
I like to mimic the brain with technology. | trader | founder @playfair_app | https://teapawt.org/t.co/hZy4wnLrIf |
The World
Joined January 2021
- Tweets9.1K
- Following1K
- Followers2K
- Likes22.5K
Pinned Tweet
Fantastic reply Parag. Never thought I'd say it but this is great form
Parag Agrawal (@paraga) on how he dealt with pressure during @elonmusk’s takeover of Twitter:
“Through the Twitter acquisition, I used to track my sleep score. And I was sleeping fine.”
“If you know what you must do, you do it. You don't have to feel pressure.”
“The world can come at you, but if you know what you're capable of & you have a slightly long-term view.. you don't have to feel pressure. You have to perform every day, which is a completely different thing.”
If you can accurately conceptualize 10x, 100x and 1000x gains, you already win. But as humans we certainly cannot. So winning is therefore probabilistic.
My beliefs going into 2027
1. Models will be 10x smarter, 100x faster and 1000x cheaper. You need to build into that future.
2. The cost to create new software is going to 0. What remains are capital, network and distribution. Twitter engineering will be more important than software engineering. People that can drive the right eye balls and users are extraordinarily valuable. The same has happened to the music industry a decade ago. No one makes money on Spotify. They make money on concerts and merch.
3. Obviously agents will spend trillions on the internet.
4. Assistants are the native interface to everything in the digital world. Online first becomes agent first. Interfaces become irrelevant. I personally switched from Revolut to Chase just because ChatGPT has better access. Your nice UI and fancy animations do not matter anymore. No one will open the Gmail or Chase app ever again.
5. Every single line of human written code is a liability. Agents will have to re-write everything. Autonomous 24/7 agentic auditing is the only defence.
6. Social and entertainment remain and become even more important. AI does not replace doom scrolling or dating apps.
Is this honestly true?
I genuinely think the x bubble has no clue how much the average US citizen loathes AI
It causes an existential spasm within them
“What do you mean it’s smarter than me”
Couple that with Dario’s “we will have mass unemployment” and AI has the recipe to be the “most hated thing” other than maybe… Donald Trump
Go talk to a few normal human beings. They aren’t fans. They might use it, but man do they hate it
RSI does require open source models to get the best data - that much is obvious
Everyone is missing the real story here: this might spell the end of frontier labs and the dominance of their close-weight models.
It suggests a world where RSI requires open weight models.
If the techniques here can scale up to frontier-size models, it will be hard for closed-weight models to compete with the flexibility and improvement rate of programmable open weight models.
OpenAI and Anthropic will then be a in a classic innovator's dilemma double bind: cannibalize their own business by focusing on open weight models you can program (and destroy their billions upon billions of existing capex) OR let the open weight model community outcompete them.
It's ironic since this result was first shown using Astra.
We'll find the answer to this shortly
This just breaks my brain: How does a brain wire itself, starting from a single cell, using only the information encoded in a genome? We pose this as an engineering problem: Write a program that a single cell executes to build itself into a brain. The program must be small enough to fit in a genome, and fast enough to finish within developmental time. A computer scientist who knows little about biology quickly realizes why the obvious strategies, which developmental biology has rejected experimentally, fail at scale: The genome is too small to store per-synapse wiring, and axons searching blindly for targets would take too long. These same algorithmic constraints drive the design toward solutions that resemble the developmental strategies organisms actually use. That the same solution structure falls out of scaling limits as out of evolution suggests that features of neural development can be grounded in computational necessity rather than contingency alone. Where earlier thought experiments reached discouraging conclusions about the ability of a biologist to fix a radio 1, or to understand a microprocessor 2, the news here is better: The design of the brain may be recoverable, not from taking it apart, but from asking how a genome must specify it in the first place.
- Stan Kerstjens & Anthony M. Zador Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 14 August 2026
The Golden Rule:
Everything happens For You not To You
My life improved significantly when I looked for evidence it was rigged in my favor. Stuck in traffic? Extra time on that audiobook. Rude stranger? Extra chance to practice empathy. Long line at the store? Extra chance for a moment of gratitude. Every circumstance that I normally viewed as "negative" became an opportunity for progress. And as a result, every area of my life improved.
This is actual RSI if not mistaken. Incredible though not surprising. Applying weights to information and codifying it is nothing new. Perhaps what's interesting is the technical ability of models able to just edit on command, and the token landscape offering so much optimization
We asked GPT-6 Astra to edit Qwen3.5-0.8B weights to improve math.
It directly changed only 0.016% of weights, fixing 0.8B's reasoning loops & improving math up to 6x and even instruction following 3x, without gradients or training.
We call this Weight-Space Programming: frontier LLMs can now natively read/write neural network weights! 🧵
Blog: rikiyat.github.io/blog/weigh…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
LLM was given weights explicitly as text in prompt and used code/forward passes (per authors' logs) to ablate Qwen looping direction, a known thinking-mode issue per model card. Primarily fixed repetition in that mode, not general 'natively' improving weights/math.
rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-sp…
github.com/RikiyaT/lm_und…
huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-0…
huggingface.co/RikiyaT/Qwen3.…




















