Rex is so fucking awesome @superlogical You can literally feel the level of quality put into developing it. I cannot wait to drop sshd.
akrm retweeted
this was deadass the happiest time of my life
akrm retweeted
‘STAR WARS: BATTLEFRONT 3’ is in the works.
Respawn and DICE are teaming up to develop the game.
(Source: variety.com/2026/digital/new…)
akrm retweeted
The best Software Engineers in the US right now are telling you they don’t review code and have 10, 20, 30 agents running at once
Meanwhile your British 40+ middle manager drops in to standup a couple times a month “yeah I’ve tried AI, not that great would never pay for it”
Replying to @ThePrimeagen
Ugh. Why are you doing this to me Prime. You were the chosen one.
Replying to @notloganhogg @mgill25
That doesn't make sense. You don't `git blame` merge commits. That would be silly way to place reasoning for a bug or defect.
The merger is responsible yes, but the author owns that code. Thus they should be responsible for triage and/or post-mortems.
akrm retweeted
The single most important AI guidance I gave to my team was - does not matter who wrote the code, you own it in production.
"I didn't do anything, I asked agents..." is something that would get any regular, non-popular engineer immediately thrown out of an incident call.
Replying to @crertel
I didn't do anything. I asked two frontier agents to make the most of Elixir and this is what they came up with. Please do send a PR to speed things up! But also realize that it's not exactly extra points for Elixir if frontier agents can't find the magic "go fast" switches.
akrm retweeted
Replying to @dimitrov2k
My position, which has been the same since the beginning, is: I will never pay for a subscription service to program (nor rely on some Internet service), and I will never turn my brain off and stop caring about the details I care about today.
I am not inherently attached to typing every character, and I think the idea of human language processing and accelerating the production of programming language semantics is exciting. I would only ever do this using local models on my own hardware, and I would employ such tools very carefully (likely using them in my own tooling), and likely not in the ways that many people are employing them today.
If I can accomplish the same work I would’ve been doing by hand more quickly, that’s pure win. But if I accelerate yet lose attention to detail, or the ability to think through those details, that’s not the same work anymore, and so there is some loss. That loss is potentially very important.
Replying to @gmkurtzer
My post explicitly noted that I do not believe AI can become conscious. I don't even think there's a chance.
I was entertaining the original author's post...
Replying to @gmkurtzer @JeffBohren
You said that agents don't "start themselves". I am just wondering what that means as it pertains to whether or not they could be or become conscious
Replying to @gmkurtzer @JeffBohren
Do we "start ourselves"? What does that look like for us as living, conscious beings.
akrm retweeted
I love and respect dhh as much as any other young programmer who is inspired by his love for computers.
But I can't help but imagine that, as a black person, he would not want to see me living in Denmark or the larger Europe, regardless of my contribution to the country.
He would prefer Europe to look like it did in the 80s, or to be as homogeneous as Japan, as he said on the Lex pod.
He mentions having a positive contribution to the society, but after listening to him more, it seems to me that he cares far less about that than about whether the immigrant looks more like him.
That means, even if I contribute to their economy, pay my taxes, raise my family there, and integrate into the culture, he would not really want to see me move there with my immediate black family, because I would be disturbing their homogeneity.
I thought for days about what that actually means. It means no matter what I do, no matter how much I give, the door will always come with an asterisk. "You're welcome, but only if you physically blend in."
I lived in London and Amsterdam. I contributed positively to their economies, that's why they let me in, in the first place. And I like to think I am well assimilated into the society and culture.
But because I do not look like what Britain looked like 100 years ago, nor does my immediate family, dhh would rather not have me live in Europe, or even marry there!?
By that logic, would you also tell Jude Bellingham he doesn't belong? Or Sir Lewis Hamilton? Or Marcus Rashford, who fed millions of British children during the pandemic when the government wouldn't? If dhh's version of Europe has no room for people who look like them, then what he is really saying is that contribution doesn't matter. Appearance does.
And I get that not everyone assimilates equally, and that it is okay to have standards for who you want in your turf. Every nation has a right to shape its immigration policy. That is not what I am arguing against.
But why do it in a way that clearly shows favour and discrimination in equal measure based on how a person looks? Why not simply judge from person to person, instead of categorizing whole groups and communities?
Europe immensely benefited from Africa and its resources. They went to Africa and laid the entire continent to siege, extracting minerals, labour, and wealth for centuries.
My country is still reeling from those effects to date, having gained independence only about half a century ago.
And yet, merely 50 years later, Europe is so harsh to Africans that they do not want them, even legally, accessing opportunities in Europe?
There is something deeply contradictory about benefiting from a continent for centuries and then shutting its people out when they come seeking the same prosperity your ancestors built on their backs.
Britain has a huge healthcare crisis and a massive shortage of healthcare workers. Guess who is the backbone of that? Immigrants, most of them African and South Asian. They work night shifts, they hold the system together, and they do it quietly.
Isn't it irresponsible to walk into a hospital and say, "I do not like the demographics of this hospital. I would have preferred if it looked like it did in the 80s"?
I used to think people had a problem with illegal immigration. But no, it is not illegal immigration they oppose. They simply do not want immigration from certain parts of the world. God forbid if you are just a good human being from that part of the world yearning for better opportunities.
You can have a PhD, speak the language fluently, pay more in taxes than most locals, and still be told you don't belong, simply because you don't look the part.
Why won't we just vet individuals and give everyone a fair chance? Judge the person, not the group. Character, not colour. Contribution, not complexion. I beleive this is not a radical idea, it is the bare minimum of fairness.
To dhh, please don't block me for asking this 😅, and I really do hope I am wrong and that you clarify this. Would you happily let me and my black family become your neighbours in Copenhagen, if I don't have a problem with assimilation? Do you feel the same about the USA?
I am genuinely asking these questions and I welcome discourse here bc I really do want to believe dhh is a good person and he does not have a problem with people who are not white.
And if the answer is no, then what we are really saying is that there is no amount of effort that makes someone like me acceptable. And that is a huge problem for all of us.
I hope I am wrong.
Kaka.















