Pinned Tweet
I just published the latest version of “An (Institutional) Investor’s Take on Cryptoassets” medium.com/john-pfeffer/an-i…
John Pfeffer retweeted
Greylock is excited to lead @antiochrobotics's $32M Series A, with participation from @A_StarVC, @Category_VC, @BoxGroup, @IcehouseVenture.
AI has shrunk software development cycles from weeks to days, but that speed has not yet reached the physical world. Physical validation processes have been a barrier to physical AI development and adoption speeds, as slow, costly testing bottlenecks progress.
Introducing @antiochrobotics, the simulation platform for physical AI.
Antioch enables robotics and autonomy teams to develop, test and validate AI systems in high-fidelity simulation, scaling from a single experiment to thousands of parallel evaluations before real-world deployment.
By calibrating high-fidelity simulations to each customer's hardware and running them at cloud scale, the platform enables companies to accelerate development, increase test coverage and bring new capabilities to production faster.
With experienced, second-time founders and partnerships with leading physical AI teams already in place, we believe Antioch is building the core platform for the future of physical AI.
We’re excited to partner with @HarryMellsop, @AlexLangshur @michaeljcalvey and @CollinSchlager for what comes next.
Read more on our investment blog (link in comments).
👀👀👀
The first complete, end-to-end fault-tolerant resource estimate for running Shor’s algorithm—the team used IonQ’s Walking Cat architecture to demonstrate how a specific application can be optimized for a trapped-ion quantum computer.
This work concludes that a 20,000-physical-qubit IonQ quantum computer, once developed, is expected to be able to break secp256k1, the 256-bit elliptic curve used by blockchain technology such as Bitcoin, in just under 26 days.
This architectural and resource-estimation study is consistent with IonQ's publicly stated roadmap, which targets systems with the relevant capabilities in the 2028 timeframe.
Watch Chris Ballance share the full view in our livestream today, September 8, at 12:30 PM ET → investors.ionq.com/events-an…
Read the announcement → ionq.com/news/ionq-publishes…
Read the full paper → ionq.com/blog/the-first-full…
#IonQ #QuantumIsNow #QuantumComputing #WalkingCat
Go @antiochrobotics !!!
Today, we’re announcing Antioch’s $32 million Series A, led by @GreylockVC with participation from @A_StarVC, @Category_VC, @BoxGroup, @IcehouseVenture, and angels.
While AI has drastically accelerated software development, physical autonomy has been constrained by slow, expensive hardware-based development. Antioch enables physical AI teams to build, test, and validate systems at the speed of software.
We’re proud to be working with leading teams including @amazon @ring, @NVIDIARobotics, and @nebiusai as we make scaled, high-fidelity simulation the standard for physical AI development.
Our sincere thanks to the legion of investors, customers, partners, and advisors who are making this step change possible.
We’re scaling rapidly and hiring across simulation, infrastructure, machine learning, 3D graphics, go-to-market, and operations.
John Pfeffer retweeted
Checking in here.
How much bitcoin needs to be hacked before white hats in the industry can get access to better models?
We are at almost 6,000 bitcoin (~$500M) at this point.
John Pfeffer retweeted
3,400 BTC just returned to the liquid federation. Looks like ~600 BTC stayed behind.
👀👀👀
🚨 LIQUID NETWORK SEES ~4,000 BTC MOVE AS “WHITEHATS” LEAVE ONCHAIN MESSAGE
Roughly 4,000 of 4,200 BTC associated with a Liquid Network peg-out transaction appears to have moved at once.
An OP_RETURN message attached to a subsequent transaction reads:
“we are whitehats. contact us on chain”
TXID:
c103de95817b43f2df635ec6f35ff126ca26a7c6d20570c4b01866b2b3e69a19
The nature of the transaction and whether the funds were moved through an exploit remain unclear, but it does not look good.
What the SpaceX–Anthropic Deal Means
Two weeks ago, we published a note laying out what GPT-5.5's release implied. The conclusion was simple: whoever secures compute first, in greater volume, and with greater reliability ultimately takes the win. With OpenAI's 30GW roadmap dwarfing Anthropic's 7–8GW, we closed by arguing that the structural advantage on compute sat with OpenAI.
Less than a fortnight later, that conclusion is being tested. On May 6, Anthropic signed a single-tenant lease for the entirety of Colossus 1 with SpaceXAI — the infrastructure subsidiary that consolidates Elon Musk's xAI and SpaceX. The asset carries more than 220,000 GPUs and 300MW of power, and crucially, is scheduled to come online within this month. It served as the capstone of Anthropic's April blitz, which added 13.8GW of cumulative capacity over the span of a single month. On headline numbers alone, OpenAI took more than a year to stack 18GW; Anthropic has put 13.8GW in the ground in thirty days. The takeaways break down into three.
First, the compute pecking order has been redrawn again. Anthropic has now swept up the AWS expansion (5GW, with $100B+ in spend commitments over a decade), Google + Broadcom (3.5GW of TPU), Google Cloud (5GW alongside a $40B investment), and now SpaceXAI's Colossus 1 (0.3GW). Cumulative committed capacity, inclusive of pre-April allocations, sits at 14.8GW. This is still only half of OpenAI's 2030 target of 30GW, but the fact that the SpaceX lease will be live inside a month makes "deliverability" a qualitatively different proposition.
Second, Elon Musk is the plaintiff in an active lawsuit against OpenAI — and at the same time, the supplier handing 220,000+ GPUs and 300MW of power, in one block, to OpenAI's most formidable competitor. The timing matters: the deal was struck in the middle of the Musk–Altman trial. We read this as a deliberate pincer with OpenAI in the middle. In the courtroom, Musk works to dismantle the moral legitimacy of OpenAI's leadership; in the market, he arms Anthropic to absorb OpenAI's revenue and user base.
Third, the structure is financial-engineering perfection — a clean win-win for both sides. xAI can recognize $6B of annual revenue from a single contract, an amount that almost precisely offsets its Q1 2026 annualized net loss of $6B. It also accelerates the cleanup of SpaceXAI's pre-IPO balance sheet, with the entity now being floated at around $1.75T. Anthropic, on the other side, converts roughly $5B of spend into what it expects to be $15B of ARR via the coming inference-revenue surge.
(Mirae Asset Securities, May 8, 2026)
Now that the @AnthropicAI and @SpaceX deal happened, the next logical domino is for @OpenAI to do a compute deal with @Meta. OAI needs compute. META can redirect compute to OAI from its own failing/weak AI.
So obvious that @xai should do a compute deal with @AnthropicAI. xAI is using only a fraction of its compute capacity. Ant's revenues are severely compute constrained. Ant's revenues would rip and xAI would flip profitable. Right before their IPOs. @SpaceX @DarioAmodei @elonmusk
Why META and not @awscloud or @Microsoft? Because META can redirect compute from its own AI efforts and because META and OAI are both consumer focused, so a rapprochement makes more sense. AMZN and MSFT don't have compute to redirect to the same extent.
Perhaps we move to a world with 3 large frontier lab + compute companies / kereitsu / chaebols:
1. @GoogleDeepMind (already = lab + compute + capital + data + consumer and enterprise dist, etc.)
2. @spacexai + @AnthropicAI (compute incl data cent in space + Terafab + front lab)
3. OpenAI + META (compute + lab + cons dist)
Lol. I love the simulation we live in! 😂
We’ve agreed to a partnership with @SpaceX that will substantially increase our compute capacity.
This, along with our other recent compute deals, means that we’ve been able to increase our usage limits for Claude Code and the Claude API.
So obvious that @xai should do a compute deal with @AnthropicAI. xAI is using only a fraction of its compute capacity. Ant's revenues are severely compute constrained. Ant's revenues would rip and xAI would flip profitable. Right before their IPOs. @SpaceX @DarioAmodei @elonmusk
It would also be the funniest and most entertaining thing @elonmusk and would really yank Sam’s chain.
Just sayin’
As an investor, I once was concerned about whether capital would still have value in a world of abundance. While some argue that we will go post-capitalist in an abundant world, the opposite now appears to be true. We appear to be moving to a much more capital intensive world where returns on capital will be sustainably significant. Intelligence requires compute. Compute requires energy. Both require capital. Space. Robots. On and on. The economic version of Pascal’s Wager dictates that you want to hit the Event Horizon of the Singularity with as much capital as possible.
John Pfeffer retweeted
I've spent the past few weeks reading 100s of public data sources about AI development. I now believe that recursive self-improvement has a 60% chance of happening by the end of 2028. In other words, AI systems might soon be capable of building themselves.
Very cool from my freinds @AlpenLabs
What if the biggest (and most irreparable) shift in relative wealth in our lifetimes and for many lifetimes to come ends up being the shift of relative wealth from those who spent the entire Singularity calling it a bubble to those who saw the Singularity for what it is and simply geared their professional lives and their investment portfolios to benefit from it?
#Bitcoin over the last 17 years was good training for this.
John Pfeffer retweeted
I think I accidentally witnessed a historic speech
Replying to @matthewclifford @lfg_uk
As I watched this, I could almost feel the tide turning. I hope enough people see it to make it come true.

















