe don’t swallow everything you read off Social Media and do your own independent research. You do some good listening to people outside your echo chamber of nonsense.
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
The highest quality video of the moon was just released… this is so beautiful.
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Chemtrails are not real.
The only reason why this dumb conspiracy theory even exists is because science-illiterate adults who failed 5th grade science got scared when they saw clouds trailing behind airplanes. If that frozen condensation wasn't visible, “chemtrails” wouldn't even be a thing that was talked about.
Proposed stratospheric aerosol injections (SAI) are a real thing, at least in theory. But that process, which is very expensive and not widely conducted, does not produce visible “trails” behind aircraft.
Clouds also do not form in the stratosphere, except for the rare polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) seen during the winter in the Arctic and Antarctic, which form at altitudes of 15–25 km (10–15 miles) when air temperatures dip below −78°C (−108°F). PSCs are often colorful because they are created by the condensation of trace gases such as stratospheric water vapor (H₂O), nitric acid (HNO₃), and sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄).
🔗scied.ucar.edu/image/polar-s…
Cloud seeding, on the contrary, is done inside of existing clouds to attempt making them more efficient at producing rainfall or snowfall, usually wintertime orographic (think mountain-produced) stratiform (gray, sheet-like) clouds or convective (fluffy, cotton ball-like cumulus) clouds. Contrails, which people on here mistake for alleged “chemtrails,” are artificial cirriform clouds akin to the natural feather-like cirrus clouds, which do not precipitate. The efficacy of cloud seeding at enhancing precipitation, however, is not really known. Estimates vary.
🔗chrismartzweather.com/2025/1…
🔗epa.gov/geoengineering/frequ…
That being said, I don't care if SAI or cloud seeding are banned. Cloud seeding should probably, at the very least, be more strictly regulated at a federal level. SAI should in all honesty be banned whether it is in use or not.
But neither of those things have anything to do with the clouds you see overhead that form behind airplanes. Those are not examples of “spraying.” What people see are contrails and contrails only. The only way those will ever go away is if we ban air travel or change the laws of physics, the latter of which is not possible.
People need to stop being paranoid about things due to some YouTube or TikTok video, and start learning a thing or two about science.
Replying to @ChrisMartzWX
Except chemtrails ARE real. Maybe the conspiracy got stretched too far by some( maybe not) They just prefer to call chemtrails "atmospheric aerosol injections"
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
I have been a military and commercial pilot for 28 years… I have never met any pilot who believes in chemtrails, nor have I ever heard of any pilot that knows of one.
If there was… we would all know his name.
Replying to @AntiEVidiots
I see retard chemtrail deniers that refuse to listen to pilots admitting that the spraying is real. facebook.com/share/v/1P5nFc1…
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
This video has been shared extensively on Twitter over the last few days as some kind of "proof of chemtrails".
While it clearly just shows an aerodynamic contrail (like this youtube.com/watch?v=P3-IWfgs…), it did present an interesting challenge.
What plane is this? Read on...
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Our government is still working overtime to cover up what happened in Syria—BRAVO.
P.S. It wasn’t ISIS.
Covering for al-Qaeda never ends the way they think it will no matter how much hubris they jam into an ops room. The saddest part is how many people are perfectly content being lied to. We didn’t strike anyone in Syria who targeted those troops, but sure, keep pumping chests and siding with al-Qaeda.
Al-Qaeda survives because too many people would rather defend a crap narrative and a bad strategy than confront the enemy!
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @dhookstead
As a teacher, I can tell you what melted his brain: the phone he had. Parents have no idea what their kids are watching and listening too. He probably had some bad teachers too, but the unfettered access to stuff on the phone is basically a portal to hell.
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
ELON MUSK: "What the hell kind of system are we living in if thousands of kids were abused, the government has videos of the abusers and yet none of the abusers are even facing charges!?"
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
⚡️#BREAKING US intelligence assessment: Attacks on nuclear sites delayed Iran's nuclear program by only a few months






























