FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) 🛩🇺🇸 retweeted
Why are Democrats going after Elon Musk with everything they have? It's not because he's a billionaire in politics. They've been perfectly comfortable with billionaires in politics for decades. They're going after him because he's the first one playing against them.
Look at the numbers. Soros's Democracy PAC had put over $100 million into this midterm cycle before the summer was even over. Only a tiny fraction of it shows up under his own name. Then add the advocacy arm of his foundations, which doesn't have to disclose all of its political spending. And that's just the visible part. Over 40 years, tens of billions have gone into NGOs, universities, legal networks and media projects that shape what counts as an "acceptable" opinion.
That's the real game. Billionaires have been buying politicians for decades, on every side. But the smartest ones figured something out: you don't buy a candidate, you buy the ecosystem. Universities, foundations, newsrooms, NGOs, regulators, courts. Once you control who writes the reports, who trains the lawyers and who decides what counts as "misinformation", elections become a detail.
For 30 years that ecosystem leaned one way. Nobody called it oligarchy. They called it "civil society."
Then Musk showed up. He bought the main public square, took the filters off, and started spending in the open, under his own name. Yes, he's the biggest donor of these midterms. Everyone can see exactly how much he gave and to whom. That's the difference. One plays in daylight, the other plays through a maze of structures.
And suddenly, billionaire money in politics became a threat to democracy.
This isn't really about left versus right. It's about an ideology that captured these institutions and leads straight into a wall. More regulation, less building. More process, less progress. Countries shutting down working nuclear plants. A decade to approve a power line. A system whose default answer to any ambition is "no."
Musk is the opposite. Reusable rockets. Mass-market EVs. Satellite internet for the whole planet. Brain-computer interfaces. A serious plan to make humanity multiplanetary. You can hate his tweets. You can't deny that no one in the last 20 years has pushed the frontier of what humanity can build further than he has.
That's why they need to break him. Not because of his money. Because he proves the system can be bypassed.
If we leave the system as it is, we don't get a catastrophe. We get something worse: slow, comfortable stagnation. A civilization that manages its own decline instead of building its future.
Everyone in Europe argues about the symptoms. Almost nobody looks at the plumbing: who funds the people who write the norms, litigate before the courts and set the boundaries of the debate.
Take the best-documented case: the Open Society Foundations, created by George Soros. Over a billion dollars a year. Roughly $32 billion given away since 1984. Not a single voter ever approved one of those dollars.
The model is simple and ruthless. You don't need to win an election. You fund NGOs, think tanks, legal clinics, university programs. They produce reports, train lawyers, run strategic litigation. And some of those people end up inside the institutions.
Concrete example: the European Court of Human Rights. A 2020 report found that at least 22 of the 100 permanent judges between 2009 and 2019 came from seven NGOs that are highly active before that same Court. Open Society is the main one, and it funds the other six.
The worst part: in 88 cases, 18 judges sat on the bench while the NGO they came from was the applicant, the representative or an intervening party. In any listed company, that's called a conflict of interest.
None of this is illegal. That's exactly the hack. These institutions were designed to protect themselves from governments and parties. Nobody planned for a private actor funding the entire chain: the plaintiff, the expert, the lawyer, and sometimes yesterday's colleague who is now the judge.
Same logic in Brussels: a dedicated policy advocacy institute, tens of millions flowing to NGOs at the heart of the EU, and Open Society among the largest private donors to the Council of Europe.
And the money? Soros made his fortune speculating, most famously against the British pound in 1992. But let's be precise: the foundation doesn't make money, it spends it. The return isn't financial, it's normative. Shaping the rules is worth more than any dividend.
So stop shouting "Soros" like an incantation. It gets engagement and changes nothing. The problem is structural: any billionaire, left or right, could do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Many already do.
What we should demand is rules. Full transparency on the funding of NGOs that litigate before European courts and institutions. Public declarations of interest for judges. Automatic recusal. Traceability of foreign money in lobbying.
Stop staring at the puppets. Look at the plumbing. Whoever funds the infrastructure of the debate always ends up writing its conclusions.
Now that I've had the iPhone Duo for 24 hours, here are my thoughts:
Adhesive on the case is a non-issue. The Apple case fits nicely, its hard plastic (I was expecting a more grippy silicone feel). You likely don't even need the adhesive.
I don't miss Face ID. I do think that having a watch to unlock the Duo makes it infinitely better/quicker. Then you only need your finger for using Apple Pay or passwords. I find myself looking at the camera for a second to authorize something and then realizing. I imagine that'll muscle memory will change in a few weeks.
I like the smaller folded form factor more than I thought I would. I find myself using the outside screen more than I thought I would. With non-optimized apps the screen area is kind of comically small.
Unfolded it's a great size for two handed use. I don't find the phone to be too heavy. I do use the split keyboard as it's easier to type that way. I have a nano textured iPad, and the matte screen unfolded reminds me a lot of that. No complaints so far.
Not too many apps optimized for the Duo yet. I imagine that will change quickly, I'm not too concerned.
Coming from a 16 Pro Max I can already tell battery life is a huge step up. Seems like it'll easily last a full day.
I hope Apple/third parties come out with a good Duo magsafe wallet. The wallet is just a bit too tall for the Duo but will still attach.
Haven't taken many pictures yet but the camera seems perfectly fine. My daughter loves the Kid Cue screens. It is weird to take a picture with it unfolded as the camera orientation is 90 degrees off what you'd expect.
Overall, I'm surprised a how much I like the Duo so far.
Have any questions? Let me know!
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) 🛩🇺🇸 retweeted
I don’t think the @liberal_party realizes how much consumers will hold them accountable next time they vote due to this mistake.
ie: BC.
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) 🛩🇺🇸 retweeted
1 month review: LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45" OLED
After 9 years on a dual 27" LG setup, here's how the switch to a single ultrawide is going:
✅ Picture quality is top notch
✅ The OLED blacks are so good
✅ Way less head turning. Active windows stay front and center
✅ The 800R curve hasn't been disorienting for work at all
✅ Mac scaling works just fine (I was nervous about this one)
✅ Stand and power brick are absolute beasts, but build quality is great
⚠️ After powering on the display for the first time, I noticed lines down both sides. I did a bit of digging, decided to run image cleaning, and about 10 minutes later the lines were gone. They have not returned at all since!
When it comes to window placement, I have been a longtime BetterSnapTool user and it just so happens to work great with the UltraGear display by allowing me to save my window layout. That means I'm just one keyboard shortcut away from snapping everything back into place after I connect my MacBook Pro back to the display.
Really glad I upgraded. Gaming PC is the next thing coming for the full experience!
For whatever you think of the NY Times news service, their Cooking app is superb. It’s $50 /yr & well worth it.
The recipes often teach me something new, they’re fresh & constantly evolving, the app is fantastic, and the user comments are useful & engaging.
Highly recommend. 👍
(But fuck the NYT for their news articles)
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) 🛩🇺🇸 retweeted
I left the Democrats a few months ago and somehow started aging backward.
I’m 44, but people think I’m in my 30’s.
No more constant outrage, guilt, or doomscrolling. Stress ages you.
My dermatologist asked what changed. I told her I stopped treating every Trump headline like a personal emergency.
Friends keep asking if I got work done. Nope. I just stopped treating normal life like a human rights violation.
Turns out, perpetual outrage is terrible for your complexion.
Leaving the Democrats was the best decision I ever made. My skin agrees.
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) 🛩🇺🇸 retweeted
If Democrats get power, they will:
1. Lawfare Trump officials;
2. Pack SCOTUS;
3. Go after Elon, SpaceX, and Tesla--then billionaires, then millionaires;
4. Crush free speech;
5. Make voter ID illegal;
6. Flood the country with illegals.
It sounds insane. It *is* insane.
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) 🛩🇺🇸 retweeted
I’m so tired of people who don’t build talking about seizing companies and wealth from those who do.
Democrats want to seize SpaceX because he’s a larger billionaire than all of their billionaires.
They don’t like that he can outspend their billionaires.
what an incredible photo
all they did was expand the geofence for F1 weekend and Robotaxi figured out the rest
generalized intelligence paying off
Elon Musk understands something that the political establishment desperately wants people to forget.
Government isn’t some magical institution that protects you from concentrated corporate power. It is concentrated power. And unlike corporations, it has the legal authority to use force against you.
Now imagine giving that power to a global government. One political hierarchy. Billions of people. No competing jurisdiction to escape to. No meaningful alternative when the people in charge decide your rights are inconvenient. That’s not progress. That’s the blueprint for the most terrifying monopoly in human history.
Look at what’s happening across Europe.
More authority concentrated in distant institutions. More regulatory power. More restrictions on speech. More decisions made by people ordinary citizens can barely hold accountable.
The answer has always been decentralization, private property, free markets, and the freedom to walk away.
Yet the political left keeps demanding more centralization, more bureaucracy, and more authority over ordinary people. And somehow they call that liberation.
What a fucking joke.
Replying to @Rothmus
Those who are opposed to corporations and favor government do not realize that government is simply the largest, most monopolistic corporation of all and it has a monopoly on violence.
Replying to @ChuckieFFS
You absolute midwit. Congrats on repeating the Wikipedia "Nazis were far-right, end of story" summary you absorbed between TikToks.
Yes, the Nazis crushed independent unions, jailed and murdered communists and social democrats, and Hitler liquidated the Strasserite "left" wing of his own party in the Night of the Long Knives. That part is not in dispute. They were not Marxist class-struggle socialists. They hated Bolshevism as a Jewish plot and treated international socialism as the main enemy. Fine.
What your middle-school history class skipped is that they still ran a National *Socialist* state: private property existed only as long as it served the Führer’s racial and war goals, wages and prices were controlled, industry was cartelized under state direction, profit was subordinated to the party, and the economy was planned for autarky and rearmament. That is not free-market capitalism, liberal conservatism, or classical right-wing economics. It is the same family of state-directed, anti-liberal, collectivist economics practiced by every other fascist and "national socialist" regime. The name was not a prank; the 25-point program and the early rhetoric were full of anti-capitalist planks precisely because they were competing with the actual socialists for working-class support.
Your North Korea comparison is the usual gotcha and it is only half-clever. Yes, names can lie. But the NSDAP did not merely call itself socialist while secretly running a Rothschild hedge fund. They nationalized, directed, rationed, and regimented. The difference from Soviet socialism was mainly that the Nazis kept the owners as managers under party orders instead of shooting them all and installing commissars. Both systems produced shortages, secret police, and mass graves; one just had better uniforms and Wagner.
Elon pointing out the obvious—that "National Socialist" is not an ironic branding exercise and that the regime was economically left of any classical liberal or conservative—does not make him a moron. It makes him less obedient to the post-1945 academic consensus that insists every totalitarian who isn’t a full Marxist must be filed under "far-right" so the left never has to share the body count. Money didn’t buy him a brain; it just bought him a platform where he doesn’t have to pretend your selective reading of 1930s Germany is the complete picture.
Keep yelling "far-right fascists" while ignoring the actual economic policies and the party’s own name. It is the historical equivalent of covering your ears and shouting.
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) 🛩🇺🇸 retweeted
Yep. I was totally guilty of this in my 20’s, and mildly guilty of it in 2024.
I legit don’t give af about parties anymore. But the popular dem brand right now is to basically hate everything good about America, so I can’t see myself voting for one anytime soon aside from Fett.
Honestly, even just hating Elon and wanting to destroy him is enough to make me not vote for a politician. Idgaf if you personally hate Elon, but anyone who thinks sabotaging the things he created/continues to create is a good idea can’t possibly have my support. Obviously this is partially because I am heavily invested in him, but only because I believe what his companies do are genuinely good and extremely necessary to keep the USA competitive globally.
You just out yourself as an incompetent moron if you actually want to sabotage Tesla or SpaceX.






































