How to make your Grok Bots stop repeating the same mistakes Every correction becomes a rule the bots read before they work. 190 corrections in 3 weeks turned into 99 rules The full loop is in the image. How it works: 1. Log every correction the same day > the exact words, quoted > the asset it was about > the rule it maps to If a rule already covers it, mark it a repeat and make that rule more concrete 2. Give every rule an ID, a why and a tag > the rule in one line > the data or feedback behind it > which bots it applies to: X, newsletter, LinkedIn, graphics Every bot reads the shared rules plus its own tag before it starts work 3. Let results decide which rules stay > X posts get checked at 24h and 72h against the 30-day median > 2x the median, or bookmarks at 1% of impressions, is a win > under 0.75x is a loss > 3 straight losses in one format pauses it for 2 weeks 4. Run a daily check Our Bot Improver checks the rules every day. The daily loop check flags anything slipping, like a weekly Article with no approved draft by Wednesday 5. Rewrite the rules every Monday Our Chief of Staff bot fills a 30-minute review from the logs, then we confirm, add or retire rules. The number we watch is repeat feedback. The target is 0 Start with the last 3 things you corrected your AI on and turn each one into a rule

How to stop Claude, ChatGPT or Grok Bot from shipping AI slop SEO pages (prompt included): Our Grok Bot's SEO drafts went from 58 to 86 out of 100 once our editor's notes became the grading rubric. This is the rubric we grade ours against. How it works: 1. Score every draft out of 100 on 8 checks The first 6 came from our editor and our grader. The last 2 are standard SEO practice. The points are my split > title pays off its promise (15) > every stat named and linked (15) > human voice, first person is fine (20) > every tool explained (10) > no fake or anonymous reviews (10) > passes Yoast's SEO checks (10) > answers the search in the first 100 words (10) > one first-hand detail (10) 2. Paste the grader prompt into Claude or ChatGPT It's in the first reply. Put your draft under it > it scores each check > it quotes the sentence that cost points > it gives you the 3 fixes worth the most 3. Fix and re-score Under 70, rewrite it. 70 to 89, fix what it flagged. 90 and up, ship it Run it again after every fix. Plug in any anti-slop skills your team already has 4. Let the person closest to the work own the rubric Ours is our editor. Her first note on the bot's drafts: "to be honest, this looks very AI" Give one person edit access to the rules first. Everyone else watches until they hold up Start with a page you already published and see what it scores -- The Prompt. Copy everything below into Claude or ChatGPT and paste your page at the end: "You are a strict SEO editor. Check the page below against these rules. Mark each one PASS or FAIL, quote the line that fails it, and write the fix. Any FAIL means the page goes back. 1. Title pays the promise. If the title promises a number or scale ("thousands"), the body shows a real number, or the title changes. 2. Named tools get a what + why. Every tool in the title or body gets one plain line on what it is and how it's used here. 3. No unverified case blocks. Remove anonymous reviews, quotes or case studies unless there's a real source and date. 4. Named stats are hyperlinked on the anchor (source name + date), not a bare "Source: ...". 5. Anti-robot voice caps. Max 1 colon-thesis opener per page. Hard limit on "do not / is not" lines and "It is not X. It is Y." antithesis. No filler slang. 6. Figure lead-ins. Every chart or image section gets one transition sentence under the header before the asset. 7. Tip piles need H3s. No disconnected tips under a fake "checklist" heading. 8. SEO gate. A primary keyword. Title tag of 65 characters or less (fail over 75). Meta description states the reader's job and pain. 9. Timestamped embeds. If a video says it, embed it at the timestamp instead of paraphrasing. Baseline: 1,500+ words, 6+ H2s, 3+ H3s, stats cited from the last 30 days, no invented numbers, video timestamps, a search-shaped headline. Don't lock these, just flag them for a person: Title Case on H2/H3s, image captions, table of contents placement, first person vs third person. Then grade the page from 1 to 100, list what would move the score most, and rewrite the intro."

Introducing Claude for lead triage. Your agent can now pull, enrich, and rank your new leads across HubSpot and Apollo. Hot, Maybe or Drop, with one reason each. SingleBrain Gateway: read-only, pay per call. Link below 👇

If you want to hire AI-native talent, use this Grok @bot. Only .2% of people are considered 'AI-native', so how do you find them? Hint: it's not going to be traditional talent managers because they're just too slow. Our talent bots: • Manage our applicant tracking system (ATS) • Pre-screen based on our criteria (e.g. 2 promotions ideally at 2 different companies; avg 3 year tenure) • If they're interested, we send 7 pre-screening questions and apologize in advance, saying we are only looking for AI-native individuals • Then we use Jev to eval based on their responses • Best ones get shortlisted for a real screening call This re-imagines the hiring process by saving both sides a ton of time. Around 37.5% of people respond to the 7 pre-screening questions, and only 4% pass the screen In the video below, you’ll see the actual workflow and the early report, including zero graded passes and zero bookings on a new run. Just remember that someone still has to check the permissions, missed runs, and missing records, then keep improving it. It ain't all sunshine and rainbows right now, but it will be soon. Bot link in first comment. 00:00 Why talent is the X factor 01:19 How Grokbot and Jev fit together 04:02 Inside the recruiting workflow 05:43 Sourcing, screening and outreach 08:00 Why I keep the hiring decision 10:54 The seven screening questions 14:00 Reading the funnel report 15:13 Why you need a bot manager 15:47 What’s working 16:10 What still needs work

Steal this. We open-sourced an SEO panel: 10 AI experts that grade your SEO plan out of 100 before you put budget behind it. Drop it into Claude Code or whatever agent you use, then say... "Read this file. Before you show me any SEO plan, have all 10 experts score it out of 100. Under 90, rewrite the weak parts and score it again, up to 3 rounds. Show me the final score and every change." The panel includes a technical SEO specialist, a competitive analyst and an AI search specialist who checks whether the plan accounts for AI Overviews, ChatGPT citations and Perplexity. It docks points for vague advice like "optimize your content." The ROI expert makes the plan clear a 4:1 return bar.