Gold-Coast-blonde

For everyone questioning the filing of the Federal Law suit with JLR as the plaintiff. I personally walked it into the federal court house in Phoenix AZ Here is an image where I am standing at the cashiers window. In Phoenix you go to clerk window they review your filing and give you a slip to take to cashier window. So for anyone questioning it or claiming it's fake I suggest you make a call first. I would not be posting a fraudulent federal receipt.

If you have ever sent @JLRINVESTIGATES money and now feel you were conned, please schedule an appointment with an eye doctor and a hearing specialist. Apparently, you were watching an entirely different livestream than the rest of us. It absolutely blows my mind that grown adults need someone to explain how livestreaming works, but here we are. So I'm going to break this down slowly for the people who apparently think sending a Super Chat is the same as falling victim to an international fraud ring. JLR decides he's going live. JLR announces he's going live. People who enjoy watching JLR think, "Oh, JLR is going live. I think I'll watch." Now pay close attention because this is where the investigation apparently gets complicated. THEY CLICK ON HIS LIVE. ALL BY THEMSELVES. Nobody kidnapped them. Nobody held a gun to their head. Nobody showed up at their house demanding they watch a man walk around with a camera. They willingly clicked on a livestream. Now they're watching. They're enjoying the content. Maybe they're laughing. Maybe they're interested in the investigation. Maybe they're just sitting there eating a sandwich minding their own damn business. Then suddenly, a thought enters their head. "Hey, I like this guy's content. I've got a few extra dollars. I think I'll send him something." AND THEN THEY DO. Holy shit. Somebody call the FBI. A grown adult just voluntarily spent their own money supporting content they enjoy. By this logic, every comedian who ever received a tip, every musician who ever had money thrown in a tip jar, and every streamer who ever received a donation is running a criminal enterprise. Imagine calling the police. "Yes, officer, I'd like to report a crime." "What happened, ma'am?" "I watched a livestream." "Okay?" "I enjoyed it." "Go on." "Then I voluntarily sent the creator five dollars." "Ma'am, what exactly is the crime?" "HE ACCEPTED IT!" Some of you have confused supporting a content creator with being the victim of a Nigerian prince email scam. Nobody promised you an inheritance. Nobody guaranteed you a return on your investment. You watched content, you enjoyed it, and you chose to support the person making it. That's how livestreaming works. And accusing someone of conning their audience is a pretty serious allegation. If you're going to make that claim, you might want to bring something more substantial than the fact that people voluntarily gave a man money because they like watching him. Because at this point, the only thing I'm convinced of is that some of you need adult supervision before opening YouTube. Or any other platform a content creator chooses to use. For the ones that understand how this works. Please repost. No wait copy and paste because if you repost they will claim I am trying to get clicks. Imagine that.

I am so tired of seeing people obsess over how much money @JLRINVESTIGATES made on YouTube. Let me tell you what I see. I see a man who has gone out of his way to help other people. I watched him raise $30,000 for three individuals who needed help. He didn't pocket a dime of that money, yet somehow he still caught hell for it. I've seen him send money to people who needed food while they were out searching for missing loved ones. I've seen him contribute money toward rewards to help bring people home. But somehow, all people want to talk about is how much money he made on YouTube. WHO CARES? YouTube wasn't just a hobby. It was his livelihood. It paid his bills, just like your job pays yours. And let's not pretend we haven't watched people openly threaten to mass report his channel. We've seen the same behavior directed at Criminal Network. Some of the videos reported were YEARS old. YouTube made it clear they weren't randomly going through his old content looking for violations. So let's not act like the timing isn't suspicious. I don't give a damn if he made $100 or $100,000 a month. That's his business. He worked for it. What bothers me is watching people celebrate someone losing their primary source of income overnight, especially someone who has repeatedly used his platform to help others. And let's not forget the money he's had to spend defending himself against all the bullshit thrown his way. Yes, we believe he'll get his channel back. But 90 days is a long damn time when your income disappears overnight and the bills don't stop coming. You don't have to like the man. You don't have to watch him. But acting like someone deserves to lose their livelihood simply because you don't like them says a hell of a lot more about you than it does about him.