That's the integral. Sometimes it's valleys.
God olds are based sometimes: "it's peaks and valleys" "through thick and thin"
Bro just say indefinite integral.
I've said it before, I'll say it again:
We don't need an operating system. We need an operator catalogue, a linear algebra runtime and a scrapbook UI for it.
Why aren't you linear algebra maxxing anon.
You should be linear algebra maxxing anon.
Use the tensor arithmetic anon.
Exploit sparsity anon.
Identify symmetry anon.
Exploit common sub expression repetition anon.
Stay in log space, anon.
Why are you recomputing the same denominator, anon?
Precompute the reciprocal, anon.
Why are you evaluating nonlinear functions at every step, anon?
Can you linearise around the operating point, anon?
Why are you quotienting more than once anon?
Shouldn't there be a linearized logarithmic form of this anon?
Why are you dividing in a loop, anon?
Have you considered the logarithmic domain, anon?
Why are you exponentiating between operations, anon?
As an RE, eventually you reslise everything engineers design is kinda predictable and easy to understand.
And at that point you ask yourself: dude why am I not a biologist. I wanna RE *that* shit.
Hey @grok
Surely you can discover far more about ligand causality through dual and triple drug dose parameter sweeps, combined with blood or brain samples, because you can recover trajectories of stable ligand concentrations and project or predict causality from what moves and what stays static.
Like uh dynamic sensitivity analysis and servo-static sensitivity analysis.
Idk tho.
It do be like that.
That's why we men need aftercare (post sex and morning cuddles)
This quoted post is unavailable.
Do you ever think tools should like, not have GUIs but just like, a standard plug to expose their internal model state and working that goes into like Paraview or so?
Seems cleaner and better that way. Then VTK can fusion the model state from multiple tools without any fuckery..