Cred (@credlessk) header
Cred (@credlessk) profile picture

Bios are gay.

Joined June 2021
Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)Photo by Cred (@credlessk)
I’m long $pineowl 💎 🙌
1
4
7
375
Pèp ayisyen, Nou prèske fin deplwaye sòlda nou yo ak ekipman nou yo sou tè Ayiti. Sa a se pa yon operasyon kont pèp ayisyen an, ni yon envazyon peyi Ayiti. Nou pa yon gwo pisans. Nou pa gen okenn enterè ni pou nou vin domine pèp ayisyen an, ni pou nou mete men sou richès Ayiti. Nou se yon peyi modès k ap devlope. Sèl sa nou vle, se pou kat teknisyen avyasyon nou yo tounen lakay yo. Epi n ap bay gang yo yon leson, gang sa yo k ap fè pèp ayisyen an soufri, ki touye moun pèp la renmen yo, k ap anpeche l viv yon lavi nòmal, lib, san laperèz. Se prèske nou menm sèl k ap peye pou operasyon sa a. Menmsi nou resevwa yon ti èd lojistik nan men kèk lòt peyi, se ak pwòp ti kès nou n ap kouvri 90% nan depans yo. Sa koute nou chè, men nou te aprann nan pwòp soufrans nou: jistis ak lapè pa gen pri. Nou te pase nan menm soufrans Ayiti ap travèse jodi a. Nou te viv yon beny san ki te pi terib toujou pase sa pèp ayisyen an ap sibi kounye a. Nou konnen sa sa vle di: viv nan laperèz, pa fè politisyen konfyans, pa kwè okenn moun ki pwomèt l ap ede w. Paske pèsonn pa t vin ede nou, e moun ki te vini yo pa t gen bon entansyon nan kè yo. Men nou te rive chape anba sa. Apre 200 lane soufrans, finalman n ap viv nan lapè, e jodi a nou se peyi ki gen plis sekirite sou kontinan an. Nou pa vin ann Ayiti pou nou touche lajan, paske pèsonn pa peye nou pou sa. Nou vin ann Ayiti pou nou goumen kont mechan yo. Men sa m ap mande nou: fè nou konfyans, lapriyè sèl vrè Bondye a, epi mande L pou L geri Ayiti. “Lè sa a si pèp ki pote non m lan lapriyè nan pye m, si yo soumèt devan mwen, si yo pran chache m ankò, si yo vire do bay vye peche yo t'ap fè yo, m'ap tande yo nan syèl kote m ye a, m'ap padonnen peche yo, m'ap fè peyi a kanpe ankò.” 2 Kwonik 7:14 Ede nou ede Ayiti. Epi lè misyon nou an fini, n ap tounen lakay nou. Petèt jenerasyon Ayisyen k ap vini yo ap sonje nou kòm zanmi ki te vin ede yon lè.
9,356
31,565
3,857
177,510
7,526,984
Replying to @News24Aust
That's just inaccurate. In fact, the bill has only gotten worse: — The sock puppet craziness is still in there. That means the censors at eSafety can run unlimited fake accounts and override social media platforms’ terms of service. It can do this with immunity from any civil lawsuit for things “done in good faith” lol. It does not require that it tell either users or platforms what it’s doing. — The government added section 28A. That lets the eSafety Commissioner order any online service in Australia, from ISPs to app stores to AI chatbots, to give anyone she deems qualified “access to the service required” to inspect internal systems and “decision-making algorithms.” Creepy af — The amendment some are weirdly claiming is a “retreat” in fact obliges every general service to keep lawful adult content from under-18s. Here’s the rub: no service can do that without checking everyone’s age.
25
245
17
1,159
19,463
The same @AlboMP that wants to “protect your children” online with “e safety” also is funding a program to tell paedophiles “it’s just a phase”…… You couldnt make this bs up. Mainstream media, where art thou?
Wtaf?????? Horrendous.
55
467
13
2,284
25,107
Hastie just blocked me on Instagram after I called him out for not showing up to vote against the digital duty of dog shit bill. He’s actually allergic to criticism and accountability, what a dork 🇦🇺🫡
164
264
6
3,192
25,938
When the @greens pass Labor’s censorship laws through the senate it’s just one more reminder that they are all in with @australianlabor and that both organisations are conning the Australian people to enrich themselves. If “independant”@DavidPocock follows suit, like he did when he voted through the blatantly lied about tax increase laws, add him to the list. Never forget the role the “charity”@TheAusInstitute plays too. In their own words, “We don’t reveal our major donors to protect them from scrutiny.” The digital safety bill is an attempt to stop that type of scrutiny. They are telling us it’s to stop such heinous attacks as Helen Haines suffered. But the truth is if it had been in place, it wouldn’t have stopped the attack, but afterwards it could have stopped us from being aware that the attacker had a social media account expressing very similar views to many on the left side of politics. The Labor Government and their partners don’t want the Australian public to have all the information. They want to curate the internet. There is no doubt that the curators will slant things to make themselves the good guys. This is not the Australia the majority of citizens want.
157
575
22
3,378
40,635
Replying to @AlboMP
Congrats on ushering in “Black Mirror” style totalitarianism. Section 25E(1)(c) makes “material or conduct that encourages or promotes hostile attitudes towards women or gender equality” a harm platforms must keep from every user they can’t prove is an adult. Section 25E(1)(f) adds “any other material or conduct ... that may cause serious harm to children.” And your team added in the bill labeling the encouraging of someone to “take their own life” as “seriously harmful” — I take it that's so you can censor people who wish you dead — except “in the context of voluntary assisted dying.” Sick. Oh, and the evidence that your Social Services Minister cited on "Insiders" that it takes “an average of 23 minutes” to be fed “violent misogynistic content” is garbage science. There was a Dublin City University experiment with ten fake accounts on ten phones. Totalitarianism by the stupid class to prevent anyone from criticizing you. You're an embarassment.
79
502
25
4,172
57,672
500 Milhões de Europeus, esperam que 300 Milhões de Americanos os protejam contra 120 Milhões de Russos que nem conseguem derrotar 40 Milhões de Ucranianos enquanto, não percebem, que estão a ser invadidos por 2000 milhões de Muçulmanos que se dizem perseguidos por 9 milhões de Israelitas!
1,138
14,950
879
65,925
2,109,663
As someone who has personally spent $500k / mo+ on Google Ads for years, I can tell you with certainty: This revenue growth in Search is artificial & extremely unhealthy for Google’s business long term Search volumes are declining as legacy search is being increasingly cannibalized by non-monetized LLM queries Google’s response? Manufacture revenue growth via short-sighted, highly extractive, customer-hostile tactics. I.e. charge advertisers more for lower quality clicks, including clicks they do not want and explicitly did not approve Google to charge them for A few examples to illustrate: For all of its history until recently, Google operated on a 2nd price auction model I.e. if you bid $5 CPC and the next highest bidder bids $1 CPC, Google charged you $1.01 for the click (one penny more than the 2nd highest bidder) rather than the $5 you bid This was a genius move by Google early on as it incentivizes advertisers to input their true maximum willingness to pay rather than trying to play the game of bidding low and constantly adjusting to try to stay just ahead of the next highest bidder while still not paying too much However recently, Google silently deprecated the 2nd price auction and began charging advertisers as much as their bid and budget caps allow, regardless of what anyone else is bidding It’s a short-sighted cash grab at the expense of the long term health of the advertiser ecosystem Making thing worse, Google also recently nerfed keyword targeting precision Google previously had precise keyword targeting settings that allowed advertisers pick individual search phrases to bid on, defined down to the character w/ exact match or phrase match targeting This was one of the core features that made search advertising magic, enabling advertisers to run extremely precise campaigns based on exactly what their target customer typed But now, even if you bid on a specific term or phrase using the strictest exact -match targeting settings, Google will show your ad across 1000’s of unrelated keywords, labeling them as as “exact match (close variant)” The definition of “close variant” means whatever they want it to and changes constantly. The result is advertisers get billed for clicks that are totally irrelevant to their business and that their targeting settings explicitly forbid Google from targeting. Google does it anyway and there’s no ability to turn this off So now exact match is broad match, and broad match is just meaningless spam This is all very bad for advertisers, but for Google, it allows them to show your ad and bill you for clicks across 1000x more searches that were previously going unmonetized (mainly because they’re garbage queries no one wants) This is how you grow revenue atop declining search volumes Lastly, and perhaps most egregiously, Google quietly stopped respecting budget caps by a factor of 2x. For example campaigns we’ve been running for years with $1000 daily budget caps suddenly began spending $2000+ per day And the extra spend is entirely on the garbage keywords Google arbitrarily throws in as “exact match (close variants)” which have no value to our business, but can’t be turned off Google offers no refunds nor any recourse for overspend or spend on keywords you explicitly did not target These are not the actions of a healthy business. These are the actions of company whose core business is in decline but desperately needs to pump quarterly earnings so Wall Street will continue to fund insane capex while hopefully looking through their rapidly deteriorating negative free cash flow Google operated a benevolent monopoly for the better part of 25 yrs Meaning the value Google captured from Search was but a small fraction of the value it created, and that spread produced a potential energy that justified expectations of high earnings growth far, far into the future This is now no longer the case At the alter of AI capex, Google is sacrificing the golden goose
Q2 was an amazing quarter, with our AI investments redefining what’s possible across every part of our business. Alphabet revenue grew 24% YoY and Google Cloud accelerated to 82% growth. We saw exciting momentum across the board from Search to YouTube to the Gemini app (which reached 950M monthly active users). Our model APIs are processing 22B tokens/min (up from 16B+ last quarter) driven by our workhorse Flash models. We’re also seeing great adoption of Gemini Enterprise, used by 90% of the Fortune 100, as well as strong demand for our security solutions. Outstanding results and momentum, and such an exciting moment—thanks to all of our partners and employees around the world! 🙌 About to hop on the call!
844
2,002
722
17,501
5,708,651
Us hooters are delulu
2
1
4
88
Apparently the Sydney Morning Herald had to turn off comments to stop New Zealanders saying what they think of Jacinda Ardern's new appointment. Yes, she inspired that much "social cohesion"...
84
308
12
2,235
24,900
We keep Hooting regardless
2
2
5
124
Aboriginal One Nation voter here. A lot of this “ancient culture” stuff is brand new. The media and the parties push this stuff to split us and keep us weak. Dot paintings on canvas? Started in 1971. A white teacher called Geoffrey Bardon at Papunya taught the blokes how to put their stories on boards and canvas. Before that it was sand and body paint that got wiped away. Welcome to Country? Made up in 1976 by Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley so some Maori dancers would feel welcome at a show in Perth. There’s no old Aboriginal word for it. Not like the Maori haka. Hundreds of different mobs, different languages, different laws. No one big welcome for the whole country. Acknowledgement of Country? 1990s. No film of any of this at big events before the 70s – Olympics, royal tours, nothing. “Dreamtime” and “Rainbow Serpent”? English words. Not from any Aboriginal language. So what hasn’t been invented in the last 50 years?
74
293
15
1,559
36,829
THE FIX IS IN THE DEEP STATE HUNTING A WAR HERO The shocking truth is unraveling in Parliament. Australia’s highest ranking public prosecutor, Raelene Sharp KC, is facing furious demands to explain her compromised role in the relentless persecution of Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith. Bombshell Freedom of Information (FOI) drops and Senate transcripts have exposed a sickening web of inner circle collusion: Before taking over as head of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP), Sharp was literally embedded inside the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) the exact agency that spent years desperately building the case against our most decorated living soldier. FOI documents prove Sharp was secretly back channelling with OSI bosses in March 2026. Internal memos show actions were taken “at Rae’s suggestions” to fast track the trial brief. In a staggering 24 hour turnaround that legal experts say is unheard of for complex national security cases, the Attorney General rubber stamped the prosecution on April 1. Shadow Attorney General Michaelia Cash completely dismantled the government’s narrative in the Senate, exposing that the Albanese Government quietly tried to pass a law allowing an “external official” to step in when a CDPP boss has a conflict of interest. Was this law rushed through specifically to shield the establishment's witch hunt against Ben Roberts-Smith from being thrown out of court? You bet it was. How can a trial be fair when the person choosing who gets immunity already helped lead the initial hunt? To make matters more sinister, defense lawyers just caught prosecutors trying to sneakily black out 574 names and witness statements completely outside of formal court orders. What are they hiding? Our veterans bled for this country. Now, the bureaucrats are changing the rules, hiding witness names, and coordinating behind closed doors to tear down a Victoria Cross hero. This isn't justice, this is a stitch up.
189
1,012
66
3,983
66,976
Poor @TheNancyRoc doesn’t realise she is detached from reality…
🇭🇹🇸🇻 À ceux qui pensent que Nayib Bukele peut intervenir militairement en Haïti à la suite de la «disparition » des quatre militaires salvadoriens, je tiens à rappeler ceci : La volonté légitime du président salvadorien de sauver ses quatre militaires ne saurait justifier une intervention militaire unilatérale en Haïti, en violation de sa souveraineté nationale. La lutte contre les gangs ne saurait devenir un prétexte pour contourner le droit international. Toute opération militaire doit s’inscrire dans un cadre juridique clairement établi, conformément au mandat de la Force de répression des gangs (FRG) et aux dispositions de la Charte des Nations unies. La gravité de la situation sécuritaire en Haïti ne suspend ni le droit international ni la souveraineté du pays. Nancy Roc #Haiti #Salvador #Souveraineté #InterventionMilitaire
1
1
139
Replying to @blknoiz06
Look at the timeline No one outside of paid off pump shills wants these celeb coins or for kols to become 'celebs' and extract even more from the plebs Every coin has pumpdex fees, pumpswap, terminal or bot fees, creator rewards, cashback, call out rewards, etc It is endless extraction, taking money out of coins and giving it to deployers, bundlers and kols, making the slice of the pie plebs have access to ever smaller But it's the plebs that make this space - without them - there's nothing to extract But you are bleeding us dry Meanwhile yourself and others have taken huge paid deals from pump, when instead you have the platform to lead us to a better way if you wanted to Robinhood took marketshare from pump and sol and the market was great, now the market share has gone back to pump and we are all getting farmed to zero again This is because pump only cares about spending money to generate fees through their ecosystem. They don't care about coins that people hold because they don't make anything from it. They need pnds for their revenue. With each pnd deploy a huge amount is extracted from the trenches, never to be seen again. This is not sustainable. And it's why it's rare to see coins on pump go to a high mc. It's a race to the bottom Where is the airdrop? Will you start advocating for it again? Or do the plebs have to give it up so 'celeb' kols can get paid?
197
260
62
1,727
50,185
So to be clear, the eSafety Commissioner and Communications Minister @AnikaWells is going to issue a takedown order for this leftist advocating for violent revolution - correct? Because last time I checked, inciting violence is against Australian law. Or let me guess, the laws mean nothing and their purpose is to silence a very particular political opposition against the Labor Party.
Recording your daughter inciting violence against white people award!!! 🏅 "Anti-racist campaigner" Zamard Zahid posted a TikTok of her and her daughter supporting a violent revolution against "colonisers" AKA Europeans in their own nations. This is how they think. This is how they look at the world. Remigration is the peaceful solution.
40
320
3
1,106
20,939
Have you tried idk… Shilling the token
2
2
3
56
Yes lady we know it’s NOT YOUR MONEY it’s always someone else’s money you lunatics want…
Replying to @OscarNunez90
No estoy prometiendo dinero de mi bolsillo ni inventando recursos. Estoy defendiendo una postura política sobre cómo deberían distribuirse los recursos colectivos. Para eso existe el debate político: para discutir qué prioridades debería tener el Estado.
1
98
A reportedly drunk & possibly insane man attacked a member of parliament in Australia with his car. And so, naturally, a few vile politicians are exploiting the tragedy to demand mass online censorship. Decades of scientific evidence & common sense demolish their lies. THREAD
168
1,120
45
7,901
267,323
The only appropriate response now from PM @AlboMP and his jet-setting Censorship Czar @AnikaWells is to withdraw their disgraceful censorship legislation at once, out of respect for the victims of real-world violence. /END
22
108
1
879
25,223