“The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie -deliberate, contrived and dishonest -but the myth -persistent, persuasive and unrealistic" ~John F Kennedy
Joined September 2009
- Tweets26.5K
- Following3.8K
- Followers1.9K
- Likes113K
Pinned Tweet
Where there is no voluntary informed consent, medicine becomes a violent act.
No mandates.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Friends, I could really use some help.
A large group of Amish builders from Ohio are spending the next FIVE MONTHS fixing homes damaged by Hurricane Helene for FREE in Western North Carolina and South Carolina.
There's just one problem... the Amish don't drive, so they need drivers to take them back and forth to job sites and drop off trailers (if you have a truck).
I have already volunteered to help, but we need more volunteers.
If you feel led and are in the area, there's a sign up sheet in the comments.
You'll get free breakfast and free dinner too + you'll get to meet some of the heroes who have been working here to rebuild.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Ce n’est pas tant la droite qui m’a convaincu, mais surtout la gauche qui m’a fait basculer...
Je viens d'une famille ouvrière, donc historiquement de gauche. J'ai grandi dans un milieu où être de gauche était une évidence.
Et pourtant, à la base, je n'étais absolument pas politisé.
Les histoires de gauche, de droite, d'extrême gauche ou d'extrême droite, pour moi, c'était surtout du vent.
Je n'ai jamais ressenti le besoin d'appartenir à un camp, de défendre un parti ou de me reconnaître dans une idéologie.
Je suis de base un électron libre.
Mais avec le temps, l'expérience, le recul et la maturité, ma vision du monde a évolué.
Et je suis convaincu que nous sommes très nombreux dans ce cas. Certains d'entre vous, ont dû aussi passer par là...
Ce ne sont pas les discours de droite qui m'ont fait évoluer. C'est le comportement exécrable de la gauche.
Son arrogance. Son mépris. Sa violence. Son intolérance. Cette manie insupportable de distribuer des leçons de morale tout en étant incapable de supporter la moindre contradiction.
Cette obsession de vouloir imposer sa vision du monde, de coller des étiquettes, de salir des réputations et de désigner des ennemis dès que quelqu'un ose sortir du cadre idéologique autorisé.
Des méthodes profondément autoritaires et fascistes.
Ils parlent au nom du peuple, mais méprisent ce même peuple dès qu'il refuse de penser comme eux.
Ce sont des imposteurs.
Je ne me suis jamais réveillé un matin en me disant que j'avais envie d'être d'extrême droite.
Ce sont eux qui m'ont classé de ce côté du prisme politique.
Ce sont eux qui ont décidé que certaines de mes opinions, certaines de mes interrogations ou certaines de mes critiques suffisaient à me ranger dans cette catégorie.
Je n'ai pas choisi cette étiquette. Ils me l'ont collée.
Alors ainsi soit-il.
Vous avez réveillé quelque chose en moi : une profonde colère face à l'injustice et une envie viscérale de remettre les choses à leur place.
Parce que s'il y a bien deux choses que je ne supporte pas, ce sont l'injustice et l'autorité illégitime.
Je déteste ceux qui s'arrogent le droit de décider ce que les autres doivent penser, dire ou croire. Ceux qui prétendent détenir la vérité et s'autorisent, au nom de leur prétendue supériorité morale, à faire taire tous ceux qui les contredisent.
Ce n'est même plus une question de gauche ou de droite. C'est une question de liberté, de dignité et de refus de la soumission.
Et plus ils chercheront à nous imposer leur vision du monde, plus ils renforceront notre détermination à leur résister.
Ils ne cherchent pas à comprendre ce que vous pensez. Ils décident à votre place de ce que vous êtes.
Et quand les gens finissent par se détourner d'eux, ils ne se remettent jamais en question.
Ils les traitent de fascistes, de racistes, d'extrémistes.
Ils ne comprennent toujours pas que leurs méthodes radicalisent les gens contre eux et c'est tant mieux !
Et je pense que beaucoup de Français ont vécu la même expérience que moi...
Tout le monde est en train d'ouvrir les jeux ces derniers temps sur cette gauche dangereuse.
Vous êtes juste imbuvables et plus grand monde ne peut vous saquer.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
I’m living in the South-East in Brazil in the middle of nowhere. Yesterday, I drove 45 minutes to the next pharmacy to pick up my autism medication.
And guys, I live in a very sparsely populated area. People here know about my political views, and some even follow me on this platform.
Several people (those at the gas station and the pharmacist) brought up the elections. And you know what? They were whispering. Literally whispering.
They no longer dare to speak their minds. They told me how difficult things have become. They’re afraid that even the slightest criticism could get Alexandre de Moraes to send someone after them. They no longer feel safe because of the authoritarian central government.
And that’s despite the fact that my entire region, and pretty much all of southern Brazil, is overwhelmingly conservative.
What’s happening to Brazil is extremely frightening.
It’s as if an entire population is being held hostage by a Supreme Court judge who thinks he’s God, and a president who was once convicted of corruption and whose political opponents are being pushed aside, just like the communists once did in the Soviet Union.
I hope the right finally unites and, if necessary, even breaks away from the tyrannical regime in Brasília.
People have the right to freedom and self-determination. Here in Brazil and everywhere else in the world.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
An Open Letter to the University of Sydney @Sydney_Uni @mscott
Regarding the appointment of Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice
Dear Professor Scott,
I read with absolute disgust that the University of Sydney has appointed Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice, where she will apparently be sharing her wisdom on empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust.
You cannot be serious.
You are quoted as saying:
"Dame Jacinda led New Zealand through events of profound consequence and her leadership demonstrated that empathy and resolve do not compete with one another; each can strengthen the other."
Appointing Jacinda Ardern to teach social cohesion is rather like appointing Jeffrey Dahmer to teach a course on wellbeing, or Jimmy Savile to run the local daycare centre. The sheer absurdity would almost be funny if the consequences of her leadership weren't so hideously tragic.
My name is Alia Bland. I am a co-founder of Voices for Freedom, an organisation established in New Zealand in 2020. For years, we stood alongside tens of thousands of ordinary Kiwis whose lives were torn apart by the policies of Ardern's government.
While the international media fawned over her kindness and compassion, we were dealing with the wreckage.
At the height of the COVID response, we were receiving upwards of 1,000 emails a day. Desperate people reaching out because they had lost their jobs, their incomes, their homes and, in many cases, their will to live.
People nearing retirement were forced to sell family homes they had spent decades paying off. Some are still living in caravans five years later.
Marriages collapsed. Families fractured. Lifelong friendships were destroyed. People who had served their communities for decades were suddenly treated like lepers because they declined a medical procedure.
Some of the people who came to us had spent their entire lives believing New Zealand was a decent, fair-minded country. Watching that belief crumble, and seeing what it did to them, was heartbreaking.
I cannot adequately describe the anguish in those emails. The desperation of parents wondering how they would feed and house their families. The humiliation of hardworking people being marched out of professions they loved. The despair of people who had done everything society asked of them, only to discover that their own government considered them disposable.
And presiding over it all was Jacinda Ardern, smiling for the cameras and telling the world how kind New Zealand was.
Kind? For whom?
Her government deliberately created a two-class society. Ardern herself acknowledged it publicly. New Zealanders were excluded from workplaces, businesses, events and ordinary social life. People were coerced into accepting a medical intervention under threat of losing their livelihoods.
And those who suffered adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines faced another nightmare. We fought for vaccine-injured New Zealanders whose lives had been devastated by serious physical harm, while many struggled to have their injuries acknowledged or receive adequate support.
The government's public assurances about vaccine safety deserve particular scrutiny. Officials knew about the myocarditis risk, including among young people. We have examined the records. Yet people raising legitimate questions about those risks were routinely dismissed and vilified.
The damage went far beyond lost incomes and broken relationships. An enormous number of New Zealanders lost faith in the very institutions they had trusted their entire lives. Government, health authorities, education, police and the media. That trust has not magically returned because Ardern has moved on to more prestigious surroundings.
While her government was busy marginalising people, we were building a nationwide support network to help them survive.
Voices for Freedom grew to more than 100,000 people on our mailing list, many representing entire families. More than 45,000 people signed up to our local groups across the country, which are still operational today in 2026. We established industry groups to help people fight for their careers, provided support through employment disputes and legal challenges, organised practical assistance and hand-delivered millions of flyers to households throughout New Zealand.
We did this while facing censorship, public vilification and government surveillance. Official records obtained since have confirmed that our activities and communications were being monitored and reported on.
Our volunteers gave everything they could to help people who had been abandoned by the institutions meant to protect them.
And now the University of Sydney wants to hold up the woman responsible for overseeing this period as a shining example of empathy and social cohesion?
It is sickening.
Professor Scott, did anyone at your university bother to speak with the people whose lives were destroyed under Ardern's leadership before celebrating her appointment?
Have you spoken to the former nurses, teachers and police officers who lost their careers? The families who lost their homes? The people still suffering from vaccine injuries? The parents whose children no longer speak to them?
Or did you simply swallow the carefully cultivated international image of Saint Jacinda, the compassionate leader who saved New Zealand?
I wonder whether you have considered why this internationally celebrated former prime minister now lives in Australia rather than the country she once led. The depth of hostility towards her among many New Zealanders should give you pause.
Because I can assure you, there is another side to that story. And there are hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders who live with the consequences.
I have no objection to universities studying Ardern's leadership. In fact, I would encourage it. There is an enormous amount to learn from what happened in New Zealand between 2021 and 2023. Like, what not to do...
But presenting her as someone uniquely qualified to teach empathy, social cohesion and civic trust, without acknowledging the extraordinary human suffering that occurred under her leadership, is an insult to the people who paid the price.
We were there, Professor Scott. We saw what happened. We picked up the pieces. We are still picking them up.
Some of those people will never recover what they lost.
And the woman who presided over it all gets a professorship in empathy.
What an absolute disgrace.
Yours sincerely,
Alia Bland
Co-founder, Voices for Freedom
New Zealand
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
On January 10, 2020, the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 was released. That same day, Linfa Wang, a leading bat coronavirus expert at Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore (named in the DARPA Defuse Grant) resigned from his position directing its emerging infectious diseases program.
Coincidence? Or did the newly released genome tell an experienced coronavirus researcher something the rest of the world didn't yet understand.
What did Dr. Wang know on January 10, 2020, and when did he know it?
Call for transparency now: CarolinaFlu.org
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
In 1982, a major network aired an hour-long special on the shot every American child had to get for school.
It reported that serious reactions were "common." Studies going back to 1933 showed brain damage. And a scientist who'd worked at the agency regulating vaccines said that they "very much do not wish to know" about adverse reactions.
This is what TV news did before Pharma bought it. 🧵
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
In 2013, one of the most famous anchors in America gave her daytime show to a mother whose healthy 21-year-old was found dead in bed 18 days after a Gardasil shot.
Pharma's response was swift. Two weeks later, the show's cancellation was announced. 🧵
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Right now in the US, part of the Democratic Party has decided to play the "socialist" card. Days before the midterms, DSA candidates are winning primaries and the word isn't taboo anymore.
So today I'm going to show you why socialism never works. Not with ideology. With mechanics.
Let's start with a dumb question. How much should a loaf of bread cost?
You don't know. Neither do I. Nobody does. And that's exactly the point.
The price of a loaf of bread is the instant synthesis of millions of pieces of information that no single person holds: the wheat harvest in Kansas, the price of gas for the oven, the baker's wages, the shop's rent, a drought in Argentina, a war on the Black Sea, whether people feel like bread this morning or a bagel.
In 1920, Ludwig von Mises published a paper that should have ended the debate. His argument: without private ownership of the means of production, those means are never exchanged. No exchange, no prices. No prices, no economic calculation. The planner can't know whether a steel mill is worth more than a dam or a hospital. He's flying blind. He can't even tell that he's wrong.
In 1945, Friedrich Hayek drove the point home in "The Use of Knowledge in Society." Useful knowledge is scattered across millions of minds. The baker knows things about his neighborhood that no ministry ever will. Prices are a telecommunications system: when tin becomes scarce somewhere in the world, its price rises, and millions of users economize on it without even knowing why. No committee, no ministry, no plan can replicate that. The market isn't an ideology. It's a distributed information processor.
Then Milton Friedman picked up a simple pencil. The wood comes from Washington State, the graphite from South America, the rubber from Malaysia. Thousands of people who don't know each other, don't speak the same language, maybe even hate each other, cooperate to make something none of them could make alone. Nobody gave them orders. Prices were enough.
Now run the experiment in reverse. Set the price yourself.
Cap rents below market: landlords stop maintaining, stop building, housing disappears. Swedish economist Assar Lindbeck, a man of the left, said rent control is the most efficient technique known for destroying a city, short of bombing it.
Cap the price of flour: shelves empty, lines form, the black market takes over. Venezuela, 2016. The country with the largest oil reserves on earth, and people standing in line for hours to eat. Nearly 8 million Venezuelans eventually fled.
Socialism smashes the thermometer and then acts surprised that the fever keeps rising.
And this is where it gets serious.
Because when the plan fails, and it always fails, the planner has two options. Admit the plan is wrong. Or blame the people. Saboteurs, speculators, kulaks, enemies of the people.
He always picks the second one.
Hayek saw it in 1944 in The Road to Serfdom, in a chapter with a chilling title: Why the Worst Get on Top. A central plan requires central power. Central power attracts those who crave power. And when reality resists the plan, reality has to be broken. Which means people have to be broken.
Stalin. He collectivizes the land. Output collapses. He blames the peasants and seizes the harvests. The Holodomor, 1932-1933: millions starved to death in Ukraine, the breadbasket of Europe. Add the Gulag, the purges, the deportations.
Mao. The Great Leap Forward, 1958-1962. Backyard furnaces producing useless steel, insane grain quotas, local officials inflating numbers to avoid punishment, and the state requisitioning food based on those fake numbers. The result: the worst famine in human history. Estimates range from 30 to 45 million dead.
Pol Pot. The Khmer Rouge abolish money, markets, property, and empty the cities. The dream of total planning, carried all the way. In four years, roughly one in four Cambodians dies.
Hitler. He sent communists to the camps, but his party called itself National Socialist and the economy answered to the plan and the party. Companies stayed private on paper, but the state decided what to produce, at what price, and for whom. Hayek dedicated The Road to Serfdom "to the socialists of all parties" precisely because he saw the same root: the idea that the state must steer society toward a collective goal, and the individual must step aside.
Different eras. Different continents. Different cultures. Same mechanism. Same ending.
This isn't a bug. It's a feature of the system. Remove prices and you remove information. Remove information and you remove the ability to correct. And when you can no longer correct through prices, you correct through force.
So let me say it plainly. Socialism always starts nice. A rent freeze. Public grocery stores. Make "the rich" pay. Nobody promises the Gulag on day one.
But if America truly goes down this road, the rest of the story is already written. The plan will fail. There will need to be culprits. There will need to be power to punish them. And a socialist government holding the American state apparatus, its surveillance capabilities, its technology, its military, wouldn't be a regional tragedy. It could be the greatest tragedy in history.
The 20th century paid for this lesson with tens of millions of lives. We don't get to forget it in one generation.
Prices aren't the enemy of the people. Prices are the voice of the people.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
French communist admits why they are REALLY protesting…
“We are socialists, we are communists, we are anticapitalists,… the whole system must go!”
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
I've been saying it for months: we're heading toward a new 1989.
Not the fall of the Berlin Wall this time. The fall of the globalist project, and its fundamentally collectivist vision of humanity.
Remember the video Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum published in 2016, the "predictions for 2030." Prediction number one: "You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy." You'll own nothing, rent everything, and smile about it. They presented it as a desirable future. Marx summed up communism in a single sentence: the abolition of private property. The WEF just rewrote it with a delivery drone.
Their problem is that two forces are now tearing this project apart.
The first is AI. For the first time in history, a single individual can own a lever of production that used to require an army of employees, a bank, and a state. AI doesn't centralize capital. It hands it to the people who build. That is the exact opposite of "you'll own nothing."
The second is reality. Exploding debt, collapsing public services despite record taxes, rising insecurity, schools that no longer teach anything. You can lie about reality for decades. You can't stop it from arriving.
So here's what they're going to do now.
First, activate their networks. Soros's foundations, starting with Open Society, have spent years pouring money into NGOs, activist collectives, and "anti-repression" groups that form the ideological and logistical breeding ground of the crowds we're seeing today from Paris to Montreal. When the argument no longer works, all that's left is chaos.
Second, manipulate the youth. This is how communists have always taken power. Mao, speaking to Chinese students in 1957: "The world is yours. You young people are like the sun at eight or nine in the morning." Nine years later, he unleashed the Red Guards: high schoolers and university students who humiliated their teachers, denounced their parents, and burned books. And once they were no longer useful, he shipped some 17 million of them off to the countryside to be "re-educated." Youth is always the fuel of the revolution. Never its beneficiary.
Third, the globalist elites will do everything they can to keep the chaos going. Because a country in chaos demands more state, more control, more surveillance, more "governance." Chaos isn't a bug in their project. It's how it runs.
But either way, their project has only two possible endings. Neither one goes their way.
Ending one: political Islam. They think they can use it as an ally against the West, against the nation, against the family. They forgot Iran. In 1979, the Iranian left, led by the communists of the Tudeh Party, marched hand in hand with Khomeini to overthrow the Shah. Four years later, the party was banned, its leaders in prison, many of them executed. Islamism never lets itself be used by Marxism. It devours it. Your Marxist project will end up eaten by the very people you thought you were manipulating.
Ending two: economic collapse. Because let's say it plainly: the elites running this project are, on the whole, economically illiterate. Brilliant at storytelling, hopeless at incentives. Ludwig von Mises proved it back in 1920: without private property there are no prices, without prices there is no economic calculation, and without economic calculation there is only waste and shortage. Hayek drove the point home: no central planner can aggregate the dispersed knowledge of billions of people. Global collectivism can't work. Not because it's been badly implemented. Because it is structurally impossible.
The USSR learned that in 1989. They're about to learn it now.
The wall is already shifting.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
China emits as much CO2 in 16 days as Canada emits in an entire year. Australia's annual total takes China just 12 days to emit, while Britain's takes barely 9 days.
Combined, Canada, Australia and the UK emit about 1.23 billion tonnes a year. China emits that much in roughly 37 days.
So, even if all three countries eliminated every tonne of fossil CO2, closing every factory, power station and banning every gas vehicle, China would replace the entire annual reduction in little more than five weeks.
Yet, Western governments are deliberately making energy scarcer and more expensive, by dismantling dependable sources, restricting oil and gas exploration and loading industry with carbon taxes and net zero mandates.
Steel, chemicals, fertilizers, refining and manufacturing are driven overseas, often to countries burning more coal. So the emissions do not disappear. Only the jobs, tax revenues and energy security do.
The West impoverishes itself. China profits.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
I just filed a formal ethics complaint against @SenatorSlotkin
FIRST ON FOX: Sen. Elissa Slotkin faces a new Senate ethics complaint over remarks about deterring young people from joining the Trump administration.
University of Chicago student Michael Bicksel filed the complaint Thursday.
The complaint alleges Slotkin advocated using congressional investigations and potential prosecutions to discourage government service. Slotkin disputes that characterization.
Full story here foxnews.com/politics/slotkin…
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Somewhere in Kelston, on the road between Bristol and Bath, a pothole has been there for so long it now has its own postcode.
Nearby in a little cottage, a nice old lady has been on an NHS waiting list for a hip replacement for three years.
Meanwhile, YOU, the British taxpayer are funding a full PhD at Bristol University for Ilhan Omar's gay brother-cum-ex-husband Ahmed Elmi.
I repeat.
You, the British taxpayer, are funding this gay Somali man, who likely has committed immigration fraud, to produce self-indulgent nonsense dressed up as research at a Western university, while he lectures you on the need to decolonize Western academia.
Meet Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, the man Ilhan Omar married in 2009.
All signs point to him now being a PhD student at Bristol University in England. In a paper he published in 2026, he writes: "As a gay man of the East African diaspora, my fieldwork was never neutral."
His thesis? "Bravery amidst Brutality: A Queer Resistance to Violence and Criminalisation in Contemporary Kenya."
The British government is paying for it with a full scholarship. His big idea is that Western research needs "decolonising." He's arguing that from a Western university, on Western taxpayers' money.
From October to December 2025, he helped curate an African LGBTQ+ art show at a gay and lesbian archive in Johannesburg.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
🔻THIS IS BIG !
🚨BILL GATES/BOURLA TRIAL: “These injections are a BIOLOGICAL WEAPON.”
“COVID-19 injections are LETHAL.”
“The global deployment of this biological weapon can only take place through the UNLAWFUL deception of the public on a global scale.”
“The defendants [including Bill Gates and Albert Bourla] are implementers of the ‘COVID-19: The Great Reset’ project and are GUILTY of this deception; they are therefore being sued individually in these proceedings.”
Share !
⟁
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Schröder, ehemaliger Kanzler, LEGT DIE WAHRHEIT OFFEN: „Frieden sabotiert!
Schröder äußert sich: „Warum der Krieg endlos in die Länge gezogen wird. Es ist das größte Skandalon unserer Zeit: Während täglich Menschen in der Ukraine sterben, Städte in Trümmern liegen und die Energiepreise in Europa durch die Decke gehen, wird Frieden systematisch verhindert. Nicht durch Zufall, nicht durch Missverständnisse – sondern durch absichtliche Sabotage hinter verschlossenen Türen.“
Der ehemalige Kanzler Gerhard Schröder, enthüllt in einem sensationellen Interview, wie historische Chancen, den Krieg zwischen Russland und der Ukraine zu beenden, absichtlich sabotiert wurden.
Russische und ukrainische Delegationen trafen sich in Istanbul. Ein Abkommen schien in greifbarer Nähe: Neutralität für die Ukraine, Sicherheitsgarantien und eine Lösung für den Donbass-Konflikt.
Doch dann kam der berüchtigte Besuch des britischen Premierministers Boris Johnson in Kiew. Laut Schröder und anderen Quellen überbrachte Johnson eine klare Botschaft des Westens: „Kämpft weiter, wir stehen hinter euch – mit Waffen, Geld und politischer Unterstützung.“
Ein Friedensabkommen? Vom Tisch.
Die Eskalation war beabsichtigt. Gerhard Schröder, der Putin seit Jahren persönlich kennt und einer der letzten westlichen Staatsmänner war, die echte Diplomatie betrieben, spricht von einem „System zur Verlängerung des Krieges“. „Es geht nicht um Freiheit oder Demokratie“, sagt er weiter. „Es dreht sich um geopolitische Macht, um Russland um jeden Preis zu schwächen und um Milliarden an militärischen Gewinnen. Jeder, der von einem Waffenstillstand spricht, wird als Putin-Apologet hingestellt. Das ist keine Demokratie mehr, das ist eine Diktatur der öffentlichen Meinung.“
Die Beweislage, die Schröder und investigativer Journalismus zusammentragen, ist vernichtend. Interne Memos des US-Außenministeriums, durch Whistleblower geleakt, zeigen, dass es bereits im März 2022 klare Anweisungen gab, keine Verhandlungen zu unterstützen, die Russland „belohnen“ könnten. Schröder nennt es „moralische Selbstentwaffnung“: Deutschland, einst die treibende Kraft hinter der Ostpolitik, wurde zum Vasallen amerikanischer Interessen. Besonders explosiv ist die Rolle der NATO-Erweiterung. Schröder weist darauf hin, dass Warnungen aus Moskau bereits auf dem Gipfel in Bukarest 2008 ignoriert wurden. Putin betrachtete den Beitritt von Georgien und der Ukraine als existenzielle Bedrohung. Statt Kompromisse zu suchen, gingen die Provokationen weiter: Militärmanöver an der russischen Grenze, Waffenlieferungen und die Ausbildung ukrainischer Truppen durch westliche Spezialeinheiten.
„Das war kein Verteidigungsbündnis mehr“, sagte Schröder, „das war ein aggressives expansionistisches Projekt.“ Hinter den Kulissen florierte ein Netzwerk aus Think Tanks, Waffenlobbyisten und neokonservativen Hardlinern. Namen wie der von Victoria Nuland, die eine zentrale Rolle bei dem Putsch auf dem Maidan-Platz 2014 spielte, tauchen wieder auf. Milliarden Dollar an US-Hilfe flossen nicht nur in die Ukraine, sondern auch zurück in die Taschen amerikanischer Unternehmen. Raytheon, Lockheed Martin und andere Waffengiganten buchten Rekordgewinne. Inzwischen frieren deutsche Familien, weil die Nord-Stream-Pipelines – ein Projekt, an dessen Verhandlungen Schröder maßgeblich beteiligt war – in die Luft gejagt wurden. Bis heute gab es keine echte Untersuchung.
Schröder geht noch weiter. Er berichtet von geheimen Treffen, in denen hochrangige westliche Vertreter offen zugaben, dass ein schneller Sieg für die Ukraine unrealistisch sei. Dennoch wurde die Erzählung vom „Kämpfen bis zum letzten Ukrainer“ aufrechterhalten. Zehntausende junge Männer starben in sinnlosen Offensiven wie jener bei Charkiw oder im Donbass. Zivilisten in Donezk und Luhansk, die seit 2014 unter Beschuss stehen, wurden in den westlichen Medien systematisch ignoriert. „Das ist keine Voreingenommenheit, das ist Propaganda“, sagt Schröder bitter.
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
חיפשתי את הקטע הזה בנרות - וסוף סוף מצאתי אותו. ביום ראשון, אחרי המהומות, פראנס 2 שידרו כתבה של 12 דקות בשם ״בלב האלימות״ שהראתה, עם מעט מאוד קריינות - מראות פשוט מהממים של האלימות הגדולה של המהומות של יום שבת. אני זוכר שצפיתי בזה מרותק - כמו במלחמה בלייב. רואים שם הכל מהכל: משטרה מסתערת ונסוגה, את מארגני המחאה שמחלקים לאנשים טיפות עיניים נגד גז מדמיע, אנשים ששוברים ״פאווה״ כדי להעיף על השוטרים, ונדליזם, ביזה, הצתות וגם חובשים מתנדבים ומכבי אש ותזמורת ואת מלנשון החלאה צועד, מתמוגג ומאושר עם חבורת המנוולים שלו. אלו רגעים טלוויזיוניים מרתקים. אני זוכר שצפיתי בזה ולא הבנתי באותו רגע במה אני צופה. זו טלוויזיה טובה. טובה מאוד למעשה. ערוכה היטב. מסמך נדיר מסוג שכבר קשה לראות היום. בצרפת, מהדורות החדשות אינן סיפור מתיש של פורנו מוות ושכול על פני שעתיים עם פרסומות כמו בארץ ועם מריחות בלתי נגמרות והאכלה של נראטיבים בכפית. 12 דקות של תיעוד, כמעט ללא קריינות הן דבר מאוד יוצא דופן. הרבה מאוד נדל״ן במהדורה צרפתית שנמשכת כחצי שעה בלבד.
אחד מועדי העובדים הגדולים של צרפת, ה-סה-ג׳ה-טה שזה סוג של ״הסתדרות״ אולטרה-שמאלנית. יחד עם ועד דומה אחר (סה-אף-דה-טה) מאוד זעמו על השידור של הכתבה הלא שיגרתית הזו. כי היא מראה שם את פרצופה האמיתי של ה״מחאה״ הזו בלי קשקושים ובלי התייפיפות ובלי פילטרים.
עכשיו הם דורשים לא רק את פיטוריו של המגיש הותיק - לורן דלאוס - אלא את פיטוריו של כל צוות החדשות של המהדורה הזו.
אתם קולטים? **ועדי עובדים**, שדורשים שמנהלי הערוץ הציבורי הצרפתי - יפטרו צוות שלם כי העזו להכין כתבה שאינה לרוחם. כתבה שבה ברוב השוטים - המצלמה פאסיבית לחלוטין ואין אף נקיטת עמדה או תיווך.
זהו השמאל הקיצוני העומד על רגליו האחרויות כנגד, ובכן, - המציאות עצמה ואלו המשדרים אותה. הם מכנים את הכתבה הזו ״פרופגנדה״. אל הדרישה ההזויה הזו, הצטרפה גם ואלרי לרוז׳ - נשיאת אירגון העיתונאים סה-דה-ז׳י. מבחינתה, מדובר ב״התדרדרות טוטאלית ובלתי נשלטת״. אל ועדי העובדים ואליה הצטרפו עוד קולות עיתונאים ואחרים מן השמאל בזעם קדוש.
הנהלת הערוץ הציבורי פראנס 2 ששידרה את הדוקו הזה - מיהרה להוציא סוג של ״מאה קולפה״ - הודעת התנצלות די מבועתת שבה היא מצרה על כך שהתמונות לא היו בתוך ״קונטקסט״ יותר רחב. כלומר שלא ישב שם איזה מישהו וחירטט לאנשים שצופים במסמך המרתק הזה - מה עליהם לחשוב או להרגיש.
אני אתן לכם לשפוט בעצמכם. מזל שמישהו העלה את זה לטוויטר:
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Much has been published and said elsewhere about UNC’s possible involvement in the pandemic’s origins. Those claims cannot be left unexamined. An independent investigation should test them and, if the evidence warrants, disprove them. Leaving allegations unresolved lets suspicion linger and risks erosion of UNC’s reputation — and North Carolina’s.
A leaked 2018 DEFUSE proposal by the federal Department of Defense identified UNC Professor Ralph Baric as a participant in proposed coronavirus research involving SARS-like viruses and cleavage sites — a feature unique to Covid-19. It does not establish that the research occurred or that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a laboratory. It does warrant investigation.
For several years, we have examined coronavirus research associated with UNC and its foreign and domestic collaborations. Our investigation began with COVID-19’s origins, which remain murky. It spawned a broader question: Who verifies independently that potentially high-consequence research at America’s public universities has been properly managed, disclosed and overseen?
Our hypothesis about Covid-19’s origin as a well-intended vaccine gone unintentionally awry remains contested and unproven. Examining the evidence does not imply support for our theory, or any other. The evidence in its entirety deserves an open and neutral investigation.
North Carolina’s biotechnology and research economy depends on trust among funders, companies, investors, researchers and surrounding communities. Credible scrutiny strengthens that trust.
The fact is that Baric and his UNC laboratory spent years developing methods for studying and genetically modifying SARS-like coronaviruses, including in bats. UNC researchers also collaborated with scientists associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
businessnc.com/op-ed-unc-sci…
