Prague, Czech Republic
Joined November 2025
- Tweets8.5K
- Following266
- Followers107
- Likes2.4K
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Another proof? Look at South America. It's the live experiment, running right now in front of us.
For two decades, the continent was the showroom of 21st-century socialism. Chávez, Maduro, Morales, Correa, Kirchner, Petro. Endless promises, endless crises, endless enemies to blame.
Then voters turned. Argentina elected Milei, who inherited 211% inflation and brought it down to around 34%. Bolivia ended nearly twenty years of socialist MAS rule. Chile elected José Antonio Kast with 58% of the vote. Ecuador kept Noboa. Peru moved right. And Colombia, after four years of Gustavo Petro, elected Abelardo de la Espriella.
Look closely at Colombia, because it's the clearest case. Petro's flagship policy was "Total Peace": negotiating with guerrillas and narco organizations, treating armed groups as political partners. De la Espriella did the opposite. Within weeks he ordered a "total offensive" against the ELN guerrilla and the FARC dissidents and ruled out any negotiation with what he calls narco-terrorism. Daily arrests. Strikes against the Clan del Golfo, the country's largest cartel. Same country, same army, same cartels. Different will.
That's the question that should keep you up at night. If crime can be confronted the moment someone actually decides to confront it, why wasn't it?
My answer: because the problem was the business model.
A left that solves problems makes itself unnecessary. Its entire apparatus, the parties, the unions, the NGOs, the consultants, the international conferences, the careers built on "managing" poverty, violence and inequality, lives off the problem continuing. Solve crime and you lose the fear that justifies your programs. Solve inflation and you lose the state that controls prices. Solve poverty and you lose your clients. I'm not saying they plotted it in a back room. I'm saying every incentive points the same way, and people follow incentives. A movement that lives off chaos will never be in a hurry to end it. Its status, its funding, its standard of living depend on the problem never going away.
And that's what is collapsing today. Across South America, voters looked at decades of problems that were "managed" but never solved, and they fired the managers. Brazil is the last big piece. If it follows, the five largest economies on the continent will all be governed from the right.
The lesson for the rest of us, for Americans voting in a few days, for Europeans watching their countries drift: a problem that is never solved is not always a failure. Sometimes it's the product.
Free people solve problems because they have something to lose when problems persist. Collectivists manage problems because they have something to lose when problems end.
Once you see the world through this lens, a lot of things that looked random suddenly make sense.
You understand why Macron recognized a Palestinian state at the UN. Not a state with borders it controls, a single government, or elections. A symbol. A gesture for domestic consumption, performed on the world stage. That's the politics of posture over reality, the obłuda I described earlier: what matters isn't what is true on the ground, it's the narrative you get to emit.
You understand why Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the leader of France's hard left and a man trained in Trotskyist organizations in his youth, made Gaza the center of his politics and refused for months to call Hamas a terrorist organization. Look at the mechanism. He doesn't address French Muslims as individuals with their own jobs, families, ambitions and disagreements. He addresses them as a bloc. A mass to be mobilized. That's the collectivist reflex in its purest form: you don't speak to people, you herd categories. Yesterday the proletariat, today identity blocs. The individual disappears every time.
You understand why Zohran Mamdani built his rise on the Democratic Socialists of America. The mayor of New York isn't just a progressive Democrat. He's a DSA member, and DSA doesn't hide what it is: an organization that openly calls itself socialist and treats the Democratic Party as a vehicle. His campaign promised a rent freeze, city-run grocery stores, free buses. Every one of those ideas has the same shape: the individual steps back, the city steps in. The price is set by the planner, the store is run by the planner, and voters are addressed as categories, tenants, riders, communities, rather than as free people who can build something of their own.
And Mamdani didn't come out of nowhere. The same movement helped send Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Congress in 2018, and Bernie Sanders spent decades making the word "socialist" respectable in American politics. Different faces, same software. The lie isn't that they hide their ideology. It's the promise attached to it: that you can freeze prices without killing supply, that the state can run what entrepreneurs run, that someone else will always pay. That promise has been tested on every continent. It has never been kept.
And you understand the most important thing: collectivists need chaos.
This isn't a metaphor. It's their own doctrine. Lenin's strategy in 1914 was to turn the war between nations into a civil war inside them. The Soviet Union spent decades arming and funding movements across the Middle East and pushed through the 1975 UN resolution equating Zionism with racism. The KGB had an entire doctrine, "active measures," dedicated to amplifying every division inside Western societies. A stable, prosperous, confident society is the collectivist's worst enemy. Chaos is his natural habitat.
Why? Because chaos is the perfect justification. It justifies emergency powers. It justifies more state. It turns citizens into frightened masses looking for a shepherd. It replaces individual judgment with tribal loyalty. A society at peace with itself asks the planner: what do we need you for?
Look at the two great conflicts of our time through this lens.
Russia's war in Ukraine was launched by a former KGB officer who called the collapse of the Soviet Union the greatest catastrophe of the century. A man formed in the exact school that treated chaos as a weapon. He doesn't just wage war on Ukraine. He wages it on Western cohesion, feeding every division he can find in our elections, our streets, our feeds.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the perfect fuel for Western politics. It splits every campus, every party, every city. It lets politicians like Mélenchon build an electoral base on permanent outrage. And for everyone who lives off that outrage, a real peace would be a disaster. Ask yourself honestly: who in our political class actually has an interest in this conflict ending?
That's the pattern. The people who live off chaos never solve it. They manage it, they feed it, they posture around it. Because a solved problem is a lost lever.
Freedom produces order from the bottom up: people who own things, build things, trade with each other and have something to lose. Collectivism produces disorder from the bottom up and then sells you order from the top down.
Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Le juge qui a paralysé le dépouillement de la présidentielle du Brésil est Cristiano Zanin.
Il s’agit de l’ancien avocat personnel de Lula qu’il a désigné pour intégrer la Cour Suprême.
Lula et ses amis socialistes usent de méthodes douteuses car ils savent qu’ils ont perdu.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
To understand why Western leaders all sound the same, you need to understand how a system that has captured its own institutions keeps producing elites aligned on the worst possible line.
In 2004, Klaus Schwab created the Forum of Young Global Leaders. Every year, the WEF selects a few hundred people under 40. You don't apply. You get nominated by people already inside and vetted by people already inside. Then come the annual summits, Davos, and a two-week executive program at Harvard Kennedy School built around global governance, climate, global health and "21st century leadership."
Emmanuel Macron: class of 2016, the same year he launched his presidential campaign. Gabriel Attal: listed by the WEF itself among its notable members. In 2017, at Harvard, Schwab bragged that his network "penetrates the cabinets" of governments. His words, not mine.
Now here's the mistake most critics make. They imagine a brainwashing camp. Two weeks at Harvard don't rewire anyone. The YGL program doesn't create the mindset. It certifies it.
The capture happened upstream. The formatting starts at 18. Sciences Po, ENA, Harvard, Columbia, Yale Law. Ten years of being graded by people who already hold the consensus. You learn fast that the reward doesn't go to whoever is right, but to whoever restates the room's beliefs most elegantly. Every essay, every oral exam, every internship in a ministry or a consulting firm teaches the same lesson: the frame is given, your job is to optimize inside it.
Obama never went through YGL. He didn't need to. Columbia, Harvard Law, president of the Law Review. Same factory, American edition.
So by the time the WEF calls, the product is finished. The program just adds the final layer: flattery. You're told you're one of the few people under 40 who will shape the world. You spend your summers with ministers, CEOs, royals and Nobel laureates who all agree with each other. Imagine what that does to a 35-year-old ego.
That's the profile it produces. Very high verbal intelligence, very low dissent. Brilliant at defending the frame, never trained to question it. And a narcissism fed by a network that confirms, year after year, that you belong to the elect. Combine the two and you get leaders who are never punished for being wrong, as long as they're wrong together.
Immigration is the perfect test case. Obama, Macron, Attal can tighten a law, announce deportation numbers, harden their tone before an election. Obama deported more people than any president before him. But listen to how they talk about it. For them, immigration is never a civilizational question. It's a flow to manage, a labor shortage to fill, a demographic curve to correct, a moral duty to perform. Whether a nation has the right to remain itself never even enters the frame. Not because they've answered the question. Because their education taught them it isn't a legitimate one.
That's why the voter who says "my town has changed and I'm worried" gets a lecture instead of an answer. The leader isn't even lying to him. It's worse: he genuinely cannot see what the voter sees. Twenty years of formatting taught him that this perception is a bias to correct, not a reality to address.
That's the real problem with captured institutions. Not a secret plot. A monoculture. Same schools, same summits, same Davos panels, same vocabulary from Paris to Ottawa to Washington. When every leader is selected by the consensus and rewarded by the consensus, the consensus stops being tested against reality.
And a ruling class that never gets confronted with reality ends up governing a country that only exists in its own slide decks.
Before you vote, ask one question about every candidate: who formatted them, and who do they still need to impress?
🤖 Made with AI
A tohle komunistcký svinstvo podporuje přes 30% mladých Francouzů pod 34 let.
Jean Luc Mélenchon candidat de l’extrême gauche à l’élection présidentiel en France vient de déclarer que « le droit de propriété n’est plus supportable » et veulent réquisitionner les logements, interdire les expulsions sans relogement et plafonner les héritages immobiliers.
Ce n’est pas du social. C’est le premier acte du totalitarisme.
Ce n’est pas une politique du logement mais c’est une attaque frontale contre un droit naturel et constitutionnel.
La Déclaration de 1789 (art. 2 et 17) le proclame inviolable et sacré. L’article 544 du Code civil le définit comme usus, fructus et abusus : le droit d’user, de percevoir les fruits et de disposer.
Nos ancêtres ont arraché cela aux seigneurs féodaux, à la monarchie absolue et aux réquisitions arbitraires. Ils ont payé en sang pour que plus personne ne puisse ouvrir votre porte au nom du « bien commun » défini par le pouvoir du moment.
La gauche radicale n’a jamais digéré cette victoire. De Rousseau à Marx, de la Commune aux bolcheviks, l’idée fixe est la même : la propriété privée est une injustice, le collectif (État, parti, « peuple ») en est le seul propriétaire légitime.
L’URSS, la Chine maoïste et le Cambodge ont commencé exactement ainsi : d’abord les logements « vacants » ou « sous-occupés », les terres, les entreprises, puis tout le reste. Le résultat est toujours le même famines, pénuries, déportations, nomenklatura qui gardait ses privilèges. Mélenchon reprend le même schéma sous le vernis « logement » et « écologie ».
Réquisitionner aujourd’hui, plafonner demain, nationaliser après-demain. L’histoire ne ment pas mais elle se répète.
Sans propriété sécurisée, personne n’investit, n’entretient ou ne loue durablement. L’offre s’effondre, les prix explosent, les sans-abri se multiplient.
Les socialistes aiment tellement les pauvres qu’ils les multiplient.
Et comme toujours, la règle ne s’appliquera pas à Mélenchon et aux siens, qui possèdent des biens. La nomenklatura garde ses appartements pendant que le peuple attend.
Refuser ça n’est pas de l’égoïsme, c’est défendre ce que des siècles de luttes ont conquis contre les tyrannies, qu’elles soient royales ou totalitaires.
La gauche et l’extrême gauche ne veulent pas réformer la France : elles la démontent pierre par pierre, en commençant par le droit qui a fondé notre civilisation.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Trotsky – The Myth.
Ask a Western leftist which communist he admires, and you often get the same answer: Trotsky. The intellectual. The orator. The true revolutionary, betrayed by Stalin. If only he had won…
Look at the young Trotsky in the picture: round glasses, wild hair, burning eyes. Many young leftists today would recognize themselves in him. The look hasn’t changed. Neither has the certainty.
So let’s look at what he did when he had power.
Born in 1879 in what is now southern Ukraine, Trotsky was a brilliant writer and a spellbinding speaker. In October 1917, he played a central role in organizing the Bolshevik seizure of power.
Then Lenin made him Commissar for War, and he built the Red Army, directing it from an armoured train that rushed from front to front.
Deserters were shot. Military discipline was enforced through executions. Blocking detachments were deployed to stop retreating soldiers, and former tsarist officers recruited into the Red Army were kept under surveillance by political commissars. Their families were sometimes held hostage to guarantee their loyalty.
Cruelty knows no limits when you have no doubts.
In 1920, the Red Army marched on Warsaw. It was stopped on the Vistula.
That same year, Trotsky published an entire book, Terrorism and Communism, explaining why revolutionary terror was necessary. He wanted labour militarized too: workers organized like soldiers, subjected to military discipline and compelled to serve the needs of the state.
In 1921, the sailors of Kronstadt – once hailed as the pride of the revolution – demanded free elections to the soviets. Trotsky supported the suppression of the revolt. Thousands were killed in the assault or executed afterwards.
Then he lost the power struggle to Stalin.
Expelled, exiled, forced abroad. From there, he wrote that the revolution had been betrayed – by Stalin, never by himself.
He ended up in Mexico City, where he stayed for a time with Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera. And so the Western romance took shape: the exiled prophet, the revolutionary betrayed, the road not taken.
In August 1940, a Soviet agent who had gained his confidence entered his study and struck him with an ice axe.
The machine Trotsky had helped build had come for him too. His killer later received the Soviet Union’s highest honour.
Trotsky was not the alternative to Stalin. He was the same machine – only with better prose. He never rejected the terror. He rejected losing control of it.
The "good communist" is always the one who lost.
Next: Stalin.
The Butchers – The Men Who Ran the Soviet Terror.
Moscow, a winter night in 1937. Long past midnight in the Kremlin, a man with a pipe sits at his desk under a lamp. In front of him, a stack of typed lists – names, one per line. He runs a blue pencil down the pages. A tick. A note in the margin. Sometimes a name crossed out, sometimes one added. The same pencil he uses to edit film scripts and poems.
His officials stay awake at home, next to the phone, in case he calls before dawn.
Hundreds of lists. Tens of thousands of names. On a single day, December 12, 1937, he and Molotov approved more than three thousand death sentences. Then, historians tell us, they went to watch a film.
But Stalin didn't invent the machine. He perfected it.
In August 1918, Lenin sent a telegram to his comrades: hang at least a hundred kulaks – hang them so that people see it for hundreds of kilometers around. Trotsky, the "good communist" of Western nostalgia, ordered the families of officers taken as hostages.
The founders gave the orders. Then the machine needed men – men who would build the apparatus, fill the camps, write the confessions and pull the triggers. And sooner or later, it devoured many of them.
1. Dzerzhinsky – the Founder. "Iron Felix," a Polish noble's son, who built the Cheka in 1917.
2. Trotsky – the Myth. The revolutionary Western intellectuals still romanticize, who wrote a whole book defending terror – until the machine he helped build killed him with an ice axe.
3. Stalin – the Editor. The man at the desk, with the blue pencil, long past midnight.
4. Yagoda – the Builder. The Gulag as an economy: canals dug by prisoners who died by the tens of thousands. Then shot by his own machine.
5. Vyshinsky – the Prosecutor. "Confession is the queen of evidence" – so he got confessions. "Shoot the mad dogs!" at the show trials, then the Soviet seat at the United Nations.
6. Yezhov – the Butcher. The Great Terror, the quotas, the Polish operation – then shot, and erased from the photographs.
7. Beria – the Strategist. Katyn, the atomic bomb, the deportations – and a predator. Shot by his own colleagues three months after Stalin's death.
8. Blokhin – the Executioner. In the spring of 1940, at Kalinin, he personally shot thousands of Polish prisoners over a few weeks, in a leather apron and cap.
9. Serov – the Hunter of Poland. He crushed the Home Army, lured the leaders of the Polish Underground State to "talks" and had them tried in Moscow. Then Hungary in 1956, and the first chairman of the KGB.
10. Andropov – the Modernizer. Dissidents sent to psychiatric hospitals instead of camps: softer, quieter – same goal: erasing people. The first secret police chief to rule the country.
11. Epilogue – The Chekists Never Left. From the KGB to the FSB to the Kremlin.
Why name them? Because their whole work was erasure – of people, of records, of memory. Remembering is the opposite of what they did.
And erasure didn't die with them. Today it rarely needs a bullet. It is called cancelling, deplatforming, debanking, lawfare. The inconvenient person isn't shot – he is removed: from his job, his bank account, his platform, the conversation. Yezhov needed a retoucher. Today a terms-of-service update does the job.
For Poles, these are not names from a history book. They are the names behind our grandparents' graves – and that is why we recognize their heirs.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
A Single Somali immigrant is estimated to cost Finland €951,000 over their lifetime. A native Finn contributes a net €3,400 per year. It takes 280 working Finnish people to offset a single Somali migrants arrival. #Finland #Somalimigrants #Benefitscammers #CloseTheBorders
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Christians are being driven out of the Middle East.
Jordan just confirmed it.
Gunmen opened fire on a funeral inside a Greek Orthodox church in Karak on Friday, killing 7.
Karak itself was hit in December 2016 when ISIS gunmen killed 10 near the crusader castle, including a Canadian tourist.
Open Doors already ranks Jordan among the 50 worst countries for Christians.
The king can call it terrorism and promise retaliation, but the targeted killings and the resulting exodus continue.
In neighboring countries:
Before 2003, Iraq held around 1.5 million Christians, but after years of bombings, kidnappings, and ISIS rule, the number is now a few hundred thousand.
Syria’s Christian population fell from up to 2 million before 2011 to roughly 300,000 after the war and the June suicide bombing that killed 22 at Mar Elias church in Damascus.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
The Nazi economy was socialism in a better-tailored uniform. Strip away the parades and you find exactly what Mises diagnosed in 1940 as Zwangswirtschaft: private ownership on paper, total state control in practice. You held the title to your factory. Göring's ministries told you what to produce, what to charge, whom to hire, and where your profits went. That is ownership the way a prisoner owns his cell.
Hjalmar Schacht ran the monetary con. From 1934 the Reichsbank financed rearmament through Mefo bills, off-books IOUs worth 12 billion Reichsmarks by 1938, hiding the printing press behind a shell company. Berlin froze wages in 1933 and prices in 1936, so the inflation surfaced as shortages and ration cards instead of rising numbers. You have watched the same trick play out in Caracas.
The "economic miracle" in your textbook was conscription plus capital consumption. Unemployment fell because Hitler drafted young men into the Wehrmacht and labor battalions while forcing women out of the workforce. Real wages stagnated below 1929 levels. The 1936 Four Year Plan chased autarky, burning capital on synthetic rubber and gasoline that cost multiples of the world price.
By 1939 the regime faced the choice every inflationist regime faces: liquidate the malinvestments or loot the neighbors. Hitler chose Poland. War was not incidental to this economy. It was the business model.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Correct.
Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be.
Starshield, a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them.
Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week.
Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact.
Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia.
SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR.
That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell.
End of story.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
🇫🇷 A French politician poses for photos with MASKED RIOTERS just minutes before they TRASH a bank in Grenoble.
And the man in the pictures? He's in charge of the city's FINANCE commission.
Allan Brunon, an elected official from the far-left LFI party, smiles for the camera alongside black bloc-style protesters.
Just minutes later, some of those demonstrators allegedly ransacked a Crédit Agricole branch.
Seriously, a city finance official posing with masked protesters while banks are getting smashed up?
You couldn't write a more ridiculous set of circumstances.
Writer: Oliver
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Report: Israeli intelligence shared with the US that terror group Hamas has no plans to disarm, has rebuilt its tunnel system, restored its pre-October 7, 2023, force levels of 30,000 to 40,000 terrorists, and has reimposed full governance over Gaza.
And now Hamas has made its intentions explicit.
Last week, Hamas officials met with the UN humanitarian coordinator in Gaza - and used the meeting to deliver a direct threat to Israel: they are prepared to carry out another October 7, 2023-style attack, inside Israel, in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria, and abroad, wherever an opportunity arises. Israeli officials described the warning as “unusually explicit and severe.”
While the world pressures Israel to make concessions - Hamas is rebuilding, rearming, and promising to do it again.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Izraelské tajné služby informovaly Spojené státy, že Hamás se nehodlá odzbrojit. Naopak obnovil síť tunelů, doplnil své řady na 30 až 40 tisíc teroristů, tedy přibližně na stav před 7. říjnem 2023, a znovu znovu upevnil kontrolu v oblastech, které drží.
A Hamás už své záměry ani neskrývá.
Minulý týden se jeho představitelé setkali s koordinátorem humanitární pomoci OSN v Gaze. Podle izraelských informací při této schůzce otevřeně pohrozili, že jsou připraveni zopakovat masakr ze 7. října 2023 - v Izraeli, v Judeji a Samaří i v zahraničí. Zkrátka všude, kde k tomu dostanou příležitost.
Izraelští představitelé označili hrozbu za mimořádně otevřenou a závažnou.
Zatímco svět tlačí na Izrael, aby ustupoval, Hamás obnovuje své síly, zbrojí a otevřeně slibuje další 7. říjen.
Report: Israeli intelligence shared with the US that terror group Hamas has no plans to disarm, has rebuilt its tunnel system, restored its pre-October 7, 2023, force levels of 30,000 to 40,000 terrorists, and has reimposed full governance over Gaza.
And now Hamas has made its intentions explicit.
Last week, Hamas officials met with the UN humanitarian coordinator in Gaza - and used the meeting to deliver a direct threat to Israel: they are prepared to carry out another October 7, 2023-style attack, inside Israel, in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria, and abroad, wherever an opportunity arises. Israeli officials described the warning as “unusually explicit and severe.”
While the world pressures Israel to make concessions - Hamas is rebuilding, rearming, and promising to do it again.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
V:s riksdagsledamot Ilyas Hassan, som anklagats för valfusk i Stockholm, möter inte uppgifterna med sakliga svar eller minsta ödmjukhet. I stället avfärdar han kritiken som rasism och menar att majoritetssamhället borde lära sig somaliska för att vinna röster.
Vänsterpartiets svar? Att belöna honom med tunga uppdrag som bostadspolitisk talesperson och ledamot av civilutskottet.
Det säger allt om nya V: riksdagens gangsterparti.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Vänsterpartisten Frida Holmgren har varnats av partiet för att hennes kritik av Mohamed Ali kan leda till uteslutning.
Samtidigt välkomnade riksdagsledamoten Anfal Mahdi terrordådet den 7 oktober. Partiets reaktion? Ingen. I stället belönades Mahdi med posten som vice ordförande i civilutskottet.
Nadja Awad har poserat framför kartor där Israel är utraderat, delat klipp med Hamasflaggor och hjärtemojis och deklarerat att V ska ta ”varje klanröst”. Reaktion? Ingen. Hon belönades med posten som ordförande i socialförsäkringsutskottet.
Gangsterpartiet V tystar kritiker med stalinistiska metoder. Men att uttrycka antisemitism, terrorromantik eller misstänkas för valfusk är fritt fram – så länge man är lojal med partiet.
Dalibor Vrána retweeted
Here we go again. The Black community is yet again outraged and calling racism. This time over a toasted bagel
I repeat… Toasted bagels are now racist in America according to the Black community
A bagel shop in Harlem, New York is forced to remove their sign out front of a toasted bagel because according to black people, it’s racist
They say because the bagel was toasted it reminds the black community of “Black face”
The shop owner has allegedly received threats and harassment over this toasted bagel