Jordan Michaelides retweeted
This Mongolian version of Jingle Bells might be the best thing to happen to Christmas in years.
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
-Can you tell me the GDP of Mordor?
-Well, look, I don't know exactly.
-Ha! How can you oppose Sauron if you don't know the GDP of Mordor??
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
Excited to announce our first full time hire at kick it forward today, Harry comes with a wealth of experience in content creation and has interned for us for 4 years. Grateful for this team’s growth & what’s to come. 💪
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
I've started a "Skool" group.
This is a paid group to have direct access to my team and I + the community that will build inside the group.
I'll be offering all information and takes I have on the industry. Recipes, yields, butchering methods, how we value ad, farming methods, suppliers - you name it and I'll share with the group.
I have spent a lot of time, brainpower and money to create, innovate, fail, learn and grow into our current position.
I believe the value that anyone serious about getting into the space will gain from this group will pay dividends - immediately.
skool.com/wolki-farm-8609/ab…
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
The Greens never walked out for the Uyghurs.
They never walked out for the Tibetans. The Hong Kongers. Ukrainians. Iranian women.
Azerbaijan ethnically cleansed 100,000 Armenians last month. Pakistan is expelling more than 1 million Afghan refugees as we speak. But they don't get attention
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
Latest Russian joke:
-- What does mobilization have common in Russia and Israel?
-- Long lines for flights to Tel Aviv.
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
This is a pertinent clip from Sam Harris on the moral difference between Israel and her enemies.
The moral difference comes down to understanding the answer to this question: what would each side do if they had the power to do it?
TRANSCRIPT:
The truth is that there is an obvious, undeniable, and hugely consequential moral difference between Israel and her enemies. The Israelis are surrounded by people who have explicitly genocidal intentions towards them. The charter of Hamas is explicitly genocidal. It looks forward to a time, based on Koranic prophesy, when the earth itself will cry out for Jewish blood, where the trees and the stones will say “O Muslim, there’s a Jew hiding behind me. Come and kill him.” This is a political document. We are talking about a government that was voted into power by a majority of Palestinians.
The discourse in the Muslim world about Jews is utterly shocking. Not only is there widespread Holocaust denial—there’s Holocaust denial that then asserts that we will do it for real if given the chance. The only thing more obnoxious than denying the Holocaust is to say that it should have happened; it didn’t happen, but if we get the chance, we will accomplish it. There are children’s shows in the Palestinian territories and elsewhere that teach five-year-olds about the glories of martyrdom and about the necessity of killing Jews.
And this gets to the heart of the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. And this is something I discussed in The End of Faith. To see this moral difference, you have to ask what each side would do if they had the power to do it.
What would the Jews do to the Palestinians if they could do anything they wanted? Well, we know the answer to that question, because they can do more or less anything they want. The Israeli army could kill everyone in Gaza tomorrow. So what does that mean? Well, it means that, when they drop a bomb on a beach and kill four Palestinian children, as happened last week, this is almost certainly an accident. They’re not targeting children. They could target as many children as they want. Every time a Palestinian child dies, Israel edges ever closer to becoming an international pariah. So the Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants.
What do we know of the Palestinians? What would the Palestinians do to the Jews in Israel if the power imbalance were reversed? Well, they have told us what they would do. For some reason, Israel’s critics just don’t want to believe the worst about a group like Hamas, even when it declares the worst of itself. We’ve already had a Holocaust and several other genocides in the 20th century. People are capable of committing genocide. When they tell us they intend to commit genocide, we should listen.
There is every reason to believe that the Palestinians would kill all the Jews in Israel if they could. Would every Palestinian support genocide? Of course not. But vast numbers of them—and of Muslims throughout the world—would. Needless to say, the Palestinians in general, not just Hamas, have a history of targeting innocent noncombatants in the most shocking ways possible. They’ve blown themselves up on buses and in restaurants. They’ve massacred teenagers. They’ve murdered Olympic athletes. They now shoot rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas. And again, the charter of their government in Gaza explicitly tells us that they want to annihilate the Jews—not just in Israel but everywhere.
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
Alan Joyce presents @Qantas grand theft klepto: joeas.tn/44xtkSN
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
Apple Vision Pro is great, but 99% of people are not getting the most out of it. Here is a thread that will teach you how to become a Pro Vision Pro user.
👇🧵 1/3499
Jordan Michaelides retweeted
#Election2024 So far the most painful 2 minutes of foreign policy discussion in this election cycle, though the process is still young. This is going to be a long one. Let's take it apart:
1. Russia overrunning Ukraine isn't a top priority.
2. Sino-Russian alliance is the top threat to the US.
2a. Supporting Ukraine drives Russia further into this alliance.
3. End the war on peaceful terms that do make concessions to Russia.
3a. Freeze current lines of control.
3b. Permanent agreement that Ukraine will never become a NATO member.
3c. In exchange Russia breaks its agreements with the PRC.
Taken together this is an incoherent stance, allow me to explain:
1. Russia's invasion of a country bordering 4 NATO nations we're treaty bound to defend is a top concern. The fact that many of our treaty allies (in addition to the US under the current Admin) are collectively committing hundreds of billions of dollars of military hardware and sundry assistance to the defending nation of Ukraine, is a top concern. The possibility (highly unlikely IMO) of Ukraine being overrun and creating either a conquered Russia subject nation or wartorn rump state on NATO's border, is a top concern.
2. The PRC and its allies (including Russia) are the biggest geostrategic threat the US faces today, this is correct.
2a. #DragonBear was always going to be a thing. The two most powerful anti-West/anti-current international order nations were always going to nominally align in pursuit of short-mid term common goals. Moreover, if you have the opportunity to cause massive damage to one of the pair in isolation from the other, it makes no sense not to take advantage of that opportunity. Especially when you can do so w/o risking your own personnel.
3. I'm sure this sounded great in his head, in the real world it's DOA. Neither side will agree to it.
3a. Neither side will agree, both have repeatedly said it's a nonstarter. Allowing a Korean style freeze in place would allow Russia to rearm, regroup, solidify control over the captured areas, and try again in a decade. This tells Putin if he shows commitment to his aggression past the point the West is willing to sacrifice to defend the current international order, he will get positive results. It's foolish on all levels.
3b. Allowing Russia to dictate to NATO who can and cannot be allowed to join the alliance was always a bad notion. If they can dictate who may join under threat of force, why should Putin not believe he can dictate who can remain in NATO under threat of force?
3c. How will you verify this? You can't. How can you enforce it? You can't. Why would you assume Putin would honor any such deal without a viable coercive incentive to do so? You shouldn't.
Mr. Ramaswamy seems like a nice guy. This set of comments doesn't (IMO) indicate a worldview with a coherent understanding of strategic realities and a plan for navigating the US through existing dangers.
The neocon-Democrat consensus rejects my vision for peace in Ukraine by saying that we’d be wrong to trust Putin in a peace treaty. I don’t trust Putin, and he doesn’t trust us, but both sides can trust that we *do* act in our self-interest. We can end the war in Ukraine by freezing the current lines of control & committing to keep Ukraine out of NATO in return for dissolving the China-Russia military alliance. That’s how we achieve the most vital U.S. security objective of the 21st century: deterring Chinese aggression.























