Unauthorized intel. Redacted narratives. Broadcast from the breach.
Joined August 2020
- Tweets127K
- Following7.6K
- Followers21K
- Likes211K
MAGA is in a weird spot right now. They're inviting Nicki Minaj to events—why? Then discussing and looking at her ass? I don't know what's happening.
I'm getting back into the NBA for the first time since 2020. I really like how these young guys are playing—they're actually showing effort in the regular season. We're in a new era.
The shooting is still the question. Everything else is getting impossible to question.
I get it… they aren’t Klay from beyond the arc. But they do a hell of a lot everywhere else.
Amen and Ausar are already making those offseason contracts look justified. Their teams are 5-0 through the twins’ first five games, and both are making game-altering plays defensively while creating plenty with the ball too.
#rockets #pistons #nba #basketballanalysis
Be careful. I recommend avoiding this because nigs often come back popping off, especially when they lose.
I've seen it personally.
My dad always told me not to fight somebody who has less to lose than you.
Definitely don't fight anyone who has nothing to lose.
At some point, most people won't own cars. If you're unaware, these cars have no drivers; they are robots.
Men can father children until they're 90, so they desire sex for many years.
This is your husband's face right before he bends the 27-year-old intern over the office desk if something isn't worked out.
BREAKING: Man wants sex after taking a woman out three times. Let's go to Kim for more on this revelation.
If a man cheats on his wife with a woman that looks like this, I'm guessing there's something much deeper going on.
I know they're jews, but generally when a man cheats, everyone sees that and the story ends there: he cheated, he's the villain, case closed.
That's too simple. As a Christian, I don't believe we can treat that as the whole truth from the outside.
Cheating is wrong—I'm not excusing it. But marriage involves two people, and a wife has responsibilities just as a husband does.
In many cases she failed hers long before he cheated, through years of coldness, withholding affection, treating him with contempt, or letting her heart drift toward someone else.
That failure doesn't have a clear receipt, so nobody counts it, yet it can be the root of the problem.
And the gender on that can go either way.
I believe the order in a Christian home is God, then man, then woman, and accepting that means accepting what follows.
A man who claims to be head of his household can't take the authority and then hand off the blame for a failed marriage. Keeping the marriage and family together is his responsibility.
He can't fix everything, but it's on him to own it and fight for it; cheating is walking away from that duty. I'm not letting men off the hook. A Christian man has less room for excuses than anyone.
That responsibility doesn't erase hers.
A wife can't fail in her part and then point to his cheating as the only problem.
There's usually fault all around, and most every failure is a sin against God first, with the marriage as the consequence.
Movie: Klara and the Sun (2026)
Spoiler warning.
I knew Jenna Ortega as the girl from Wednesday. I didn’t know she could do this.
She plays Klara, a solar-powered robot bought to keep a sick girl company, and it’s an Oscar nominee level performance. I’m at 79 out of 100, and she’s the only reason it’s that high.
I read that Ortega studied Buster Keaton, the silent movie comedian from the 1920s who pulled off crazy physical stunts with a dead straight face, to figure out how Klara should move.
That work paid off big time. Kudos to her. This is someone who obviously takes their craft seriously.
Ortega also copied the wobbly way her nieces and nephews moved when they were toddlers, because Klara is brand new to the world and basically learning how to work a body for the first time.
You can see all of it pop-off on screen in a great way.
Wednesday was dead eyes and no blinking, and Klara lives in her eyebrows. Same actress, total opposite instrument and technique. Impressive range. She is the story of this movie. Without her it loses 50 points.
Even the critics who trashed this movie couldn’t stay mad at her. One festival review called her faultless, and Inverse said she’s the only thing keeping the whole movie from feeling glib.
The rest of the cast showed up too. Amy Adams - stunning as always - played a complicated mother who is desperate and ice cold at the same time, and Mia Tharia as Josie, the sick girl, holds her own in every scene with Ortega, which is not easy.
Tharia was outstanding as well.
The best scene in the movie is the party where the “lifted” kids, rich kids who got genetically upgraded, come over to the house and treat Klara like a toy. It took me straight back to high school and college where you could see the gap between the kids with money and everybody else.
I wrote an essay in high school about how the Advanced Placement classes felt like a different school within the same school after I had to sit in a non-AP class taught by the same teacher.
And that divide is coming for all of us at an exponential rate in real life with AI. Robots, ChatGPT, whatever comes next, the people with money get it first, and the gap only gets wider from there.
The problem is the movie never tied that scene back into the main story. It was a side mission. A great side mission, but it felt like it belonged to a different movie.
That’s the bigger issue. Grief, class, faith, pollution, AI, love, all of it was fighting for room, and one critic said the real plot gets lost in all the noise. I agree.
Then they throw in Josie getting jealous because Rick, the neighbor boy, gave Klara a piggyback ride. She threw a fit like he took the robot to prom. It added nothing, and one critic summed that scene up perfectly: “Just, no.”
Here’s my biggest problem though. I'll have to read the book to find out if it's the source material or the adaption issue.
The moral is supposed to be that you can’t copy a person, because who you are lives in the love of the people around you. There’s a whole plan to rebuild the human daughter, Josie, inside a robot body if she dies, and the movie treats it like a horror show.
But the hero of the movie is a robot who loves. And a robot can be copied.
So if a machine can love like that, what stops a copy of Josie from doing the same thing?
The movie argues against its own message, and that’s why the ending didn’t land for me. I walked out not totally sure what happened or what it was supposed to mean.
Michael Giacchino’s score and that gold storybook look were gorgeous, two of the best things in the whole movie.
I’ve never read the book, but this made me want to. From what I've researched, the novel is told entirely through Klara’s eyes, and that tight focus is exactly what this movie needed to center the story.
Ironically the author Kazuo Ishiguro said he wanted Waititi’s wacky, surreal take. Fine, but the author asking for it doesn’t make it good. Ortega is the only reason this isn’t a bad movie.
The critics hammered it. It’s sitting at 24% on Rotten Tomatoes, and The Hollywood Reporter called it the worst movie ever made from a Kazuo Ishiguro book.
Sounds brutal until you remember one of those other movies is The Remains of the Day, which got eight Oscar nominations. Being last behind that isn’t the death sentence they think it is.
Go see it for Jenna Ortega, before everybody else catches on and the Oscar talk starts.
79/100.
🤖 Made with AI
Perfect example of how time can change perspective on a movie. Revenge of the Sith is 100/100 and the best in the series. The Empire Strikes Back is not better, and it's not even close. The strength of that final act also boosts the value of Episodes I and II.
