🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now) profile picture

Restore Britain. Dreams remain out of reach until belief gives them wings. Bound to this sceptred isle by heritage, pride, and history.

Joined January 2012
Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)Photo by 🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 (@mark1854now)
This sceptred isle, this England. We inherited a nation built on courage, freedom and grit. Restore Britain isn't nostalgia — it's our duty. Free speech is the hill we die on. Heritage is our anchor. The flame has not gone out. It only needs belief to roar again. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇬🇬🇬🇬🇧🇬🇧
4
2
22
2,281
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
🚨 Cristiano Ronaldo on the dressing room that shaped his career: 🗣️ Reporter: “What do you remember about Ruud van Nistelrooy?” 🗣️ Cristiano: “When I arrived at United, I was a boy who loved having the ball. I wanted to dribble, I wanted to entertain people, and sometimes I thought beating 3 defenders was better than beating one and scoring. Then I met Ruud. I remember watching him in training and thinking, how can somebody make scoring look so simple? He wasn’t interested in doing six things before shooting. Sometimes he would touch the ball once and the goalkeeper was already picking it out of the net. There was a session when I tried to beat a defender again after I already had space to square the ball or shoot. I lost the ball. Ruud looked at me and said, ‘Cristiano, what is that?’ I told him, ‘I wanted to get closer.’ He said, ‘You were close enough.’ That stayed with me. Because when you’re young, you think the difficult thing is always the impressive thing. But Ruud could make one movement inside the penalty area, receive the ball and score. And you realise there is another kind of genius in football. I was very fortunate with the dressing room I entered. You had players who had already won everything, players who weren’t afraid to tell you when you were doing something wrong, and a manager who wasn’t interested in how talented you thought you were, but still protected you. I could have gone somewhere else at 18 and perhaps become a good player. But I don’t know whether I would have become the same Cristiano. At United, you learned very quickly that talent was only the beginning. And over the years, United have had some extraordinary finishers. Ruud was one. Robin van Persie was another. I didn’t play with Robin, but I watched him. His technique when striking the ball was beautiful. Sometimes the pass wasn’t even perfect, but the finish made it look perfect. These players had something special. They didn’t need many invitations to score. When I returned to United, I understood even more how much those early years had given me. You start recognising things you didn’t fully appreciate when you were young. I wanted the younger players to understand that wearing that shirt is an opportunity, but also a responsibility. The standards I experienced with Sir Alex helped make my career. And I will always be grateful for that.” 🗣️ Reporter: “You’ve mentioned Van Nistelrooy and Van Persie, but you haven’t mentioned Wayne Rooney. You played alongside him for years.” 🗣️ Cristiano: “Because then you are asking me a completely different question. You asked me about finishers. If you say Ruud, the first thing I think about is goals. If you say Robin, I think about that left foot, the volleys. But Wayne? Wayne could do everything. I remember games when I would be playing further forward and suddenly Wayne was defending near our penalty area. 2 minutes later, he was making a run beside me. Sometimes I would look at him and think, what position are you actually playing today? He could pass like a midfielder, shoot like a striker, carry the ball, tackle, press, create chances. You could ask him to play on the right, as a 6, even at right-back, and after 10 mins, you’d think he’d played there his whole life. That’s why I didn’t mention Wayne. Not because he wasn’t a great finisher. He was. But if I put him in a conversation only about finishing, I feel I’m leaving out most of what made him special. With Ruud, you remember the finish. With Wayne, sometimes you have to watch the entire match to understand what he did for you. I know because I was one of the players who benefited from it. People talk about what United gave me, and they’re right. But part of what United gave me was the opportunity to learn football beside the quality players they had. I arrived there wanting to show everybody what I could do with a football. I left understanding how much more there was to the game.”
21
127
5
1,458
180,854
It's not compulsory.
Replying to @RupertLowe10
As a veteran myself; I dont deserve any special provision or consideration ahead of countless other equally 'worthy' members of society.
15
The problem with EVs is stopping ICE production. The grid simply cannot cope with all new vehicles being electric, as fast as the grid expands the demand will exceed its capacity and there is no possibility of the grid catching up. Either ICE remain or car use will be rationed.
Richard Hammond has been talking about electric cars again, and some of his claims are ridiculous. The former Top Gear presenter has suggested that keeping old petrol cars running on synthetic fuels would be better than switching to electric vehicles. But let’s look at what the evidence actually says. 1. “A £45,000 electric Kia will be worth £10,000 next year.” That’s almost 78% depreciation in just 12 months. Hammond provides no evidence for this extreme example, and there is no evidence we can find of this happening with any electric car depreciating this much in 12 months. And just because newer technology becomes available doesn’t mean existing EVs suddenly become obsolete. 2. “Synthetic petrol could keep 1.4 billion cars running.” Technically true, but completely ignores the enormous amount of electricity required to manufacture synthetic fuels. Producing hydrogen, combining it with captured CO2 and burning the resulting fuel in an engine is far less efficient than using electricity directly in an EV. Anyone with even the basic knowledge as an interviewer should have shut down this claim immediately. Synthetic fuels have potential, but powering billions of everyday cars with them is another matter entirely. (Source: Transport & Environment, e-fuels lifecycle and efficiency analysis) 3. “Electric vehicles will hand global power entirely to China.” China dominates battery manufacturing, but that doesn’t mean electrification hands it global power. Battery supply chains can be diversified, and electricity can be generated domestically. Meanwhile, petrol and diesel vehicles remain dependent on continuous supplies of oil from Russia and Saudi Arabia. (Source: International Energy Agency, Global EV Outlook 2025) 4. “Restoring an old Ford Fiesta and running it on synthetic petrol is the greenest option.” Keeping an existing vehicle running can make environmental sense, especially for somebody covering very few miles. But claiming a restored petrol Fiesta running on synthetic fuel is the greenest option without comparing its lifecycle emissions is misleading. Research published in 2025 found that new battery-electric cars in Europe produce approximately 73% fewer greenhouse gas emissions over their lifetime than comparable petrol cars, including manufacturing. That doesn’t automatically mean replacing every old car is greener, but it certainly challenges Hammond’s sweeping conclusion. (Source: International Council on Clean Transportation, July 2025) 5. “Electric cars don’t work for everyone.” Finally, something we can agree on. Not everybody has access to home charging, and EVs aren’t suitable for every application. But nobody needs to spend £45,000 on a brand-new EV. Affordable used electric cars are available, and they don’t suddenly stop working because a newer model has been released. Here’s my problem with Hammond’s argument… He compares an extremely expensive EV with an old petrol car running on a synthetic fuel that isn’t currently available at an affordable mass-market price. That’s hardly a fair comparison, and is designed to be misleading. Electric vehicles aren’t perfect. There are legitimate challenges surrounding affordability, charging infrastructure and battery supply chains. But the evidence consistently shows that EVs are significantly more energy-efficient than combustion vehicles and generally produce substantially fewer lifetime greenhouse gas emissions. Hammond says motorists shouldn’t blindly follow the narrative surrounding electric vehicles. I agree. But perhaps people shouldn’t blindly follow the opinions of a famous petrolhead trying to stay relevant either.
8
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
vcgca.org/our-people/profile… Awarded The George Cross, incredible and unselfish bravery as the end of Olaf's tribute shows. God Bless young man and may you Rest in Eternal Peace ♥ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🙏
October 31st, 2009 Staff Sergeant Olaf Schmid GC, aged 30 from Truro, and of the Royal Logistics Corps, was killed whilst defusing an IED in Sangin, Helmand Province, Afghanistan Lest we Forget this brave man, awarded a posthumous GC for disabling 70 IEDs on one tour 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧
20
52
4
360
2,996
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @GBNEWS
We've sent our new Restore Britain veterans policy paper to you, but it seems there's been some clerical error and your article covering it hasn't been published yet? I'm sure it will be live very shortly...
30
208
2
2,308
18,044
Whoever is responsible at Reform for creating that strategy should be sacked. Its soo effective it is losing you a 1/3 of your support and your leaders popularity has tanked. Reform are soo poorly organised, if they somehow got elected their govt would collapse in weeks.
Incorrect This sort of messaging done en masse is very effective indeed Having been part of multiple elections at home and abroad for 2 decades I have observed the cut through. Most voters only deal in 'vibes'. Top lines are largely all that matter to significantly move the needle Cameron won a surprise majority using exactly this technique Matt Goodwin is a Professor of Politics who has also been in the business since you were in nappies. I think he knows what he is talking about
10
In 8 years Reform have won 2 parliamentary seats. Every time Reform say to the voters "put us into Westminster" the public say no. You had 35% support now you are 22/3%. Basically you are not a nice party, you disrespect opponents, victims rather than fighters. No-one wants that.
You have zero understanding of the British electorate. Spend less time in podcast echo chambers surrounded by young people who agree with you and more time campaigning with actual voters. If you think a majority will rally to a party like Restore you are insane.
10
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
Today, Restore Britain has published our comprehensive veterans policy paper, A Home Fit for Heroes. I want Britain to become a country that properly looks after the men and women who have served in our Armed Forces. Our proposals are substantial. We will establish a dedicated Department of Veterans' Affairs, headed by a Cabinet-level Secretary of State. One department responsible for veterans' welfare, pensions, compensation, housing, healthcare and employment support. Every local authority area will have access to a dedicated Veterans Officer. Someone who can actually get things done - one point of contact to simplify the process. We will abolish NHS prescription and dental charges for qualifying veterans and their immediate families. Free eye tests and hearing tests, too. Where NHS dentistry is unavailable, we will fund private treatment. Veterans will receive statutory priority for social housing - nobody who served this country should be left sleeping on our streets. NOBODY. We will introduce funded retraining for veterans whose military qualifications are not recognised in civilian life, alongside lifelong employment support. We will also encourage recruitment of former servicemen and women into our police, emergency services, prisons and border services. And importantly - immigration enforcement roles. We will bring post-service pensions and compensation administration together under the new department. Bereaved families will receive dedicated support, and we will introduce a funeral contribution for veterans whose deaths were not attributable to military service. We will legislate to stop malicious legal proceedings against veterans who served. We will not tolerate endless legal harassment of our former servicemen and women - we will legally pursue those found to be engaging in vindictive complaints against our veterans. We will also introduce a statutory Veterans Charter, giving qualifying veterans enforceable rights rather than leaving them dependent on goodwill. As a party, we are sick of seeing veterans treated as an afterthought. These people served our country. Some came home with life-changing injuries. Others lost friends, colleagues and years with their families. They have done their duty to Britain. It is time Britain did its duty to them. That is what a Restore Britain Government will deliver.
114
683
39
3,488
54,912
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
31st October, 2003 Corporal Ian Plank, aged 31 from Poole, Dorset, of the Royal Marines and SBS, was shot and killed by hostile fire, during an undercover operation to locate insurgents and Saddam Hussein in Ramadi, Iraq Lest we Forget this brave man who gave his all 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧
85
125
13
832
8,819
How can Reform take in the dregs of the Tories, the people who betrayed us for 14 years, the people who run Reform and have moved the party into alignment with the uniparty, credibly assert that its Restore teaming up with the Tories. Deflection is not winning you votes June.
I must say the Tories and Restore make an excellent team
1
16
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @Nigel_Farage
I made a public offer to work with you on a patriotic policy platform, you rejected that. That’s your call. We will now continue to make our argument to the British people. Evidently it’s working, or you wouldn’t be posting this. The best news? Restore Britain is just getting started.
677
1,271
59
13,742
279,769
The gap between Reform and Restore support was 35%. It is now 12- 14%. Restore has only been a political party for 9 mths, still building infrastructure, still blanked by MSM, doesnt have its own TV channel! In spite of that support is growing and everyone is talking about them🇬🇧
Strong Reform wins overnight! In Worksop East (Bassetlaw), we went from nothing to 46%, with Labour sinking from 74% to 37%. We also smashed the Lib Dems in a ward in Halton, Cheshire, which they won in May this year. The Westminster bubble is as out of touch as ever. Sadly, we did lose one ward in Dudley. We won 872 votes, Labour won 874 - and Restore took 159. The next election will be existential for Britain. I’ll deport everyone who is here illegally. Vote Restore, get Labour.
16
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
Latest MP salary donation sent - this time to help rehome retired racing greyhounds from Great Yarmouth. Nobody can accuse me of being in politics for the money.
460
843
53
9,568
222,767
Could an intelligent Reformer explain how a party that has contested 26 parliamentary by-elections and lost 24, has lost a 1/3 of its support in 12 mths and has a leader whose popularity is at an all-time low, can turn that around to win the GE. Are Reform a solution or problem?
I thought you were an intelligent man Henry and I always enjoy listening to your point of view. This post is absolute nonsense. Restore do not stand a cat in hells chance of winning a GE. Put the country first instead of egos.
2
6
161
Appropriate response Matt? Anyway congrats, in one post you have managed to be condescending, arrogant, sanctimonious, haughty, patronising, supercilious and disingenuous. "Why won't they support us"? Hazard a guess Matt.
Replying to @_HenryBolton
This is a joke response. When your leader was asked what he would do about the Boriswave he said “he didn’t want to get into the weeds” of detail. Reform UK has a serious policy drafted and ready to go. And some of your top activists like Charlie Downes were even asking the Tories for a job AFTER the Boriswave. The only thing that unites yourself and Rupert and is your dislike of Nigel Farage. Everywhere I look in Restore I just see people who don’t like Nigel — not true patriots who want the best for Britain. You are putting your egos ahead of what is in the best interests of the country.
20
In summary, if you support Restore its because you are too stupid to under tactical voting and splitting the vote. Reform only have 1 or 2 Tories! If you don't support Reform its because you're too stupid to understand what's at stake. A note to Reformers, don't patronise us.
A note to Restore voters: I know ‘Vote Restore, Get Labour’ irritates some people so let me explain why I say it. Because it’s the truth. Voting Restore will hand this country to the Left. We’ve seen it in Dover, Blackpool, Dudley, and elsewhere. I get why Restore voters are livid. I am angrier than you with the state of the country, I suspect. But the reality is that the Right will lose the next general election if it does not consolidate. Roughly 60% of left-wing voters tell pollsters they are voting tactically. That’s Green or Lib Dems voting Labour not because they agree with Labour or Burnham. But because they want to stop the Right and they are putting the wider mission, not their party, first. But only 30% of right-wing voters are doing the same. The Left is much more disciplined and ruthless than the Right. The reason Burnham and Labour are now back on 30-32% is because they are winning back left wing voters who are willing to do whatever it takes to control the country. Greens holding their nose to vote Labour. Lib Dems holding their nose to do the same. 2024 Labour voters coming home to Labour to stop the Right. And they are on course to do it. All MRP polls suggest the Left is on course to win the next general election, whether by winning a majority or in coalition. That means more migration. More refugees. More taxes. More two-tier policies. More open borders. More soft-on-Islamism. More EU and free movement. And a system of PR to ensure the Left continue to dominate Britain going forward. They will give children, migrants and refugees the vote. They will turn a blind eye to family voting and mass postal fraud. That is what is about to happen. They will control Britain until at least the 2030s, maybe longer. Because they are boxing clever. Many pro-Restore voices who claim to represent you are fully invested in dividing the Right. Their YouTube channels, their “independent media”, their entire existence depends on amplifying the splits, the drama, the chaos on the Right. Those people will be fine under this long period of left-wing rule. They will continue to scream into their phones and encourage you to do the same. Rupert Lowe will probably end up in the Lords, put there by the same Tories who just put him on a committee and who he himself says “he talks to all the time”. But the British people, the country, will lose out. It is the people who will be screwed. And just look at the total hypocrisy. Restore criticise Reform for taking one or two ex-conservatives. While Restore is literally standing ex-Tories at the next general election!! You do know this? I just think you are being led up the garden path by a lot of people who do not understand how first-past-the-post systems work and are invested in sowing chaos. The only way the Left is stopped is by winning a broad coalition. That coalition is there. At recent local elections upwards of 50% have been voting for right-wing parties. But Labour and Green candidates have been winning on just 25-30% of the vote. That is your next general election. It’s not about Nigel, or Rupert, or even Reform or Restore. It is about the country. It is about the British people. Look at France right now. One right-wing party is preparing to win the presidency and power. Another is flailing around on 3%. Do you want power or 3%? To leave the ECHR or 3%? To end mass migration or 3%? To ban Muslim Brotherhood or 3%? To stop the boats or 3%? To end welfare for foreign nationals and slash overseas aid or 3%? It is about whether the Right is going to be smart enough, ruthless enough and disciplined enough to put the country first. Because if we don’t we will lose it. It is that simple. The Left understand what is required to win power. Many people on the Right currently do not. That has to change otherwise it is game over.
4
Farage can lead a party to 35% in the polls and lead them back down to 22/3%. Smart. Reformers don't want to admit it but they know it's their leadership that has let them down, the support didn't walk away, it was driven away. You should focus on holding Farage & co to account.
Congratulations to those 159 people that voted Restore. You now have a Labour Councillor. Maybe a nice migrant camp next. You can lead a horse to water but you can't give it brains to understand tactical voting for your own greater good. 🇬🇧💙
1
2
29
YEAH you're on the money. I have noticed this, hundreds of elections and Restore never stood a candidate......and then they became a party and started standing candidate's and in 9 mths they have grown soo quickly they are the talk of every election. Wait till they start winning!
My post shows it. So many other past local elections where Restore haven't stood if the Tories are favourites. The fact Tory MPs helped Lowe set up Restore. Lowe telling us about his special deal with the Tories in the GB news interview.
11
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
Replying to @GBNEWS
GB News constantly insults Restore Britain and makes false accusations of both myself and the party, yet blocks me from appearing on the channel to defend ourselves. Why not finally let me on GB News to make our case? My only condition? It's live and unedited.
178
666
10
7,136
58,672
🇬🇧 onlywayisup 🇬🇧 retweeted
The country does not want ‘safe routes’ for people who look to break into our country and charity sponsorships for them. If anything however, it will help for the future when civil servants, charities, NGO’s and their directors will be identified, put on trial and prosecuted for facilitation.
14
191
4
1,270
9,145